|
They're pulling out all the guns with these regular dumps. They'll be out of ammo soon. Bulls seem to be having no trouble absorbing these dumps either. Halving coming up. Bitcoin to the fucking moon people.
|
|
|
|
The statistics coming out of Hong Kong definitely looks suspicious. The Singaporean case studies are very detailed. They seem to be taking contact tracing quite seriously. So far, they seem to be truthful but hard to tell.
Yep Hong Kong can't be trusted, their citizens will tell you that. Singapore though, is the best we have. Close to Asia, rich, a government that is pretty honest and does look after it's people despite being authoritarian in nature, fantastic health system, plenty of travel from China before being stopped, and very urban. This is the one to watch I reckon. |
|
|
|
They are being supercautious because they don’t know what they are dealing with.
Doesn’t prove or disprove anything.
Am watching the cases in Western jurisdictions closely. So far no explosions of infection from the French or German cases.
Given the amount of air travel from Hong Kong and Singapore, cases currently are surprisingly low.
That's what I'm watching too. I can only hope that every other countries systems can handle this better than the Chinese and being that they are more open than the Chinese, not punishing doctors etc we might have a chance. And seem to be taking things more seriously as well. However, take Singapore as an example. They have 40 cases currently. Apparently Hubei/Wuhan had the same on the 17th of January then in the next 2 weeks things exploded. We definitely still need to wait and see before judging how things go outside of China. |
|
|
|
Anything burning fuel produces SO2, including my truck. The African Swine Flu is still happening over there I think. They could be burning off the pigs. Either way trusting anything coming from the CCP is the same as trusting anything coming from the Soviets when they existed. Utterly pointless. We will not know the full extent of this crisis for some time, and maybe not at all. |
|
|
|
^  Jeep, I've always had one at home, you can do anything with them.  Self levelling active air suspension my man. The wheels should go up and down but the cabin should remain stable. That guy in the backseat isn’t going to have a spine left. Yeah it was so bad they used to get something called Jeep riders' disease back in the war. |
|
|
|
BTC is not measurably better than bitcoin protocol 1.0 in any discernible dimension.
Hmm, off course you don't really believe that do you. Because you have large holdings in both Bitcoin and BCH. You refuse to put your money where your mouth is. Why should he not diversify or hedge, whatever he believes. This argument, dump everything else to prove anything is silly. How is it a hedge? The whole crypto market goes in sync. A hedge would be in another non correlated market, or perhaps using futures/options. Nope, it means he doesn't believe that BSV is actually better. |
|
|
|
BTC is not measurably better than bitcoin protocol 1.0 in any discernible dimension.
Hmm, off course you don't really believe that do you. Because you have large holdings in both Bitcoin and BCH. You refuse to put your money where your mouth is. |
|
|
|
You are a scammer
Being a scammer requires a victim. Who have I scammed, somac.? Name the aggrieved party or STFU. Anybody you convince to invest in your scam coin by pretending that it is the real Bitcoin when it isn't. It must be nice for your sociopathic tendencies that you can sit behind a screen and pretend that your ramblings and lies aren't manipulating any "victims" just because the anonymity of this forum hides the noobs "victims" from you. Anoyminity is great for a lack of empathy isn't it. I bet you feel real fantastic about yourself. |
|
|
|
If he truly believes that BSV is better, and right, why hedge?
Because the market can stay irrational longer than I can stay solvent, grasshopper. That's a bullshit excuse and you know it. And if that is the case at what point do you trade your BCH and Bitcoin holdings over to BSV? Never maybe, because a market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent? Maybe. Maybe tomorrow. Either way, I'm not going to call to inform you before I do. I don't want you to inform me, I want you to admit that you don't fully believe in BSV. Tough shit. That would be a mischaracterization of my position. Which you do not get to dictate. With every post you try to peddle here about BSV being the correct Bitcoin, you should probably have a disclaimer saying that you also own a significant portion of Bitcoin and BCH. Just to make things clear.
