| Borrower: ruggedman_dan | Lender: redsn0w | 0.30BTC (0.33BTC) | Collateral: forum account | 14/11/2015 | Reference | Active |
code: [tr]
[td] Borrower: ruggedman_dan [/td]
[td] Lender: redsn0w[/td]
[td] 0.30[BTC] (0.33[BTC]) [/td]
[td] Collateral: forum account[/td]
[td] 14/11/2015 [/td]
[td][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1022817.msg12843761#msg12843761]Reference[/url][/td]
[td][color=#10D624][b]Active[/b][/color][/td]
[/tr]
Thanks. |
|
|
|
You'll be eagerly checking every ~2 weeks for activity update then  i think it must be specified that legendary rank should get in some particular rank like other ranks do I rather enjoy the randomization for the last obtainable rank for any bitcointalk user. I also prefer the randomization, it is very interesting and curious to not know exactly when you will be a 'legendary'. |
|
|
|
Why this thread is in the meta section  ? #reported. |
|
|
|
1D21VbzEakD5sdTPajcXDBkj9Ev3Uqxnic
--BEGIN SIGNED MESSAGE--
this is ruggedman_dan
Loan amount: 0.3 BTC
Repayment amount: 0.33 BTC
Loan date: 10/31/15
Repayment date: 11/14/15
Collateral: Forum account
--END SIGNED MESSAGE--
Gzq607DCIrZMh1ioJa11r8gYVyeBsi/53X1HtorN0is0aePxM4CRWABRV4e4ljsaFcW5lJm/AhTCjGlyxYm2s6k=
Access data changed and bitcoin sent: https://blockchain.info/it/tx/88e04838f37d1f9d1a182b9152ff06e13044d51096db87468cab1569f3ea1aa3Repayment must be made to : 1GkGt3218AM8FU7ZGDCeZS4LWZR8xeZcjf on or before the 14th of November 23.59 PM If someone can quote this post, it would be really appreciated! |
|
|
|
|
As HostFat said it is impossible to find an alt account, without the IP check (but it is so easy to change or hide the ip address). So there isn't the 100% of security that those are real alt account, I suggest you to close this useless thread because you don't have valid proofs.
|
|
|
|
Loan Amount:0,015
Amount to be repaid:0,0185
Repayment Date:6/11/2015
Collateral:this account
Reason:bet
Bitcoin Address:1PwZkzix1crRv9PU83m1USHxLmsyxCxrL8
I think you have already received the loan and this is the transaction id: a9f9e729e23921c7573c9639887dd28c80d51d8697fc00035ae75baf0828a43e ( link). So it is not more necessary my "help". |
|
|
|
Loan amount required:0.045 BTC
Repay amount: 0.05
Repay date: 30oct
Collateral: this account
Bitcoin address: 15W8vFrwh6RYDYRq3sAT84kcTjWNAeBKSW
Denied. |
|
|
|
Signature campaigners themselves check the quality of post before paying to members using their respective signature.I think they are the right people to decide because they are paying for posting after all.Other users can simply put them on ignor list if they find their posts useless or repetitve
I don't think they care. They only want their stuff advertised, so to them it doesn't really matter. They are definitely NOT the right people to be judging this. There are many campaigns where the posters are all low quality posters yet they still get paid for all of their posts. This is being discussed in the staff section and the mods are trying to figure out a way to deal with the signature campaigns. The general consensus is that the forum does not want signature campaigns to go away completely, however that is a possibility if the forum cannot get otherwise cleaned up. One option being considered is to allow signatures to be hidden on a per-user basis and if enough of a similar signature were to get hidden then all similar signatures would get hidden by default.
I would say that for the most part the worst signature spammers have been taken care of, and the overall browsing experience has improved from ~15 months ago, and even from ~5 months ago.
How would you know what is going on in the staff section? Unless you have an alt that is staff  lol I don't think QS owns a staff account.
However, I think the staff should take a important decision. |
|
|
|
But as QS has mentioned , I would definitely not consider his posts understood to most people. It seems his primary language isn't english.
As a native English speaker, I can understand him perfectly. It's obvious that he knows what he is doing and has no intention to stop. Read some of his posts once again, he is clearly not a native english speaker. Another point he doesn't ask the same question again and again, at least I didn't find so when going through his posts , maybe he just posts repetitive questions over a long range of posts so that they are not visible when going through his recent posts. Repetitive = spam or am I wrong? Eh, kind of. Repetitive would be the same thing over and over again. Spam encompasses both repetitiveness, uselessness, etc. His posts are definitely spam, though, basically on the level of a bot which copy and pastes phrases and matches them up, but it seems here that it's just a human typing vaguely related stuff at speed to earn money. It was a rhetoric question  . However it is obvious he is posting only to earn money, this is clear. |
|
|
|
But as QS has mentioned , I would definitely not consider his posts understood to most people. It seems his primary language isn't english.
