Not only those who have said bitcoin died on its way until now, almost many people and companies doubted the journey of Bitcoin, but in fact all these assumptions were wrong and turned to accept as payment.
This phenomenon occurs not without reason, but when companies begin to see opportunities for the use of bitcoin in accepting payments, that is where bitcoin will be considered as something quite important in its application.

Some companies that have accepted payments use Bitcoin.

• Amazon

• Starbucks

• Apple

• Overstock

• Namecheap

• Microsoft

• Paypal

If some of the large companies that I mentioned above have accepted bitcoin, it is impossible for other companies not to adopt it, especially if the use of bitcoin can facilitate transaction access and data transparency for certain needs for companies.
Public awareness and companies are increasing objective about bitcoin, so the scope of bitcoin can make it easier for them to be more advanced in their use. Even no one can resist technological advances, but the need for the use of bitcoin will be increasing widespread throughout the world.

So far Juventus are not in good condition, they have lost a lot of points in the matches they have played. Lastly they lost to Monza, where if you calculate the strength of the players owned by Juventus it is clear they are more superior, but unfortunately Juventus lost their vision in playing, so they again lost three points in the match.

Many people think that Juventus' condition is getting worse because Pogba and their new signings have not played well and have not contributed anything to the club, even though Pogba himself is still injured and has not found his best level of play since moving from Manchester United

Massimiliano Allegri is increasing difficult to develop Juventus' game, because at the moment they are experiencing a storm of injuries to several players, so the option to rotate players does not match the main strengths they have.
Juventus did not get so good results in the previous few matches, so the points achieved have not been able to raise the ranking in the standings.
The latest news, Massimiliano Allegri is threatened with being fired, if Juventus' performance does not improve in the next match.

and it looks like you are wrong to mention the defeat received by Juventus, because the real result Monza won 1-0 against Juventus.

The three points you mentioned seem to be the deciding factor for Juventus playing badly, but actually I'm more focused on the storm of injuries and the coach's strategy that hasn't fully worked out in line with the team's needs.
Because if you pay attention, this season Juventus is not much different from the previous season.

Psychologically, people who have aged have memory and ways of thinking that are getting slower, this is clearly driven by age. Several studies that I read, it turns out that people who are elderly have limitations in thinking, acting and doing things so quickly.
So that at this time elderly people are considered no longer potential in career development and achieving success.

From the few people you mentioned, it doesn't represent 50% of the elderly people on earth who can achieve success.
If you calculate the success rate of elderly people around the world, there is no correlation between old age and total success.
This is in line with the vision and mission of large companies, that retirement is determined at an age that is no longer productive at work, but most people are no longer productive when they are in the elderly category.


Only a few percentages of the examples you give, but if you calculate the whole world for elderly people, then the examples are not very precise and accurate in my opinion

Thus, old age can be said to be unproductive in career development and achievement of the value of success.
The successful cases you mention don't represent 50% of parents in my opinion.
And it can be concluded that the five examples you mention, have a good fate line, and the process they go through is a perfect timing and hand line.

Re: Satoshi Nakamoto- If he ever made himself known what would make you believe it?
Category: Good Reply & Answer
Section: Bitcoin Discussion

Re: Mining Bitcoin
Category: Good Reply & Answer
Section: Bitcoin Discussion

Re: The Impact of the Capitalist System on People's Economic Practices, Really?
Category: Good Reply & Answer 
Section: Economics

Re: Is the pet industry recession-proof?
Category: Opinion
Section: Economics

Re: Don't worry, bitcoin is cyclical
Category: Good Reply & Answer
Section: Bitcoin Discussion

Anyone can claim the creator of bitcoin, but no one can prove Satoshi's Identity. Even I don't think his parents knew Satoshi as closely as we think today, the great work created by him is more important than his identity, so bitcoin is the most sought after by people and doesn't really care how people think about it

And also want to reverse your question, to what extent can one believe that it is Satoshi out of many who have made confessions, if he really wants to reveal his identity can anyone believe it and what evidence do you think he should have?
Being there to convince people wasn't easy and it wasn't like Satoshi wanted to do that.

