Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 03:27:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 [75] 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 ... 562 »
1481  Other / Politics & Society / Re: BERNIE SANDERS, WEIRDO IN CHIEF on: March 31, 2016, 04:03:01 PM
Sanders == Neoliberal, ultraleftist and quasi-socialist puppet. Hypocrisy is absolutely OK for this kind of individuals.

The part of that which needs to be repeated over and over to Sanders fanatics is bolded.

Great. So Trump is a free mind and everyone else is a puppet. A puppet from who, we don't know but they're all puppets.


Is bernie a puppet of is he free?




Don't know. I'm not the one talking about candidates as being puppets. It seems especially dumb considering the fact that USA is a country where "lobbyist" is actually a job... Considering any politician as "free" is probably as dumb as considering a shark vegan.


You've just demonstrated why TRUMP, who's not a politician, is so popular.

 Smiley




Not a politician?
Whaou, funny, last time I checked he has all the characterisitics of a politician! The greed of course, but also the lies, the use of misinformation, the extreme demagogy of his speeches, the will to do anything if that brings votes and refusing everything that doesn't bring votes, the use of useless debates like immigration in order to make people believe you're actually doing something...

In fact Trump is clearly a politician. There is 0 difference between him and the others. None of you brought anything that could start proving Bernie is a puppet (that would be cool to start by saying who "controls" him is he's a puppet...) and how Trump is a totally free mind...


How can you say bernie is not clearly politician?




I never said that. Again you're overusing strawman arguments. Not like we're not used to this now.


You are saying bernie is like a snowflake that hasn't touched the ground. Pure. No dirt. No strings attached.

But he has powerful people behind him. Those people will ask him to pay them back if he becomes president.

That's how this game of thrones is played.





Again I never said that. But keep talking saying nonsense claiming I was the one saying them at first... It's exactly this way Trump and his kind discuss.


Why is bernie your choice then?



Because of the Ideology he defends and represents, that's all. There is a difference between appreciating someone and his ideas and being crazy about him. Not that a Trumper could understand that though.


Socialism is dead.

1482  Other / Politics & Society / Re: BERNIE SANDERS, WEIRDO IN CHIEF on: March 31, 2016, 03:26:25 PM
Sanders == Neoliberal, ultraleftist and quasi-socialist puppet. Hypocrisy is absolutely OK for this kind of individuals.

The part of that which needs to be repeated over and over to Sanders fanatics is bolded.

Great. So Trump is a free mind and everyone else is a puppet. A puppet from who, we don't know but they're all puppets.


Is bernie a puppet of is he free?




Don't know. I'm not the one talking about candidates as being puppets. It seems especially dumb considering the fact that USA is a country where "lobbyist" is actually a job... Considering any politician as "free" is probably as dumb as considering a shark vegan.


You've just demonstrated why TRUMP, who's not a politician, is so popular.

 Smiley




Not a politician?
Whaou, funny, last time I checked he has all the characterisitics of a politician! The greed of course, but also the lies, the use of misinformation, the extreme demagogy of his speeches, the will to do anything if that brings votes and refusing everything that doesn't bring votes, the use of useless debates like immigration in order to make people believe you're actually doing something...

In fact Trump is clearly a politician. There is 0 difference between him and the others. None of you brought anything that could start proving Bernie is a puppet (that would be cool to start by saying who "controls" him is he's a puppet...) and how Trump is a totally free mind...


How can you say bernie is not clearly politician?




I never said that. Again you're overusing strawman arguments. Not like we're not used to this now.


You are saying bernie is like a snowflake that hasn't touched the ground. Pure. No dirt. No strings attached.

But he has powerful people behind him. Those people will ask him to pay them back if he becomes president.

That's how this game of thrones is played.





Again I never said that. But keep talking saying nonsense claiming I was the one saying them at first... It's exactly this way Trump and his kind discuss.


Why is bernie your choice then?

1483  Other / Politics & Society / Re: BERNIE SANDERS, WEIRDO IN CHIEF on: March 31, 2016, 03:22:20 PM
Sanders == Neoliberal, ultraleftist and quasi-socialist puppet. Hypocrisy is absolutely OK for this kind of individuals.

