Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 07:49:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 ... 405 »
1301  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: $100 per BTC reached, lets start using mBTC as default unit. on: April 01, 2013, 11:20:32 PM
If you want to sell other people BTC, then give your price in mBTC.  If you want to sell goods in exchange for BTC, price them in BTC.

To someone buying BTC, getting 1,000 mBTC sounds better than getting 1 BTC.  To someone buying a laptop, spending 5 BTC sounds a lot better than spending 5,000 mBTC.

TL;DR:  Do whatever you want.
1302  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics on: April 01, 2013, 11:17:39 PM
Those transaction costs seem high:


That chart is based off of what miners are supposedly spending on electricity divided by number of transactions, correct?  I'd guess that the chart is still estimating electricity used based on GPUs/FPGAs, and not taking into account the much more energy-efficient Avalons that make up a large part of the hashing power now.
1303  Economy / Economics / Re: Things getting interesting once we past $100 on: April 01, 2013, 11:14:16 PM
You seem very certain of an eventual crash MatTheCat.  Why?  And are you willing to bet on it?
1304  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Instawallet/Bitcoin-Central Security Breach on: April 01, 2013, 09:53:57 PM
They posted in the Bitcoin-Central thread that all user funds (BTC and Euro) were safe.
1305  Economy / Economics / Re: Things getting interesting once we past $100 on: April 01, 2013, 09:38:29 PM
From reading through this thread, looks like a whole bunch of you are going to be still 'all in' when the day comes when whoever is manipulating the Bitcoin price astronomically high, decides to pull the rug out from under its feet.

If I had kept the many Bitcoins that I have bought in the past two years (I spend em all on SR), then I would be surely looking at a profit taking strategy right now, of course whilst keeping some/plenty skin in the game, as who knows how much higher this dragon shall fly before the inevitable occurs.
OTOH, there's 8,000 people still waiting to be verified at Mt Gox who want to buy Bitcoins, so perhaps there's too many people standing on the rug for it to be pulled out?
1306  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Instawallet/Bitcoin-Central Security Breach on: April 01, 2013, 09:26:33 PM
Does anyone have any theories as to how it is possible that the most recent two transactions to 1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy are still confirmed after several hours despite each including a massive 0.1 BTC fee?

They use unconfirmed inputs. Such as this tx: http://blockchain.info/tx/a3aad3ddc180ec33d3060e5b0b048ab07647271db559743b46f4668f7796c6d4 which is too large for no fees.
Well, invalid tx hash when I click on the link, but that makes sense anyway.

So, question.  Can you create an identifier for unconfirmed inputs, such that they would "pop out" at a person looking at this page: http://blockchain.info/address/1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy

Maybe just mark the text in red, or put a little red "unconfirmed" bubble next to any of them that aren't confirmed.
1307  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Instawallet/Bitcoin-Central Security Breach on: April 01, 2013, 09:23:26 PM
Does anyone have any theories as to how it is possible that the most recent two transactions to 1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy are still confirmed after several hours despite each including a massive 0.1 BTC fee?
That's kind of a huge "wtf" to me as well.

Is Bitcoin broken??   Tongue
1308  Other / Archival / Re: DrEvil - Hacked my BTC-e account and withdrew 1001 coins. on: April 01, 2013, 09:18:30 PM
I'm betting the London Trust Media is a VPN...  You could file a police report, then ask the police to subpoena Time Warner Cable for the user's information, then submit a civil suit against him for the stolen amount.

Quote
Choopa, LLC CHOOPA-NETBLK08 (NET-108-61-0-0-1) 108.61.0.0 - 108.61.255.255
London Trust Media Inc NET-108-61-55-72-29 (NET-108-61-55-72-1) 108.61.55.72 - 108.61.55.79

Quote
%rwhois V-1.5:0020b0:00 ipmt.rr.com (by Time Warner Cable, Inc. V-1.0)
network:Class-Name:network
network:ID:NETBLK-ISRR-69.204.0.0-17
network:Auth-Area:69.204.0.0/17
network:Org-Name:Road Runner
network:Tech-Contact:ipaddreg@rr.com
network:Updated:2013-04-01 10:32:21
network:IP-Network:69.204.0.0/17
network:Admin-Contact:IPADD-ARIN
network:IP-Network-Range:69.204.0.0 - 69.204.127.255

network:Class-Name:network
network:ID:NETBLK-ISRR-69.204.64.0-20
network:Auth-Area:69.204.64.0/20
network:Org-Name:Road Runner
network:Tech-Contact:ipaddreg@rr.com
network:Updated:2013-04-01 10:32:21
network:IP-Network:69.204.64.0/20
network:Admin-Contact:IPADD-ARIN

