Playing at home, Athletico was able to control the game throughout the match but unfortunately they had to concede first with Rodrygo goal
Atlético Madrid is a club that uses a defensive strategy in every big game, almost all competitions that I have seen, atlético Madrid do have a pretty good defense, even their defensive strategy is difficult for opponents to penetrate, although not all matches result in wins But this time, Atletico Madrid played quite open and didn't defend completely, it's just that they were unlucky and unable to secure the points. I think Rodrygo, who was plotted as a substitute for Benzema, was able to replace Benzema position well and made it possible for Ancelotti not to be too confused when Benzema was injured like now this
Ancelotti had other options but to include Rodrygo as a substitute for Benzema, but Ancelotti had a strong drive for the decision to play Rodrygo in the game, so Rodrygo took quite a good chance in this game. Ancelotti was very right in taking this decision, so Rodrygo answered quickly in the 18th minute, Rodrygo's goal made the Real Madrid players more confident, so in the 36th minute Federico Valverde scored an additional goal until the first half ended. I saw that madrid played quite effectively in that match even though they only had a few chances but indeed we can't doubt the mentality that madrid has so far, even though they are in a crippled condition due to their main striker being absent but that doesn't make ancelotti squad weaken at all.
When viewed from 90 minutes of normal time, Real Madrid actually had difficulty playing openly and lacked possession of the ball, because Atletico Madrid were quite dominant in possession of the ball and set the rhythm of the game. But one thing I see is the mentality of Real Madrid really as the masters of La Liga, under any pressure they are able to make a surprise three points, Ancelotti is a coach who knows how to place the players' needs against any club. For that I take my hat off to this old grandfather who still feels young. |
|
|
|
 Can we describe how shady, beautiful and enchanting bitcoin will be in the future, this dream is just a picture of the desire to fight the challenges of achievement, which was initially thought impossible to become more real. Then where are we, when this achievement is perfectly realized? Isn't Bitcoin the source of the solution? |
|
|
|
Atletico Madrid were not weak opponents. Also, at the home, Atlético Madrid is always strong. Even then, Carlo Ancelotti took the risk. And he rested Benzema and put his faith in the younger players. And the young players did not disappoint Ancelotti. They managed to earn full points. Real Madrid won 2-1 with goals from Rodrygo and Valverde despite Vinicius not scoring.
Real Madrid was able to prove that they were able to maintain a positive trend in 6 weeks, previously Atletico Madrid wanted to end Real Madrid's positive trend at home, but in fact they were not too strong to beat Real Madrid. Ancelotti did not risk resting Benzema, but the player suffered a knee problem against Celtic the previous week in the Champions League, which forced Benzema to rest in the Derby match, even in the match against Celtic Benzema was forced to come off in the 30th minute and was replaced by Eden Hazard. |
|
|
|
The match between Villarreal and Sevilla ended in a 1-1 draw. Sevilla had 55% possession during an exciting match. A free-flowing game played between the two teams, with short and long ball passes landing in the penalty area. Oliver Torres' goal for Sevilla in the eighth minute gave them the lead in the first half while Villarreal's only goal came in the 51st minute by Alex Baina. With this result, Villarreal are 6th in the standings and Sevilla are 15th.
Villarreal had six chances to shoot on target, but unfortunately didn't score more than one goal for them, while possession was won by Sevilla by a small percentage, the match was quite difficult and both clubs attacked each other, five Sevilla players were given a yellow card by the referee in the match for committing violation. Five important saves were made by the Sevilla goalkeeper, which saw them avoid defeat and earn a point in the game. This draw puts Sevilla in 15th place with five points, the next match will be even more difficult for Sevilla, because they will face Atletico Madrid on 01 October. |
|
|
|
Two matches have been postponed Two matches to be played Even though the British Government allowed the Premier League to continue in the midst of the current mourning conditions. However, the Premier League chose otherwise. It will be a loss for the postponed teams, given the hectic schedule of fixtures they will face going forward, and the other two matches to be played this week, without the same delay. If the reason for the delay is 12 days of mourning in memory of Queen Elizabeth II. But it's actually unfair if other matches are still being played, it seems there is another reason for the delay, but it seems there is a lack of police personnel to protect the match |
|
|
|
The best way to fight food inflation IMO would be to stock up on as much food right now as possible (nonperishable foods, obviously). Everything else is a crapshoot.
