Say goodbye to much of your $20!  (probably, one way or another. but if you can afford that, it will be invaluable experience!) I suggest keeping "most" of any longer term "investment" in cold storage bitcoin, not altcoin. You are still an early adopter in bitcoin's journey at this stage. Most altcoins are simply repackaged hype, designed to part you from your bitcoins. These altcoins will be pushed on bitcoin "news" sites, such as cointelegraph. (if cointelegraph are paid to do so) And here, many "farmed accounts" give the appearance of popularity to the latest long con altcoin. (overseen by admin) You are their mark  Just take a bit more time, keep reading. Learn to spot what is really going down before loosing big. (click on my profile/showposts to find my threads if you are interested in a deeper understanding of what i say here!) |
|
|
|
Open your eyes and look at the original post by Timelord2067 about you and your alternate accounts. There is proof of this...
And open your eyes sanas, there is proof against you farmed chronobank.io shill scam account. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597201.msg16166647#msg16166647https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1670807.0Chronobank.io are doing exact same thing as Qtum. Pretending they have support to sucker in the gullible. Anyone who invests in anything you or your hundreds other accounts shill - Chronobank.io in this instance - will loose their bitcoins. (sorry to clutter this thread lauda, but ya know, next sanas will be giving trust to you and timelord!) |
|
|
|
4. i was thinking of reddit? are there any other core/blockstream contributors moderating here? I thought i had seen his name here - Bitcoin Forum > Other > Meta > Bitcoin Wiki (Moderators: nanotube, Luke-Jr, SomeoneWeird) ? |
|
|
|
Even if I loved SegWit technically... That ain't gonna happen. We need to get Blockstream out of the Core influence.
Neither is that. Core will be ousted by design. |
|
|
|
While I *in principle* agree with the spirit of what @rizzlarolla is saying, perhaps there are other scenarios that should be explored, for example who would want to discredit BitCoins? Real Banks or even law enforcement who might perceive (without understanding the power of BlockChain), that crypto currencies are a threat?
Interesting assertion. The situation is most surely damaging to the ecosystem. Especially if an Alt Farmer TM were commissioned by a third party to actually create thousands of Alts to destabilise BitCoinTalk.org - the farmer is already paid for the entire crop, not just one cherry off the tree at a time. That would not be a problem - unless theymos supported it. That "Real Banks or even law enforcement" farmer could easily be detected and stopped. If theymos thought his forum was being destabilised, he could have banned my farmed accounts before i had even found them! Easy. Problem solved. (or well on the way to being solved) In theymos's position, i could identify many, many more farmed accounts. If i had his access and tools, i could find them much quicker. Like he can. (i have already found a few hundred other farmed accounts - unpublished - i have a job IRL) theymos has Known of all my farmed accounts before i did. He does not act because this is how he want's it. |
|
|
|
Gunthar - "i'm claiming as wrong NOT because "there is not a forum rule against alts" "They are damaging the entire cicle" I strongly agree. i have been saying the same. Gunthar - "what Theymos does with this forum rules isnt any of our business," I strongly disagree. theymos is compliant in, or instigating, the destruction of the entire circle here, presumably for his own personal gain. As a bitcoiner, i will not just walk away. Take This quote, The first 12 names are listed here (+ 2 others 898570, 898578) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597201.msg16875643#msg16875643(i had posted in known alts that "Any fool can see they are farmed by the same (russian?) owner") They have moved en-masse to the next campaign. (next scam to pump?) How many times do we have to prove these (same) accounts are doing this!!! Read the links above, read my farmer thread, look at my 500+ list. Then ask yourself this. Why doesn't theymos and his mods do anything to stop it? |
|
|
|
prasha2 Just saying thanks and letting you know you helped, i quote this from bitcoin.com, where Bitcoin Day Trade also posted, ------------- rizzlarolla wrote: (jan 23) quote from prasha2, (bct) "User "Bitcoin Day Trade" made a post advertising a bitcoin trading book for FREE. The first comment caught my attention which mentioned the doc was password protected. I had heard of such a way of installing trojan (I think the doc asks you to enable micros or something), so I ran the doc through virus-total. And the result found out that there were indeed trojans in there - https://virustotal.com/en/file/56302e88 ... 485141666/. I have put a warning comment on the post. Please do your bit and paint his trust RED. Also, is there a way to blacklist the website from which the doc is downloaded? - http://bitcoin-help.online" ----------- bientang replyed: (today, feb 1) waw it is dangerous. thank for your warning because i wan to download and i read your post thank you friend ----------- (this thread on bitcoin.com is finally in the trashcan, moved today after bientang replyed) |
|
|
|
There is still time for anyone to get in on this, just come over to forum.bitcoin.com sign up an account and post away, a chance to win 4btc could never be easier. Congrats in advance to Roger's Alt who would likely win this competition.
