Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 01:13:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 ... 334 »
1561  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: BTC sent to wrong address. on: November 05, 2015, 02:13:04 PM
I contacted support and they informed me that they are unable to trace the recipient of my BTC as I failed to generate a receiving address via their site(which I thought would stay the same after it was generated last year). It seems all hope is gone...

I find it a little hard to believe that they just "deleted the private key" (surely they take and keep monthly backups).

I'd keep an eye on the address to make sure that the funds don't move (if they do then the exchange has lied and stolen your BTC).
1562  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Decentralized Professional Services Market Protocol on: November 04, 2015, 01:40:17 AM
Oh, also what kind of premiums did you offer over what you considered fair in your experience but still get no takers?

Things like getting some very simple scripts written (kind of stuff that would take someone with the skills only an hour or so). I had to offer a few hundred dollars for these kinds of tasks (many of which I just ended up doing myself instead to save funds).
1563  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Decentralized Professional Services Market Protocol on: November 03, 2015, 05:20:36 PM
Point taken. Clearly people do gigs online all the time so it sounds like a key focus is going to need to be addressing the reasons why more workers don't get involved. What might those be?

To a fair extent I think it very much depends upon the kinds of tasks.

Very talented programmers (which I have tried to target) are simply not possible unless you offer almost ridiculously high prices (it is just too easy for them to get a high paying stable job).

Low talented programmers you'll find but are really not even worth bothering with (they'll cause you more trouble than you pay them for).

Graphic designers are perhaps your best bet as those people tend to work for nothing (often trying to chase bounties which only one of them will get). For CIYAM Open I didn't want to do bounties (as I think it is actually unfair to have people working for nothing) but I think for that kind of task they actually seem to work better (apparently those kind of people like to gamble on whether they will get paid at all).
1564  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Decentralized Professional Services Market Protocol on: November 03, 2015, 05:09:34 PM
We're there projects that were funded outside of that?

Probably the main project other than the platform itself and the Automated Transactions (AT) project was the Moneychanger project (from the Open Transactions people). Unfortunately they did all their payments "off the record" so the Project tasks listed there show no payments (and were never closed).

I'm calling this a protocol because though we have to start with specific tools, a well-documented and well-designed  protocol can be platform agnostic. Maybe it would be best if you wrote up lessons learned on your project and posted a link here.

I guess the main lesson that I've learned is that people are not yet ready to work this way - even when I offered almost insanely generous payments for tasks there were very few (if any) people willing to take on the work (and that was not due to not trusting me about payment).
1565  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Decentralized Professional Services Market Protocol on: November 03, 2015, 04:39:18 PM
Not sure if you had ever looked at CIYAM Open but it is a similar (but simpler) concept (http://ciyam.org/open).

Feel free to contact me via PM if you'd like to discuss my experiences with trying to get this kind of thing up and running.
1566  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Manufacturing Consensus on: November 02, 2015, 03:32:21 PM
I'm currently working on a toy project (which derives heavily from BitMessage ideas) that concerns messaging.

A blockchain version of the CIYAM Message package has been created (and is just getting some polishing touches).

Someone creating an application that uses it doesn't need to do anything more than the following steps (using the Meta application which is the IDE and assuming a genesis block has already been created for which some further work will be done to make that just as easy as the following):

1) Create a Model and give it a name (let's assume "Sample").

2) Install the blockchain User package (this is necessary for applications to have users).

3) Install the blockchain Message package (which supports encrypted messaging).

4) Create an Application and give it a name (to make things simplest use the same name as the Model so "Sample" again) and supply the blockchain identity (just a copy and paste from the genesis block creation).

5) Click "Generate".

Done.

I think this is rather way ahead of anything like Ethereum (despite having no funding).
1567  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Singapore pretends to be pro bitcon on: November 02, 2015, 03:05:11 PM
You aren't giving any details. We need to know so other people that travel to china take the required prevention measures to avoid any of that happening.

You do realise that Singapore is a completely separate country to China don't you?

As for an assassination attempt I wonder whether the OP is just trying to entertain (and if not then I'd like to know how he managed to dodge such an attempt - is he actually some sort of Bourne identity?).

1568  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: bitcoin core RPC compatible lite wallet proxy? on: November 01, 2015, 11:08:44 AM
Unfortunately the problem is UTXO indexing (by address) which is not done by Bitcoin Core (except for its own wallet).

The watch only wallet mode of bitcoin core doesn't support listunspent?

I assume it indexes the UTXOs for watch only addresses in exactly the same way (the only difference being that you don't have the private keys) so yes it should work with the "listunspent" RPC command.

1569  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: bitcoin core RPC compatible lite wallet proxy? on: November 01, 2015, 06:41:23 AM
Or am I missing something here?

You are quite correct - I wouldn't pay much attention to the posts of the other person.
1570  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: bitcoin core RPC compatible lite wallet proxy? on: November 01, 2015, 04:32:05 AM
Those Electrum servers that couldn't keep up with the Bitcoin transaction stream during recent stress tests and were getting hours behind w.r.t. the live network?

Clearly you just don't know when to give up - you do realise that Electrum is not the only software that does UTXO indexing or do you not?

Maybe you should go and study indexing for a while before making more ridiculous posts.

Hint - check what the OP is asking about and stop going off on stupid tangents trying your best to show off some sort of technical knowledge that you clearly lack.
1571  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Thanks to people who support 1-2 MB blocks - great idea u fools... on: October 31, 2015, 07:00:24 PM
Can you destroy a Bitcoin private key?

