wow price of Block has dropped a lot. Im glad I got my refund. So whats going on here guys? Cliff notes  We Won. Next question? You've not answered my question. I asked for cliff's.. synechist? It's up 55% from the ITO price on Bter. And what about the drop to 0.00018487 on Bittrex? Someone bought like 20 blocks on bter above 19k, thats a legit pump, new floor now 38k |
|
|
|
69.5 BTC969.2 BTC Internet of blockchains bro |
|
|
|
Why are stealthcoin and spoetnik not banned yet?
All they do on this forum is troll coins ...
You consider stealthcoin's last 2 comments trolling? Just asking because I 100% agree with him. Spoetnik is on my ignore since months tho. |
|
|
|
It is comforting to see that you are eloquent enough to write the above sentences, however your behavior and posts seem to be in contrast with kenotic activity. I'm quite comfortable discussing the ethicality of my actions. I'm also quite comfortable, at present, with my actions, because I perceive them to be ethical. Happy to consider the possibility that they're not, of course. First of all, you have vested financial interest regarding blocknet and it is very hard to detach oneself from financial position and be unbiased observer. For instance, one of your latest post was about the blocknet price:
DO NOT POST SESC LINKS
and yet the price did go down. So you think that I'm trying to hype the price in order to deliver a return on my investment? What I stated is that "it's unclear whether it'll go down again at all." I do not believe that this constitutes hype in any sense. Neither do I believe that it's necessary to be an unbiased observer before one can give predictions on the price (not that I gave a prediction, mind you). All that's necessary is to disclose your bias (which in my case is obvious). I will remind you that it is not ethical to comment (even more hype) about the price of a coin in which you have active involvement and financial interest. You were hyping before regarding the success of the ITO, the battle won against the FUD (which is ridiculous on its own as there was no battle), calling people to put buy orders above Bittrex buy wall etc. I second this. He had several comments trying to hype up the coin and raise confidence in people with no technical arguments backing up the comments, ex.: why the price will not fall. How can he even think that he can argue in an unbiased way if he is financially invested. FYI synechist you are the official "PR" representative of blocknet and you: 1) try to argue against your bias while you are both employed and invested by blocknet 2) you write empty hype comments with no backing 3) go into personal arguments If you guys advertise the mighty Blocknet as the "Internet of blockchains" than act like it. My own opinion about Blocknet: Not sure who thinks linking together some few month old cryptos (and some few week old ones) can be called the internet of blockchains or even a revolution. Everything is open source, an experienced coder could just simply take every feature and put it into a coin instead of asking for a 2500 BTC ICO. Ps: Blocknet is dumping. |
|
|
|
Pretty elaborate fud campaign guys. You started dumping your XC and then pried out all this pre mine dumping crap and smear campaigns. Made it easier to buy up the cheap xc huh keep the thread booming until you have accumulated enough.
