Guys Livecasino.io has a hunting party event for Blackjack right now. You can win 5USDT for every 5 Blackjack you will get on any live table. This is a very good promotion to combine on crypto crunch wager requirements so that you can participate on 2 bonus promotion with 1 game alone. Using multiple seat at 1 table with minimum bet of 5$ each will increase your chance of completing 5 BJ quickly while you can play safe using basic blackjack strategy.
I don't know if everyone receive this promotion but I always get this promotion through my email. Happy Weekend Blackjack Guys!
I've received a mail about this promotion yesterday but when I click the link "Learn more" into the email I'm just brought to the promotion page where I don't find any promotion of this kind. Is it the same for other users? Has anyone received those $5 after doing 5 blackjacks? This is what I've received into my mailbox :   |
|
|
|
It's not worth the trouble in my opinion. Sportsbooks can spot arbitrage bets and they will limit you. If you are unlucky, they can even confiscate your money. Don't forget that all casinos and sportsbooks hide behind their TOS. Crypto bookies are licensed in Curacao. There isn't much you can do when they take your money and ban you. Curacao standards can't be compared with normal casino regulators. The little profit you could make isn't worth the headache if it goes sideways.
Ivekzg can maybe confirm it but I don't think their TOS prohibit arbitrage betting, it wouldn't be lawful and they have no oversight to know you have place another bet on the opposite outcome at another sportsbook. What sportsbooks don't like is players placing value bets, that is to say bets with positive EV, or odds above the real odds to happen in other words. So if you are able to make surebets without using value bets too frequently at the same sportsbook, you should be fine IMO. |
|
|
|
Just like TV station shows, where we have certain shows or movie series that are designated or referred to by some set of people are feminine shows or series. For example, in my own part of the world where I come from, TV station like Telemundo, Telnovelas etc. They're mostly regarded as TV stations meant for the feminine.
Now bringing this home as it concerns gambling, I ask, you as a gambler are there gambling games or sports that you think that such gambling games or sports are supposed to be mostly engaged in by a particular gender (as it suits such gender more), and why?
Mind you am not saying that gambling is gender-centric in anyway.
Women are famous to mainly play slot games, Moon Princess from Play'n Go and Starlight Princess from Pragmatic Play seem to have been made to suit this gender for example, but ladies are also known to enjoy playing lotteries, bingo along with poker. While classic table card games like blackjack and baccarat are mostly played by men. Roulette and craps are more neutral and randomly played by both genders IMO.   |
|
|
|
You can use stake as they will not create any hindrance when it comes to withdrawing any earnings no matter what the ammount is. As long as it is legit they will not create any problems.
many won big money on Stake.com even my friend won every month a few digits of USD, it's just that I'm not as brave as he is betting big money, actually to get a few digits of USD of course you have to be an expert at analyzing the sports he is betting on and I don't totally expert on that, but true you said at Stake.com everything is safe and no problem if you win big money there  Don't promote your casino by saying BS please. You haven't seen enough threads in the scam accusation section and posts on their ann thread about funds locked after winnings or unfair limits and restrictions applied to accounts without any warnings neither notice? Your casino don't like and don't want this kind of gamblers, he would be quickly banned. They like big players but if they lose money actually. OP needs a decentralized sportsbook, a parimutuel one or a betting exchange. |
|
|
|
Cela fait au moins 50 ans que l'on tente de nous faire peur avec ces éruptions scolaires. Chaque année on nous promet une éruption solaire qui va au mieux perturber nos installations et au pire faire de gros dégâts. Et puis... Rien.
