IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.
Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused. Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this. You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members. And what's the point in that? You're saying that to try and get yourself more trust. Giving it to just Sr. and Hero Members is pointless, and giving it to high posters would still result in inflated trust scores regardless.
|
|
|
Dogecoin unlocks in 6 days for me! Awwwww yeah ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I'm classified as a Supporter right now, only 4 L1 referrals and 1 L2 referral - it's going to be a while until I can actually cash out anything.
|
|
|
EDIT: Not sure if OP's story is all it seems to be anymore.
|
|
|
If I remove my signature today is that ok? As the cycle is basically ending now, will I still be paid for the posts I've made up to the point I remove my signature?
|
|
|
OP, the way you've put it is very confusing. Just put it into simple words: For instance, answer this one simple questions WITH A SIMPLE ANSWER:
If all 20 slots are taken and I make 100, 150, 200, 250 posts, what happens? Am I still paid, if not, why not?
He has made it pretty simple. There are 20 simple slots and 5 overflow slots. 20 people will get the first 20 slots worth of BTC. The first person to get 100 posts will get one of the overflow slots and will be paid his normal amount one more time. If one person makes 300 posts , he can get all the overflow slots for a grand total of 6 times his original payment , but only if he does this before anyone else makes 100 posts. TLDR; If you make 50 posts after being verified , you are guaranteed payment. The extra bonuses need you to post a lot and fast.Ah, that does make sense then. I'll be joining this signature campaign either today or tomorrow - whenever I can get rid of my current signature.
|
|
|
OP, the way you've put it is very confusing. Just put it into simple words: For instance, answer this one simple questions WITH A SIMPLE ANSWER:
If all 20 slots are taken and I make 100, 150, 200, 250 posts, what happens? Am I still paid, if not, why not?
|
|
|
Yeah, and escrow.ms doesn't need to. He removed the person from DefaultTrust so the issue is basically solved now.
|
|
|
It wouldn't have been the mods. Like I have told you, trust is very rarely removed unless some bot has started to spam negative trust all over everyone.
|
|
|
Damn, if you're the same guy as Thomas20078 from Ogrr/MMOExchange and Shine20078 from sythe then bitcointalk has definitely gained a very trustworthy member. Good luck dude, maybe I'll contact you soon for some BTC -> RSGP or PayPal.
|
|
|
You bumped it 10 seconds after 48 hours...damn son, that really is just sad. There's no way in hell that I can compete with that while still keeping my life ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
I can escrow if required, shoot me a message and we can work something out. I will hold the cryptocurrency on an exchange of your choice (on my account of course) and liquidate if required.
|
|
|
I could also host an escrow agreement for free. I will be joining this program in a few days once my current signature commitment ends.
|
|
|
0.05 BTC per 1000 words, which is around $30. Considering I'll be pushing out 1000 words of high quality articles per day if everything goes to plan, that seems like a very reasonable rate to me.
For you or him?! Both. Not sure what you're trying to say there, especially when I look at your own thread offering writing services, which starts at $40 per 1000 words. Are you trying to say he is being ripped off or me? Totally depends on how fast you write. I'd have thought that works out a little low for you. I can type at about 100 words per minute at my fastest. Factoring in everything like research it's actually very nice for me and still a good deal for the OP.
|
|
|
0.05 BTC per 1000 words, which is around $30. Considering I'll be pushing out 1000 words of high quality articles per day if everything goes to plan, that seems like a very reasonable rate to me.
For you or him?! Both. Not sure what you're trying to say there, especially when I look at your own thread offering writing services, which starts at $40 per 1000 words. Are you trying to say he is being ripped off or me?
|
|
|
Google Drive
You need permission
Want in? Ask the owner for access, or switch to an account with permission.
You need to set the permissions so that "Anyone with the link" has the permission to "View" or "Comment", depending on whether you want us to simply be able to view the spreadsheet or be able to leave comments on it about issues, etc.
|
|
|
0.05 BTC per 1000 words, which is around $30. Considering I'll be pushing out 1000 words of high quality articles per day if everything goes to plan, that seems like a very reasonable rate to me.
|
|
|
I have received a PM back from the OP which I have replied to, and I'm currently waiting for a response back from the OP. Hopefully this all works out well.
|
|
|
I find it funny that you two can bash uvwvj for having negative trust when the majority of his - note, untrusted - negative trust is from people who actually have a real negative trust score? I've never personally had any problems with uvwvj - while I haven't traded with him before I don't see him as the type to scam.
|
|
|
Each feedback is worth exactly the same, except that every 25 BTC risked counts for another feedback as far as I'm aware. The algorithm is quite complex, for example you can not get green trust within a month of joining the forum.
So basically, if Stunna gave out a second trust feedback to everyone who already has one, they would move to green? Or would the block number of the right side just increase without changing the overall colour to green? Potentially. As far as I'm aware, if they're spaced out over the course of 2 months (like they would be), with 2 positive feedback even from the same person, we could potentially see some people being boosted to green just for participating in a signature campaign.
|
|
|
Each feedback is worth exactly the same, except that every 25 BTC risked counts for another feedback as far as I'm aware. The algorithm is quite complex, for example you can not get green trust within a month of joining the forum.
|
|
|
|