 Good one.  Yea but its the truth, I just have to sit back and skim over the fudder posts in here and I know where you all have your money, lets just name a few coins NOT under the same scrutiny...which has more weight in the scam categories - 50% insta mined Dark, SDC, Supernet None of these coins have copped it has hard as XC and Block have. Gutted jaded investors are worse then scorned women, you really are. You really leave your allegiances for those to read into it. This is why crypto will never work in the real world. We got Mr OP here who is arguing semantics and has no proof and the rest of you frothing at the mouth hoping to increase your bags because the hoard are only attacking coins they dont have an interest in, that IS a threat to their coins (when the Muppet argues about stupid things like not addressing things he never asked you will always be in a losing argument with fools like that - so you haven't proved or disproved a thing other than you like the sound of your own voice - right or wrong) Nothing in this thread has swayed me at all, when I look at your fav coins - there you all are trying to big note it, yet in turn in here to fud another. No one has solid proof as far as I am concerned with what has been said in this thread. Pretty fucking obvious. While I'm sure there are people here who own one or more of the coins you listed, I do not. Not that there's anyway for me to prove that as far as I know. I'm open to suggestions though. The big difference here is that while some people have made some pretty wild claims(Spoetnik), most people here are simply attempting to find the truth about XC. One problem is that a lot of the information in this saga is spread out over many threads, each with a lot of noise and a lot of posts to sift through. So given your attitude I'm going to assume you aren't familiar with everything that's been revealed. I made a post yesterday in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=846801.0;all with a few simple points that have yet to be addressed by someone from XC: 1) Dan drained the XC premine when there was a promise of transparency. And Synechist lied saying that it was drained by mid-September when in fact there was money being taken out of it up until late October according to the blockchain. 2) Dan has been consistently deceptive. If you honestly think that he doesn't frequently bend the truth and dodge legit questions then you're being willfully ignorant. 3) Dan deceived at best and lied at worst when directly asked if he had involvement in HAL by claiming he had no role in the development despite Promethus saying that Dan helped develop their anon. Even if Dan didn't physically write any code, he was involved in the development. It was confirmed by Prometheus that he was involved with more than just a code review. His wording has consistently been deceptive. It is unethical period. Please explain how that is not unethical. Dan doing a code review under the pretense of being an unbiased third party to lure unsuspecting investors in to a Prometheus pump and dump is the epitome of unethical behavior. How is could it not be? 4)Lie: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? NO
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841958.msg9396234#msg9396234Dan's excuse when caught was that he was 'frustrated'... 5) He was confirmed to have loljosh launch the clone coin by both n00bnoxious and Synechist in my deleted post from the blocknet thread. Him saying he "assisted with some QT work" is a lie. Launching the chain is much more than "assisted with some QT work". I'd seriously love to hear a defense of these actions. And yes, lots of people knew about the shadiness surrounding XC for a very long time. Dan Metcalf already had one of the worst reputations in the alt scene. But XC supporters would never know that outside their circlejerk of a thread. And to call it smear tactics is insane. It's mind boggling to see these shell shocked people continue to follow this group. It's wild to see these actions carried out while a group approves of them and applauds. It's like the Twilight Zone. Pretty much sums up the problem. Even if Blocknet is legit, Dan and his crypto career so far is based on deception and no one knows the full truth. He avoids straight answers with his wording, so he can avoid further legal consequences, regarding HAL, XC and relationship with Prom. This pretty much made me avoid investing in Blocknet even tho it is more than most coins did for crypto. |
|
|
|
|
Is it clean? How to mine?
|
|
|
|
Someone gonna get killed one day by scamming people like this !! Not great for crypto, but it was a question of time ... No way im gonna put btc in ICO
Nerds who invest in shitcoin IPOs won't kill anyone ever. |
|
|
|
|
I agree that Coinsource should also be fault on some people getting frauded, but come on.
There is a reason the dev could only scam around 60 BTC.
Because people who actually own a brain didn't invest into this shitcoin.
Learn from it.
|
|
|
|
I would like to know if there are several people posting under atcsecure on github or just Dan. This is a legit question and people actually made a research on it.
This is the best FUD YET!!!! LMAO!!!! but off topic, please self-mod and delete the post - the answer is NO!!! its called auto-correct from different access devices, I type extremely fast and hard - having used an IBM-101 Keyboard for years while coding, nothing like the feel of clink - **Touch devices **don't respond well to that method Deleted, im open for discussion. |
|
|
|
Please let the adults talk. I agree that blocknet is probably a scam, but your comments are not helping. 0 arguments just spam, please leave. Arch wasn't a scam neither Craig. |
|
|
|
as an outsider who hasn't invested big amount. This thread is pretty amusing. As someone who doesn't invest into ICOs I find it fun and enjoy that people lose $. |
|
|
|
mindblown, everything is pointing at the fact that he doesn't even code his innovations. |
|
|
|
|
Why is there a 13 sell wall at 2k?