The part of that which needs to be repeated over and over to Sanders fanatics is bolded.

Great. So Trump is a free mind and everyone else is a puppet. A puppet from who, we don't know but they're all puppets.


Is bernie a puppet of is he free?




Don't know. I'm not the one talking about candidates as being puppets. It seems especially dumb considering the fact that USA is a country where "lobbyist" is actually a job... Considering any politician as "free" is probably as dumb as considering a shark vegan.


You've just demonstrated why TRUMP, who's not a politician, is so popular.

 Smiley




Not a politician?
Whaou, funny, last time I checked he has all the characterisitics of a politician! The greed of course, but also the lies, the use of misinformation, the extreme demagogy of his speeches, the will to do anything if that brings votes and refusing everything that doesn't bring votes, the use of useless debates like immigration in order to make people believe you're actually doing something...

In fact Trump is clearly a politician. There is 0 difference between him and the others. None of you brought anything that could start proving Bernie is a puppet (that would be cool to start by saying who "controls" him is he's a puppet...) and how Trump is a totally free mind...


How can you say bernie is not clearly politician?




I never said that. Again you're overusing strawman arguments. Not like we're not used to this now.


You are saying bernie is like a snowflake that hasn't touched the ground. Pure. No dirt. No strings attached.
But he has powerful people behind him. Those people will ask him to pay them back if he becomes president.

That's how this game of thrones is played.



1484  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump Has The Power To Expose The Largest Money Laundering Scheme In History on: March 31, 2016, 03:15:07 PM


This is amazing how much power TRUMP has to face, just in his own party. Not against harpy clinton yet.

Thank you for the video

 Smiley

1485  Other / Politics & Society / Re: BERNIE SANDERS, WEIRDO IN CHIEF on: March 31, 2016, 03:05:38 PM
Sanders == Neoliberal, ultraleftist and quasi-socialist puppet. Hypocrisy is absolutely OK for this kind of individuals.

The part of that which needs to be repeated over and over to Sanders fanatics is bolded.

Great. So Trump is a free mind and everyone else is a puppet. A puppet from who, we don't know but they're all puppets.


Is bernie a puppet of is he free?




Don't know. I'm not the one talking about candidates as being puppets. It seems especially dumb considering the fact that USA is a country where "lobbyist" is actually a job... Considering any politician as "free" is probably as dumb as considering a shark vegan.


You've just demonstrated why TRUMP, who's not a politician, is so popular.

 Smiley




Not a politician?
Whaou, funny, last time I checked he has all the characterisitics of a politician! The greed of course, but also the lies, the use of misinformation, the extreme demagogy of his speeches, the will to do anything if that brings votes and refusing everything that doesn't bring votes, the use of useless debates like immigration in order to make people believe you're actually doing something...

In fact Trump is clearly a politician. There is 0 difference between him and the others. None of you brought anything that could start proving Bernie is a puppet (that would be cool to start by saying who "controls" him is he's a puppet...) and how Trump is a totally free mind...


How can you say bernie is not clearly politician?

1486  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? on: March 31, 2016, 02:56:46 PM
Two in three adults say that Clinton "has the right experience to be president." That includes a stunning — at least to me — 40 percent of Republicans as well as 90 percent of Democrats and 64 percent of independents. I think she is trustworthy.


Ask any of them what they are most proud of regarding harpy clinton.


1487  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why do islam hates people? on: March 31, 2016, 02:53:42 PM
well I say, you are wrong mate. real moeslims don't have people. they are ordered to do good things to other even they're not moeslims.

I'll tell you the story of Prophet Muhammad, he had always fed a non moeslim blind old woman in the market every day. you know, the old woman always said something bad about the Prophet (in this case, she didn't know that the person who fed her is the Prophet because Prophet didn't say anything when he fed her). and then when Prophet Muhammad died, his friend fed the woman. the woman realized that it was a different person, so the friend told her that it was Prophet Muhammad who always fed her although she always said bad things about him. then the old woman became a moeslim.

