Io ti proporrei anche Electrum, è un wallet offline e non hai bisogno di scaricare tutta la blockchain. Ci sono moltissime informazioni a riguardo sul forum. Fatti un giro sul search...
Non è offline, è un desktop wallet. Come fa ad essere offline e a comunicare con la BTC blockchain senza una connessione internet (a parte firmare tx 'offline' e poi trasmetterle da un altro dispositivo connesso ad internet). Se conosci un po l'inglese, qui troverai un sacco di informazioni utili: - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=98.0
|
|
|
What other API Payment system can you use on Linux?
Export your private keys and use another client if you can, problem solved.
I am looking into this. But for the payment system it needs to be a 128 bit key and they keys we have are 111 bits long.. So we can't import them into the plug-in for the payment. I have kept everyone up to date with what's going on. Like I have said as soon as we get these coins online you will see our hot wallet rocket back up. What more can I say than I will let the payback speak for itself. Prime.. I didn't read all your posts, but if you have the private key of each address you can import them on any wallet (desktop or online) that you want. For me it sounds only some sort of excuse.... We have a ticket open in the electrum part of the forum If you care to look. and Its not 100% as simple as just import them we have to use electrum for this process and there is a issue with the old style mkp keys and the new xpub keys. We are trying to work round a solution as we speak. but please do help if you can here is the log of the error. Error 1. Exception in thread Thread-14: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 810, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/electrum/interface.py", line 300, in run s.shutdown(socket.SHUT_RDWR) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 760, in shutdown socket.shutdown(self, how) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) error: [Errno 107] Transport endpoint is not connected
Exception in thread Thread-5: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 810, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/electrum/interface.py", line 300, in run s.shutdown(socket.SHUT_RDWR) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 760, in shutdown socket.shutdown(self, how) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) error: [Errno 107] Transport endpoint is not connected
Exception in thread Thread-9: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 810, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/electrum/interface.py", line 300, in run s.shutdown(socket.SHUT_RDWR) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 760, in shutdown socket.shutdown(self, how) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) error: [Errno 107] Transport endpoint is not connected
Exception in thread Thread-15: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 810, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/electrum/interface.py", line 300, in run s.shutdown(socket.SHUT_RDWR) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 760, in shutdown socket.shutdown(self, how) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) error: [Errno 107] Transport endpoint is not connected
Exception in thread Thread-4: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 810, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/electrum/interface.py", line 300, in run s.shutdown(socket.SHUT_RDWR) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 760, in shutdown socket.shutdown(self, how) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) error: [Errno 107] Transport endpoint is not connected
Exception in thread Thread-6: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 810, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/electrum/interface.py", line 300, in run s.shutdown(socket.SHUT_RDWR) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 760, in shutdown socket.shutdown(self, how) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) error: [Errno 107] Transport endpoint is not connected
Exception in thread Thread-7: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 810, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/electrum/interface.py", line 300, in run s.shutdown(socket.SHUT_RDWR) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 760, in shutdown socket.shutdown(self, how) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) error: [Errno 107] Transport endpoint is not connected
Exception in thread Thread-17: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 810, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/electrum/interface.py", line 300, in run s.shutdown(socket.SHUT_RDWR) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 760, in shutdown socket.shutdown(self, how) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 224, in meth return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args) error: [Errno 107] Transport endpoint is not connected Error 2 unable to find certificate Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 810, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/user/lib/dev/electrum/lib/interface.py", line 304, in run self.s = self.get_socket() File "/user/lib/dev/electrum/lib/interface.py", line 176, in get_socket s = ssl.wrap_socket(s, ssl_version=ssl.PROTOCOL_SSLv3, cert_reqs=ssl.CERT_REQUIRED, ca_certs=ca_certs, do_handshake_on_connect=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 886, in wrap_socket ciphers=ciphers) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 496, in __init__ self._context.load_verify_locations(ca_certs) IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory So yea. Still working on it. and have support tickets open untill I can find the solution to this problem Sorry but I can't help you, wait a reply from the electrum dev.
|
|
|
address: 1D21VbzEakD5sdTPajcXDBkj9Ev3Uqxnic
--begin signed message-- hi this is ruggedman_dan. Loan request amount: 1 BTC Collateral: bitcointalk.org forum acct Interest: 0.1 BTC Repayment date: 9/26/15 Reason for loan: bills --end signed message-- G6arakHaZESXXEIMZJKir+UnK540ifChz3YJ8nazkRLfCVIh9f6DEWUk0XlgJXf2k4Lpzu1b+zDhmYg41I8ZfV0=
I accept your loan request, please send me the collateral (or choose an escrow). I do like chrome but I'm using also firefox.