Just imagine many other people who do not hate bitcoin, so bitcoin is growing very rapidly for now.
I mean like this, to link bitcoin, Satoshi and Government is no longer a problem, it's better that we no longer try to talk about it, the most important thing is that people's awareness of bitcoin has been very developed, because many people understand better and this is the best solution in investment.

The question is why did he do that.
to be famous?
to be appreciated?
or wishing for a nobel prize and other things in private.
and I honestly don't think Satoshi expected that, from what he created such a huge masterpiece with bitcoin.

No one can even guarantee where he is now, or maybe he's quite close to us on this forum.
The message he left was nothing more than the development of Bitcoin which is growing and advancing, because this is more rational than anything else.

People limit the relationship between privacy and work, because they have big dreams for change, but it seems these people are more comfortable keeping their identity a secret, compared to a nobel prize or anything for an Award.
If you want to create great things, then think about doing what Satoshi did, because of the many great works that have been created, only Satoshi is the only person who has a big heart and is not rash when it comes to identity.
So what we see, he has been living comfortably without anyone knowing about it, and just imagine if his identity was published in the media, what would happen to him and his family.

Your last sentence, is actually the answer to many of the questions you have given, if you are able to analyze and understand the sentence.
Simple and quite practical to answer questions people ask about Satoshi.

For now, ASIC prices vary quite a bit, depending on the year of production and the quality of the mining products, but the problem is that it is not enough to only use one, for this reason it seems that not everyone can achieve it.
After all, there are several important factors to consider before buying an ASIC.

1. Hash rate
2. Efficiency
3. Price

How many hashes a Bitcoin miner can generate per second, to get the most out of mining done with ASICs. This efficiency is important to ensure the hardware can run as efficiently as possible in mining, while the price determines the equipment used and can generate maximum profit.
The cheaper the device purchased, the lower the bitcoin mining generated and if the mining hardware is expensive and quality, the more bitcoins will be generated.
Don't try to buy miners based on price or hash rate alone. The best ASIC miners are the most efficient bitcoin miners.

Some Countries have differences or vary for the cost of electricity required to carry out mining, the electricity available by the government will not be able to offset the income generated by ordinary bitcoin mining.
this will not be optimal, because expenditures and income costs will never be balanced if we use the electrical engineering provided by the government, unless we can build our own environmentally friendly electricity system.

Regarding the quality of knowledge related to mining, it may not be a big problem, because nowadays there are many sources that can be easily learned, so it's not a big problem in my opinion.
Of course we need to learn before starting mining, so that the basic mining needs are known and can be implemented perfectly.

We can avoid the state's legal attitude towards bitcoin mining and not violate any rules, by buying or building a self-contained electrical system that is environmentally friendly and does not have an impact on environmental damage, so that none of these are violated in regulatory procedures.

Such as companies that use independent and environmentally friendly electrical systems. However, the problem is that the costs incurred are quite large and not everyone is able to fulfill them.

Based on the above considerations, very few people want to mine using this method, if the quality of support is not adequate in carrying out the process, this will have no impact if the required tools are not available and are still quite complicated to fulfill.
Therefore, the cost of expenditure will not be offset by the mining results obtained, thus we are wasting time in the wrong place.

We can see the cycle of bitcoin's journey from several years of its journey until now, it's not so strange the picture you show to people who have known bitcoin for a long time and of course for beginners this is more suitable and must be integrated.
Even in real life the cycle is something that cannot be ignored or separated, it is directly related to the process of its journey.

"That's why bitcoin is more rational compared to others".

This is called a cycle

and this is part of the bitcoin journey cycle process, which is increasing logical and can be understood easily, without neglecting the close relationship with speculative.
Basically this is in line with natural processes in human life that are in accordance with the behavior that will be caused.
Without these two things, bitcoin would not be as rational as we see it today.

That's how bitcoin works in generating the next ATH achievement, bitcoin's growth is far more advanced when compared to any investment model, even though the presence of technology and science is the driving force for bitcoin to grow.
Uniquely, bitcoin does not need testing, does not need to be used by many people and does not have to involve big people in its ownership, in order to push bitcoin to be more valuable and advanced.

