The latest "me too" language regards "maximalism" is within a range of social acceptability, and if you really want to insult V8, you gotta label him as a cylinder "extremist" hahahahaha 

I like that:  "VeeCash! VeeCash! VeeCash!"  Vroom, Vroom.

Nevertheless, guaranteed full employment for years to come for anyone seeking engagement in such a shit posting battle.  hahhahahahaha   

In 2015, we were stuck in a price range that was largely in the mid $200s for a bit more than 8 months, so currently, we are quite a distance from that level of stagnation.  I am thinking that it could be good to be stuck here for a bit longer, and I would prefer this range than to go below $3k and get stuck in a lower range, if that were to happen, which is certainly possible.

Two shills battling for a bitcoin narrative.   

Exactly, that is why it remains a prudent practice to buy some portion more than what you intend to HODL for the long term.  buying double seems to be a bit of an overkill, yet I understand that each person finds his/her proper balance, such as buying an extra 20% or 50% or whatever amount that makes it comfortable to sell those off as the price goes up and to continue to be able to maintain a decently sized ongoing "in" position.

Easier said than done.  Good luck with those kinds of core change proposals that you believe to be so potentially malleable.

Whoaza!!!!!

I am not sure if I like that, even though logically it makes a decent amount of sense.  The $160k in August 2023 seems like decently acceptable, but then again, by August 2023 we are going to be coming close to the 2024 halvening, which will likely be in early 2024 (meaning before May).

Yeah, we all need to wait and suffer in order that you can buy an additional .1BTC.  

Do you have any specifics to share?

There were quite a few people struggling to be included in the at least 1BTC club in late 2017 and early 2018, and recently, that at least 1 BTC club has has become easier to achieve entrance. 

Surely, there are a lot fewer members in the double digits and above club, so each of us has our own goals about how many BTC to accumulate and considerations of whether we can move our goals upwards once we achieve the lower goals.  I have done so many times in my BTC experiences.  I also had to move my goal downwards after a fairly extensive hack (related to phone porting) that occurred for me in early 2017.

Hairbearie... are you starting to smoke from the same batch of UP hopium as some of the rest of us HODLers?

The substantive fact about "rich" is not as important to the story as is the perception of "rich."   In other words, there was some perception (or expectation) that I had some kind of duty to help out here on the interwebs.   

During the run up to $19k, I had a guy ask me donate some bitcoin to a good cause (which was a mutual acquaintance who had made some bad financial decisions in then recent times), because he knew that I was rich.  

I did not know that I was participating in this forum to be "supportive" of crazy?  Next thing you are going to want me to invest in some "profitable" charity?

The whole situation seems strange to me.

If there were "random and spontaneous acts of kindness and generosity," then why is there a need to draw attention to such by creating a thread?  Reminds me of one of my female co-workers who brought homeless guy to work with her, and then attempted to defend her position.  She ended up getting fired over the matter, because it was a sign of her bad judgement especially the fact that she failed/refused to be discreet about the matter - a kind of self-destruction.

Ok.... Now that I read that again, I recall seeing it.

It seems like a bit of an over-leveraging, but not necessarily a bad one.  Each of us needs to make those kinds of decisions, and not necessarily kick ourselves if we teeter on one side or another.

I recall that in about late 2014/early 2015, I was teetering on whether I should divert some of my 401k investment into bitcoin.  At the time, I was more than 50% in the red in bitcoin, and I figured that such a diversion of merely a portion of my 401k could more than double my BTC holdings.  In the end, I decided NOT to do it because I had already gotten to a level of investment in bitcoin that was beyond my initial projection of what I was going to do.  So I could not really justify taking a larger stake, which would rise to the level of a kind of excessive gambling, in my thinking.  I continued to dollar cost average and to attempt to invest fairly high amounts of my spare cash flow into bitcoin, and I considered that what I was doing was more than enough "overleveraging" because it also allowed me to feel comfortable with my soon thereafter decision to sell on the way up (my current practice of selling on the way up and buying on the way down with ongoing dollar cost averaging into bitcoin of any extra income that I get).  So, I never really feel bad to shave off a bit of sales of bitcoin, here and there, because I already feel a bit "overleveraged," but NOT overleveraged so much as to have taken out of my 401k.  Anyhow, my point is that there can be a variety of ways to still achieve a kind of overleveraging approach while NOT breaking the bank, so to speak.

"Again"?  What is the back story?

I am not going to argue with you about any alt coin having any long term value, and that is part of the reason that I do not hold much alt coins at all.  Currently, I think that my total altcoin holdings amounts to less than 1% of my total crypto value territory; however, I still will maintain that the facilitation of scams is a short-term use case that can be quite profitable by a large number of folks who want to get involved in such shady business.  Even if its longer term fundamentals are not present, such scams and pump and dump use cases could be prolonged for much longer than either you or I are likely to live 50 years or more. In the end, the scams are likely to collapse and be replaced by other scams, but I am not going to concede to you that there is not value in that, which you seem to be caught upon long term viability which seems to be a bit of a different question.

Wear a helmet and shoulder pads, for the sake of science.

To the extent that it matters, such information is already embedded in the original tweet, misaligned whiteknight trolling fucktwat.

 

Yeah, right.       Looking for a bit of opportunism here, I see.   Showing your true pouty colours.