Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 09:18:35 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 ... 405 »
1761  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-02-13 Could Amazon run central banks out of business on: February 13, 2013, 09:35:49 PM
Isn't stuff like Amazon Coins serving to effectively increase monetary inflation?  I mean, if I have $1000 of Amazon coins, and I give $1000 to Amazon for those coins, then suddenly, there's $2000 of purchasing power.  I can purchase things from Amazon, and they can purchase things from whoever.

It's a strange form of debt I guess.  I let Amazon take out an interest-free loan from me with the promise to repay me in goods of equivalent value whenever I like.
1762  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: February 13, 2013, 08:40:39 PM
Especially, this being a race, why wait to announce the winner 5 days after the race is over?
Because it's so much more EXCITING to watch people's blood pressure go through the roof in speculation and anticipation!
1763  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Knew about Bitcoins early on: February 13, 2013, 08:25:12 PM
Numbers were invented around 35,000 BC, therefore, I'm an idiot for not investing in Bitcoin in 34,999 BC.
1764  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics on: February 13, 2013, 08:06:49 PM
Was just going to come here to post this.

Also on firstbits lookups.
1765  Economy / Gambling / Re: BitMillions.com - More than ฿ 1,400 in Prizes - Now Play with ONLY ฿ 0.01 !! on: February 13, 2013, 08:04:24 PM
Love the site, very well done.  Only one thing I'm a bit confused over:  Is there a reason you decided to have the tickets pay out for each play?  The current method is going to end up filling wallets with a lot of small inputs, making it harder to spend without long delays and/or high fees.  Perhaps a separate address to purchase a ticket which sends your total winnings after the ticket fully matures?  This saves you money, and the player as well in the long run.
I had the same concern, but look at how nicely the small transactions (all the way down to 0.000003!) were sent without a fee in this transaction:  https://blockchain.info/tx/0895a6fa923d399f5079c5a444a70a7543b5c34ebe4a5d21ae522350042b311e?show_adv=true

It seems as though packaging these smaller inputs with larger inputs allows them to be sent fee-free.  If you ever want to consolidate a small amount at a single address, send a larger amount to that address, then send them both back to the address you wanted to consolidate the small amount at.  Use the larger amount as a vehicle to transport the smaller amount, for free.  Wink
1766  Economy / Goods / Re: !!! [WTS] 2007 Porsche Cayman S - 8200 miles !!! on: February 13, 2013, 05:58:32 PM
If only I had that many BTC's... even if I had kept every one of them I have ever received, I still would have less than half, lol.

Gotta wait for the price to rise more...!

If only I had the foresight to keep every coin I've ever mined. When the exchange rate went down to 2, I was still selling half of what I mined. The rate is so volatile right now, who knows what it will be next week or next month. Could be back down to 15 or way above 50... All I know is, if you've got a substantial amount of coins right now, there's a very good chance you bought or mined them at a much lower exchange rate. So this is a great deal regardless!

For transfer of the title, would the seller have to include a bill of sale for say $1 or something?  Just curious.

Yes, we're going to have to do something like this. Although I'm also thinking we may be able to use bitpay and a receipt from them to transfer the title.

I'm also willing to sell for cash, but wouldn't you guys like to see the first supercar-bitcoin transaction?

Don't use bitpay - you'd be knocking yourself for 16 BTC (0.99% fee) if you do.
1767  Economy / Goods / Re: !!! [WTS] 2007 Porsche Cayman S - 8200 miles !!! on: February 13, 2013, 04:46:54 PM
If only I had that many BTC's... even if I had kept every one of them I have ever received, I still would have less than half, lol.