The cause of inflation is usually due to an increase in demand for a certain type of goods or services. When demand increases while the stock of goods available is not sufficient, there will be an increase in prices. I've heard economists say that one way to suppress inflation is to stockpile basic foodstuffs, because these are needs that must be met and everyone must and is compelled to buy. I also have the idea of keeping inflation lower, assuming that each head of household collects basic necessities for as long as he can. For example, where we live the main food is rice, so what has to be stockpiled is rice as the raw material for rice, because without rice it will be difficult for people to survive, while the side dishes can be adjusted. Inflation is caused by several things, natural disasters, wars between countries and also caused by Distributors, because they know when demand increases they can sell at a higher price, so hoarding rice is a way to make a profit. Regardless of the impact and risks that will be experienced by many people, it is appropriate to suppress inflation by hoarding as much basic commodities as possible. Thus, when basic commodities are available to the public, the prices of these goods will automatically fall by themselves, so that Distributors will resell these staples at standard prices. |
|
|
|
|
As far as one can argue about this, if there are special rules governed by the system, the power of the state is not greater than the influence of the kingdom, when compared to the presidential system, I think in this realm it is final, considering the many things and positive impacts that the Queen has made for the country.
Personally I don't really understand the legal and statutory issues in the royal system, that when the royal family leaves they are exempt from the death tax. Even if the law has been formed, talking about the legal power to change the law still looks weak to propose revisions, especially Queen Elizabeth II (Specific) is the longest-serving leader of the British Empire, reaching 70 years. I think it will be difficult to argue in this area. Even people in the parliament themselves do not dare to agree if someone proposes it.
Although in reality there may be many people who do not agree with these rules, but that is the royal system that applies to this day.
|
|
|
|
The capitalist economic system is a system in which private business actors own and control property according to their interests. An important factor of the capitalist economic system is the profit motive according to Adam Smith's theory. In his book entitled "Wealth of Nation", he explains the concept of laissez faire and the principles of the invisible hand. Capitalist Illustration Image These two concepts are the basic framework for the formation of the capitalist system theory, which includes the value of goods and services, structure, consumption prices, and production prices. There is a shortage in the capitalist economic system, because their goal is not to see the impact of consumers, but rather to the value of profits from the products and services issued. Thus it seems that the capitalist style will destroy the order of life of the little people, in making purchases, be it products or services. Let's see how they work, in the area where I live, currently intensively promoting various types of houses, where they work with banks as third parties. However, in this case, the Bank is authorized to determine the prospective buyer, based on consideration of the criteria, employment status and agreed terms. However, it must be understood that Real Estate is different from Real Property, both which can involve the government in its management and those related to financing and settlement as building ownership. Terms and Rough Figures For the Purchase of a Single House1. Time period This relates to the time period agreed upon by both parties (the Buyer of the House and the Bank), the longer the agreed year, the greater the profit received by the third party. Because the buyer will continue to deposit every month according to the current year's agreement. 2. Advances The amount of the down payment that must be deposited depends on the agreement between the home buyer and a third party (bank), taking into account the conditions they provide, the smaller the down payment, the greater the monthly deposit. 3. Monthly Installment Installments determine the price of the house, because the smaller the agreed monthly installments, the longer the ratio of the specified repayment period, so the more expensive the house price. - Monthly Installment Ratio $134.26
Let's count? 20 Years X 12 Months = 240 Months 1 Month Deposit $134.26 X 240 Months =$32,221.25 Down Payment $5,370.21 + 240 months Deposit $32.221.25 = $37,591.46 Total for one house $37,591.46 In fact, if we buy land and build our own house, without using their system, the money we need is about $16,781.90 So, if the term of the agreement is long (Current Year), then the third party will automatically benefit $20,809.56, because the monthly deposit will run according to the year and the agreed down payment. This is an example I got in the field, a few weeks ago? Actually, I have conveyed this example earlier in this post Why the european housing market is about to crash, But because I think this is interesting, then I try to recreate my post? This looks pretty crazy, the way they rob people of financial freedom, where for a need (a house), people have to spend that much money and not to mention talking about monthly deposits during the agreed-upon agreement. Of course, the consumer has the authority to buy or not, but if it is considered a house is a necessity, what can they do? In the context of Economics, there is nothing wrong with this capitalist system. But there should be other ways that can be done to not be burdened by the system, so that people are not trapped in something that is not necessarily capable of being done. Now I want to combine buying a house using this system, with investing in crypto and bitcoin. Maybe this can be a reference, especially for those of us who are in this forum. If people currently choose to buy a house, then they have to make a down payment of $5.390,11 as a condition and they continue to deposit a monthly fee of $134,75 for the current period (20 years). Just imagine, if we invest $5.390,11 in bitcoin or in altcoins, if the return on investment is maximum and we do it at the right time, then to make one house no more than 1, 2 or 3 years running time, without having to wait for repayment annual fees that run according to the agreement. Of course, the investments that we make also have the impact of risks and losses, if someone does not understand the pattern and the right time to enter the market, this problem is related to knowledge, which may be learned before starting an investment. But that doesn't mean the risks are unavoidable. Because there are many things we can learn before starting, be it investment knowledge, strategies and how to enter the market at the right time. Because what I see, the pattern of buying a house that they do, is no less than the danger posed by investment, meaning that both processes have the same risk, only in different conditions and portions. Oddly enough to understand, if we want to get involved in such a home buying system, despite the opportunity for change, we can do so through investment. Whereas in Crypto systems in general we are used to determining the direction of freedom we want to do. Instead I think, cryptocurrencies are a way out of a problem they can't solve, towards housing needs for low-income people. By making the right investments, we will save ourselves from problems that are considered incapable of becoming easier. Technology that has developed, will pave the way for everyone who wants to learn to do something new. Why did I mention cryptocurrency and not specifically Bitcoin, because the concept is more accessible to the lower classes, because talking about cryptocurrencies in general, it has a cheap purchase value, but the return at a certain time is quite maximum. |
|
|
|
But when it is expected that during an economic crisis, people would pull back on spending on their pets, it turned out the opposite. According to research by Edge by Ascential, the pet industry is forecasted to reach $281 billion by 2023.