Bump.
@AdvancedCash, do you have any news or improvement about your service?
I would like to ask if it is possible also to add ETH, I know it is a new 'coin' with a new algo but maybe it is possible.
Why exactly were you posting from ruggedman_dan's account while you were holding it as collateral? I know that it was you because you didn't post until September 26, 2015, 02:58:36 PM that you had been repaid: As well as the fact that his password was changed on September 12, 2015, 08:45:14 PM when you made the loan, and you didn't change it again until September 26, 2015, 09:49:59 AM Because I wanted to post from his account (to not lose any activity point). The first loan was granted 12th of Sep. and he repaid it 26th September. Sorry but I can't understand the sense of your question (can you reformulate it in another way?).
Do you want a loan? If you the reply will be : No, I don't need it.... then you should not post in this thread but I suggest you to open a scam accusation against me (if you think that there is something of suspicious in the previous loan, or a thread in the Meta section . Thanks for your attention.
|
|
|
Hey there !
Loan Amount: 0.1 Amount to be repaid: 0.11 Repayment Date: 7 Days Collateral: Dogecoins Reason: btcjam//allcoin.com not legit anymore Bitcoin Address: 1GFLA2yzXYCZerN6cVUvjXjSUnNGHReeUZ
ty for your loan!
regards lama-hunter
Denied, sorry.
|
|
|
address: 1D21VbzEakD5sdTPajcXDBkj9Ev3Uqxnic
--begin signed message-- I'm ruggedman_dan and I will provide my forum account as collateral to redsn0w.
10/03/2015
Loan: 0.6 BTC Repayment 0.66 BTC Repayment date: 10/17/2015 Collateral: Forum account --end signed message-- G+tNSHqXMN5xM6GSxdHL0J8Hw2TyhTxKc4iT8D/tw+ArJNhE70NxtBg4HqQenzlDpRWSfxdr2hCVFttcVLjtvlY=
Accepted, please provide your access data to me or choose an escrow (for me it is not a problem).
|
|
|
Hanno motivato questa loro scelta?
No, l'unica cosa che hanno detto è questa: We're experimenting with referral programs & have updated ours. Inviting a friend now earns you and your friend $10 Ieri investendo 210€ tramite due account, alla fine dei vari giri mi son ritrovato 20€ di guadagno. Troppa fatica! Comunque per la cronaca funziona anche se il ref porta il tuo stesso cognome! Allora concordo con chi ha detto "Finita la pacchia"... troppo tempo da dedicarci per solo 10 (+10 €) di guadagno.
|
|
|
Loan Amount:0.01 Amount to be repaid:0.0175 Repayment Date:48 hours Collateral:My account or send pm talking Reason:trade Bitcoin Address: 1BjWpRWVCKvod5F2ToHpWL744aBRpY1Cf3
Denied sorry.
|
|
|
I will fill this loan, for the terms described. 0.11 bitcoin paid back no later than October 10th.
If you agree, provide a fresh address for me to fund.
Sure. I am 100 % agreed. Here is the fresh btc address . Btc address = 14dPAFFhKe6eudkLVWpDSQLYT3Z3QNmWcV 0.1 btc sent Transaction ID: 3af7235e0894db57c7caf4047e18e5fcb773e463c4d86a9d9d01c380ff6b36b0-000 Confirmed . Amount Received. Please post your Repayment Address buddy. Repay to 15HCuwr9LQc2fKFYntKyDwKmgJe4wN9rP4 Quoted as reference.
|
|
|
Così ognuno che apre una discussione qua può dire ciò che vuole? Come si ristabilisce la situazione? Dando 0,60 BTC all'utente? Mi sembra quasi un ricatto.
Allora se la mettiamo così inizio ad aprire tread di scam ogni volta che gioco al raddoppio ad un dicegames e dopo 10 alti di fila esce un'altro altro me la prendo e rivoglio i BTC indietro e dico che non c'è probably fair? Tu cosa farai, supporterai l'accusa di scam?