~snip~ Roger is voting for Gavin Anderson. Now i don't doubt Gavin can write, but does he really need to be awarded 4 btc? I don't think any of us really know what Gavin's financial situation is, he could be on his last bitcoin but i do suspect he would have a few stashed away but that is besides the point, anyone can win this competition and not many have given as much of their personal time and work to bitcoin as Gavin has, he also hasn't been treated too kindly of late. I just thought it a bit strange, i got no problem with "everyone" being involved. A 4btc competition to attract new members to Rogers forum, great. But then Roger votes for someone new members know they cannot beat! I don't think this was intentional, but it isn't helping inspire people to try is it? (i'd like to think Gavin would not/not need to except 4btc if he won anyway!) There have been some good post, but nowhere near what i would have expected for 4 btc. Anyone can still win! What is stopping people? Is this thread in the wrong topic? (i only found it because "whothefuckareyou" started a thread about me, so i checked his posts, and that led me here!) |
|
|
|
1. i don't think your wrong about that as i have been trying to show. 2. oh yes. 3. thanks 4. i was thinking of reddit? are there any other core/blockstream contributors moderating here? 5. i try to speculate based on research. we can't all just walk away can we? (as explained previously) ------------------- I am also doubtful if why would they say it? because in the first place I think you are doing a good job and besides it can help them looks for this certain accounts and finds out if they violates some rules.
I shall not comment on this, but rizzarolla might.
i stated why the mods would say it on the previous page here? |
|
|
|
Signature campaigns have got "a bit" cleaner lately, since my input was making clear how many "farmed" accounts were taking the places of real members. (not that many real members would want to advertise the latest batch of scams would they?)
I would only modify this statement to better reflect the situation by changing it to:"Some signature campaigns..". There are plenty of those that are full of shitposters. Ok, i can probably agree with that. After all, i know how much work it can be to fight this problem when there is an endless supply of new farmed accounts ready to try to replace "blacklisted" accounts. You were the only mod i could see doing anything. (but now you got yourself fired) The forum was on it's knee's under the weight of spam until (i speculate) i forced SMAS to pretend to be against spam.
But previously they helped create the problem.
You have? That must have been something during the first SMAS attempt. IIRC it was me who revived it with the blacklist idea when I started to manage Bitmixer. I think we both played a part in getting things done, and making things clearer. It can only be a sticking plaster against this. Two (global?) mods have told me tonight i should get a new hobby. Piss off rizzlarolla? They have not acted against farmed accounts. They love Fatanut? Senior DT members must also be involved. Their inaction shows this.
Yes, and no. It is really hard to say who pulls what strings in certain cases. However, a lot of 'serious DT' members have abandoned this 'ship' due to inaction. Yeah, a lot are gone, some are sold(?). The remainer's (in the higher ranks) have overseen bitcointalks decline. I'm not well versed in DT. It feels to me like Greg maxwell is also compliant. He moderates here.