Bitcoin runs itself according to progress, needs and can adapt to the complexity of people who want to get out of the chaos zone of financial freedom.
Speculative is another part that can be found in all forms of investment.

This is actually very different when viewed by beginners or the more extreme dislike of bitcoin, because their understanding still considers bitcoin speculative and the same as gambling.
But don't worry, people who are experienced and very familiar with bitcoin must already know this problem very well.

The last sentence is the best way to remove the fear, worry and panic from every cycle generated by bitcoin, in quotes "beginner"

And I don't expect an ending like you know, but I want to see a beautiful ending for a fat goose laying ten eggs a day, because honestly I don't want to poison them and end up just dying.

Actually I do not want to avoid, but in fact you have assumed.
It seems I didn't mean that, more specifically I didn't mention the loan you meant.

Its nature is more to companies that deal with housing problems, so people are forced to follow their rules, and of course the purchase becomes the burden and responsibility of the buyer, if they take this route to buy a house.

This is where the real problem arises, the person you are referring to also does not fully understand how to invest in bitcoin, even the people around me are not very familiar with bitcoin, so the decision to buy a house prefers this way.
What needs to be underlined is that the company is the first party that owns the capital and simultaneously builds the house, while the second party is the bank as the guarantor for the purchase of the house.

There's no need to buy from me, and I'm sure you misunderstood the conversation we're having, or I don't quite understand the content of your question.
This is to be straight and not misunderstood, I mean the purchase of a house is a purchase from a private party, they are investors who build houses, while the buyer is free from anyone, but there is an agreement with a second party as a guarantor.
So, I mean houses as dead assets, because they buy houses to live in, not to resell as the first party did.
Well, on this basis I think people should learn more about bitcoin investment, when the investment they plan goes well, then to build a house there is no need to follow them, but we can build our own with the size and model we want.

My focus is here

This is only a piece of knowledge that we can share in real life, this concept clearly has positive and negative values in practice, and not everyone likes or dislikes the concept, so let the choice be the responsibility of each individual.

Technical talk can be learned according to one's preferences before getting further involved in investing, that's why a more systematic and measurable introduction to this problem is needed, so that people can know the functions and the best way to invest in bitcoin.

Then if not bitcoin as a basis for consideration in investment decisions taken, what can we provide another example in your opinion?
The problem now is not that bitcoin has been around for several years running, but the value of investing in bitcoin is much better than any other investment system.
As for investing at the highest price and losing 60% as you mentioned, it is just a technical matter to enter the market under the right conditions. I'm also less sure that anyone would lose investing in bitcoin, if that complete understanding is known, either how to enter the market or buy at the right time.
That's why I say investment requires knowledge, does not work according to a narrow understanding, bitcoin is said to be good and perfect because of the long process they have gone through.

From what angle is bitcoin being harmed and what big problems should we be afraid of?

It's just improvisation before getting to the actual point of discussion, does this look funny and ticklish. Grin Grin
Because basically I'm the type of person who likes humor before getting more serious into the discussion.

I prefer to take two pieces at once, the golden goose and the egg, because it will breed in the future  

That's why we have to name bitcoin golden goose in quotes in our discussion, whereas golden egg can be classified under other cryptocurrencies in general.
If the use of both can be done well, appropriate adjustments to the target when entering the market and using a measured strategy in investment, it is not impossible that investment is a step out of the capitalist system.
In the end we can conclude that bitcoin is the best source to run investments for now.
To be more convincing, I have accurate evidence of bitcoin travel for more tangible benefits for me Bitcoin Changes Lives, Touches Non-Formal Education for Underprivileged Children

Since this is a discussion about the house as a place to live, it can be concluded that there is almost no income value from previous purchases, because basically a residential house is a dead asset that has no income value.
It's not like people turning 5K into 30k in buying some coins in the next three years, as long as the coins purchased have good potential value and movement.
So it can be concluded that the benefits obtained will be maximized in the future, in accordance with the involvement in the investment taken.