Je ne suis pas spécialiste mais l'activité solaire est réputée depuis bien longtemps pour impacter les télécommunications par voie hertzienne, ça n'existe plus de nos jours mais au 20ème siècle il y avait beaucoup de cibistes et de radio-amateurs. Les stations de radios émettaient notamment sur une bande de fréquence dite AM ou grandes ondes permettant d'être captées depuis l'étranger, comme la fameuse "radio Londres" utilisée par le général de Gaulles le 18 juin 1944 notamment. Et quand ca captait bien les cibistes et radio-amateurs disaient qu'il y avait de la "propag", c'est-à-dire une activité solaire favorable. Peut-être que dans notre monde actuel on est moins sensibles à ce genre de chose, mais à l'époque on s'en souciait beaucoup plus. En tous les cas ça ne doit pas être très bon pour les satellites j'imagine. https://www.passion-radio.org/ham-radio-labs/propagation Les militaires et scientifiques ont certainement bossé dessus aussi, mais c'es très difficile d'atteindre la cible définie. Beaucoup de chances que ca tombe plus loin (dans un autre pays). Si les Russes essayaient sur l'Ukraine, il y aurait de grandes chances que ca tombe sur un pays de l'Otan, voire même que ca touche la Russie, ce qui ferait qu'ils se bombardent eux-mêmes.  Oui mais ca veut dire que si ils se fâchent, notamment en cas d'intervention directe de l'OTAN ou d'une armée d'un pays européen, ils pourraient utiliser cette arme contre nous, par exemple en faisant exploser une bombe nucléaire au-dessus de l'Atlantique, grâce à un sous-marin, pour éviter les dégâts humains directs tout en créant un gros black-out paralysant. |
|
|
|
|
1. Beterbiev
2. Round 5
3. 2
|
|
|
|
|
Game 1: 36, 16'
Game 2: 36, 29'
Game 3: 36, 30'
|
|
|
|
You have tried to say me (you) but i am not the defaulter. The person who defaulted the loan could just contact me. If the person contact with me then I would not create scam accusation as this amount of fund can be arranged within a short period of time. The reason i have mentioned just as a suspense no proof and no one know what happened.
Yes I know, sorry if my post was a bit equivocal but it was just an impersonal/generic you, because as you say no one knows what happened actually, so I didn't want to personalize my speech by naming and blaming SiNeReiNZzz specifically. I hope he is ok and he will come back soon to pay back your loan, but people should try to do their best to inform the lender when something is wrong instead of hiding. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_you |
|
|
|
Update:
Dear Trader,
Thank you for your reply.
Kindly note that we have thoroughly checked all the information you've provided, and, unfortunately, it can't be accepted as a valid source of funds report. We will not be able to proceed any further until the actual source of funds of the transaction in question is provided.
Please provide us with an actual source of funds, and we'll be happy to proceed.
Anyone understand what they want? I provided them with a cash withdrawal statement, a statement from work with annual income. They write in riddles without explaining what they want.
This is an obvious scam, look at the thread about the withdrawal issue for Doge. They've stopped to provide withdrawals for this coin since more than one year and a half (April 2021). And they are still accepting deposits without any warnings... So now I think they will try to steal the more funds they can until their bad reputation prevents them to get new customers. And if we look at the number of users on their chat and on twitter, they seem to be already half-dead actually. So we can expect them to definitively close their doors and to fly away with our funds in the coming months IMO unfortunately. |
|
|
|
Why would he scam for this tiny amount? It was very much possible to earn within a few week from signature campaign considering the pay rate these days we can see. Shame!
You are right that it is possible to earn multile times of my fund if the person was active on the forum. I can't imagine this type of incident may happen to a legendary member. I think there might have 3 reasons: 1. The person died 2. The person is in prison 3. The account has been hacked or sold/bough There might have any other reason but can't guess. Having been hacked, solding his account or being banned is not an acceptable justification. If you are an honest person you will contact your creditor through telegram or you will create a new account here to send him a PM or to post a message on the dedicated thread. Moreover the payback address is usually known, so you dont need to have an account to repay your loan at least partially. It's the same if you're jailed, you can ask someone to inform your creditor of the situation. |
|
|
|
When I saw January 16, I thought it was a 2 weeks old topic. Unfortunately after reading the thread I figured out it was a thread from last year. And I have to note that in one year nothing has changed. Deposits for Doge coins are still open (without any warning) but for unknown reasons withdrawals are still closed. They claim the wallet to be in maintenance but my coins left the deposit address for a bigger wallet in few minutes. If they are able to move them like that why they can't send them to the customers?  Have you tried to open the system monitor page about what they are saying? If you face such type of issue then are you able to sell your doge coin? If you can sell your dogecoin then sell on the and buy from another website. It will make you a little loss. The updates happened a long ago there is no reason to hold the fund for these types of time. Yes of course, I looked at their so called "system monitor" and they just say that the withdrawals are "offline" without ETA neither explanations. I just saw in their ANN thread that the wallet is in maintenance since April 2021 actually...   We can sell them on their spot market for sure, but the buying orders are just 10x times below the current prices of the market if you see what I mean. BTW if someone trusts them and doesn't bother to wait, he can buy Doges at a very cheap price there. |
|
|
|
I recently deposited 15147 Dogecoins onto HitBTC, At this time 16/01/2022 they are worth $2,767.25, i use Dogecoins for the cheap sending fees and most exchanges use this currency. I was not expecting a price manipulation of $666.00 when i received the dogecoins on the website.
