Oh...
Those... already knew them, although I don't use them...
I thought it was MT4 :p
My bad...
Sorry and thank you, Matthew N. Wright and Serge!
SierraChart is nice. It allows you to use pretty much any indicator you can think of with fully editable parameters. Then you can add text, and draw trend lines/Elliot waves right on the charts. Thanks. I'll try to give it a run on crossover with .net installed! |
|
|
|
|
Interesting topic...
Can anyone help?
|
|
|
|
In windows, yes, by copying your wallet.dat file. But fear not, you can disable the administrative shares. I use a batch file on my work machine to shut them down every 30 secs, so I don't have any co-workers snooping around my files. Why every 30 seconds? They can be remotely reactivated or they reactivate automatically, I don't know. Unfortunately, WMI is a very powerful tool... Here's the batch: @echo off
:BEGIN
date /T>> sshr.log
time /T>> sshr.log
echo ---- >> sshr.log
net share C$ /delete >> NUL 2>&1
net share D$ /delete >> NUL 2>&1
net share Z$ /delete >> NUL 2>&1
PING 127.0.0.1 -n 31 > NUL
GOTO BEGIN Let me detail it a bit: date /T>> sshr.log
time /T>> sshr.log
echo ---- >> sshr.log It's a run log. With it, I can be sure it run. net share C$ /delete >> NUL 2>&1 This is the command to shut them down. As you can see, I shut down C$, D$ and Z$ shares. >> NUL 2>&1 is used to have no output whatsoever. PING 127.0.0.1 -n 31 > NUL This is the approximate 30 secs delay itself. But if I were you, I would have a VM running some Unix and storing your wallet, so it is truly independent and stealth from windows, and always have a rooter or a good software firewall like Sunbelt Personal Firewall with advanced features turned on. Although this features might be annoying in the first days, they always let you know of any non requested communications activity. I hope this can help you or any one! If you need any other info, feel free to ask! |
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately I found later something I hated in TrueCrypt but only in Windows: since you associate the decrypted volume with a drive letter, windows creates an administrative share (f$, for example) to that drive.
Any one able to access administrative shares (a colleague in the same network, for example) will see that content's totally unencrypted.
In Linux I don't find that problem, using either truecrypt or encfs, since the content's are only available to the current user's session.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh...
Those... already knew them, although I don't use them...
I thought it was MT4 :p
My bad...
Sorry and thank you, Matthew N. Wright and Serge!
|
|
|
|
1.) Can I have both a NVidia card and an ATI card installed with NVidia drivers and ATI drivers running at the same time?
I answer only for Linux (maybe someone is interested). Yes, if and only if: a) your first video card (the card in the first slot) is the ATI one; b) all the monitors you have are attached to the ATI card; c) you use the Nvidia card only for computing. Which is completely pointless, if you use the Nvidia card only for mining, because Nvidia cards suck at mining. If you use it for something else (like some BOINC projects), it should be fine. 2.) Can I use both cards for mining at the same time? (if 1 is yes, I'd image yes for 2?)
See above. 3.) Can I run my 5970 mining and game on my 560 Ti (1) is it possible (2) would it be laggy?
No, you can't. This is because ATI computing goes through video driver. So Xorg must be loaded and running upon the ATI video driver. On the contrary, Nvidia computing doesn't need Xorg. Thanks Lem, this was exactly what I was looking for. It is exactly the behavior in my machine - nVidia is still working for the sata, usb and other drivers, but the graphics hardware disappears from lspic, which is now quite understandable with your explanation. It is a pitty and it sucks... oh well! Moving along, nothing to see!  |
|
|
|
What the shit?  Was somebody really happy to just trade with themselves in a .00001 spread? Sorry to ask, phorensic, but how do you get those graphs? I'm tired to look information about it with no luck or conclusive information. Is there any tutorial as to obtain them? Would it run in Linux? Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
Well, sorry to bother, but I have an Asus M4N78-VM with an embed gForce 8200 and an ATI HD5550.
I'm running Ubuntu and I'd love to use the gForce as my main graphics card, letting the mining to the ATI.
My problem is that I can't have a nice configuration for this.
Can anyone give me some cue?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Best luck, zhoutong!
Thanks for bitcoinica. Nevertheless, it was a well done job.
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO, I think you should clamp it to a table and ensure it is secure.
Than you could use a dremel with a cutter disk on the side, there is plenty of space on it, but be gentle.
Draw a straight line along the side without much penetration.
It's a patience job.
Cut in many passes, since this must be steel, and weaken the material, but don't perforate it (yet).
Turn around the other side and repeat, many passes but now, let it perforate the material in a last pass.
Take it out and bend the case outside.
It should break in the other weakened side.
If you don't have that much space on the sides, try alongside the corners.
Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
Lol! Almost wanted to post an "Will pick nose for BTC" add!