AGAIN FOR PEOPLE WHO claims that Islam and Muslims hates people, Try
1- Read the holly Quraan
2- Islamic Shareaa
3- Visit Islamic country
4- Try to know muslim people in real life

After that you can judge muslims and Islam religion, I do not care what USA, UK, Europe Media saying about Islam, We also do not care about you guys, just keep hating us, we do not hate you, you hating us, we also do not care if you think Bin ladin is our leader or Qaeeda, we really do not care.

So just do your own research about muslims and have real life, this is just fake opinions and you really seems so ignorance to us.
Sorry but you need to learn first about Islam then judge it or you are retard follow like herd of cattle.

I have done some research, and here's what I've found:

Sharia, Islamic sharia or Islamic law (Arabic: شريعة‎ (IPA: [ʃaˈriːʕa]) for law) is the religious legal system governing the members of the Islamic faith.

...

If a person has never been a Muslim, and is a kafir (infidel, unbeliever), sharia demands that he or she should be offered the choice to convert to Islam and become a Muslim; if he or she rejects the offer, he or she may become a dhimmi. Failure to pay the tax may lead the non-muslim to either be enslaved, killed or ransomed if captured.[232]

Pretty jarring; "accept what I believe or else we'll steal from you, and if you resist we'll enslave you or worse!"

The Quran Dehumanizes Non-Muslims
and Says that They are Vile Animals

The Ayatollah Khomeini, who dedicated his entire life to studying Islam, said that non-Muslims  rank somewhere between "feces" and the "sweat of a camel that has consumed impure food."  Small wonder.  The Quran dehumanizes non-Muslims, describing them as “animals” and beasts:
Those who disbelieve from among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures. (98:6)
Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are those who disbelieve, then they would not believe. (8:55)
Verse 7:176 compares unbelievers to "panting dogs" with regard to their idiocy and worthlessness.

Verse 7:179 says they are like "cattle" only worse. 

Verse 9:28 says the unbelievers are unclean. 

Verse 6:111 says they are ignorant. 

Verse 23:55 says they are helpers of the devil.

Verse 5:60 even says that Allah transformed Jews of the past into apes and pigs.  This is echoed by verses 7:166 and 2:65. 

A hadith (Bukhari 54:524) says that Muhammad believed rats to be "mutated Jews" (also confirmed by Sahih Muslim 7135 and 7136).

Verses 46:29-35 even say that unbelieving men are worse than the demons who believe in Muhammad.

According to Islamic law, non-Muslims may be owned as property by Muslims, but - in keeping with Islam's supremacist message - a fellow Muslim should never be (unless they convert to Islam under enslavement).  Even Christians and Jews are not considered fully human in that the penalty for killing one of them is limited to one-third of the compensation due for unintentionally killing a Muslim.

Uh huh...  Straight from the Quran.

The Quran Says that People of Other Religions are to be Violently Punished in This World

Allah himself fights against the unbelievers (9:30), so why should Muslims not fight in his cause rather than in the cause of evil (4:76)?  )?  About 19% of the Quran is devoted to the violent conquest and subjugation of non-Muslims:
Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies of Allah and your enemies and others besides, whom ye may not know (8:60)
Strive hard (Jihad) against the Unbelievers and the Hypocrites, and be firm against them. Their abode is Hell,- an evil refuge indeed.  (66:9, See also 9:73)
Muslims are to expect a reward in this life as well as the next (4:134), so it makes sense that unbelievers should be punished in this life as well:
…He whom Allah sendeth astray, for him there is no guide. For them is a penalty in the life of this world, but harder, truly, is the penalty of the Hereafter… (13:33-34)
There are at least two places in the Quran where the violent death of non-Muslims is referred to as Allah's reward for unbelief (2:191, 9:26), as in "such is the reward for unbelievers."  Verse 3:56,  bluntly states that "those who reject faith" will be "punished with terrible agony in this world" (a vow that Muhammad and his companions personally took it upon themselves to fulfill).

The Quran tells Muslims that Allah uses them to violently punish others:
Fight them, them by your hands and bring them to disgrace... (9:14)
Allah could slay unbelievers himself, but he makes it a test for Muslims to prove their faith:
"If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, by means of others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost" 47:4)
One of the most violent chapters in the Quran charters Muhammad and his followers with making Islam "superior over all religions" (9:33).

