addnode=155.207.34.49 addnode=217.77.59.45 addnode=94.23.102.99 addnode=176.226.131.78 addnode=116.16.215.138 addnode=85.117.114.209 addnode=181.229.231.4 addnode=46.39.39.19 addnode=118.232.9.247 addnode=36.81.252.174 addnode=217.231.130.114 addnode=115.178.236.188 addnode=105.228.10.134 addnode=115.178.236.188 addnode=169.255.197.79 addnode=185.173.33.92 addnode=185.150.154.164 addnode=103.47.134.56 addnode=46.172.213.12 addnode=5.76.84.43 addnode=2.87.177.211 addnode=37.72.70.152 addnode=91.151.111.250 addnode=118.232.9.247 addnode=85.117.114.209 addnode=217.77.59.45 Everything is resolved next step The exchange your coin does not allow to mine from remove connection, you should fix this, all ip that are not local don't work This node 91.83.204.254:9090 Works well yet it is not local If you destroy all the data Then download the wallet no i mean internal ip are not allowed such as 192.168 etc... box ip ?? vmware ip, i'm trying to connect to one of those where i put all my scam coin and it say that the ip is not allowed in the config, if i create another config called xrevcore it repeat synching from zero No ip is allowed xrev is the config file name? try yourself put 192.168.xx.* and see in the xrev.conf, it say not allowed |
|
|
|
Everything is resolved next step The exchange your coin does not allow to mine from remove connection, you should fix this, all ip that are not local don't work This node 91.83.204.254:9090 Works well yet it is not local If you destroy all the data Then download the wallet no i mean internal ip are not allowed such as 192.168 etc... box ip ?? vmware ip, i'm trying to connect to one of those where i put all my scam coin and it say that the ip is not allowed in the config, if i create another config called xrevcore it repeat synching from zero |
|
|
|
Everything is resolved next step The exchange your coin does not allow to mine from remove connection, you should fix this, all ip that are not local don't work This node 91.83.204.254:9090 Works well yet it is not local If you destroy all the data Then download the wallet no i mean internal ip are not allowed such as 192.168 etc... |
|
|
|
Everything is resolved next step The exchange your coin does not allow to mine from remove connection, you should fix this, all ip that are not local don't work |
|
|
|
wallet works and mining works as well..  when i try to solo it start synching again, is this normal for you? |
|
|
|
hes a fucking scammer he scammed me on a sale a few years ago when I was a newbie , paid 300 or so any never delivered the rig
STAY THE FUCK AWAY!!!
are you sure i got mine quickly when i paid for it in 2014, was not this version though |
|
|
|
|
in europe they have exempt bitcoin from vat which is already a good step in the right direction, but if you don't get the same regulation as japan you won't do much
in some of those country you can buy an house with bitcoin already like in italy, some agency allow this at Rome
what i believe must be done to accelerate adoption is starting to paying the salary in bitcoin , no company do this directly without relying on third party like bitwage, which for some people could be troublesome, i really think this is the dowel that is missed
|
|
|
|
until they reach 75% there is no worry, i'm sure it won't be activated with all the recent bugs and incompetency they have Almost 42% and rising.
Suuuuure that fork is never going to happen. Lol.
It seems there is a possibilty that segwit will not happen at present forms. miners are just undecided , segwit was at 35% before and bu 38% Almost 42% and rising.
Suuuuure that fork is never going to happen. Lol.
isn't most of bitcoin unlimited hash in one form or another connected to bitmain? since the antminer s9 is the best one now, all the pool are running that so yes, but why bitmain should go with BU if with litecoin they supported segwit with their new asic also, doesn't make sense to me |
|
|
|
|
well think about that, litecoin doesn't have litecoin unlimited competitors, so they have no choice, and also miners know that by supporting segwit now on litecoin the value will increase, this is a win situation for them
no miners i his right mind would say no to thisand there is also no asic boost for litecoin that i'm aware of, but with bitcoin is different the situation have muliple "antagonist" to segwit
|
|
|
|
But is anybody really thinking that BU is anything else but an "I don't want Segwit" thing, in other words "I want to keep bitcoin exactly as it is, but I want to make you think that I want also a "solution" for crashing the lucrative fee market" ?