Everyone should have the opportunity to choose financial freedom, without being compartmentalized in one or two systems.
If the opportunities we have are greater in the cryptocurrency space, why not make this a solution to exit any system.
Try to think big to produce more tangible benefits in our own lives.
Because if we don't change, then who else should we give this responsibility to?


CONCLUSION

It also doesn't look easy for Liverpool to destroy Chelsea, in the Premier League Liverpool have won just two of the six weeks they have played, drawing three and losing once against Manchester United.
When viewed from the series of matches they have played, Liverpool are also in a bad condition.
Likewise with Chelsea, they only won three times, lost two and drew one, from the six weeks they played.
That means both Clubs are in the same trouble.
It's just that Chelsea is superior in the number of wins, but not necessarily Chelsea can beat Liverpool in that match, I think a draw is more than enough for both of them.

Football also has an important role in terms of discipline and hard work, the players will build awareness to work together to improve skills.
This factor will influence the club to be better than before, since the coach was taken over by Erik Ten Hag, Manchester United have progressed, although in the first two matches they lost.
Erik Ten Hag is a coach who loves discipline and hard work, and it is evident that Cristian Ronaldo has lost his influence, not playing from the first minute and only coming off the bench as a substitute at the start of the season.

Erik Ten Hag has similarities with Pep Guardiola, although it is clear that the contribution of the titles given cannot be said to be the same, especially since Erik Ten Hag has just coached a big club, while Pep Guardiola has been for a long time. So that the comparison of Pep Guardiola's success cannot be compared with Erig Ten Hak who has just coached Manchester United.

Atlético Madrid is a club that uses a defensive strategy in every big game, almost all competitions that I have seen, atlético Madrid do have a pretty good defense, even their defensive strategy is difficult for opponents to penetrate, although not all matches result in wins
But this time, Atletico Madrid played quite open and didn't defend completely, it's just that they were unlucky and unable to secure the points.

Ancelotti had other options but to include Rodrygo as a substitute for Benzema, but Ancelotti had a strong drive for the decision to play Rodrygo in the game, so Rodrygo took quite a good chance in this game.
Ancelotti was very right in taking this decision, so Rodrygo answered quickly in the 18th minute, Rodrygo's goal made the Real Madrid players more confident, so in the 36th minute Federico Valverde scored an additional goal until the first half ended.

When viewed from 90 minutes of normal time, Real Madrid actually had difficulty playing openly and lacked possession of the ball, because Atletico Madrid were quite dominant in possession of the ball and set the rhythm of the game.
But one thing I see is the mentality of Real Madrid really as the masters of La Liga, under any pressure they are able to make a surprise three points, Ancelotti is a coach who knows how to place the players' needs against any club.
For that I take my hat off to this old grandfather who still feels young.

Hello @LoyceV
Here are some entries that I have, I hope it doesn't disappoint you. Thank you

1. How to save as food inflation jumps more than 11% in a year

2. Is the pet industry recession-proof?

3. Differences in Cryptocurrency, Bitcoin and Benefits in General

4. The Impact of the Capitalist System on People's Economic Practices, Really?

5. Bitcoin Changes Lives, Touches Non-Formal Education for Underprivileged Children

Can we describe how shady, beautiful and enchanting bitcoin will be in the future, this dream is just a picture of the desire to fight the challenges of achievement, which was initially thought impossible to become more real.
Then where are we, when this achievement is perfectly realized?

Isn't Bitcoin the source of the solution?

Real Madrid was able to prove that they were able to maintain a positive trend in 6 weeks, previously Atletico Madrid wanted to end Real Madrid's positive trend at home, but in fact they were not too strong to beat Real Madrid.
Ancelotti did not risk resting Benzema, but the player suffered a knee problem against Celtic the previous week in the Champions League, which forced Benzema to rest in the Derby match, even in the match against Celtic Benzema was forced to come off in the 30th minute and was replaced by Eden Hazard.

Villarreal had six chances to shoot on target, but unfortunately didn't score more than one goal for them, while possession was won by Sevilla by a small percentage, the match was quite difficult and both clubs attacked each other, five Sevilla players were given a yellow card by the referee in the match for committing violation.
Five important saves were made by the Sevilla goalkeeper, which saw them avoid defeat and earn a point in the game.