As noted, verse 8:55 compares unbelievers to animals.  In keeping with this theme, the passage goes on to encourage Muslims to gain "mastery" over them and severely punish those who disobey, so as to intimidate the rest:
So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson " (8:57).
In the end, All beings on heaven and earth will be forced to bow down to Allah, either willingly or by force:
And unto Allah falleth prostrate whosoever is in the heavens and the earth, willingly or unwillingly (13:15)
Muslims are told that Allah "loves those who fight in his way" to make Islam "victorious over all other religions, even though the disbelievers resist" (61:4-11). Those who do resist Islam will be humiliated:
Those who resist Allah and His Messenger will be among those most humiliated. (58:20 - The context for this verse is the eviction of the Jewish tribes of Medina and the confiscation of their wealth, land, and children by Muhammad).
Non-Muslims are to be fought until religion is only for Allah:
And fight them until there is no more ftna (unbelief, worshipping others beside Allah), and religion is all for Allah… (8:39 – Some translate the word "fitna" as “persecution”, but in this context it means resistance to Islam – defined in the prior verse as an unwillingness to believe (see verse 38).  This passage was “revealed” following a battle that Muhammad deliberately provoked.  Verse 2:193 essentially says the same thing and was also “revealed” at a time when the Muslims were not under physical attack).
Those with "diseased hearts" - which include Christians and Jews according to 5:52 - are to be "seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter" (33:60-62) al) along with "hypocrites" (Muslims who are judged not to be true believers by their associations with unbelievers or their unwillingness to engage in Jihad).
Non-Muslims are to be encroached on, pressured and punished by the Muslims:
See that we gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? (13:41 - See also 21:44)

We shall punish them gradually from directions they perceive not. (68:44)

And He made you heirs to their land and their dwellings and their property, and (to) a land which you have not yet trodden, and Allah has power over all things. (33:27, See also Bukhari 53:392)
Allah will grant Muslims authority and power over all other people:
Allah has promised, to those among you who believe and work righteous deeds, that He will, of a surety, grant them in the land, inheritance (of power), as He granted it to those before them; that He will establish in authority their religion... (24:55)
(Muhammad's companions continued to self-fulfill this prophecy with an aggressive and senseless military expansion that left a trail of bodies from Spain to India).

Allah provides instructions to Muslims for dealing with unbelievers who are unwilling to accept Islamic rule:
Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them." This because they contended against Allah and His Messenger: If any contend against Allah and His Messenger, Allah is strict in punishment. (8:12-13)
Defeating non-Muslims should be easy for true believers because they are superior in intelligence and understanding:
O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you twenty steadfast they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a hundred (steadfast) they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are a folk without intelligence (8:65)
Other verses of violence may be found here.

Remember that the Quran says that not all men are equal according to Islam.  This even applies to Muslims with regard to their aggressiveness toward unbelievers.  Those who kill or are killed on behalf of Islam are more pleasing to Allah:
Not equal are those of the believers who sit at home... and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and lives" (4:95)

At this point, you do either of the following: accept that one is not a Muslim unless they actually follow what they claim to believe (else you'd be a hypocrite), or hone up to the fact that this is all hatred stemming from Muslims aimed at non-Muslims.  You can deflect all you want, nobody's buying your bullshit aside from other Muslims.  Your awful attempts at English make you even less charitable, but such is to be expected from a Muslim where about 6 out of 10 of you are illiterate in any language, let alone your own--yet somehow it is the non-muslims who are the beasts; it'd be funny if it weren't so sad: an entire society which is completely lacking in self awareness.

Here's some more fun facts about Muslim people and their countries:

The combined annual GDP of 57 Muslim countries remains under $2 trillion. America, just by herself, produces goods and services worth $10.4 trillion; China $5.7 trillion, Japan $3.5 trillion and Germany $2.1 trillion. Even India’s GDP is estimated at over $3 trillion (purchasing power parity basis).

Muslims are 22 percent of the world population and produce less than five percent of global GDP. Even more worrying is that the Muslim countries’ GDP as a percent of the global GDP is going down over time.

