Actually if they let De Jong go to United I think a deal on Lewandowski can still be done but it looks like they continue to hold back both Lewandowski and De Jong.
It would be better if they could decide as soon as possible because indeed if this is allowed to continue then it will be increasingly difficult for them especially the transfer market is getting closer to the end, the more they hold on to it the harder it is to get a deal.
This means that something has to be exchanged to outsmart the team's needs next season, but reaching an agreement between the two clubs will also be problematic if player contracts are not seriously discussed in the near future, as the transfer window is about to end. I'm sure, this will not happen for the purchase of these players, with the difficulties they are currently experiencing Barcelona will have Lewandowski if in the future De Jong manages to move to Manchester United. The fee from the sale of Frenkie De Jong could be used to complete the process of Lewandowski's move from Bayern Munich. So there is no need to worry about the financial problems that are being experienced by Barca.
Lewandowski is too expensive in my opinion considering he is already over 30. Maybe Barcelona saw other things that Lewandowski had so they still wanted to bring him to Camp Nou.
It's different if Barcelona have an interest in other players who are much cheaper than Lewandowski, the problem is that Barcelona wants players who are mature and have great experience to bring back the Club, because in the past season Barcelona failed miserably in all competitions, the best option is to release De Jong, but until now there has been no agreement on a sale clause against De Jong, it is certain that Barcelona will find it increasingly difficult to get around the problem |
|
|
|
|
The World Cup is always discussed and the discussion is identical about Brazil, Germany, Italy, France, England, Spain and the Netherlands, even though there are still many other countries that have the same quality as them, although it has not been proven that they can win the Cup, strangely every World Cup is held , many people put their hope and gamble with the countries that I mentioned above, of course we understand that people do that, because history has recorded the country's records and achievements, but it is also undeniable, players from other countries have also developed so much for now
|
|
|
|
Almost all major transfers have been finalized. Only the possibility of Lewandowski's transfer to Barcelona remained. If Barcelona want to get him, they should finish this transfer without much bargaining. There is nothing that will make Bayern Munich give up Lewandowski so easily. Barcelona must pay the price Bayern Munich wants.
It looks like Barcelona will find it difficult for that, Barcelona is experiencing a financial crisis this season, meaning they have to be really frugal in spending on players, despite the fact that they need new quality players like Lewandowski, the clause offered by Bayern Munich could be preventing Bercelona from getting players. With that said, what Club management currently has to do is improve finances, not buy players who have fantastic prices |
|
|
|
But the most interesting thing is Indonesia, this country has been absent for 15 years in the Asian cup performances, so for now they are back in, mathematically Indonesia is not superior in the Cup, because indeed the quality and flying hours for Indonesia are quite doubtful in the Cup. .
Indonesia is my country, regarding indonesian football is indeed developing. Statically, Indonesia is not favored. Indonesia is ranked at the bottom for the 24 AFC participants in 2023. But I am amazed by the current new Indonesian coach. After they qualified for the AFC they reached the 155th place in FIFA. I hope that Indonesia can enter the knockout phase even though it is difficult. They are currently in the process of naturalising several players playing in europe, Jordi Amat, Sandy Walsh, and Shayne Pattynama. Maybe they can play in the competition. In addition, they are also looking for other European players who have descendants of Indonesian citizens who want to play for the Indonesian national team. This is a pretty good step taken by Indonesia, but football is not just a matter of naturalization of European players, because the strength of the team is built from the experience of players, coaches and mentality, 15 years absence in AFC for Indonesia, this is a long time to develop, Indonesia it will take time to make changes, starting from players, flight hours and centralized training, because most Indonesian players have difficulty getting into European leagues. Even if there is, it is not very developed, but it should be appreciated for a great achievement for Indonesia |
|
|
|
Arsenal have officially announced the signing of Fabio Viera from FC Porto in the fee around the region of 35 million Euros.The player will be looking forward to starting the pre season games with Arsenal as soon as the pre season starts.The player was very instrumental to Porto's team last summer after the player netted about six goals,and registered about 14 assists in just 26 appearances.Viera is a player that helps the front three score more goals because of his continuous passes in the final third. This deal is really a good one for Arsenal,and we will be hoping he will improve more at Arsenal.