But congrats, great job!
|
|
|
|
I bought my first btc by pp, and had no problem, but not everyone is honest. There is no risk BUYING w/ pp the risk is on the seller. You were honest but if you hadn't been the seller would have lost the funds and there is nothing he could have done about it. Technically depending on when the trade was even if you had honest intent you could change your mind now and chargeback the tx and the seller would still lose. Yes, that's quite right. Of course, my honesty can only be stated by others, but as far as i can say to those who don't know me, I am an honest person. I wouldn't feel good with my self if I had reversed the transaction. It would be like stealing. And those less honest ones, are the ones taking down the bitcoins. They don't see it is bad not only for others, but also for them, since also they can be scammed, or each bitcoin they stole lost value. |
|
|
|
|
I bought my first btc by pp, and had no problem, but not everyone is honest.
Another problem is that if PayPal discovers, they can cancel your account, since it violates the TOS.
I have quite the opposite problem (as most of bitcoiners) I have 10 btc i'd love to sell, but the fees current exchanges charge, makes it prohibitive.
I thought using them to buy a cheap fpga (90mh/s), but it seems it isn't possible also...
|
|
|
|
Excellent work! Thanks for the help! |
|
|
|
You should place a Limit at 5.1 and a Stop at 4.9.
The limit order will be filled whenever buyers bid more than 5.1. If there are only enough bids to take part of your order, only part will sell, but it will all be at 5.1. If you're dealing with small amounts it will generally get filled completely since the whole market can't go over 5.1 until your order is filled. In other words, your entire order will be filled at 5.1000 before the market hits 5.1001.
A Stop order means to liquidate immediately at market price. When the price is crashing no one will be buying at 4.9 - so it has to accept lower bids in order to finish liquidating. Trailing Stop works the same, except it automatically raises the liquidation price as the market rises. IE, the Stop price will be higher, but the immediate liquidation in a down market will still require selling under the Stop price.
Oh... I was placing trailing stops on the rising quite above the price... Dumb... Thank you very much for making me understand my error! |
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry to crash in this post, but I also have some doubts on trading using Bitcoinicas interface.
I'm member for months on Bitcoinica, but I still couldn't figure out how do Limit, Stop and Trailing Stop orders work.
I've been banging my head to figure it out but with no success.
Let's suppose I have 0.05BTC that I bought for $5/BTC, hopping for them to raise their price.
Instead, they dropped to $4.9/BTC.
I wanted to sell them automatically when they reached, let's say, $5.1/BTC or higher.
What type of order should I put to accomplish this on its way up?
What about the other way around, if I was selling and BTC moving the way down?
Every time I tried to place a Trailing Stop, I never understood how or why it was executed way below the values I defined.
|
|
|
|
|
Yay!!!
Now it is working!!!
Thank you very much!!!
|
|
|
|
This is weird... Iv'e been digging around for the "./graph.sh: line 52: [: 0: unary operator expected" and tried this: user@Machine:~/cgminer-2.3.1-2-x86_64-built$ export DISPLAY=:0
user@Machine:~/cgminer-2.3.1-2-x86_64-built$ ./cgminer -n
[2012-03-16 13:00:06] CL Platform 0 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[2012-03-16 13:00:06] CL Platform 0 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
[2012-03-16 13:00:06] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.1 AMD-APP-SDK-v2.5 (684.213)
[2012-03-16 13:00:06] Platform 0 devices: 1
[2012-03-16 13:00:06] GPU 0 ATI Radeon HD 5500 Series hardware monitoring enabled
[2012-03-16 13:00:06] 1 GPU devices max detected
user@Machine:~/cgminer-2.3.1-2-x86_64-built$ ./cgminer -n | grep "devices:" | sed 's/.*devices: //'
user@Machine:~/cgminer-2.3.1-2-x86_64-built$
Although cgminer outputs the correct code, grepping it returns no value. user@Machine:~/cgminer-2.3.1-2-x86_64-built$ ./cgminer -n | grep "devices:"
user@Machine:~/cgminer-2.3.1-2-x86_64-built$ ./cgminer -n
[2012-03-16 13:04:04] CL Platform 0 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[2012-03-16 13:04:04] CL Platform 0 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
[2012-03-16 13:04:04] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.1 AMD-APP-SDK-v2.5 (684.213)
[2012-03-16 13:04:04] Platform 0 devices: 1
[2012-03-16 13:04:04] GPU 0 ATI Radeon HD 5500 Series hardware monitoring enabled
[2012-03-16 13:04:04] 1 GPU devices max detected
user@Machine:~/cgminer-2.3.1-2-x86_64-built$ ./cgminer -n | grep " devices:"
user@Machine:~/cgminer-2.3.1-2-x86_64-built$ ./cgminer -n | grep devices:
user@Machine:~/cgminer-2.3.1-2-x86_64-built$ ./cgminer -n | grep devices
user@Machine:~/cgminer-2.3.1-2-x86_64-built$
Since i only have one device, can I bypass that check, somehow? thank you for your patience! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
(Expensive one, although!)