 According to the United Nations’ Arab Development Report: “Half of Arab women cannot read; One in five Arabs live on less than $2 per day; Only 1 percent of the Arab population has a personal computer, and only half of 1 percent use the Internet; Fifteen percent of the Arab workforce is unemployed, and this number could double by 2010; The average growth rate of the per capita income during the preceding 20 years in the Arab world was only one-half of 1 percent per annum, worse than anywhere but sub-Saharan Africa.”

The planet’s poorest countries include Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, Cambodia, Somalia, Nigeria, Pakistan and Mozambique. At least six of the poorest of the poor are countries with a Muslim majority.

Fifty-seven Muslim majority countries have an average of ten universities each for a total of less than 600 universities for 1.4 billion people; India has 8,407 universities, the U.S. has 5,758. From within 1.4 billion Muslims Abdus Salam and Ahmed Zewail are the only two Muslim men who won a Nobel Prize in physics and chemistry (Salam pursued his scientific work in Italy and the UK, Zewail at California Institute of Technology). Dr Salam in his home country is not even considered a Muslim.

Over the past 105 years, 1.4 billion Muslims have produced eight Nobel Laureates while a mere 14 million Jews have produced 167 Nobel Laureates. Of the 1.4 billion Muslims less than 300,000 qualify as ‘scientists’, and that converts to a ratio of 230 scientists per one million Muslims. The United States of America has 1.1 million scientists (4,099 per million); Japan has 700,000 (5,095 per million).

Consider, for instance, that Muslims constitute 22 percent of world population with a 1 percent share of Nobel Prizes. Jews constitute 0.23 percent of world population with a 22 percent share of Nobel Prizes.

Even assuming Muslims did not hate everyone, this is a pretty clear indication to stop following Islam.


^This^


1488  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump Has The Power To Expose The Largest Money Laundering Scheme In History on: March 31, 2016, 02:49:59 PM


I am worried a bit when you share a positive news about TRUMP...

 Smiley


1489  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Up Like Trump on: March 31, 2016, 02:45:26 PM
Bullshit that attracts more bullshit can only be good shit. I think that goes without saying. Got to spread the shit, that makes flowers bloom they say. All in a pile it just stinks.

+1

Attention is most precious asset on this planet.


How would you know?

 Smiley



1490  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Trump Wall on: March 31, 2016, 02:18:38 PM













1491  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Up Like Trump on: March 31, 2016, 02:01:29 PM
TRUMP’S NEW GRANDSON GETS VERY PRESIDENTIAL NAME

The newborn baby boy of his daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner is named Theodore.


Trump: Isn't Ted Cruz's Real Name "Rafael"?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/03/30/trump_isnt_ted_cruzs_real_name_rafael.html


ANDERSON COOPER, CNN: You just welcomed a new grandson...

DONALD TRUMP: ... And I really appreciate your statement. Thank you.

COOPER: You just welcomed a new grandson...

TRUMP: I did.

COOPER: His name is Theodore. Any chance you're going to call him Crying Ted?

TRUMP: No, I don't think so.

(LAUGHTER)

TRUMP: I said -- well, actually, isn't Ted's real name Raphael? I think so, right? Because that was one of the questions did have to ask.

COOPER: I -- it is.

TRUMP: I doesn't matter.

Theodore Roosevelt is somebody Jared and Ivanka have long studied and respected, and it's Theodore James. Tough, strong, and it's Theodore James, and that's what they really had in mind.


What a master!

 Cheesy Grin Cheesy



1492  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Up Like Trump on: March 31, 2016, 12:41:59 AM
Bullshit that attracts more bullshit can only be good shit. I think that goes without saying. Got to spread the shit, that makes flowers bloom they say. All in a pile it just stinks.


All that natural, recycled green excrement that saves a polar bear or two, making you eat organic food while replying on bitcointalk.org...

What's not to like?


1493  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: March 31, 2016, 12:32:14 AM
For one, i live in Canada and nobody owns their own oil well here.  Oil spills can be cleaned up, there is no lasting contamination if done right.  Nobody in this thread will argue against that we need another clean energy source.  Where I live, we recycle 75% of our garbage, 15-20% goes into my garden, with about 10% going to the landfill.  I agree, plastics are bad, we have too much and I was never in favor of switching from glass.  Its march 30th and I still have a foot of snow in my yard.  Ive lived in this area most of my life and the weather isnt getting warmer here, its getting colder.
You got to watch this I just found this....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4l6ArtUlrk

Why on earth are you saying it's so easy to clean up..When the companies spill this oil..Do they like paying for the clean up?
Get this in your head the earth will still be here we wont... SHOCKING VIDEO..Poor Nigeria..