If you look at Arsenal's game last season, Fabio Viera's role is quite needed for next season, last season Arselan was quite difficult to score big goals every game, because indeed there were no players who were able to provide assists to the forwards, but if Fabio Viera was able to adapt quickly, it is possible that next season Arsenal will have players who are ready to provide assists to their attackers, Fabio Viera's role is quite needed for Arsenal to compete in the title race and improve the standings in every match that will be played. I also believe that Fabio's presence in Arsenal will help boost their ability to score goals and push them forward because frankly, last season was bothering if you ask me. It also seems lukaku has fallen out of favor with Chelsea and may return to Inter as talks have it the San siro are intent on him. Fabio already showed his skills and abilities last season, so Arsenal were interested in signing the player, while last season Arsenal did not have a player similar to Fabio, who was able to provide accurate passes forward, so this was the right move to sign him. Fabio. Rumors are circulating that Lukaku will be taking a 30% cut in his salary at Inter Milan, and this player has agreed |
|
|
|
|
Is this a country that has won the Asian Cup?
Japan 4 times champion
Saudi Arabia and Iran 3 times champion
South Korea 2 times champion
Qatar, Iraq, Kuwait, Israel Australia 1 time champion
For now, it is too early to make predictions that which country will emerge as the Asian champion in 2023, but looking at previous experiences, all the countries I mentioned above have a chance to win.
But the most interesting thing is Indonesia, this country has been absent for 15 years in the Asian cup performances, so for now they are back in, mathematically Indonesia is not superior in the Cup, because indeed the quality and flying hours for Indonesia are quite doubtful in the Cup. .
|
|
|
|
the price of bitcoin has fallen below $20k and it is likely that the price will stabilize around $17k, but $17k is not a final buy point because if the price of bitcoin falls below $17k it will most likely touch $13k. No one expected this situation to actually happen but the crypto market is full of mysteries, so you have to be prepared for any situation because $13k is very real.
for now bitcoin is experiencing a small increase, so it is difficult to make precise predictions, the market is currently quite volatile and tends to be speculation made beyond expectations, I think if we do have the opportunity to make a purchase, it is now possible for us to do so, because if bitcoin has experienced a steady increase, for the purchase price will be higher and it is difficult to achieve a suitable return |
|
|
|
Despite no serious bull in the market for sometime, I am thinking to buy more because the price at which bitcoin is right now I can be able to afford it. I planned buying when the price was at 40$ , the amount of bitcoin I planned to buy is a small quantity which if the market eventually go dip i may lost 30% of it. But now I feel even if I buy and it goes dip it wont go dipper the way the price is now. What do you think about my plan?
First, I really like bitcoin to invest, because indeed this coin has a much faster movement compared to other coins, secondly bitcoin is a reference source for bull runs for other coins, so it is very appropriate if you make a purchase of bitcoin, because in the future when the market has returned to normal, the return on the investment you made will be quite maximum, just need to wait for the right time for bitcoin to strengthen |
|
|
|
In my opinion, $13K is quite possible this week for Bitcoin. But whales are confuse for dumping more because they know Bitcoin has more value and it is undervalue around $13k. So more dumping means draining their bags so quickly. People are really hungry for Bitcoin in new inflationary era.
People will collect as much bitcoin as possible in a corrected market condition like now, but we also have to be aware, that the whales will make a surprise after this correction phase recovers, if it has a chance to buy, then do as much as possible, because I'm pretty sure in the future Bitcoin will pumped to a higher price, I remember very well that 2017 to 2021 bitcoin was at such a high selling price, and in the future it is not impossible that this will happen again |
|
|
|
Why not? Basically traditional bank was seeing crypto as a competitor but it can co exist. This time if you know the fact if people were using their traditional bank as a way to transfer their money into the crypto market. That means if the traditional bank is possible to cooperate with the crypto. Remember the reserved funds that used to backed the stable token was also still on the traditional bank as well. I think that that crypto can't leave from the traditional bank as well.
That is still become one of best gateway for money to come in
That's what I mean, that crypto and conventional banks have actually cooperated indirectly, in fact we can transfer money via crypto to conventional banks or even vice versa, and another hope that we need is, these two systems can bind to one regulation, so that no one feels harmed looks like it won't happen even for a long time. because if for example a traditional bank accumulates just one of the cryptocurrencies for example a blockchain network for transactions, it will make it anonymous which will be difficult to track in case of theft or something else. Currently, traditional banks have also launched mobile banking which makes it easy for users to make online transactions and that is enough.
in terms of currency, crypto is also too risky because of its volatile price. logically, banks may not coorporate with crypto, but in reality we'll see if that can happen.
