Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 12:04:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ... 296 »
1721  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [AUCTION] 3x Dignitas Designs 1oz Silver Crypto Storage Bars on: March 11, 2017, 01:58:18 AM
0.06BTC
1722  Other / Meta / Re: [SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version) on: March 10, 2017, 08:58:38 PM
SMAS has been updated with the respective lists from yahoo (as of 1st March) and Lauda (as of today).
1723  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: HexxCoin Signature Campaign on: March 09, 2017, 02:35:36 AM
- Adjustments of these rules can be made by the campaign management (the ascendancy team or myself) with the beginning of each round
Why is this? Team ascendancy was a scam right?
Looks like somebody was inspired by my campaign rules...  Roll Eyes
1724  Economy / Reputation / Re: D1 trust rating question ? on: March 08, 2017, 12:59:50 AM
And all the people D1 folks gave positive trust to are then in D2 and so forth.
No. You have to be included in their trust list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust).
Whether or not you have received feedback from any D1 user does not matter.

D1 is all the people Theymos trusts, if I'm not mistaken.
Default trust depth 1 are all those people in the trustlist of the forum account DefaultTrust (including theymos).
You're right as far as theymos is (one of the users) managing this list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=122551).

I got green trust because Vod very kindly gave me one, and he is in D2. So basically I'm in D3 (I think)
No.

How does a member get a d1 trust rating. I see that a lot of member have green true but only a few have d1 trust rating.
The vanilla setting for depth is 2, hence feedbacks from users on default trust (depth) 1 and default trust (depth) 2 show up as trusted and influence scores.
1725  Economy / Services / Re: [NEW]★☆★ Bitvest Plinko Sig. Campaign ★☆★ Up to .00065/Post(JR-Hero Accepted) on: March 07, 2017, 05:37:41 AM
Payments sent (23c9d3b93c389e22d6210b60ae211e6f1b28529b5654d2d40f08e5195b89bcb5).



No new enrollments this week.
1726  Economy / Services / Re: [NEW]★☆★ 777Coin Signature Campaign ★☆★ Up to .0007/Post (Jr-Hero Accepted) on: March 07, 2017, 05:11:26 AM
Payments have been sent (bbd4d87f88446b56eb85eea0bb8f24d800263af31b8eab33bc6156c050533bba).



User: funbarrel
Enrolled.

1727  Economy / Services / Re: [BitBlender] Signature Campaign - Seniors and up (CFNP) on: March 06, 2017, 01:17:49 AM
Payments sent (5dfdb6438047b06ca27141df8b523ee1966fd0e9fa5e005014186fb9f116a517).
1728  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [24 HR AUCTION] NOLA COIN (2) 1BTC + (2) 5BTC on: March 05, 2017, 10:54:15 PM
0.08BTC
1729  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [24 HR AUCTION] NOLA COIN (2) 1BTC + (2) 5BTC on: March 05, 2017, 09:47:41 PM
0.06BTC
1730  Economy / Gambling / Re: ★Crypto-Games.net ★ 9 coins ★ 6 games ★ Since 2014 ★ Contests ★2200 BTC invested on: March 04, 2017, 09:09:02 AM
questionable provable fairness
Can you please put some meaning to your words by providing examples about in which way it is "questionable"?
I doubt you can reach the experise of NLN, who did a review of the system while adding the 3rd party verifier on dicesites (https://dicesites.com/crypto-games/verifier),
but you can't say stuff like that and not provide the facts for it.
Else, don't say it in the first place.
1731  Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone on: March 03, 2017, 07:14:42 PM
~snip~
Deffy, I know you probably had already a few glasses of "alcohole" and one or two too many of those green rolls, but dude.
You're crossing a few lines here. Think about the posts you're writing.
Wanna attack somebody? Alright, I'm here. Go focus your anger, give me your best shot.
But ffs, leave others out of this, when the person you got a problem with is me, not them.
Show me what you got, bring out more of that blockchain analysis you have tried to do (and failed) in your first post.
If you come back here, do so with results, not insults. We're all adults and we should stand above that point.
This kindergarten posting is not going to benefit either side, and honestly, I think you know that.
1732  Economy / Services / Re: Let's Think About the Future | Signature Campaign | (All Ranks Welcome) on: March 03, 2017, 06:37:16 PM
When are you going to make payments for the past week?
It will be sent today most probably once Lutpin reaches home.
As said, Friday. Friday means, well...Friday.