I tried to withdraw my coins back onto another exchange and received this message " Withdrawals for this cryptocurrency are offline. Please refer to the System Monitor page for updates. " . Okay I'm not worried at this point as most exchanges have wallet maintenance from time to time, but then i scrolled through the internet and i see this exchange has been having issues for a very long time with their dogecoin withdrawals
and many many angry customers. You would think they would disable Dogecoin deposits! especially when this has been a problem for what seems a year, so i reach out to them through email i get this message When I saw January 16, I thought it was a 2 weeks old topic. Unfortunately after reading the thread I figured out it was a thread from last year. And I have to note that in one year nothing has changed. Deposits for Doge coins are still open (without any warning) but for unknown reasons withdrawals are still closed. They claim the wallet to be in maintenance but my coins left the deposit address for a bigger wallet in few minutes. If they are able to move them like that why they can't send them to the customers? |
|
|
|
|
Finally I start to like this game, I play it sometimes but I don't see many other players there till now. Streamers are nice but one thing I don't like very much is the rather high minimum stake ($0.20). You need to be careful of the volatility of the slot played by the streamer with such stakes, because if he plays a game with a small hit ratio it can suck your bank roll if you haven't a very large one. A history of the bets is lacking too.
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know how to quickly find the available balance when you want to place an order? Because the balance at the top of the screen is not the available/reaming one for orders but the global one, ongoing orders included. The only way I've found till now is to go to the Funding page and then to the withdrawal tab of the specific coin. Needless to say, this is convenient at all. On other exchanges there is at least a "100%" balance feature that helps to view the amount available, but not there.
|
|
|
|
facile gemini, nexo, binance pour les plus connus.
Il n'y a pas de plate-forme sûre. Ce qui était sûr hier sera dangereux aujourd'hui et vice versa. Vous pouvez essayer de suivre les flux de trésorerie pour assurer la sécurité de la plateforme, mais en tant qu'utilisateur ordinaire et sans données supplémentaires, vous ne pourrez pas prédire avec précision la faillite d'une plateforme. La meilleure solution est de ne pas garder votre argent avec eux et de le retirer immédiatement après avoir terminé la transaction. Malheureusement parfois la faillite n'est que virtuelle ou organisée. Avec les cryptos il n'y a pas de banque qui encaisse les fonds donc on peut en faire ce qu'on veut et les cacher où on veut puisque ca n'est pas difficile de trafiquer des comptes à l'aide de comptables véreux. Et même pour les plus propres, avec les cryptos on est malheureusement jamais à l'abri d'un fameux "nous avons été hackés". Donc essayer de suivre les flux de trésorerie comme tu dis, n'offre pas une tranquillité d'esprit totale, ca permet juste de détecter ceux qui sont les plus susceptibles de fermer les premiers. |
|
|
|
One fairly common complain among gamblers is they are allowed to make a deposit at casinos and lose their money without any issue, but if they happen to win and they want to make a withdrawal then they are hit with a KYC request almost immediately, Tonybet a fiat Estonian casino was fined more than 400,000 pounds for this practice and it seems the regulators are now interested in making reforms to the laws and force casinos to also make checks on those gamblers which have lost a lot of money. If those new regulations are passed they will affect not only fiat casinos but cryptocurrency casinos will have to eventually follow them as well, do you agree with this idea? Would you like to see casinos to be fined more often for the practice of only asking for personal information from winning gamblers or do you think this will have a harmful effect on their finances? Source: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jan/18/tonybet-fined-regulator-online-betting-id-checks-terms"Would you like to see casinos to be fined more often for the practice of only asking for personal information from winning gamblers or do you think this will have a harmful effect on their finances?" I don't really understand your question, why do you ask "or"? We can't think it will harm their finance AND/BUT it's ok if those scammy casinos are fined, lose their licenses and are banned from countries which take care of their citizens? AFAIK the casino you advertise is well known for doing this kind of things despite its UK license. I wonder what UK regulators will say about them now? |