The cooperation carried out by traditional banks with crypto can also be interpreted broadly, for example sending money from crypto to banks or vice versa, but people worry that banks will be left behind, even though we who have been in crypto for a long time understand very well that we also need banks. to make a delivery or a withdrawal, people acquire something in a very general sense, and I think the two can go hand in hand going forward Right now there's already a cooperation between many banks and crypto platforms. In my country, more and more banks and financial institutions are considering crypto platforms. Even our central bank will be working with some of these crypto platforms for improvements. The bank don't need to get threatened by crypto progress, whereas, they just need to understand how it works and then adopt when they deem it necessary and some sort of improvement to the system.
Decentralized finance is another thing. I still find it difficult to regulate unless there are changes and well, it may not anymore fully decentralized in nature. Our central banks and governments existed in order to regulate.
This is a pretty good step taken by a bank in your country, this is a new breakthrough to guarantee technological sophistication as the vein of a development, although many problems will arise later, but the adoption of crypto is worth trying by the central bank, if the regulation is good enough and binding, I'm sure no one will be harmed Actually traditional banks can switch to the world of cryptocurrency and apply cryptocurrency technology, it's just that all of this has a very high risk and of course blockchain technology if applied to banks can be wider and everything becomes transparent so it is likely that banks will find it difficult to make profits and will likely there is a reduction in employees because everything is digital and automatic.
All forms of work experience risks, the problem is that we are required to be able to accept the development of the times or existing technology, people no longer need to work in offices, they can easily access anything at home, won't developed countries continue to launch technology, then what about developing countries , who always says that he is not ready to accept, regarding employee restrictions, that is indeed the target of developed countries, they want humans to be more developed and have skills it's always possible. I just try to remind you that if central or traditional bank will always be needed by people no matter how hard they were blaming the central bank but the fact that if these kind of people are still using central bank for their daily activities. Central bank already cooperated with crypto but it's not all of central bank was doing it. It's always possible for the traditional bank to cooperate with the crypto company. i have seen so many times central banks were investing in the crypto
Not in the context of wanting to blame each other, I mean are there future regulations that can regulate central banks and crypto to cooperate widely, isn't this very beneficial for all of us, and even everyone hopes that central banks and crypto can run together, full support given by the authorities can guarantee the continuity of both of them in the future |
|
|
|
It is unknown what competition between banks and cryptocurrencies will be after the widespread introduction of CBDC. It is unlikely that we will see the closure of banks in the next few years. Most likely, centralized finance and decentralized finance will develop and exist in parallel. Even if there is a direct threat to the banking system, governments are more likely to start restrictions for cryptocurrency than to destroy banking institutions. This is not beneficial to big capitals, and of course, no one will give full power to decentralized finance, where there is no state control. Therefore, replacing banks with DeFi is more of a fantasy.
So far it has not been possible to replace Banks with DeFi, even I personally am not sure it will happen in the near future, many rules are related to restrictions on crypto, if conventional banks start to be threatened by the presence of crypto in general, and certainly all countries will protect banks over DeFi DeFi or decentralized finance can threaten the world of traditional banking, because of the shift in lending, even DeFi itself is known to be able to provide loans like other traditional banks.
This can affect existing traditional banks, because there will be competition between traditional banks and crypto in general, regardless of the various problems that will occur, crypto and traditional banks must be able to adapt to each other.
Crypto development is progressing so rapidly, this can be seen from the many users who join here, if Traditional Banks close themselves it is not impossible to be abandoned in the next few years.
Although currently crypto is still very risky, it is not impossible that in the future crypto can change finances, just need to wait for regulations or legal regulations, if this happens, it is certain that crypto will grow and be accepted by many people.