If I'm correct, he spends very little time in here. There's no need to target individuals though. No staff member has the 'power' to do a 'cleanup' or make 'desired changes'. Ok, i probably should have said core or blockstream? Luke j also moderates? It is a failure by association. They are linked to theymos here and elsewhere. This failure likely suits their agenda also. Others here (or gone more likely) must see the same.
Correct. See my previous remark on DT members. That is evident by the response's in this thread over 5 months. Nothing, or nearly nothing. Quite "thought provoking" my post. You don't seem to have any real big problem with my thinking Lauda? |
|
|
|
While I *in principle* agree with the spirit of what @rizzlarolla is saying, perhaps there are other scenarios that should be explored, for example who would want to discredit BitCoins? Real Banks or even law enforcement who might perceive (without understanding the power of BlockChain), that crypto currencies are a threat?
Could be, but i don't believe satoshi was involved. Therefore, it was not the original setup. Maybe theymos sold the forum. We would not know that? But could equally be someone who loves btc. Just got greedy. Wants loads of Bitcoin. i think that the degradation of Bitcoin is only a temporary side effect, not the long term goal. (in such a case, they probably wont think they are degrading bitcoin?) |
|
|
|
Any ideas?
Yeah, get a new hobby. theymos just can't can get the staff these days.  What does this even mean? It's a play on words? Maybe i'm missing Lauda. How was your guide to finding banned accounts helpful or definitive?
- watch for a bit, if the account don't post for a while it is probably banned, or it might not be banned. Whilst certainly not definitive, it's usually a good indication of a ban when they mysteriously stop posting. pfft. Rubbish. Tough to watch an account forever before deciding not to act.
Really tough to watch 1000 farmed accounts forever, just incase you ban 1.
Again, get a new hobby. Thanks for the help and the interest in this. (i believe that is irony?) |
|
|
|
Any ideas?
Yeah, get a new hobby. theymos just can't can get the staff these days. How was your guide to finding banned accounts helpful or definitive? - watch for a bit, if the account don't post for a while it is probably banned, or it might not be banned. Tough to watch an account forever before deciding not to act. Really tough to watch 1000 farmed accounts forever, just incase you ban 1. |
|
|
|
I then stumbled upon Decred. I exposed their "fatal" flaws.
Launch was delayed for a few weeks to address some of my concerns.
The biggest flaws were not addressed. Decred is failing. Decred will continue to fail.
The flaws are fatal in the long term.
I only posted there for a few weeks.
I had learned from my Neucoin days that not everyone else wants to learn. (my word against the rich and famous)
I left Decred and their shills to fail. They will fail because of greed.
There are hundreds of these type of coins, many much worse than Decred.
Decred was approx 0.0005btc when i posted that. Today it trades at 0.0021btc. 200% pump up. (they never did thank me for having to delay launch in order to correct some technical flaws) I used to have that effect on neucoin. (not that big - 200%! wow, they must fear my words) The dev counter pump. neucoin, now de-listed after trading price fell to1 satoshi. Decred's fatal flaw's are still there - Greed. |
|
|
|
Snipped - Completely useless guide on how to spot banned accounts
Going forward, I hope this thread also serves as a reference.  I respect your work on this, but alas it is of little help in my work. (as i think you know and stated such) I have 100's more farmed accounts ready to publish, but those accounts have not posted in a while. I still cannot tell if they are banned. I don't want to be "humiliated" by publishing "already" banned accounts. Old news. Any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
I haven't looked at this HateNATO case Timelord2067, guess i will at some point.
Do you know which accounts are/are not banned. - edit, i got it, Known alts thread!
---------------------------------------------------------------
"I'm begining to think @rizzlarolla may actually be right that the staff / admin of bitcointalk.org are doing more than just turning a blind eye to the scamming going on."
- Timelord2067.
Indeed, everything is pointing that way from where i'm looking.