|
|
|
I just googled the return percentage of online casinos and saw different percentages that doesn't seem real. A slot machine can be written to pay out 98%, but its programmed to pay 90% and it's publicized that way to attract more people to play using that slot. Though one slot could be paying out that amount in the casino, yet my point is that no casino offers 100 percent payout that means if a slot pays out 94 percent for every 100 dollar bill spent on that machine the player losses 6$ to the casino. That is if you play longer times you'll lose, and we can almost never stay atop of the slot machines after long period of plays, unless you win a jackpot. Even if you win a huge amount, you can lose. They are numerous stories of people who won the jackpot and ended up spending the whole money back on the casino within a short period, 1 or 2 years, they lost the jackpot.
Jackpots are taken into account by casinos to calculate their house edge from a game of course. And they don't want to have games with negative house edge except for promotions during short periods of time. So even when you win a jackpot on a game you are not likely to make profits if you play it since very long time unfortunately. It only happens when the jackpot is worth millions times your average stake but it's quite unusual, jackpots are worth 10 000x max in general. |
|
|
|
Limiting the slot game to use for completing the wager is a very sucks rule even though it has fewer wagering requirements since some slot games have a very low RTP and low hit ratio which will burn so much money in able to win. I experience participating in a bonus like this and I didn't do it again because it's very painful to play a slot game that you didn't like while you are already losing a significant percentage of your bankroll even though you are not yet close to completing the wager. Deposit bonus that is free to wager on any game is the best bonus even with slightly high wager volume since some games like Blackjack or Play'n Go slot is very useful to farm wager with minimal risk of losing huge amount.
Why do you think Play'n Go slots are more useful than other to reach wagering requirements with smaller risks to get big losses? AFAIK their RTP are not very high. Between 96 and 97% for their most famous ones. That's a rather common RTP among slot providers, so I'm not sure they are more interesting than others for that purpose. |
|
|
|
Je n'ai pas vraiment d'explication à part peut-être une amélioration du contexte macro-économique (baisse de l'inflation aux USA). Et aussi l'idée que les gens sont au courant du narratif autour du halving: plus les jours passent, plus on se rapproche du halving. Je crois avoir lu aussi que Blackrock voulait trader du Bitcoin et des cryptos. Par ailleurs, l'affaire FTX semble avoir été digérée. La faillite de Genesis n'a eu aucun effet sur le cours du btc qui a retouvé le niveau juste avant le début de l'affaire FTX. Je n'exclus pas le retour de la baisse, ne serait-ce que pour des "raisons techniques". Mais n'ayant pas prévu la puissance de la hausse actuelle, je suis mal placé pour faire des prévisions.  Qui aurait pu la prévoir, les résistances ont toutes sauté en quelques jours, y compris la resistance psychologique des 20K. Blackrock, tu es la 2eme personne aujourd'hui à me les citer spontanément, et c'est également ceux à qui je pensais moi-même. Il faut dire qu'il n'y a pas énormément de structures, y compris étatiques, capables d'investir assez de fonds pour provoquer une telle hausse. Le sauvetage de Core Scientific au moment où tous les investisseurs fuient le secteur paraissait déjà très surprenant il y a quelques semaines. Etonnant de prêter autant d'argent à une entreprise en faillite parce qu'elle n'arrive justement plus à éponger ses dettes mais peut-être que Blackrock a foi en l'avenir de BTC et est convaincu que le cours du marché va remonter dans les prochains mois (avec peut-être un petit coup de pouce de sa part?). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