Gotta wait for the price to rise more...!
1768  Other / Off-topic / Re: Music Industry on: February 13, 2013, 04:58:10 AM
*shrug*

Few things here:
- Why mess with a formula that works and most people like?  Especially when the alternative music geared towards minority crowds can easily be distributed through other channels?
- Music is constantly changing.  If you look at the top songs in the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's, vs now, they're all quite different.
- You're complaining about the top songs because they are the top songs.  Isn't that inevitable in a free market?  People choose to listen to what they like, so if a song is at the top, it's because a lot of people like it.  It may be bad music to your ears, but good music to a lot of people's ears.
- If music isn't meant to be mixed with industry, then why do you care about what the music+industry mix decides is the best music to play?  Shouldn't you only care about music that you yourself like?  In other words, what are you really asking to happen?  That the top charts are filled with music that doesn't make any money somehow?
- That song you linked to was awful, but I'm no Taylor Swift fan either!  I'll give just about everything a chance at a listen though, so I appreciate you posting it anyhow.
- If you need some light piano listening, this is me: www.justinbporter.com

I think we must first assume music is as simple as "Oh, I like this, let's get some more of it."  I think the reasons people love some songs almost universally is different than the reason people love the songs they usually enjoy.  For example, PSY's Gangnam Style has to be one of the most popular songs in all of music history (I'm just basing this on YouTube views so don't sue me Grin )  However, most can agree, the song is simplistic, repetitive, and, more than anything, catchy.  It follows a distinct formula that all pop songs follow, yet somehow, someway, Gangnam proved to be several times more liked than most top songs  (Assuming people who watched the video liked the music.)

In this case, I believe it was more so the humor of the song's video, as the lyrics make no sense to the average listener (unless you speak Korean, of course!  In which case, the lyrics are goofy anyway.)  But humor isn't a standard quality of music; normally, when dissecting a song, "Is this song funny?" doesn't normally get factored in.  All of this, inevitably, mixes into whether or not people will impulsively purchase the song for listening.  The industry sees this, says, "Wow, we need us some of that!", and so the cycle continues.  The problem I'm having is how little musicians can diversify their music when the industry needs more Gangnam style to reel in more money, as the point isn't to make amazing music, but to make what sells.

And yes, that song is quite atrocious  Grin I like weird music like that, and I don't know why.  There's no industry for it, so I don't find a lot of music like it, as there's no incentive to make more music like that.  It's horrible, but it's one of a kind--bad news for me Tongue  But the point I'd like to make is this: if a child is exposed to certain music while growing up, they'll have a tendency to like it.  My brother and sister enjoy rap and hip-hop, because they went to a very urban school where that was the in-thing.  Not the good kind of hip hop, either.  Stuff like T-Pain, Lil' Wayne.  There's no MF Doom on their platter, nor do you find Nujabes or Aesop.  It's simply unusual, that people seem to have a love/hate relationship with top musicians, when 'hidden gems' as they're called remain loved by all their listeners.  It's disproportionate.  I love all the music I love, yet I still hear about music I don't love, and it's always a popular song everyone else falls in love with and I die a little bit because I know it's awful and took very little effort to compose.

Also, you're an excellent pianist!  I've been playing for a year or two now, but I'm still nowhere near your level.  Must practice.

You might enjoy this...  Hauschka - Freibad
In my experience, there's always a ton of variety of music to choose from, so I guess I am not concerned with musicians trying to ride the waves of various trends.  Some people are musical connoisseurs, while most people are not.  To me, that's just fine.  Those who like the music that the "hidden gems" produce can listen to that music.  Those who like the more popular stuff can listen to the more popular stuff.  I guess I just feel like the free market takes care of itself, because no matter what music you like, you can always find SOMETHING to listen to that fits your musical tastes.

I certainly agree about growing up with certain musical styles influencing a person's likes and dislikes, which does make trending musical styles more difficult to change.  That might not be such an awful thing - musical styles do tend to help define the eras of humanity.