I try to summarize some sectors that are vulnerable and resistant to the recession process, by looking at various considerations that support sectors in the US. These three sectors are relatively large in the US, so the potential for recession is greater, in fact this is a picture of the most recession-prone sectors in various countries. While the business industry that has resilience during a recession. Because these three industries are not sensitive to rising interest rates and these industries are needed by many people when the economy is in recession. Meanwhile, the pet industry did not have a major impact on the occurrence of a recession, because the supply and expenditure of this industry was not directly related to secondary or primary needs. (replaceable) Furthermore, a recession is associated with a declining domestic product, a negative real economy in two or more quarters and a major slowdown or contraction in economic activity or vice versa. Animal protection laws: Countries now have written laws that protect pets against maltreatment and suffering. These laws are really enforced in developed countries and not in Africa where pests are exploited.
Including animal protection laws, but in the next comment you said that stray dogs and cats are caught for slaughter. In some developing countries, dogs and cats are good meat. They are reared for meat and stray dogs or cats are captured and slaughtered. African culture doesn't support keeping animals as pets. Most dogs are reared for hunting or for guiding flocks. This part of the world has some of the best-hunting dogs, that can kill rabbits and bring the meat to the owner without several bites.
Do legal references only apply to pets, but not to wild animals. This confuses me? As far as I know the law is used in a general sense, there are no exceptions in its application. If your assumption is correct, then the person living in the area you mentioned is breaking the law. Covid-19 Pandemic:
>snip
The area where I live, COVID-19 has started to disappear, activities involving face-to-face meetings are running as usual, although the economic impact has not recovered 100%. However, it seems that it is no longer in the dangerous category, just waiting for the economic recovery to continue, because people still cannot get out of the economic problems that hit when Covid-19 occurred. |
|
|
|
I'm so sorry satoshi never introduced us a bitcoin ambassador before he went into hiding or disappeared.
Could be so, thus motivating @DigitalMonk to make a confession. Maybe this has a correlation!!! There is a huge demand, many people want to know, who is Satoshi ? There are many people were thought to be Satoshi and few others are claiming to be Satoshi. Some of them are scamming investors impersonating Satoshi Nakamoto.
I think it is time for Satoshi to prove his identity and end the chapter 'hunt for Satoshi Nakamoto.'
Now, how Satoshi can prove his identity ?
Please make a list in this thread. Ask any question you want to ask ? Make comments and reply to other people's question.
Hello everyone,
I am planning to build a sophisticated Bitcoin Explorer which will benefit every one trading Bitcoin. I need your help to complete my project. Once you help me, I will give a good reward in exchange of your works. You won't be unhappy because I am a Digital Monk. You will get a surPrize when you will know me.
And this proves, that he is not a beginner as described, It could be, he also wants to be like Satoshi in the ever-growing Digitalization Age. Entertaining enough from the tiredness of activities outside the forum. |
|
|
|
Some people were even saying that they will sue their Banks in court to know why they can't take their bown money on their willing time to spend.
Honestly I've never heard of a bank that forbids people from taking money, this confuses me? My assumption is that the bank does not prohibit people from taking their money, maybe the bank is filling money at the ATM, so it takes time to complete the filling process (if the assumption is correct). I can use my fund at anytime. The only thing that can hinder my transaction is network.