For some people it's: I want Bitcoin to split in two, so I can 'double' my coins! I hate the censorship theymos is doing on his privately owned forums, therefore I am going to express my anger of this by supporting BU I think the devs have full control over Bitcoin and I trust the miners more than I trust the devs, so I want miners to have the power to make economic policy. would not surprise me if chinese farm are pushing for this alone, just to have more coins to dump, they are known to be greedy and care only about their profit in fiat because it's beyond me how they can still support bu after all this bug and exploit that are discovered each week.. what i do not understand is that Roger Ver is known to spend money to keep people in his side so that BU has some followers and he is know to be a big whale,but why is he not able to spend those money to get competent developers and testers before boasting about it, after all these failed attemps who is going to believe him.
Some people can't be bought? I joke that I'm bitcoin operated since I code for bitcoin, but I'd never code on BU just because he threw money at me (note I'm a mining/pool software developer, not core code.) so he tried to corrupt you too? all this under the table drama, make me think there is more than meets the eye here |
|
|
|
all i coins is that the current money supply distribution for bitcoin, will not be the same in the future if you want the price to be much higher, the less bitcoin each person in the one have the better some lucky oen will hold his 100/1000 btc forever and do a fortune in 10-20 years, but not many will have this privilege, same story as the pizza guy being one in a million is one of those interesting topics in bitcoin if you ask me. we all know that there will only be 21 million maximum bitcoins available (ignoring the number of coins lost). so if you have 21 bitcoins you can be one in a million. now we all know there are 7.5 billion people in the whole world and there is a very limited supply of bitcoin available. The following is the cost of being 1 in a million throughout the past years. * bubbles are ignored and price is average | Year | | | 21BTC cost | | 2008-2010 | | | Practically free! | | 2010 | | | $3.7 | | 2011 | | | $84 | | 2012 | | | $188 | | 2013 | | | $2,200 | | 2014 | | | $9,030 | | 2015 | | | $5,670 | | 2016 | | | $12,117 | | 2017 | | | $21,210 Today's price |
when you look at things like that, they seem pretty ridiculous that once you could be 1 in a million with only 3 bucks but today you have to pay 21 grand to be 1 in a millionThat's why people get involved in alts. You can be a lot bigger than one in a million for a lot less. Although the alt scene is getting saturated. At the current rate of production I project we should reach 1 million different alt coin projects by 2023 (or 2019 if you include waves tokens  ) no, not for that, people jump on the various altcoin, just to gain more bitcoin, no one really care about them, you don't see people running around claiming that they will use one of those coins in the future |
|
|
|
Recently, i often see discussion about Bitcoin Bank. More and more people come here and ask about bitcoin bank & surprisingly i see few user agree with this idea.
So, i would like to find out the percentage of user who agreed with this idea.
Honestly, i think this idea is stupid and worst idea that i've seen in my life. What do you think?
p.s. we don't talk about bitcoin debit card OR any centralized service which only ask name and email address.
I think that you are totally wrong. Bitcoin is money. Or at least "play" the role of money. Mainly. The Bank is created (as a institution) to give money and to earn from this process. A normal business like hundred and thousand others. People always will have need for money from the banks. One day may have desire to have credits in bitcoin. Why the bank doesn't give credit in this kind of money?Because it is too risky for the bank If the Bitcoin price goes down, the borrower will be in a privileged position to return the loan with cheap bitcoins, which he could just buy with borrowed dollars and thereby book profits. The same is even truer with Bitcoin price surging since in the latter case, the borrower will be inclined to default and forfeit his collateral, which he could then buy back with only a part of the bitcoins he borrowed. As you can see, lending (especially mid-to-long term lending) becomes an extremely risky enterprise there is a reason why lending in bitcoin is only done for very short terms, just to avoid the problem of the price instability, there are numerous users doing it in the lending section i'm sure a bank can pull this off too with some sort of interest, also with a bank the borrower can't scam and can't run away, because thye would have his identity, and would be chased by the police, i mean you can't do the same shit you do here with a bank... |
|
|
|
All GPUs will be posted to eBay!