Regarding the lack of selection of atrocious music - I think there's a reason for that.  Cheesy
1769  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Just lost 190 bitcoins through Mt. Gox on: February 13, 2013, 04:35:19 AM
Pay pal locks out based on IP address, If I try to access from a strange IP it ask me a security question. MT gox doesn't give a shit because they have zero liability. To all the tech guys talking about yubikeys and 2fa nerd stuff you dont get it people aren't going to do that. This thing only works if people use it. I am shocked to see the bitcoin faith in here. It is all worthless if people dont adopt it. If you think bitcoin is a retirement plan you are out of your mind.

A lot banks already use it, isn't it? SMS one time authorization code, they are not fundamentally different than other 2FA, just people are more used to it. How difficult to open your iphone/android app and type the number showed there into a website?

And probably yes, bitcoin is not for average joe NOW, bitcoin ecosystem is evolving, and evolving fast. 
And becoming a currency is DEFINITELY NOT EASY, if it succeed in the end, it would be a bumpy road, but think about it, in these many thousands years, except for fiat and gold, is there anything else that even get close to become a currency? With bitcoin, it is possibility. That possiblity itself is already a big event.

The whole point of bitcoin is that there are security features build in that allow SOME people with decent knowledge and skillset in computer security could handle it correctly and become the nuclei for further expansion into normal world. In the process, there will be emerging ways to handle it correctly and easy.
I agree - which is why we should be discussing what those emerging ways to handle it correctly will be.  Rather than sit and wait for something to happen, why not discuss what security options should be implemented and push exchanges to implement them?
1770  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Just lost 190 bitcoins through Mt. Gox on: February 13, 2013, 04:30:53 AM
Wow, so they don't make you confirm anything when sending out a large sum of bitcoins? I'd expect at least an automated phone call or a secret phrase when sending out X amount of BTC at once, or in a given time.
Exactly.  More security options would be better.
1771  Other / Off-topic / Re: Music Industry on: February 13, 2013, 12:18:38 AM
Music...mixed with industry.

Isn't that the exact opposite of where you would want to take music?  But I suppose, in our economy, if you can make money from it, there's no incentive not to.  Tongue  I mean, it's great that musicians are making money from music.  The problem is, they can only make one kind of music, using the same batch of chords, in the same general time frame (2 minutes to 5 minutes, max 7 minutes), can't be too complex, probably needs some lyrics so people can sing along.  Otherwise, you won't be making much, and you damn well won't get any exposure, even when you're the next Mozart or Lennon.

Which is all fine and dandy, except when you don't like that one kind of music.  So what gives?  Why are so many people buying into the same rehashed song, and why is there such a divide between said song and every other artist who actually explores the spectrum of music?  Is there really something incredible about will.i.am, or GaGa, or Swift?  Beats me.  Whatever it is, I can't find it, but everyone else seems to click with it, whatever it is.

Any idea if Bitcoin will reshape the industry?  Or are we gonna see a rehash of that one pop song over and over until everyone has ear cancer and dies?

Also, here's a weird song for your listening displeasure, if you ever need to cleanse yourself of popular music Grin