Get this into your head, I work in the Oil industry.  Ive seen oil spills cleaned up, Ive helped clean up spills.  OHH poor Nigeria with a corrupt government.  Do you know where 75% of contaminated sand goes, in roads!
Right i put it in my head and it makes sense know..You work for the oil industry and you don't
want to have to look for another job..SORRY I understand know..

carry on taking earth blood we will die..Earth will clean it's self but we will be wiped out..
If you see a leech on your body what do you do?


No, he's saying he knows this stuff.  That you could learn things from him.

Pretty simple really.


Working for the oil company hey? That's why I've always thought he has such slippery personality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdUanAllCZM


1494  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Trump Wall on: March 31, 2016, 12:27:25 AM
A wall can`t stop immigrants.
It`s just a waste of money and resources.
Certainly it can.

It's wrong what you say.

But we all know it's not the ONLY tool in the shed.

Yeah sure. Because actually ready to risk there life in the sea, giving out everything they have for a better life, are of course going to be stopped by a fucking ridiculous wall...

Huh?  Any of them that want can try the sea route.  That has nothing to do with the wall.  The wall would stop the desert routes where a lot of the illegal immigrants DIE.

Oh, so your solution is "let's build a wall on a part of the borders"?
And what will you do when they'll all go through the sea route?
Huh

There has been no discussion of sea routes by any presidential candidate. 

Do you even know the geography?  The tides, the currents?

Mexico is not Cuba...

Doesn't matter man...

What I mean is that, you wanna build a wall? Very well. But they'll just start making a detour by sea that all! Where on Earth did you see that a fucking wall will be enough! If it was the case why did the Mexican immigration didn't stop, or at least decrease after the construction of the fortified border between Mexico and USA???





The WALL is still a good deal and will stop a lot of people



So please just explain to me why the current fortified border doesn't stop mexicans?


You have to tell me first where it is fortified and I'll try to answer

1495  Other / Politics & Society / Re: BERNIE SANDERS, WEIRDO IN CHIEF on: March 31, 2016, 12:24:51 AM
Sanders == Neoliberal, ultraleftist and quasi-socialist puppet. Hypocrisy is absolutely OK for this kind of individuals.

The part of that which needs to be repeated over and over to Sanders fanatics is bolded.

Great. So Trump is a free mind and everyone else is a puppet. A puppet from who, we don't know but they're all puppets.


Is bernie a puppet of is he free?




Don't know. I'm not the one talking about candidates as being puppets. It seems especially dumb considering the fact that USA is a country where "lobbyist" is actually a job... Considering any politician as "free" is probably as dumb as considering a shark vegan.


You've just demonstrated why TRUMP, who's not a politician, is so popular.

 Smiley


1496  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Up Like Trump on: March 31, 2016, 12:22:40 AM
To be filed for future reference...

----------------------------

This could be one of the dumber things Hillary Clinton has ever said

Twitchy  by Greg Pollowitz 3:19 pm

We’re not sure this is the best route for Hillary Clinton to take while trying to attack Donald Trump, especially with FBI agents reportedly getting set to interview her staff’s actions regarding her homebrew email server. But, alas, self-awareness never was her thing:

Hillary Clinton says Donald Trump is responsible for his staff's actions: https://t.co/troowMAacq

— Capital Journal (@WSJPolitics) March 30, 2016

She really doesn’t see where this is going, does she?

@WSJPolitics So that means Hillary is completely responsible for her illegal e-mail server?

— LetItBurnUSA (@LetItBurnUSA) March 30, 2016

Exactly. Let’s save this tweet just in case we need to remind her of what she said in the very near future:

Clip and save this for when she throws staff under the bus for her server https://t.co/jQr6s0LCxo

— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) March 30, 2016

I wonder if Hillary really thought through this statement carefully… https://t.co/yXF9txNr8I

— Michael Q Sullivan (@MQSullivan) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics Good Then she will take responsibility for Mills, Sullivan, Abedin and her own crimes endangering nat'l sec #ClintonEmail

— Kim Seefeld (@KAS_SB) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics this is a saver. #tcot

— Bill Baar (@BillBaar) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics oh I can't wait till this comes back to haunt her!!