This draw puts Sevilla in 15th place with five points, the next match will be even more difficult for Sevilla, because they will face Atletico Madrid on 01 October.

Even though the British Government allowed the Premier League to continue in the midst of the current mourning conditions. However, the Premier League chose otherwise.
It will be a loss for the postponed teams, given the hectic schedule of fixtures they will face going forward, and the other two matches to be played this week, without the same delay.

If the reason for the delay is 12 days of mourning in memory of Queen Elizabeth II. But it's actually unfair if other matches are still being played, it seems there is another reason for the delay, but it seems there is a lack of police personnel to protect the match

The cause of inflation is usually due to an increase in demand for a certain type of goods or services. When demand increases while the stock of goods available is not sufficient, there will be an increase in prices.

I've heard economists say that one way to suppress inflation is to stockpile basic foodstuffs, because these are needs that must be met and everyone must and is compelled to buy. I also have the idea of ​​keeping inflation lower, assuming that each head of household collects basic necessities for as long as he can. For example, where we live the main food is rice, so what has to be stockpiled is rice as the raw material for rice, because without rice it will be difficult for people to survive, while the side dishes can be adjusted.

Inflation is caused by several things, natural disasters, wars between countries and also caused by Distributors, because they know when demand increases they can sell at a higher price, so hoarding rice is a way to make a profit. Regardless of the impact and risks that will be experienced by many people, it is appropriate to suppress inflation by hoarding as much basic commodities as possible. Thus, when basic commodities are available to the public, the prices of these goods will automatically fall by themselves, so that Distributors will resell these staples at standard prices.

As far as one can argue about this, if there are special rules governed by the system, the power of the state is not greater than the influence of the kingdom, when compared to the presidential system, I think in this realm it is final, considering the many things and positive impacts that the Queen has made for the country.

Personally I don't really understand the legal and statutory issues in the royal system, that when the royal family leaves they are exempt from the death tax. Even if the law has been formed, talking about the legal power to change the law still looks weak to propose revisions, especially Queen Elizabeth II (Specific) is the longest-serving leader of the British Empire, reaching 70 years. I think it will be difficult to argue in this area. Even people in the parliament themselves do not dare to agree if someone proposes it.
Although in reality there may be many people who do not agree with these rules, but that is the royal system that applies to this day.

The capitalist economic system is a system in which private business actors own and control property according to their interests. An important factor of the capitalist economic system is the profit motive according to Adam Smith's theory. In his book entitled "Wealth of Nation", he explains the concept of laissez faire and the principles of the invisible hand.



These two concepts are the basic framework for the formation of the capitalist system theory, which includes the value of goods and services, structure, consumption prices, and production prices. There is a shortage in the capitalist economic system, because their goal is not to see the impact of consumers, but rather to the value of profits from the products and services issued. Thus it seems that the capitalist style will destroy the order of life of the little people, in making purchases, be it products or services.

Let's see how they work, in the area where I live, currently intensively promoting various types of houses, where they work with banks as third parties. However, in this case, the Bank is authorized to determine the prospective buyer, based on consideration of the criteria, employment status and agreed terms. However, it must be understood that Real Estate is different from Real Property, both which can involve the government in its management and those related to financing and settlement as building ownership.

Terms and Rough Figures For the Purchase of a Single House

1. Time period
This relates to the time period agreed upon by both parties (the Buyer of the House and the Bank), the longer the agreed year, the greater the profit received by the third party.
Because the buyer will continue to deposit every month according to the current year's agreement.

2. Advances
The amount of the down payment that must be deposited depends on the agreement between the home buyer and a third party (bank), taking into account the conditions they provide, the smaller the down payment, the greater the monthly deposit.

3. Monthly Installment
Installments determine the price of the house, because the smaller the agreed monthly installments, the longer the ratio of the specified repayment period, so the more expensive the house price.

• Term of 20 years

• Down Payment $5,370.21

• Monthly Installment Ratio $134.26

Let's count?