Well, as long as the government never cooperate and always see crypto as a competitor to fiat, traditional banks will never allow to accept crypto or integrate crypto into their transactions. However, if crypto will be legally adopted and accepted in the future, traditional banks will never stop their operation but they will continue to serve their customers and assist them in which type of payment they are convenient to make, be it crypto or in fiat. This is more rational, traditional and crypto banks must be able to run simultaneously, in fact this can keep the bank in accordance with its function, the development of the times cannot be covered by something with existing rules, so that new existing programs (DeFi) will grow by itself, but if the two can coexist and have clear rules and regulations, then there will never be one of them will be left out Both would co-exist with each other but there's no way that traditional banks would be adopting or integrating or cooperating with crypto even if they do tend to plan with such thing but we know that
crypto is decentralized in most projects that is existing.There's no way that they could really be having that full control which simply implies that it would really be totally opposing their overall
preference in terms of centralization thats why its not surprising that they do really always made out some counter move towards crypto if they do have the chance.
So dont expect that everything would goes well in between the two.
It is only necessary to apply the right regulations, so that traditional bank functions can continue to function as they function, while crypto (DeFi) is still given a limit, so that they do not surpass traditional banks, but if this continues to be opposed, then what is feared is that they will be better than banks. and in the end it was the bank that was abandoned by many people, it is not impossible that this will happen, the development of the times can happen things that are beyond people's predictions |
|
|
|
DeFi or decentralized finance can threaten the world of traditional banking, because of the shift in lending, even DeFi itself is known to be able to provide loans like other traditional banks. Cryptocurrency is not here to threat the traditional banking system. Defi is a different kind of lending which requires a collateral in the form of crypto. Can you take a home loan from a defi platform? Can you take a car loan from a defi platform? The answer is no! Defi is here to exclusively cater the crypto community. It can't fulfill the need of traditional consumers and hence I don't see a threat to the banking system anywhere. Also it is not practical for anyone to move to complete crypto without the need of banking. Some exceptions can happen but largely it's not really a convenient mode of payment. So there's no competition itself. Indeed, there is no real threat to conventional banks with the developments that occur in crypto, but many developing countries are starting to be wary of this problem, they can't even take home or car loans from the defi platform, but the worry is not only here. They're not OP instead, they will fight against the growth of crypto as they think this was a threat to them. Because the moment that crypto becomes legal, many will no longer use the banking system anymore. Of course, this never makes them die or the collapse of the banking system, however, this will cause a downtrend of their possible income.
Digitalization is a new trend now if we see, Banks have also upgraded their system to cope with the demand of digitalization. This is a way to a healthy compilation against cryptocurrencies.
This is what they are worried about, not about the change of conventional banks to crypto, but more about financial effects that cannot be controlled by the state, so far there is no regulation that can regulate all of that, even in crypto there has never been such a thing as inflation, financial freedom can destroy a system and I think this is the big problem Banks will stay, they might cooperate later on especially now that many are into blockchain which helps them in many ways. They might fight with those fake projects but can’t afford to mess with Bitcoin because this market can’t be controlled by those institutions so they have no choice but to adopt as well. Banks will always be a bank, what’s good for them they will take it.
Openness in accepting progress is very important to care for differences, for example crypto is starting to be juxtaposed with conventional banks, this can actually keep the bank running according to its function, but what needs to be added is regulation to take care of all of it properly |
|
|
|
That's why I prefer the power given by Bitcoin because everything runs from a large community and market capitalists in Bitcoin continue to grow and investment in Bitcoin is still quite safe even without current strict regulations, but regulation of crypto is also very important because with the existence of With these regulations, we can invest in altcoin projects comfortably because the project is already regulated by regulations but until now the development of regulations has not been made by the SEC so that market conditions are still sluggish because they are still waiting for a decision to be given.
To make regulations, there are many things that need to be considered, it will be increasingly difficult for large investors to grow investments here, because if these regulations are implemented, then financial freedom will be severely restricted, bitcoin experienced many problems at the beginning, but in the end bitcoin was able to reached the highest price compared to other coins, maybe if the regulation started a long time ago, then bitcoin is not as valuable as it is now, what are the advantages and disadvantages if the regulation is implemented |
|
|
|
|
DeFi or decentralized finance can threaten the world of traditional banking, because of the shift in lending, even DeFi itself is known to be able to provide loans like other traditional banks.
This can affect existing traditional banks, because there will be competition between traditional banks and crypto in general, regardless of the various problems that will occur, crypto and traditional banks must be able to adapt to each other.
Crypto development is progressing so rapidly, this can be seen from the many users who join here, if Traditional Banks close themselves it is not impossible to be abandoned in the next few years.
