960mhs @ 150w?  You have to excuse just about anyone who wants proof / details substantiating these performance numbers... |
|
|
|
You people who even hint at reverse-engineering claymore's stuff don't deserve to even have a computer to mine with.
You moral crusaders are more irritating than insects. This is a question of ethicality and simply doing the right thing. We haven't even addressed the morals of IP theft yet. Selling your services to the xmr botnet owners and also receiving a stolen copy of dga's xmr miner source code to make your xmr miner work makes you nothing more than a hack/thief with zero ethics. You're a disgrace, both as a "dev" and as a member of the crypto community. First, I don't know what you've heard, but I NEVER got a stolen copy of dga's work. It was given to me by the very person he sold it to - to improve upon it. Not only did I do that, when I open sourced it, I credited him and even sent him BTC. EDIT: It'd be nice if people told me these wild stories they hear so I can tell them what really happened. Interesting how as soon as I set the record straight, he doesn't say shit. Not, "sorry I spread a rumor slandering you," or anything.  What? I am not about to turn this thread into a debate on the ethicality of unauthorized open-sourcing. Dga did not authorize you to open-source any code from his xmr miner, period. He sold it to someone else, not you. He did not authorize his code ending up in your miner. Now the record is straight. Nothing else to say. The person he sold it to - who had the rights to it - told me to open source it. If dga sells the rights to his code to someone, and that person authorizes its release, then there is nothing wrong with it. Face it - you heard some rumor that was basically a bunch of slanderous lies, and took it as fact, and now that I can defend myself you want to twist it to make it fit. Liars will be liars. Oh, and you know I'm lying how? Right, because your source is impeccable, I'm sure. Who was it? The voice in your head after too much vodka?  You have no evidence for any of your claims - you're making shit up to attack me. Dga himself. You know what you did. I just laid it out. I'm done replying to you. |
|
|
|
You people who even hint at reverse-engineering claymore's stuff don't deserve to even have a computer to mine with.
You moral crusaders are more irritating than insects. This is a question of ethicality and simply doing the right thing. We haven't even addressed the morals of IP theft yet. Selling your services to the xmr botnet owners and also receiving a stolen copy of dga's xmr miner source code to make your xmr miner work makes you nothing more than a hack/thief with zero ethics. You're a disgrace, both as a "dev" and as a member of the crypto community. First, I don't know what you've heard, but I NEVER got a stolen copy of dga's work. It was given to me by the very person he sold it to - to improve upon it. Not only did I do that, when I open sourced it, I credited him and even sent him BTC. EDIT: It'd be nice if people told me these wild stories they hear so I can tell them what really happened. Interesting how as soon as I set the record straight, he doesn't say shit. Not, "sorry I spread a rumor slandering you," or anything. What? I am not about to turn this thread into a debate on the ethicality of unauthorized open-sourcing. Dga did not authorize you to open-source any code from his xmr miner, period. He sold it to someone else, not you. He did not authorize his code ending up in your miner. Now the record is straight. Nothing else to say. The person he sold it to - who had the rights to it - told me to open source it. If dga sells the rights to his code to someone, and that person authorizes its release, then there is nothing wrong with it. Face it - you heard some rumor that was basically a bunch of slanderous lies, and took it as fact, and now that I can defend myself you want to twist it to make it fit. Liars will be liars. |
|
|
|
You people who even hint at reverse-engineering claymore's stuff don't deserve to even have a computer to mine with.
You moral crusaders are more irritating than insects. This is a question of ethicality and simply doing the right thing. We haven't even addressed the morals of IP theft yet. Selling your services to the xmr botnet owners and also receiving a stolen copy of dga's xmr miner source code to make your xmr miner work makes you nothing more than a hack/thief with zero ethics. You're a disgrace, both as a "dev" and as a member of the crypto community. First, I don't know what you've heard, but I NEVER got a stolen copy of dga's work. It was given to me by the very person he sold it to - to improve upon it. Not only did I do that, when I open sourced it, I credited him and even sent him BTC. EDIT: It'd be nice if people told me these wild stories they hear so I can tell them what really happened. Interesting how as soon as I set the record straight, he doesn't say shit. Not, "sorry I spread a rumor slandering you," or anything. What? I am not about to turn this thread into a debate on the ethicality of unauthorized open-sourcing. Dga did not authorize you to open-source any code from his xmr miner, period. He sold it to someone else, not you. He did not authorize his code ending up in your miner. Now the record is straight. Nothing else to say. |
|
|
|
v5.0 is available:
- +50% speedup for 6xxx cards, use "-a 3" mode.
- Improved autoselection for "-a" mode.
- Added "-li" option for low intensity mode.
- Added Dashcoin support.
- Added auto-restarting miner when GPU thread does not respond.
Got 100 hash on my 7770 also -li option work great i can run it on background also got this error WARNING: Linking two modules of different data layouts! WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil64-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' but miner continue to work You get that from running mismatched miner and driver versions. |
|
|
|
You people who even hint at reverse-engineering claymore's stuff don't deserve to even have a computer to mine with.