But for this I strongly agree, that the bank's work system is too slow in serving consumer complaints, this is inversely proportional to the crypto system which experiences speed in terms of transactions, but the next problem is the network, when the area where we live the internet is not strong, then this too becoming a problem. My thinking is actually more about developing resources, so that the application of bitcoin in everyday life can run as fast as transactions that we know. Public awareness of Bitcoin usage will actually increase further, when processes and resources are fully supported. I am sure it will be achieved in the near future, because people's awareness of this problem is getting bigger |
|
|
|
You already know how the merit system works, but you may be looking for ways to earn more merit. At the very least, your history of merit has made it clear to me indirectly that you know how this system works. Someone can clearly analyze my desire to get more merit, it doesn't matter that's everyone's right. But as I said before, hard work never betrays results. Actually this is the point I want to learn? And that's why I went into various sub-discussions to broaden my knowledge. Maybe my thoughts are still a little ambiguous in understanding the merit system or services that I want to provide, so I need a lot of mentors to discuss, because in the past I didn't really pay much attention to the substance of the problem. For example, what I'm responding to, if I don't try to fix it now, I'm afraid that in the future I won't be able to do anything for this beloved forum. That's why I get into posts that sometimes I don't master more deeply. I also don't know if this is wrong? I almost forgot to remind you, if you want to continue discussing how the merit system works or anything related to it, then let's continue here: Merit & new rank requirementsAnd thanks for this one. Maybe in the future I can learn more about things related to this, so that in the future my knowledge will be more in-depth about the source of receiving/providing services. |
|
|
|
Instead of expecting perfection from merit source, then find your own way to contribute to whomever you think is worthy regardless of whether you like doing it on a local board (recommended) or on a global board.
It's not bad to expect from the source of achievement, because that is the most likely choice. But the question is, do we fall into their category? I agree more with this parable "Because the process never betrays the result".I mean, when we start identifying ways to make a positive impact on others, that's where we're most likely to stick around. But I don't urge you to do that because maybe you have your own way of how you want to contribute whether it's about merit or maybe with your quality posts.
Everyone has their own limitations and advantages when choosing a place to go. Choosing one, is the most likely thing to do, either achievement or post quality. Because people will develop, when they always pay attention to the drawbacks that must be corrected and take the time to learn. So far I've also started learning how the merit system works, they will come when someone starts to raise the standard of quality and is able to make a contribution. While the pattern may be different, some come with little benefit and some come with all at once. Are parts that need to be selected and improved, so that the way the forum works will be more systematic, measurable and run well. Because if you hope all at once, it may be difficult to achieve in the near future. |
|
|
|
Some one told me my a mirror. Some one saying I am Bitcoin Moses. Some directly insulting me. Some one has deleted many of my post. Some one has stollen my entire thread. If you are confused about my self and my identity or do not understand my language, then please write to me with complain instead of insulting me. I am a man like yourself but I am not a scammer or hacker or thief. I am a Digital Monk does not mean I a beger.
There seems to be something wrong with your way of thinking, because consistency in forums is a style that cannot be faked, people will find something wrong with what we have done. Falsehood is just a smell that hasn't been smelled yet? Remember, you are not the founder of this forum or inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain technology. You all are working here as Robots according to my design. You think you have made billions of dollars out of Bitcoin and you have become an Elite now. So you are entile to do what ever you want to do or say what ever you want to say. But my only request is treat others and every one with respect.
The treatment of people will be very balanced with the impact we give, people will respect us according to our respect for others. This only applies in real places, but chances are slim on forums, but you can trust people and trust will come back to you. We came here on the basis of not knowing each other, even People who have access to forum settings don't need to know who we are. But one thing you have to believe and trust, this forum is growing and quite consistent until now, because too many people are honest and care about each other, I call it trust. Maybe the important point I want to convey is "TRUST".The rest you can check for yourself, what makes people do not appreciate and do not trust you. I said, I announced that I am now a Bitcoin Ambasador. How did you bully me about it ? Unless I have capacity and capability, I would not speak it at all. Now please understand, that a gold Smith has a plan what he is going to make with gold ?
Even the last quote I read from your post is quite affirmative, and too bragging about what you have done or are currently doing. But in reality, you are not like a beginner just crawling into an adult. "Trust will take you to a more perfect place, and that's where the highest award you will get". |
|
|
|
Are you being serious with that statement? I'd like to know, since you've asked me for a post history review, and if you are indeed serious then I'm going to judge your posts relative to _BlackStar, who very clearly puts a good amount of thought into his. Same with indah rezqi above.