Without a blockchain a Bitcoin private key is just a random number (and you can create those very easily).

So the value of not being able to "destroy" a random number is exactly what?
1572  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Announcing BlockCypher's Transaction API: create&manage bitcoin transactions on: October 31, 2015, 06:54:04 PM
Well... blockcypher is definitely not a scam.

Hopefully not - but claiming they don't keep private keys and having an API that asks for your private key doesn't add up to me.
1573  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Thanks to people who support 1-2 MB blocks - great idea u fools... on: October 31, 2015, 06:49:55 PM
Even if we are to ignore durability there are still numerous aspects of Bitcoin which make it more desirable to hold than gold. While you might argue that the physical nature of gold make it more resilient to certain attacks it certainly renders it vulnerable to a whole range of issues (theft, seizure).

So I think you are admitting that your argument about durability is not a strong one.

For sure I think Bitcoin is a great investment but I wouldn't put it above gold now (let's see how things pan out in the next ten years).
1574  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Announcing BlockCypher's Transaction API: create&manage bitcoin transactions on: October 31, 2015, 06:39:39 PM
This is PHP and the syntax is very similar to C. If you see the link I provided, it wont be very difficult for you to decipher the working logic. sign() is a server side function which is taking $txSkeleton & $privateKeys variables as input and returning the signed data. But, if I could sign using PHP itself, I could avoid this step and directly push the signed Tx. I hope, someone, who knows PHP, chime in and point me to a code that allows me to do so...

Okay - then I hope the OP will explain his misleading point (hopefully it isn't a scam but it could be).
1575  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Thanks to people who support 1-2 MB blocks - great idea u fools... on: October 31, 2015, 06:32:13 PM
We are getting away from the original argument though which is that Bitcoin is more durable than gold. Now the Bitcoin network might be compromised or inaccessible temporarily yet private keys remain.

So let's get back to that (and forget about silly asteroids of gold).

Again - gold has survived since the earth was formed but Bitcoin has only been here since 2009.

If the governments of the world decide that they don't want an "internet' as we have had so far (which is looking very likely) then Bitcoin might be dead in only a few years (but gold will still be here).

My advice to any investors would be to diversify between gold, property and Bitcoin (and in that order - and notice I did not list *fiat* at all).
1576  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Announcing BlockCypher's Transaction API: create&manage bitcoin transactions on: October 31, 2015, 06:28:16 PM
No... I dint. Signing is a part of their offered API. Here is their sample code...

http://blockcypher.github.io/php-client/sample/doc/transaction-api/CreateAndSignAndSendTransaction.html

Please check this line...

Code:
$txSkeleton = $txClient->sign($txSkeleton, $privateKeys);

I'm not familiar with the language (I'm a C++ coder) but if it means that the signing is not done on the client side then that would be a serious issue (hopefully the OP will clarify this).
1577  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Announcing BlockCypher's Transaction API: create&manage bitcoin transactions on: October 31, 2015, 06:21:49 PM
We just released our Transaction API. A transaction can be created in 3 steps:

1. With only an input address, output address, and the value transferred, we build the full unsigned transaction and the data to sign it.
2. You sign the transaction data (we do not store any private keys) and send us the signature.
3. We complete the transaction, broadcast it over the peer-to-peer network, and send it back to you.

So, sharing the hot wallet private key with blockcypher is a must to use blockcypher api to create, sign and send a Tx?

Did you miss point number 2?
1578  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Thanks to people who support 1-2 MB blocks - great idea u fools... on: October 31, 2015, 06:15:22 PM
There are in facts plans to do it in the near future.

So what is their budget and how exactly are they going to achieve this feat?

Mankind has only been able to even land a spacecraft on an asteroid recently - but to drag one from the asteroid belt back to earth would be an engineering feat that would be bigger than any other ever accomplished (so if their budget isn't in the trillions then they have no chance of success IMO).

By comparison to shut down the internet would simply require a few EMP nukes (a few million budget at most).
1579  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Thanks to people who support 1-2 MB blocks - great idea u fools... on: October 31, 2015, 05:58:13 PM

I can't easily watch YouTube here (I live in China) so could you just explain the point (and I'm not talking about changing the comms to a mesh network or something like that - my point is that Bitcoin needs a network).

Let me ask you another question:

What scenario is more likely within our lifetime? A permanent, international shutdown of the internet grid or increasing development of asteroid mining technology which would make gold plentiful and not scarce anymore.

We are seeing an international shutdown of the global internet already (I am in China so I know this very well). Thailand has recently stated they are going to introduce the same sort of internet controls that China does (and even countries like Australia are trying to introduce internet censorship).

Now there might be an asteroid made of gold but I don't see any real plans to bring that back to earth in the next 100 years (we will more likely see humans on Mars first).
1580  Economy / Economics / Re: If Bitcoin goes up very high should i buy a house? on: October 31, 2015, 05:54:18 PM
It's not a road I'd particularly like to go down but if I did I'd be totally unemotional about it and buy slave boxes where the jobs are.

You don't need to be an asshole to be a landlord (I've been a tenant and a landlord myself many times).

If you want to have reasonable rental income and few hassles then you take the time to vet potential tenants and when you find a good one you look after them (i.e. repair things and keep them happy and don't raise the rent unreasonably).
Pages: « 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 ... 334 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!