organization:Class-Name:organization
organization:ID:NETBLK-ISRR-69.204.0.0-17
organization:Auth-Area:69.204.0.0/17
organization:Org-Name:Road Runner
organization:Tech-Contact:ipaddreg@rr.com
organization:Street-Address:13820 Sunrise Valley Drive
organization:City:Herndon
organization:State:VA
organization:Postal-Code:20171
organization:Country-Code:US
organization:Phone:703-345-3151
organization:Updated:2013-04-01 10:32:21
organization:Created:2013-04-01 10:32:21
organization:Admin-Contact:IPADD-ARIN

organization:Class-Name:organization
organization:ID:NETBLK-ISRR-69.204.64.0-20
organization:Auth-Area:69.204.64.0/20
organization:Org-Name:Road Runner
organization:Tech-Contact:ipaddreg@rr.com
organization:Street-Address:1841 Lapham Road
organization:City:East Aurora
organization:State:NY
organization:Postal-Code:14052
organization:Country-Code:US
1309  Economy / Gambling / Re: If you have a web betting gambling bitcoin read this post on: April 01, 2013, 09:10:11 PM
how do i html  Huh
1310  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: First BFL ASIC! on: April 01, 2013, 08:21:41 PM
I'm starting to get irritated because now all I see is the difficulty going up up up from the Avalons, and by the time we get ours, we'll earn like one btc per month. Smiley
Avalon would have to ship ~ 180,000 units in order for us to only get 1 BTC/month with a BFL SC Single.
1311  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Instawallet Security Breach on: April 01, 2013, 08:11:57 PM
Well, this is interesting...
1312  Economy / Speculation / Re: Seriously...are you buying at these prices? on: April 01, 2013, 06:15:42 PM
Kind of.... I bought a mining machine that will mint Bitcoins at this price.  Cheesy
1313  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Butterflylabs Huge SCAM on: April 01, 2013, 06:12:41 PM
Agreed @ BFL being a scam.

If you guys paid with your CCs, I would suggest requesting a chargeback within 120 days of your transaction, otherwise you'll be out of luck (assuming it is a scam).

Visa/MC have 120 day limits on chargebacks.
Willing to put some money down on BFL being a scam?
1314  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Looking to Sell $4000 in BTC at Mt Gox Rate for Cash on: April 01, 2013, 03:22:46 PM
why not just escrow?
Because "My bank account info got stolen and this is not a valid transfer"
1315  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: 1 BTC for the most creative idea on how it will be used on: April 01, 2013, 03:17:04 PM
I would do a send-many of 0.00000001 BTC to every Bitcoin address ever used, in an attempt to de-anonymize Bitcoin addresses by grouping them all together with default client behavior of including transactions from different addresses together.
1316  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Butterflylabs Huge SCAM on: April 01, 2013, 07:23:40 AM
So, BFL little single mining along....
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1CdcYVP4T4hjHwt353pEnGHrigeDLvuvZL

Anyone still think it's a scam?  Want to put your money where your mouth is?
1317  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: how can BFL still be advertising on the forum on: April 01, 2013, 07:15:44 AM
I'll put money down on them not being a scam.  You game?
1318  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: 3/3/13 LTC rally never forget on: April 01, 2013, 07:14:37 AM
Wow.  Call me shocked.

I got 0.014 BTCs out of each of mine when I sold out, so, still not complaining.  Smiley
1319  Economy / Speculation / Re: Parity Price Paypal on: April 01, 2013, 05:11:07 AM
What about the idea of comparing transaction volume to other payment processors?

Paypal has a transaction volume of about 16 billion US$ per year.

Bitcoin's current transaction volume is about 300,000 BTC per day. If we assume a market price of 90$ that would add up to about 10 billion US$ per year.

So if Bitcoin usage and price stays at least at the current level then it is already 62% of Paypal.


The parity price for Paypal (assuming transactions stay at least the same) would be:
147$

Of course a significant amount of usage for Bitcoin is exchanging for Fiat currency while Paypal is almost all for goods and services.

This is off by an order of magnitude. It is $165 billion USD per year.

oops...
so x10
so parity price would be about 1470$
I'd be ok with that.  Wink
1320  Economy / Speculation / Re: We will have dollar parity all over again on: March 31, 2013, 04:18:28 AM
I think it's pretty simple to just announce the change to the world as you would with a stock.  I.e., a stock split, then just move the decimal place after the announcement.

"Bitcoin shares split 1,000x"

Then again, some idiots would spin that as "ZOMG BITCOIN IS INFLATING LOOK AT ALL THE BITCOINS NOW!!!!"
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 ... 405 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!