Are you serious? CAT was a complete, unmitigated disaster of a launch.  

This coin hasn't even had barely 5 minutes worth of launch time.

Ya'll screaming scam, go ahead and stop mining so my diff isn't so bad.

My cgminer is connecting and mining just fine.

Most all of the blocks are stale though.

Merred, thanks!

Tons of rejected, actually.

On 5 MHs, only 5 accepted blocks out of 40+.

Ichi,
Add me to the list for selling 1k CAT @ .75 BTC.

Edit: Updated for clarity.



- EDIT - All coins sold!

Willing to negotiate the price for my CAT.  

PM me your offers.

Scroll back up the thread to post #70.

- EDIT - All coins sold!@

WTS 1,000 CAT for 1 BTC (or equivalent DOGE, LTC) ] :: Negotiatiable

or

WTS the entire 1,286 CAT wallet amount for 1.2 BTC (or equivalent DOGE, LTC) :: Negotiatiable


- EDIT - All coins sold!@
- EDIT - All coins sold!@
- EDIT - All coins sold!@
- EDIT - All coins sold!@



PM me if you are interested.


If you have no rep, you must do small increments.


If you need references about me, i am an admin of NetcodePool.

NCP Ref

Heatware Ref

Ebay Ref

Selling 800 Cat coins @ .8 BTC.

Will take the equivalent in LTC or DOGE (or straight BTC)

Amazon paid Spot instance, cc2.8 Large.


As a cautionary note to anyone who may even think about abusing the free $200 AWS credit using fake/temp CC numbers, don't even bother.  

Amazon considers that "deliberate" theft of service and has been sending law enforcement to peoples' doors.  


Also, 1.286k CAT coins for sale.

Naw, @ .456/h

I can do 1k cat for .8 BTC.

Let me know.

wow, HT makes that much of a difference? 

And the Amazon ec2 cc2.8 Large

[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Not bad.

About to add the results of a Amazon cc2.8 large instance.

mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.

Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.

I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.

Should benefit quite a bit.  I am not sure there are even diminished returns on more clock speed.

Here are some stats from a few of my CPUs:

Amazon cc2.8 Large
[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

x5650 @3.4ghz
[07:22:29] Found solution - 11760 / 1968 / 1636249367
[07:22:33] Found share ...f51fe0ced4a01e4f: submitting
[07:22:33] Stats: 4.512 hash/min
[07:22:36] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

x2 L5639 Xeons @ 2.4ghz
[07:20:35] Found solution - 10299 / 1968 / 1324839730
[07:20:51] Stats: 3.079 hash/min

3770k @4.6ghz
[07:23:35] Found share ...1ceb46262d62062a: submitting
[07:23:35] Stats: 4.158 hash/min
[07:23:39] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Note that the 6/12 core X5650 @ 3.4ghz is matching the 4/8 core 3770k @ 4.6ghz.

When using the mmc2.0 minerd cpu miner, you *must* set your --thread parameter to a power of 2. (2,4,8,16,32 etc)

I have a dual 6c/12T xeon machine, and it would not run if i set each batch file --thread parameter to 12 to match the logical cores.

Setting it to --thread 16 per batch file worked and didnt appear to inhibit the performance of each node, even though each node was overspecced 4 threads.

Moar powar

Good point.  I'll update the post.

Doge, LTC, or BTC.