i don't think so, some huge farm can't take on small coins, therefore those farm only will be forced to sell their gpu |
|
|
|
Its not right if you follow all rules and regulations they will never take your money, Until now, paypal payment system worked without any failures and there were no negative points at service users, Some are accusing paypal to be a scam because they might have lost their money as they have the tendency to freeze the account if they find high amount of activity
this is strange because they freeze the money even for a lower amount, especially with ebay, i had my $20 or so freezed because they were not sure that the item were delivered and they asked me for a feedback, when previously i made tons of transaction on ebay and nothing happen ebay + paypal is the worst shit ever, i'm starting to use openbazar and get rid of their crappy policy, which only make you in trouble for nothing |
|
|
|
|
also what the OP say doesn't make sense, why the diff should reajdust when there was no increase in hash, a 51% can be achieved with 51% of current hash mining on a single pool, without increase the total hashrate
also if you add only 51% of the current net you can't do 51% attack, because you would have 33% of the net you need to add 100%+, the diff increase in this case means only that the new attacked will make half of the block and nothign else
|
|
|
|
It was very horrible, if the Bitcoin whales take advantage from newbie with a fake pump.
Do you know the signs or characteristics of a fake pump ? So all of us to be vigilant and cautious in trading.
Just check the market capitalization of the altcoins and then compare the number of users each of these coins are having. If an altcoin which is having less than 10,000 users is achieving a market capitalization of $500 million, then the possibility is that it is a fake pump. there is no way to know the amount of users involved for any altcoin, and for bitcoin either, so your strategy to find if it's fake or not doesn't work usually a fake pump is something that resolve in a immediate dump or anyway the value return back where it was, and this is not the case of bitcoin actually here it's the opposite there was a fake dump with bitcoin, and we are once again at $1200+ |
|
|
|
|
you can't compare the growth of an altcoin which have a lower marketcap with bitcoin, altcoin are more prone to 5x 10x oincrease, also the increase of these two alt you mentioned was due to bitcoin price decrease, therefore this point is moot
i don't think either that bitcoin is mature, this value is nothign special, to have maturity you ned greater stability and to have stability, you like it or not you need greater value
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin will never have a stable price, because bitcoin is not regulated, and you need regulation to keep a stable price, this is basic to understand
Could you explain how regulation will make Bitcoin more stable? After all, price is still determined by the balance of supply against demand, and as I suspect, Bitcoin is no exception to this rule. So if you basically claim that Bitcoin regulation will somehow make Bitcoin prices more stable, that necessarily means that regulation should affect supply and demand. To make prices stable both sides of this balance should increase multifold, and how exactly Bitcoin regulation is going to do that? i think he mean that regulation can increase adoption, we have a case in japan where regulation made adoption in japan far higher, this is also proven by the very high volume they have on exchange, the highest among all so in theory if all country do the same, we can have a better adoption that will lead to more stability, which make sense |
|
|
|
I stopped reading after you said bitcoins are anonymous. Obviously if you present false information in your statement your whole post is going to be stupid bullshit FUD.
TD;DR, OP is going to use shitcoins for his big important purchases now. Thanks for dropping by. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
where bitcoin is anonymous if you don''t reveal your name attached to your address, which is the same as any other coins, otherwise you have a different definition of anonymous here in fact the possibility to track each address don't make bitcoin not anonymous... Where are the real life cases of double spending?
this is one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=152348.0 and i remember at least another but i can't find it at the moment |
|
|
|
|
the common misconception here is that with bitcoin more stable you have a better adoption, when it's exactly the opposite, to have bitcoin be more stable you need first greater adoption
stability is done with fair distribution, not with whales that hold 100k bitcoin, until those coins are distributed and each people hold a fraction of bitcoin you can't have good stability nor a very good value
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