That would be repetitive and redundant. Repetitive maybe, redundant my ass. You are a scammer that claims BSV is Bitcoin, you defend and encourage BSV at every turn while deriding Bitcoin. Yet you hold significant sums in both BCH and Bitcoin. You are a shill who doesn't practice what he preaches and I'm sure anyone who you encourage to buy into the scammers paradise of BSV would be very interested to know that you don't actually believe it is Satoshi's Bitcoin. Because if you did you would not have large holdings in BCH or BTC. In summary, when BSV and BCH both claim very aggressively to be Bitcoin and you claim the same, but still hold BCH and Bitcoin you are a damn scammer and shill. End of story. |
|
|
|
Received & confirmed with thanks! Message to r0ach: LFC_Bitcoin just sent me 0.00587140 BTC (the equivalent of around $50). He doesn't know who I am. I don't know who he is. We did not have to register to any site or server. No one, I repeat, NO ONE, could stop this transaction from happening. Even if one miner refused to confirm it for some reason, there are thousands more who would. There were no intermediaries. No company or bank to allow or deny it. He cannot take it back. No one can. He was the sole owner of that amount. He transferred ownership to me. Now I am the sole owner of that amount. He did this from (probably) thousands of miles away from me. He did not have to send anything by mail. It happened over the air. Electronically. It took less than half an hour. It cost less than $0.40. It will stay in the Blockchain forever. That's Bitcoin. I wish I had some merit for this post. One of the best I have read and If you don't mind I'd like to pass it on to some people? |
|
|
|
|
Looks like somebody out there would really prefer it stays below 9k for some reason.
|
|
|
|
If he truly believes that BSV is better, and right, why hedge?
Because the market can stay irrational longer than I can stay solvent, grasshopper. That's a bullshit excuse and you know it. And if that is the case at what point do you trade your BCH and Bitcoin holdings over to BSV? Never maybe, because a market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent? Maybe. Maybe tomorrow. Either way, I'm not going to call to inform you before I do. I don't want you to inform me, I want you to admit that you don't fully believe in BSV. With every post you try to peddle here about BSV being the correct Bitcoin, you should probably have a disclaimer saying that you also own a significant portion of Bitcoin and BCH. Just to make things clear. |
|
|
|
Fuck you jbreher, I don't come on here banging on about shitcoins like you do. I don't want to know your numbers, I'm looking for percentages. My percentages are as follows > 95% $ value in Bitcoin rest is in a couple shitcoins and those random shitcoins are not what we are talking about. BCH or BSV is 0%, why? because I don't believe in them. What do version of Bitcoin to you believe in? and if so why do you invest in the other versions?
You sound salty. According to you, if I fully believe that BSV will be the ultimate victor, I should not hold anything else. Yet you hold somewhere near five percent shitcoins. You really don't see your inconsistent position? I'm not the arsehole out here consistently saying how Bitcoin is not the true Bitcoin and that BSV is. And I don't own any BCH or BSV because I believe they are not the true Bitcoin. The other shitcoins I own do not conflict with Bitcoin, they also don't claim to be Bitcoin, big fucking difference. |
|
|
|
If he truly believes that BSV is better, and right, why hedge?
Because the market can stay irrational longer than I can stay solvent, grasshopper. That's a bullshit excuse and you know it. And if that is the case at what point do you trade your BCH and Bitcoin holdings over to BSV? Never maybe, because a market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent? |
|
|
|
A hedge! give me damn break. If you are a believer you don't hedge. Does a Muslim also practice a bit of paganism to hedge his bets. If he truly believes that BSV is better, and right, why hedge? it makes zero sense unless he doubts that BSV is actually the right one.
I added some more comment on my post that maybe clarifies that part. He doesn't need to bet to all or nothing. He already have "all" in any possible outcome. That's a pretty comfortable position and it would be really stupid to fuck it all for "religious" reasons. That's my opinion about what I understand about his position. Other than that, you should directly ask him  I'll tell you what it is, it's insincere. I bet he'll be telling noobs that BSV is the correct bitcoin yet fail to mention that he has large holdings in the other 2 coins. |
|
|
|
Has anybody here ever bought BSV?
Please, be honest guys. I could do with a good laugh.