Although currently crypto is still very risky, it is not impossible that in the future crypto can change finances, just need to wait for regulations or legal regulations, if this happens, it is certain that crypto will grow and be accepted by many people.
|
|
|
|
Hi, i wanted to create a passive income with the crypto.com lending. But they changed their terms, so i would need a lot more money to get the same result as before (with my plan i would get since middle 2025 ~a monthly passive income). So now i'm on the search for alternatives. What are your ways to generate a passive income with crypto? I've thought to hodl BTC and ETH. But i could make a passive income with altcoins (doesn't need to be a monthly income every month; but perhaps ~60$/month) with a one time investment. Those earnings i could swap regulary to BTC. This would be my, let's say 'minimum-idea'. The best would be to generate a passive monthly income. If you have some ideas for that where i don't need a million or so dollar to realise it, would be even greater  Thanks, dissi_xD We can only use the crypto space to invest, in a certain way according to the applicable mechanism, or we can also use it following available campaigns, say social media and signature campaigns, I don't really understand the meaning of borrowing as you mentioned, for me here is very limited if you want to make money, so it's better to think about how to invest in potential coins |
|
|
|
That's an effective strategy. There are lots of opportunities that crypto could offer and if a person is having a hard time providing funds for investment, better grab them and earn. If we want to gain profit when the market recovers then we shouldn't miss the chance of buying while the prices are cheap so we have to be efficient to do it. We can't say that the market could recover soon but we must always be prepared.
As many people have said, that certain coin purchases are made when the price is down, but sometimes people also don't understand, what coins can be bought in these conditions, unless we are investing in potential coins such as bitcoin, ethereum and BNB, people calculate thoroughly without separating out the coins worth buying, if this is the case, the decline in the price of the coins is also not able to generate maximum profit in good market conditions |
|
|
|
Actually you have made an answer to the question you asked, because why investing in new projects looks so bad for us to invest in, because most new projects are only able to reach the development stage, but not based on price utility, community and coin resilience in corrected market conditions, project The new one is also not strong enough to withstand the chaos that was born in the market, so the return to the new kokn died in the middle of the road
Many new projects do not consistently develop the mainnet roadmap because actually they are not able to realize the concept from the whitepaper, they actually only attract investment from investors for the sake of creating extraordinary concepts but after listing they secretly sell coins to steal the liquidity from the presale. That's how they work now, there are no other supporting factors that can make the project develop, they can't run the whitepaper concept, so the project development stage only reaches the listing and that's why I don't believe in new projects now, they only use investors to making a profit, it's really not impressive the new project that is now |
|
|
|
In the crypto world, we all must feel unpleasant things and regrets in something that cannot be achieved, such as when investing we have made a profit but still maintain and want the profit we get to be greater but what happens instead we experience losses and we cannot maintain until the value returns high because the panic we feel is very excessive.
We have had bad experiences in crypto, as you mentioned earlier, crypto will make us even more passionate when we get a small return, so we try to hold it until it reaches a high price, but something will happen beyond the predictions we made, that the coin that has reached high prices fall at low prices so fast, sometimes this greed is what we need to keep away, it's better to make small profits, but can always make the right investment |
|
|
|
You have been warned But really, there was such a topic about cheap 2-digit coins some 8 months ago. And the topic about cheap single digit coins a year ago. And they both seemed funny at the moment. Guess where are those now? In the history books. I also listen to such coins and they are talked about quite often by many people. When checking the market, we don't know where they are now, personally I have never been involved in investing this type of coin, because it is very doubtful for its development in the long term, I don't think it is worth investing in such coins in the long or short term, because that what we experience is just a historical legacy, not a return that meets expectations, a waste of time being on a kokn that has no movement Not all coins are not moving well because now there are many choices of the best coins, it just depends on which one we think we are sure to invest, for example bitcoin which has a high value and has several valuable digits. Almost all of the existing coins are not moving well, for example the example you gave, that currently bitcoin is in a correction stage, there is no hope for now to trade, it is better to buy a potential coin, then hold it until the market recovery occurs again, because if the condition of bitcoin has not fully recovered, then other altcoins will also act the same in the market |
|
|
|
Down 100 % on CoinMarket Cap !! What !?!
Better try to look at other tokens that have potential, compared to this one token, Luna was only affected by the hype at the time, so she really went up in a fairly short time, no future for this token, it's rare that tokens can deliver returns in chaotic market conditions, and Luna isn't really strong and it's time to leave the token |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