— Rebellious Mom (@jenladkins) March 30, 2016

And what about Bill’s behavior?

@WSJPolitics Any mention of responsibility for Bill's actions?

— Momo be tweet'n (@mcg0958) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics and who is responsible for her husband's actions or her email action or her Benghazi actions or her …..

— John Woods (@redeyebrody) March 30, 2016

Based on her record, this is the more likely response:

Politicians shouldn't blame staff for failings. They should blame a YouTube video, then try to walk it back later. https://t.co/jVvDPls4Ff

— Logan Dobson (@LoganDobson) March 30, 2016

You just now that’s coming.

***

The post This could be one of the dumber things Hillary Clinton has ever said appeared first on twitchy.com.


This should be posted on the clinton thread. I feel like I don't feed it as often. Poor lonely harpy cactus.

 Smiley




There is a Clinton thread? There are actualy real people voting for Clinton?

Not sure about bitcointalk people voting for clinton though. I could understand bernie, and of course TRUMP. But clinton?

I made clinton, TRUMP, bernie threads, all popular. Just search wilikon and the associate names

 Smiley



Lol, do you understand that posting bullshit on threads isn't the same as "making them populars"? xD


I do. But people keep posting and replying in them, telling me posting bullshit on threads isn't the same as "making them populars"

 Cheesy Grin Cheesy



1497  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Up Like Trump on: March 31, 2016, 12:16:18 AM







RECORD BREAKING: Exodus In Democrat Party, Quarter-Million Pennsylvania Voters Join GOP






The voter turnout in Pennsylvania is set to be record breaking as a reported 180,000 voters have joined the GOP.

As Trump mentioned during his final closing statement during the March 10th GOP debate, hosted by CNN, he stated that “millions of new voters” are joining his camp.  Trump pushed the idea that his ability to steal swing voters from the Democrat party will secure his win.  He also strongly suggested that the GOP and RNC “embrace” these new voters with open arms, indicating that Trump’s approach to being a unifying presidential leader was more than possible – it is happening as we speak.

When Ted Cruz, John Kasich, and Donald Trump square off in Pennsylvania’s April 26 Republican presidential primary, they will find themselves competing for votes from a rapidly changing base.


At least 128,000 voters statewide have changed their registration since Jan. 1 to join the party. Nearly 85,000 of them had been Democrats; 42,000 were independents or third-party voters. The GOP has also racked up 55,468 more first-time registrants.

The changes reflect what experts are calling an unprecedented number of party switches before a primary election.

That raises questions: Are Democrats and other voters flocking to the GOP in support of one of its three candidates? Or could they be plotting to stuff the ballot boxes for a Republican they think their nominee can beat in November?

“I don’t think we can say there’s one reason here,” said G. Terry Madonna, the veteran pollster who directs the Center for Politics and Public Affairs at Franklin and Marshall College. “But in the Philadelphia suburbs, if people are switching, some of that would be strategic: Vote for Trump because he would be the weakest candidate against [Hillary] Clinton.”

Since the start of 2016, nearly 215,000 Pennsylvania voters have switched their party affiliation, which includes the GOP surge, as well as 86,500 who became Democrats.

At the very least, the shift underscores something different about this year’s primary. The suspense of presidential races often ebbs before the Pennsylvania primary, but this year’s April 26 contest still has meaning – especially on the Republican side of the ballot.

The unexpected significance is what motivated Erik Blomain, formerly an unaffiliated voter, to register as a Republican.

“Normally our primary doesn’t matter a whole lot,” said Blomain, a 28-year-old medical student at Jefferson University, who says he plans to vote for Kasich. “It kind of matters more than any primary in my lifetime.”



http://government.northcrane.com/2016-election/donald-trump-exodus-pa-voter-exodus/




1498  Other / Politics & Society / Re: BERNIE SANDERS, WEIRDO IN CHIEF on: March 31, 2016, 12:00:43 AM
Sanders == Neoliberal, ultraleftist and quasi-socialist puppet. Hypocrisy is absolutely OK for this kind of individuals.