Payments sent (6253c1af25fca171527c9fe49e3a1902568be7f9f9a9f91481118f402d300c07).



No new participants are accepted this time. Also this round has been cancelled and campaign has been paused.
If the escrow funds got refilled, will this week posts be counted or this week will be skipped?
If/When. As of now, no funds have been sent to the escrow address.
1733  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [PAID] Ascendancy Signature Campaign | Juniors and above on: March 03, 2017, 08:07:27 AM
the way you and other handle this fucked up situation was really awesome
I've only played a small part, the main credit goes to the escrow team, that reacted quickly and went quite a long way to ensure this gets closed in the correct way.



Seems everybody is happy with their payment and there are no further points of discussion directly related to the campaign.
If anything comes up, PM me. Thread locked for the time being.
1734  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Escrowed funds from Ebitz Signature Campaign on: March 03, 2017, 07:52:41 AM
Lutpin was the one escrowing the funds for that campaign.
Correct.

Yeah he did sent the funds with his own pocket.
Correct as well.

Maybe he finally find out what he want to do with this BTC.
I'm not in a rush to get the funds out of the escrow address.

I don't know how it is possible, but till now 4 BTC is in escrow address.
As you can see, the funds have not moved, hence there has been no update either.
Everything is in the same state as it was when the campaign had been terminated.
1735  Economy / Gambling / Re: ★Crypto-Games.net ★ 9 coins ★ 6 games ★ Since 2014 ★ Contests ★2200 BTC invested on: March 03, 2017, 06:26:46 AM
I need open account. My account is locked for security reasons.
As I've told you, please contact support@crypto-games.net to discuss the details.
Make sure you've removed any malicious software from your device before accessing your account.
Also, as a further security precaution, I'd suggest you to enable 2FA to prevent this from happening again.
1736  Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone on: March 03, 2017, 01:52:35 AM
guys: dont you have better things to do in your own life ? better than playing those poor games ?
Says the one trying to get a witch hunt going on me. Don't you see the irony in your words? Trying to get people to look at my person, while insulting them in the same very post for doing so...

i would seriously like someone take an eye on this post .... i'm surprised this post was saw "muffled".. ( sorry for my bad english )   lol .    when you see how chronicsky  is  attacked for .... how to say ... nothing ?  ..
Because your post had nothing of substance. Your "proof" was neither conclusive, nor was it sufficient to count as indicators.
People don't follow a trail simply because you dislike two persons, deffy.



What you should have done was connect brituspol with mexxer-2.
Neither of those accounts are mine, feel free to link mexxer to as many alt accounts as you can find.
This one is none of them.
1737  Economy / Services / Re: Lutpin | Advertising Campaign Management [Looking for work] on: February 27, 2017, 09:13:00 AM
Lutpin, I sent you a PM twice, but have no any respond from you. Can you check this?
Not the right thread. Let's keep SMAS discussion in the SMAS thread and discussion specific to my managing in this.
1738  Economy / Services / Re: [NEW]★☆★ Bitvest Plinko Sig. Campaign ★☆★ Up to .00065/Post(JR-Hero Accepted) on: February 27, 2017, 08:37:41 AM
Payments have been sent (3d94331bd97c3b7a2c520b38796a14f2ce99633c6ac84706e2e01cc6004a6dbc).



Hey Lutpin,
I've been in this campaign for now going on 33 weeks and I have been active every single week and was just wondering if I can apply for the Senior member special? I've been a Senior for a while now and thought maybe I could apply for one of these spots.
Contact me again in a few days, I'll consider you for a spot.



No new enrollments (If you have an open application, you're denied, sorry).
1739  Economy / Services / Re: [NEW]★☆★ 777Coin Signature Campaign ★☆★ Up to .0007/Post (Jr-Hero Accepted) on: February 27, 2017, 08:07:30 AM
This weeks payments have been sent (5fc94685c8e55aea2d8e2fe268d28335d2d3ce3ccb70ae556f761287f0170c8c).



No new enrollments, sorry.
1740  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [PAID] Ascendancy Signature Campaign | ENDED on: February 27, 2017, 06:51:05 AM
wow, participant signature campaign still got the rewards? how about translation? just asking
how about twitter campaign participants sir?
Not my campaign.

How about another bounties, there is will pay ?
I wasn't responsible for anything other than the signature campaign.

is just for signature ?
Yes.



Giving this another day or two and then locking the thread, in case nobody got any open questions/issues.
Pages: « 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ... 296 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!