As a native English speaker, I can understand him perfectly. It's obvious that he knows what he is doing and has no intention to stop. Read some of his posts once again, he is clearly not a native english speaker. Another point he doesn't ask the same question again and again, at least I didn't find so when going through his posts , maybe he just posts repetitive questions over a long range of posts so that they are not visible when going through his recent posts. Repetitive = spam or am I wrong? |
|
|
|
eh, I am not sure if this person should be banned as I would not quite consider his posts to be insubstantial. However I certainly agree that he is only posting to earn money from his signature campaign which reflects poorly on both the company he is representing (via his signature), and on the campaign manger itself.
I would not want him in a campaign that I was running personally.
A lot of users are posting here only to earn money from the various signature campaign. Yup, and I would not want any of them (at least not the majority of them) to be in a campaign that I am running. The person in the OP isn't making nonsense posts, but it is evident that he is not really interested in the threads he is posting in. So he can't be banned (based on your opinion). The problem is that you are not a staff member so you can't decide, however I have reported a post wrote by him. I am saying that based on the current forum rules he probably will not be banned. It is not a requirement to be a staff member to known and be able to interpret the forum rules as they are all public as is the vast majority of the decisions and clarifications regarding the rules. Also staff members are not able to ban people, only global moderators and admins can, however for something like this it would be most likely that only admins should be banning this person (if applicable) because what he is doing most likely does not warrant a permanent ban, and only admins can hand out temp bans Yes of course, but also an admin or global mod is a 'staff member'. I think the signature campaign should be 'managed' in some way, otherwise the forum will become really bad (due this type of users). |
|
|
|
eh, I am not sure if this person should be banned as I would not quite consider his posts to be insubstantial. However I certainly agree that he is only posting to earn money from his signature campaign which reflects poorly on both the company he is representing (via his signature), and on the campaign manger itself.
I would not want him in a campaign that I was running personally.
A lot of users are posting here only to earn money from the various signature campaign. Yup, and I would not want any of them (at least not the majority of them) to be in a campaign that I am running. The person in the OP isn't making nonsense posts, but it is evident that he is not really interested in the threads he is posting in. So he can't be banned (based on your opinion). The problem is that you are not a staff member so you can't decide, however I have reported a post wrote by him. |
|
|
|
eh, I am not sure if this person should be banned as I would not quite consider his posts to be insubstantial. However I certainly agree that he is only posting to earn money from his signature campaign which reflects poorly on both the company he is representing (via his signature), and on the campaign manger itself.
I would not want him in a campaign that I was running personally.
A lot of users are posting here only to earn money from the various signature campaign. |
|
|
|
melisande https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=365124Please, just look over his/her post history. I see his posts everywhere. Some don't make sense at all while others are obviously posted just to boost the post count. A lot of the times, he/she asks useless questions that have already been answered with no interest in the actual product/service being offered. So... will this user be banned, or at least receive a warning? P.S. I know I have am wearing a signature as well but mine is a fixed-payment signature. Have you reported the 'most spammy' post of melisande through the report to moderator button? |
|
|
|
you would need to fork the blockchain. i'm sure he cant do it. I can not do it today on mainnet. I haven't said that it is impossible always. Maybe tomorrow? |
|
|
|
Can you make a test?
This is my address bitcoin 1GkGt3218AM8FU7ZGDCeZS4LWZR8xeZcjf send me a PM once you'll start. Not today, man. On mainnet. We can test this on testnet or on altcoin network. Why not the real BTC blockchain? because he cant. He said I'm wrong, but you can't double spend a 1 conf. BTC transaction. It's real impossible . |
|
|
|
Can you make a test?
This is my address bitcoin 1GkGt3218AM8FU7ZGDCeZS4LWZR8xeZcjf send me a PM once you'll start. Not today, man. On mainnet. We can test this on testnet or on altcoin network. Why not the real BTC blockchain? |
|
|
|
However, you can't double spend a tx once it has 1 or more confirmation.
wrong Can you make a test? This is my address bitcoin 1GkGt3218AM8FU7ZGDCeZS4LWZR8xeZcjf send me a PM once you'll start. Good luck ! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