Unsold ICO not burned?
|
|
|
|
blocknet ITO is fucked up and should be refunded
anybody got any word from bittrex guys? They are decent and should stop this madness
<bittrex> no ICO terms have been violated <bittrex> but we will conduct a review <bittrex> before opening the market or releasing the funds <bittrex> needless to say we are very unhappy with how things turned out <bittrex> we learned a lesson <bittrex> exclusivity is non negotiable in future offerings <bittrex> when other parties are involved, we can't ensure compliance with terms <bittrex> I wasn't consulted <bittrex> by the time the full terms were known we had already committed lol, they smell something |
|
|
|
atcsecure,
So now you're willing to say for the record that you had no involvement in HAL? You didn't develop for HAL?
And UTIL?
The only coins I have created are XC and Blocknet Yes, the only coins you have created are XC and Blocknet, but that wasn't the question. Wording is important here, Dan. Try to be straightforward, please. |
|
|
|
Not sure if anyone notices the main issue here:
Probably half the features on these coins (if not more), and atleast half the coins alltogether are the work of Dan M. and you are basically paying him a few thousand BTC's to link these coins together to share the work that has been already done.
Instead of being a honest dev and making 1 ultimate coin/project he made several coins that have been pumped and dumped under his name. And now they are linked together for a huge ICO?
I hate to fud but what the actuall fuck is this?
FUUUUUD Every single coin in the Blocknet has been chosen for its genuine innovation.
Some are very small, but carefully chosen nonetheless.
Butthurt because you went all-in? Screaming FUD won't help you here kid, I am not a fresh 0 activity account. |
|
|
|
|
Not sure if anyone notices the main issue here:
Probably half the features on these coins (if not more), and atleast half the coins alltogether are the work of Dan M. and you are basically paying him a few thousand BTC's to link these coins together to share the work that has been already done.
Instead of being a honest dev and making 1 ultimate coin/project he made several coins that have been pumped and dumped under his name. And now they are linked together for a huge ICO?
I hate to fud but what the actuall fuck is this?
Also congrats on working with prometheus Dan, you earned a 5* POD from me.
|
|
|
|
A lot of coins start out this way. No innovation, roadmap and so forth. XC was like this and now look at it.
The fact is, the dev has created a clean code base, which to me suggest he knows what he is doing. I have invested a small amount in this coin and plan to hold for now. This coin is far from dead IMO.
XC had a rumor going for it at start, people figured out it was made by Dan and several things pointed at it. Would a serious dev use this name for a heavily innovative coin? DarkShibe? Seriously? Long-term adoption with this name? This is a horror for anyone who deals with PR or Marketing. Doge rode on the back of a popular meme, thats a one in a million thing, but this isn't even funny just sad. rumor started about 3 weeks after launch. Also XC was originally named X11coin X11coin? Seriously? Still a better name, atleast its not some autistic meme trying to mimic 2 hypes. |
|
|
|
A lot of coins start out this way. No innovation, roadmap and so forth. XC was like this and now look at it.
The fact is, the dev has created a clean code base, which to me suggest he knows what he is doing. I have invested a small amount in this coin and plan to hold for now. This coin is far from dead IMO.
XC had a rumor going for it at start, people figured out it was made by Dan and several things pointed at it. Would a serious dev use this name for a heavily innovative coin? DarkShibe? Seriously? Long-term adoption with this name? This is a horror for anyone who deals with PR or Marketing. Doge rode on the back of a popular meme, thats a one in a million thing, but this isn't even funny just sad. |
|
|
|
I unignored you just to read the dribble you posted, as I said, look at your post history, every coin, every Ann, you are there fudding away, go make a new account son your done.
I 100% share his opinion and I never really fud on any coin. You invested in the 26th "dark" coin and this doesn't even have simple stealth adresses (which a dev could copy paste) or literally any features or ideas. How could you even earn money if you just throw it away on random anon devs and twitter hypes? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