There seems to be different farmed accounts for different purposes. Some scam or pump, some sell, some spam,. An evolving ecosystem.
I linked 209 ALPHABET accounts, explained and posted again here recently. (previous page) I am certain the ABCD accounts are the same farmer. And others. All unhindered by theymos. WTF is going on!
My "90" list (aug 8/9 accounts) published recently shows (if you read that way) how these accounts are not created for selling.
They are created for pumping the latest scam here. (Bitsler, waves, chronobank.io. stratis, Qtum to name a few)
Lulling newbies, and people who look but never register here, to part from their btc.
(most of the people scammed must be very naive, but that doesn't lessen the plot, and still blackens the btc perception)
(added - are these ico's now being made to order/rota "peimarily" for bitcointalk? more research needed, no time as yet)
If i can easily find these accounts, theymos already knows.
Of course, theymos will probably say these scams are legit business proposals. If they were, they would not need all these farmed accounts pumping would they, creating a false sense of legitimacy and popularity. (like my favourite scamcoin neucoin. they would pay cointelegraph to publish untruth's to deceive/scam their own readers)
I am a little time constrained in my searches, and am greatly hindered by the lack of any admin input (lol). The lack of any forum tools, or (usable) member search facility. (that has been disabled) theymos has never responded.
Signature campaigns have got "a bit" cleaner lately, since my input was making clear how many "farmed" accounts were taking the places of real members. (not that many real members would want to advertise the latest batch of scams would they?)
Farmed accounts probably created by campaign managers or admin to sig spam with impunity.
Any "innocent" campaign manager worth his salt would have seen they were paying farmed accounts.
The forum was on it's knee's under the weight of spam until (i speculate) i forced SMAS to pretend to be against spam.
But previously they helped create the problem.
Even Fatanut now running the sig campaign list, with full support from Yahoo.
Fatanut is a farmed account with many scammy "brother accounts". I see no evidence of that account being sold.
I wouldn't really care if it was sold. To me anyone buying an account does so to deceive here.
Senior DT members must also be involved. Their inaction shows this.
The forum hacks? Ok, maybe incompetence, but then to allow all the old accounts (that were hacked and sold?) to come back to life here.
Many are easily identifiable. Probably johnybigs? More profits for "scammers".
It feels to me like Greg maxwell is also compliant. He moderates here. He allows all this scamming of real bitcoiners.
Driving away adopters to keep his 1mb block intact, while building up monero.
Satoshi must be fuming. The go-to btc site, and the btc devs of "default" are killing what they should be nurturing - Bitcoin.
There is a bigger picture to find here.
Others here (or gone more likely) must see the same. Someone's gotta stand up for Bitcoin here.
|
|
|
|
rizzlarolla I cant understand you.Your grammar English so bad. Bye bye I leave this weird topic where nobody dont know multiply account rules  I have to dumb it down a bit. In a big way, you are right. There is no rule against having 100 accounts of your own. But if you try doing that, it wont work for you. You are not part of the sanctioned crime ring here. You will be banned.Bye Bye HateNATO.  Banned. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1769120.0 |
|
|
|
Are you really that dumb or are you just acting like so? It doesn't take much effort for riz to chase down your other farmed accounts. You are shooting yourself in your foot right now. Haven't you a thread open in the first page of the Meta section where you ask for a name change? It's so obvious that I almost feel sorry for you. Yup HateEU 880061, HateNATO 880092. 31 accounts apart. (less than 2 hours) Well spotted. I'm looking at the 800000's atm... (hence my last long "90" list) |
|
|
|
rizzlarolla I cant understand you.Your grammar English so bad. Bye bye I leave this weird topic where nobody dont know multiply account rules I have to dumb it down a bit. In a big way, you are right. There is no rule against having 100 accounts of your own. But if you try doing that, it wont work for you. You are not part of the sanctioned crime ring here. You will be banned. Bye Bye HateNATO. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