Don't be coy. You *know* I did. Laugh all you want. Just getting started. Genuinely hope you sell before 3rd Feb. Take your profits (probably handsome profits) and run. And abandon the truest implementation of satoshi's documented architecture? Not on your life. If you seriously think the BSV is the best, and the one, why do you still own Bitcoin? You should sell all of your Bitcoin and only own BSV. Unless you do this you are nothing but a shitcoin shill and you don't actually believe in satoshis vision at all. How about we get some transparency and you tell us what percentage of your crypto investments/savings are in which coins? Because if Bitcoin is more than 0% you are a dishonest prick who doesn't follow what he preaches. Rather testy, aren't you? You don't have any right to demand I divulge my holdings. As I posted above, my BTC is my hedge. Period. Plenty of people here (yourself included?) have at least some trivial holdings of other-than-BTC. Why don't you jump down their ass? Asswipe. IOW, STFU. Fuck you jbreher, I don't come on here banging on about shitcoins like you do. I don't want to know your numbers, I'm looking for percentages. My percentages are as follows > 95% $ value in Bitcoin rest is in a couple shitcoins and those random shitcoins are not what we are talking about. BCH or BSV is 0%, why? because I don't believe in them. What do version of Bitcoin to you believe in? and if so why do you invest in the other versions? |
|
|
|
Has anybody here ever bought BSV?
Please, be honest guys. I could do with a good laugh.
Don't be coy. You *know* I did. Laugh all you want. Just getting started. Genuinely hope you sell before 3rd Feb. Take your profits (probably handsome profits) and run. And abandon the truest implementation of satoshi's documented architecture? Not on your life. If you seriously think the BSV is the best, and the one, why do you still own Bitcoin? You should sell all of your Bitcoin and only own BSV. Unless you do this you are nothing but a shitcoin shill and you don't actually believe in satoshis vision at all. How about we get some transparency and you tell us what percentage of your crypto investments/savings are in which coins? Because if Bitcoin is more than 0% you are dishonest prick who doesn't follow what he preaches. He has disclosed it in the past. He had more BSV coins than BCH coins, and more BCH coins than BTC coins but... considering price, he had much more MONEY in BTC than anything else. He had just said that he considers BTC his hedge, not otherwise. Which is bonkers and I am still "processing" that statement but... I can't say I don't see some coherence in his stance: If he really expects BSV to surpass BTC in price (yeah, he has just said that!) and he already has more BSV coins than BTC coins then the "hedging" might make some sense. Except he is wrong and BSV will never succeed. Bleh, everyone is free to do whatever they want with their money. A hedge! give me damn break. If you are a believer you don't hedge. Does a Muslim also practice a bit of paganism to hedge his bets. If he truly believes that BSV is better, and right, why hedge? it makes zero sense unless he doubts that BSV is actually the right one. |
|
|
|
Has anybody here ever bought BSV?
Please, be honest guys. I could do with a good laugh.
Don't be coy. You *know* I did. Laugh all you want. Just getting started. Genuinely hope you sell before 3rd Feb. Take your profits (probably handsome profits) and run. And abandon the truest implementation of satoshi's documented architecture? Not on your life. If you seriously think the BSV is the best, and the one, why do you still own Bitcoin? You should sell all of your Bitcoin and only own BSV. Unless you do this you are nothing but a shitcoin shill and you don't actually believe in satoshis vision at all. How about we get some transparency and you tell us what percentage of your crypto investments/savings are in which coins? Because if Bitcoin is more than 0% you are a dishonest prick who doesn't follow what he preaches. |
|
|
|
And then I start to wonder what others would think/do in that situation... I mean... If the extraordinary gains Bitcoin has given in the past were not there anymore... Would most of you guys keep holding/using it as a store of value or, on the contrary, would that make you cash out an even bigger part of your stash because you were mostly hodling in the expectation of awesome future profits?
Know what I mean? What would you guys do if/when the constant staircase growing of Bitcoin stagnates?
When it looks like bitcoin is not going to get the large 10-20x moves any more, everyone will be holding it and buying more each week. Why? Because the alternative will be owning fiat currency and anyone who understands the global economy and it's monetary system knows that holding fiat is a bad idea. People who don't understand the global economy and it's monetary system, but who live in Iran, Zimbabwe, Venezuela etc, also understand why you don't want to own fiat. Fiat is good for exchange of goods, definitely not hodling. I think most long-term people in the crypto space are confused with what they are doing. They aren't investing, but rather saving for their future. Same as putting your money in any other asset that is fairly or under valued. As long as I am earning an income through my labour, I will continue to save this income for the long-term in bitcoin, no matter the price. |
|
|
|
|
9151-9200 sounds good to me.
Thanks mic.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