Black Eye/Burnt Thumb - Metronomy
*shrug*

Few things here:
- Why mess with a formula that works and most people like?  Especially when the alternative music geared towards minority crowds can easily be distributed through other channels?
- Music is constantly changing.  If you look at the top songs in the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's, vs now, they're all quite different.
- You're complaining about the top songs because they are the top songs.  Isn't that inevitable in a free market?  People choose to listen to what they like, so if a song is at the top, it's because a lot of people like it.  It may be bad music to your ears, but good music to a lot of people's ears.
- If music isn't meant to be mixed with industry, then why do you care about what the music+industry mix decides is the best music to play?  Shouldn't you only care about music that you yourself like?  In other words, what are you really asking to happen?  That the top charts are filled with music that doesn't make any money somehow?
- That song you linked to was awful, but I'm no Taylor Swift fan either!  I'll give just about everything a chance at a listen though, so I appreciate you posting it anyhow.
- If you need some light piano listening, this is me: www.justinbporter.com
1772  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: Netgear Wireless extender on: February 13, 2013, 12:09:54 AM
Ah yeah didnt know it ended up over here, ill PM john thanks. wouldnt this fit in goods since i consider hardware to be processors/gpus and the like?
It's closely related to computers, so I can see it being in either.
1773  Economy / Speculation / Re: Where is the damn correction??? on: February 12, 2013, 11:42:09 PM
Well, right now it's...awe, never mind.
Lol, +1.  I saw the dip down below $25, and thought, "hmmm... that's not gonna last judging by the last few days"
1774  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: Netgear Wireless extender on: February 12, 2013, 11:25:00 PM
Why were you unhappy with its performance?
It wasn't the extenders performance that upset me, it refused to play nice with our Cisco router. When someone connected to the Cisco wireless the connection to the Netgear would drop. I just gave up on trying to get them to get along.
Thanks for the info.
1775  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: Netgear Wireless extender on: February 12, 2013, 10:37:10 PM
Why were you unhappy with its performance?
1776  Economy / Services / Re: Cheap Investigative Service on: February 12, 2013, 10:13:07 PM
But the fact is, this person didn't pay me extra, but out of principle, I won't repeat an investigation on someone for two different clients.
Corrent me, but doesn't this offer a simple method for a scammer to protect himself? The scammer creates a sockpuppet account and uses it to hire and pay you. He gets information about himself, which at a first glance is pretty useless for him, but from that point on you refuse to give this information to others, something that can be quite valueable.

Maybe someone will offer me a lot of money to find someone they want to hurt or have no business finding and I'll turn them down.
Maybe you should start a partnership with russian debt collectors, lol. I'm sure many won't ask for the details as long as they get their money back.

I guess, if someone want to go to that trouble. Never thought of it that way. If I find that to be true, I'll act accordingly.

Look guys, there's always pros and cons to this industry, and I try to run it morally based, but there's always going to be someone happy and someone pissed off. I can't do anything about that. There are plenty of more blackhat investigators that have no morals and only see the dollar sign. All I can do is run my business to the best of my ability. Sorry if that gives people grief, but you should probably direct your complaints to the more blackhat investigators as they'll investigate everyone, including their clients if paid enough. I'm here on this forum, but I'm not the only investigator. There are plenty more. If you want Trendon, just go to them and get whatever you want. Simple solution.
There's a handy "Ignore" link below the names of the haters just to help keep your sanity around here.  Wink
1777  Economy / Gambling / Re: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts on: February 12, 2013, 09:17:14 PM
What does SWC do to combat collusion at the table?

https://sealswithclubs.eu/faq/

Quote
How do I know my opponents aren’t cheating?

You don’t know that, they might be cheating you – SealsWithClubs is the wild, wild west of online poker rooms. SealsWithClubs will vigilantly fight any collusion, cheating or otherwise unfair game manipulation. We reserve the right to handle cheating, collusion, or otherwise unfair play at our sole discretion. We encourage players to email admin@sealswithclubs.eu if you observe anything you would like us to investigate. If you are uncomfortable with anonymous ring games we offer heads up tables.
Thanks.
1778  Economy / Gambling / Re: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts on: February 12, 2013, 08:56:30 PM
What does SWC do to combat collusion at the table?
1779  Economy / Economics / Re: New 2,000 sq ft house: 5 BTC on: February 12, 2013, 08:50:33 PM
Well, there are houses bigger than some corporations. And there are some singular people richer than large corporations. I would be surprised if there wasn't at least a couple 200,000 sq ft houses in the world!

Although Gate's house is about 66k and Dell's house is about 33k. Buffet's is at a measely 6k. Smiley
Honestly, I'd rather have a smaller house than a larger one.  I think Buffet has the right idea @ 6k.  Less cleaning and maintenance annoyances that way.  Wink
1780  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Pizza for bitcoins? on: February 12, 2013, 05:04:22 PM
Quote
Server not found
     
     
     
     
     
       
       
          Firefox can't find the server at pizzaforbitcoin.com.
Pages: « 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 ... 405 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!