20 Years X 12 Months = 240 Months
1 Month Deposit $134.26 X 240 Months =$32,221.25
Down Payment $5,370.21 + 240 months Deposit $32.221.25 = $37,591.46

Total for one house $37,591.46

In fact, if we buy land and build our own house, without using their system, the money we need is about $16,781.90

So, if the term of the agreement is long (Current Year), then the third party will automatically benefit $20,809.56, because the monthly deposit will run according to the year and the agreed down payment.

This is an example I got in the field, a few weeks ago?
Actually, I have conveyed this example earlier in this post Why the european housing market is about to crash, But because I think this is interesting, then I try to recreate my post?

This looks pretty crazy, the way they rob people of financial freedom, where for a need (a house), people have to spend that much money and not to mention talking about monthly deposits during the agreed-upon agreement. Of course, the consumer has the authority to buy or not, but if it is considered a house is a necessity, what can they do?
In the context of Economics, there is nothing wrong with this capitalist system. But there should be other ways that can be done to not be burdened by the system, so that people are not trapped in something that is not necessarily capable of being done.

Now I want to combine buying a house using this system, with investing in crypto and bitcoin. Maybe this can be a reference, especially for those of us who are in this forum. If people currently choose to buy a house, then they have to make a down payment of $5.390,11 as a condition and they continue to deposit a monthly fee of $134,75 for the current period (20 years).

Just imagine, if we invest $5.390,11 in bitcoin or in altcoins, if the return on investment is maximum and we do it at the right time, then to make one house no more than 1, 2 or 3 years running time, without having to wait for repayment annual fees that run according to the agreement. Of course, the investments that we make also have the impact of risks and losses, if someone does not understand the pattern and the right time to enter the market, this problem is related to knowledge, which may be learned before starting an investment.

But that doesn't mean the risks are unavoidable. Because there are many things we can learn before starting, be it investment knowledge, strategies and how to enter the market at the right time. Because what I see, the pattern of buying a house that they do, is no less than the danger posed by investment, meaning that both processes have the same risk, only in different conditions and portions. Oddly enough to understand, if we want to get involved in such a home buying system, despite the opportunity for change, we can do so through investment.

Whereas in Crypto systems in general we are used to determining the direction of freedom we want to do. Instead I think, cryptocurrencies are a way out of a problem they can't solve, towards housing needs for low-income people. By making the right investments, we will save ourselves from problems that are considered incapable of becoming easier. Technology that has developed, will pave the way for everyone who wants to learn to do something new.

Why did I mention cryptocurrency and not specifically Bitcoin, because the concept is more accessible to the lower classes, because talking about cryptocurrencies in general, it has a cheap purchase value, but the return at a certain time is quite maximum.

I try to summarize some sectors that are vulnerable and resistant to the recession process, by looking at various considerations that support sectors in the US.

• Global Market

• Financial sector

• Real Sector

These three sectors are relatively large in the US, so the potential for recession is greater, in fact this is a picture of the most recession-prone sectors in various countries.
While the business industry that has resilience during a recession.

• Health

• Technology

• Education

Because these three industries are not sensitive to rising interest rates and these industries are needed by many people when the economy is in recession.

Meanwhile, the pet industry did not have a major impact on the occurrence of a recession, because the supply and expenditure of this industry was not directly related to secondary or primary needs. (replaceable)
Furthermore, a recession is associated with a declining domestic product, a negative real economy in two or more quarters and a major slowdown or contraction in economic activity or vice versa.

Including animal protection laws, but in the next comment you said that stray dogs and cats are caught for slaughter.


Do legal references only apply to pets, but not to wild animals.
This confuses me?
As far as I know the law is used in a general sense, there are no exceptions in its application.
If your assumption is correct, then the person living in the area you mentioned is breaking the law.

The area where I live, COVID-19 has started to disappear, activities involving face-to-face meetings are running as usual, although the economic impact has not recovered 100%.
However, it seems that it is no longer in the dangerous category, just waiting for the economic recovery to continue, because people still cannot get out of the economic problems that hit when Covid-19 occurred.