It will definitely be my responsibility. It's true, I often review the profile in question, but in a learning capacity, because I am very impressed and motivated by @BlakcStar's achievements, is that wrong? and I also know that BlackStar contributes quite a lot in the forum, While I haven't done anything for the forum, isn't it good to motivate me. As for the lizarder, I don't know what connection his comments have with me. Might as well try to get someone's attention, but I'm sure you can tell the difference. For me learning is better than imitating because the results will never be the same.
Relax indah rezqi, I'm not trying to copy your style, because I'm building my own. Trying to get someone's attention, reminding me to approach girls, how deep are your accusations? Maybe I forgot to say something. Congratulations on achieving your rank increase |
|
|
|
The impact of spammers?- Misdirection for beginners
- Making issues that are not in accordance with the facts
- The forum is filled with posts that do not meet the element of certainty
- Posts are not represented with knowledge that is in accordance with the topic of discussion
- Discussions on the Gambling board are only for filling in weekly posts, although some people don't understand the football part at all
Therefore, I think it's important to know what the post quality standards are like, Is it related to substance and statistics? Because when it comes to assessment, everyone has a different perception, for example how to judge one post with another, maybe I think their posts are good and constructive, but for other people, that's not necessarily the case. I think this standard is still gray, so it's easy to say, post A is good, post B is constructive, post C is innovative, and post D is useless. as once conveyed by @BlackStar Again quality does not depend on what your username is, what rank you are, what campaign you are promoting, but quality is a product of the knowledge you have. So you don't have to hide your avatar and signature to find them. But I just realized that avatars and signatures can also be hidden. Although personally I'm still classified as a spammer, maybe!!!
|
|
|
|
If you disagree, explain your point of view
No one seems to have the authority to approve or not. Because bitcoin can be debated in general, but not on substantive issues (decentralization) and I also don't really like people who are anti-debate or discussion. It is much more used as a financial asset than as an alternative currency.
Due to accelerated growth, more people are using them as financial assets, rather than contracts to be settled using equity instruments and entities, even if there are fluctuations in the short term. But actually, bitcoin is a great asset in the long run. While alternative currencies are more dominantly used in purchases, although they still look unusual like fiat currencies, in the country of El Salvador itself there are still many people who have not fully used bitcoin as an alternative purchase, perhaps because trust and awareness have not fully grown in people's lives there. Even in El Salvador, where it is rarely used, it is a bit of a failure, speaking about adoption.
There are several reasons why this happened, for example El Salvador's financial condition was not very good before the implementation of Bitcoin which in a decrease in the selling value, but if bitcoin is in good selling condition (sale value), then El Salvador will greatly benefited from the adoption of bitcoin. Unsuccessful adoption will never happen, as some say. A little failure may be more appropriate, rather than saying a complete failure like the news released by the left media. If a market attracts investors, it becomes volatile, while if the market attract people with a real need, it won't be the same. Yes, still volatile but a lot lot less.
For speculative matters I agree, but not in the context of investors as an excuse volatilitas. If we look more specifically, speculative is the impetus for crypto to continue to run and develop, as it refers to actions that risk losing value and significant returns on the main value, this can be said as the law of supply in investment. (My opinion) Did Bitcoin survive? Not really. In fact, you may notice that the market is increasingly correlated to traditional finance (the result of considering Bitcoin as an investment instrument).
Of course bitcoin can not stay at the price as it used to be and now, it could be volatile in a short time. For example, speaking of investment instruments in gold which are included in the traditional category, is gold able to survive? The answer is also no, but they are more likely to rise in small and stable values, but do not provide a large return on investment. Example : my parents used to use gold as an alternative to save assets (investments), but ten years later they are not getting big profits from gold, even though the buying and selling prices are high today. It is true that gold has had a good history in the past, but speaking of investments, it has also not yielded huge returns. In contrast to bitcoin, when you, I and they take part in the investment at the right time, bitcoin is able to provide maximum returns in a ten year period like the gold example I mentioned. I have proven the benefits of investing in Bitcoin, this is as proof of reinforcement ? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5411364.msg60830040#msg60830040(Bitcoin Changes Lives, Touches Non-Formal Education for Underprivileged Children) Whereas a store of value must be able to maintain its purchasing power over time
For this problem, the example of gold is very suitable, because it is able to maintain purchasing power over time |
|
|
|
While in fact, you know how it goes when you read the second link, whereas, Bitcoin is a combination of many works.
That is why bitcoin is growing, because many combined works have been perfected, to this day bitcoin is the single most valuable in cryptocurrency. I've read both, enough to broaden my horizons Feel free to update your thread with the links.
Thank you very much for the reading material you provided, I've updated the post review!!! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