Fai pure, se pensi che il sito non sia onesto. Poi te la dovrai vedere con l'admin del sito. Allora : 1) Non ho scammato nessuno e non devo nulla a nessuno; 2) Non cedo ai ricatti 3) A breve inizieremo a mettere un pò di puntini sulle "i". Così vediamo se prima di sparare Trust senza motivo ci si pensa du due volte https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1199524.new#newE adesso Bannatemi pure. Ma essere preso per il culo così proprio no. Si vede che non hai ancora capito come funziona il trust system, non bisogna per forza di cose essere Legendary member per lasciare trust o feedback che 'valgano'.
|
|
|
Premessa: un ragionamento logico: il fatto che tu abbia concluso N trade positivamente non significa che se fai qualcosa di scorretto bisogna che tutti stiano zitti.
Ora, il mio trust l'ho lasciato perchè ci sono almeno 2 utenti a cui devi restituire dei soldi. - Il trust dice chiaramente che ci sono delle accuse di scam. non ho scritto SCAMMER. - Il fatto che quei soldi li hai persi piuttosto che metterteli in tasca non fa molta differenza, se hai scritto che in caso di perdita avresti rimborsato il 50% devi farlo, altrimenti diventi un truffatore.
Quindi quando la situazione si ristabilirà modificherò o toglierò quel trust.
Il trust serve proprio ad avvisare chi non ti conosce che può essere che tu non faccia quello che prometti.
Esatto, è così che funziona il trust system (almeno in questo forum). Il commento negativo serve solo come warning, ne più ne meno.
@FX_Trader Se poi dici di essere onesto, di che ti preoccupi? Continua pure a fare le tue compravendite qui sul forum che nessuno ti romperà le scatole.
|
|
|
I voted for :
Post the analysis
It will be really interesting (in my opinion) to read it.
|
|
|
What other API Payment system can you use on Linux?
Export your private keys and use another client if you can, problem solved.
I am looking into this. But for the payment system it needs to be a 128 bit key and they keys we have are 111 bits long.. So we can't import them into the plug-in for the payment. I have kept everyone up to date with what's going on. Like I have said as soon as we get these coins online you will see our hot wallet rocket back up. What more can I say than I will let the payback speak for itself. Prime.. I didn't read all your posts, but if you have the private key of each address you can import them on any wallet (desktop or online) that you want. For me it sounds only some sort of excuse....
|
|
|
It continues to say this:
An Error Has Occurred!
You do not have permission to upload an avatar.
read the post above yours. Full Member. as in more than 120 activity. Oh, thank you. I will wait until i become a full/sr member then! You can lock the thread, search the 'lock topic' button (left corner at the bottom of this thread).
|
|
|
In the early days, the forum would give out a "scammer tag" to scammers. After awhile they stopped giving them out (probably due to the work involved in investigating each scam), but existing tags remained on the accounts. Some time, after the trust system was added, the scammer tags were removed and replaced with negative trust from OldScammerTag.
Exactly, here you can fine more info: - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603586.0
|
|
|
Hanno motivato questa loro scelta?
|
|
|
Loan Amount:0.03 Amount to be repaid:0.035 Repayment Date:24 hours Collateral: Reason:trade Bitcoin Address:1BktanfURDT3XGTvxTRAzaiTbcvimnRCzj
I will not give you btc without a properly collateral, denied sorry.
|
|
|
Hi forum,
I see alot of scammers and ponzi scammers on this forum. I think we need a new staff rank, scam buster.
No, we don't. Scams are already unmoderated. There's also no need for another staff rank, and giving regular members this rank and the ability to start banning people is really dangerous. It is just as a normal member, but this user can give "ban point" scammers with proof. If the scammer has 2 or more "ban points" than the scammer is getting IP banned.
That's a bad idea. Way too abusable, even if scams were moderated. And what if the community temporarily thinks someone is a scammer? Only people are banned if there is valid proof, i dont see that this idea is abuseable.Can you explain to me in what way it is abuseable? If u choose persons from DT, what is wrong? This is not possible, it will be an hard work for all the staff members and honestly they are here to moderate the forum ... not to catch the scammers . Yes, I know, but wouldn't it be good feeling if the risk of getting scammed is low because all the scammers are busted and banned? I think it is hard work, but it is reachable, unfortunate no people agree with me If you don't trust an user, simple don't trade with him or better use an escrow (if you don't find an escrow, don't complete the trade). Scammer will never be banned from the forum and the users should start to trade with diligence. That's my opinion...
|
|
|
|