The part of that which needs to be repeated over and over to Sanders fanatics is bolded.

Great. So Trump is a free mind and everyone else is a puppet. A puppet from who, we don't know but they're all puppets.


Is bernie a puppet of is he free?


1499  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The Trump Wall on: March 30, 2016, 11:58:44 PM
A wall can`t stop immigrants.
It`s just a waste of money and resources.
Certainly it can.

It's wrong what you say.

But we all know it's not the ONLY tool in the shed.

Yeah sure. Because actually ready to risk there life in the sea, giving out everything they have for a better life, are of course going to be stopped by a fucking ridiculous wall...

Huh?  Any of them that want can try the sea route.  That has nothing to do with the wall.  The wall would stop the desert routes where a lot of the illegal immigrants DIE.

Oh, so your solution is "let's build a wall on a part of the borders"?
And what will you do when they'll all go through the sea route?
Huh

There has been no discussion of sea routes by any presidential candidate. 

Do you even know the geography?  The tides, the currents?

Mexico is not Cuba...

Doesn't matter man...

What I mean is that, you wanna build a wall? Very well. But they'll just start making a detour by sea that all! Where on Earth did you see that a fucking wall will be enough! If it was the case why did the Mexican immigration didn't stop, or at least decrease after the construction of the fortified border between Mexico and USA???





The WALL is still a good deal and will stop a lot of people

1500  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Up Like Trump on: March 30, 2016, 11:51:56 PM
To be filed for future reference...

----------------------------

This could be one of the dumber things Hillary Clinton has ever said

Twitchy  by Greg Pollowitz 3:19 pm

We’re not sure this is the best route for Hillary Clinton to take while trying to attack Donald Trump, especially with FBI agents reportedly getting set to interview her staff’s actions regarding her homebrew email server. But, alas, self-awareness never was her thing:

Hillary Clinton says Donald Trump is responsible for his staff's actions: https://t.co/troowMAacq

— Capital Journal (@WSJPolitics) March 30, 2016

She really doesn’t see where this is going, does she?

@WSJPolitics So that means Hillary is completely responsible for her illegal e-mail server?

— LetItBurnUSA (@LetItBurnUSA) March 30, 2016

Exactly. Let’s save this tweet just in case we need to remind her of what she said in the very near future:

Clip and save this for when she throws staff under the bus for her server https://t.co/jQr6s0LCxo

— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) March 30, 2016

I wonder if Hillary really thought through this statement carefully… https://t.co/yXF9txNr8I

— Michael Q Sullivan (@MQSullivan) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics Good Then she will take responsibility for Mills, Sullivan, Abedin and her own crimes endangering nat'l sec #ClintonEmail

— Kim Seefeld (@KAS_SB) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics this is a saver. #tcot

— Bill Baar (@BillBaar) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics oh I can't wait till this comes back to haunt her!!

— Rebellious Mom (@jenladkins) March 30, 2016

And what about Bill’s behavior?

@WSJPolitics Any mention of responsibility for Bill's actions?

— Momo be tweet'n (@mcg0958) March 30, 2016

@WSJPolitics and who is responsible for her husband's actions or her email action or her Benghazi actions or her …..

— John Woods (@redeyebrody) March 30, 2016

Based on her record, this is the more likely response:

Politicians shouldn't blame staff for failings. They should blame a YouTube video, then try to walk it back later. https://t.co/jVvDPls4Ff

— Logan Dobson (@LoganDobson) March 30, 2016

You just now that’s coming.

***

The post This could be one of the dumber things Hillary Clinton has ever said appeared first on twitchy.com.


This should be posted on the clinton thread. I feel like I don't feed it as often. Poor lonely harpy cactus.

 Smiley




There is a Clinton thread? There are actualy real people voting for Clinton?

Not sure about bitcointalk people voting for clinton though. I could understand bernie, and of course TRUMP. But clinton?

I made clinton, TRUMP, bernie threads, all popular. Just search wilikon and the associate names

 Smiley

Pages: « 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 [75] 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 ... 562 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!