You moral crusaders are more irritating than insects. This is a question of ethicality and simply doing the right thing. We haven't even addressed the morals of IP theft yet. Selling your services to the xmr botnet owners and also receiving a stolen copy of dga's xmr miner source code to make your xmr miner work makes you nothing more than a hack/thief with zero ethics. You're a disgrace, both as a "dev" and as a member of the crypto community. |
|
|
|
|
You people who even hint at reverse-engineering claymore's stuff don't deserve to have the opportunity to mine at all.
|
|
|
|
hey guys i want to mine a coin what would be the next best one to start with...if you dont mind helping out
With peoples' bottom line profitability on the lines these days, noone is going to just give up this type of information. Times have changed dramatically since this previous winter, and one must do his/her own research these days. |
|
|
|
Though advancements in weapons technology have leveled the playing field there somewhat.
I am of the opinion that small nuclear fusion explosive devices (yields dialable down to the level of pounds of TNT) are likely to see application by organized terrorist networks within 10 years, and that the technology will be available to punters on a budget within 20. I am hoping this will put the fear of God into more than a few oligarchs. No. How about you keep it on topic and talk about bitcoin price movements. |
|
|
|
sale was well below market. Buyers of the coins started the market going and they are now dumping the coins for massive instant profits. Once people realise they were duped they will dump as well. There will be a crash and the SR buyers will re-buy at a really low price as well as profit massively from their manipulation of the market.
 Not everything is a illuminati-controlled powers-that-be subversion profiteering scheme. |
|
|
|
I love how bitcoiners want to spend hours and hours analyzing this auction and the buyer, when there's 1000% chance that Tim Draper will do absolutely nothing but sit on these 30K coins for the next 6-12 months while he further invests to build out the third world exchange infrastructure.  I believe this is exactly what he'll do. Why in the heck would he dump at or below market rates when he bought way above market rates? He's a VC. They hold and invest. Yes exactly. I guess everyone else that still wants to debate the stupid "dumping" scenario is just trapped in that movie Idiocracy. Yep - the dumping scenario is so stupid because it's just simply illogical and lacking of common sense wrt to the pure enthusiasm/momentum that VCs are demonstrating toward Bitcoin as a whole. Did anyone expect these VC types not to throw up a fight for these coins? Buying 30k coins below market rates and then dumping on an exchange at market rates? Really? Have people forgotten about the hundreds of millions worth of VC money that has been put toward the Bitcoin ecosystem and that only a small fraction of that is needed to secure all of these coins? FUD'rs will be FUD'rs i guess. I know i'm tooting my own horn here, I called it on the 25th: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg7504088#msg7504088Does anyone actually think that Barry and co. are gonna let the unkowns (dumpers) walk off with these coins without a fight?
This auction will turn out to be a 30k coin pump, mark my words. I'll say this now, that the rest of the SR coins will go in like manner...above market value and won by VCs. |
|
|
|
|
Let the panic buying ensue.
So predictable.
|
|
|
|
I love how bitcoiners want to spend hours and hours analyzing this auction and the buyer, when there's 1000% chance that Tim Draper will do absolutely nothing but sit on these 30K coins for the next 6-12 months while he further invests to build out the third world exchange infrastructure. I believe this is exactly what he'll do. Why in the heck would he dump at or below market rates when he bought way above market rates? He's a VC. They hold and invest. |
|
|
|
|
The precedent has been set for the other ~110k bitcoins that are yet to be auctioned.
Dumpers will not get them because they will never bid up past market price. The VC firms bidding will simply bid up past market price and keep the coins out of the hands of the dumpers.
This is all a good ending wrt to closing off the whole Mt. Gox fiasco.
|
|
|
|
How come the market hasn't crashed? I thought the winner was going to instantly dump the coins? That's what all the bears want to happen. I will say that the mere fact the coins were bid up higher than market rates is simply due to what i was suspecting all along: that whoever did get them bid way up to keep the coins out of the hands of those who would dump them onto the market. There is no dump of the Mt. Gox coins nor will there ever be. This train is heading up, and will keep heading up thanks to no China in the background. |
|
|
|
Slow and steady wins the race . Yep, right on back to 775 - 825  |
|
|
|
|
This is awesome. Way to go Newegg / Bitcoin!
|
|
|
|
Right at 650. Exactly as i thought. What's your source? [2014-02-26] Mark Karpeles Fails to Reassure MtGox Investors, Again :: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=489299.0 The price of a bitcoin was $655 (or around there) at the start of the Mt Gox fiasco. People are seeing that the government (nor the winning bidders) is/are not going to dump these coins on an exchange. As such, along with just about everything else priced in, 650ish or higher is to be expected. Edit: 775 - 825 new target once auction becomes sufficiently "old news". |
|
|
|
Right at 650. Exactly as i thought. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
