@SP_

How about you try running both by explicitly setting the same value for intensity? Your defaults are known to be much higher than the ones from every other developer, making these stats above rather meaningless.

Also, you've been around long enough that you should know by now, that miner client-side performance is not a reliable metric by itself, some folks have reported your builds to show the faster miner client-side, but have such a high reject rate, that the net result is in effect a much slower miner.

A reliable comparison, is set by running the same parameters (not the defaults), and post the hashrate graph for a reliable pool during a reasonable window on each miner (6 hours or more). A nicehash graph is pretty good for this purpose.

Kindly avoid polluting the threads for other developers with random drops of grossly interpreted hashrate metrics.

I think that we should take a vote on when to revisit the issue! 
Now in all seriousness, great logo, statement, awesome all around. 

Heck no. I would try to help if I had a clue, but I don't speak code.

Figured I'd jump in to see if I was lucky enough to get some blocks and seeing as the specs are an interesting experiment.
In-wallet miner is bugged, and/or so is validation or difficulty, at least for folks on Windows (no clue about Linux)
 - The wallet reports 1GB memory usage regardless of how many miner threads one selects.
 - Debug log shows that the wallet is finding blocks just about every minute, with every single one being rejected.

There's not gonna be rockets launching until these issues are fixed and people can mine.

I prefer the wikipedia take on the same expression, both on the economics/efficiency standpoint as well as the banana example, but I agree that my interpretation might be too liberal for some.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_to_the_bottom

I would summarize by stating that the mining competition naturally drives the overall profit opportunity downwards.
This happens both quantitatively (with more miners competing, there's less profits for each/all of them) as well as qualitatively (each new miner improvement - hardware or software - further denies profits to all the existing miners that do not enjoy the same improvement).

That's an oxymoron bensam. If miners are keeping a coin alive, they are most definitely supporters.

Generally speaking, it's quite funny how all this mining talk casually ignores the fact that PoW is a race to the bottom. People complaining about small mining profits, would do better to just stop mining, and focus their energies elsewhere. Ah well, I'm probably just at the wrong thread...

You can either try the official one:
Ziftrpool Downloads

Or this one (me thinks this is the best pick):
CCminer by tpruvot

Happy Mining!

Joblo's optimization impacts CPU validation of any found shares. This is usually insignificant, but since he's also mining with all CPU cores, it did have an impact for him. It was that his CPU mining was slowing down ccminer.

Joblo: You're invited for a beer over at #ccminer @freenode: there's friendlier dev talk there, some collaboration now and then, and certainly a lot less BS 

Infelizmente, é problema comum deste forum, mas confesso que no caso de XMR parece realmente haver mais trolls do que a média.

Ainda assim, é a minha altcoin de eleição. A equipa de desenvolvimento aborda o projeto com uma seriedade e maturidade que não se vê muito por estas bandas.

Some (pseudo)geeks do use iPhones!    
App looks to get stuck retrieving latest market data, then crashes/closes. Uh Oh... Fine now. Cool!

Looking really cool!

I agree that the frequency of their updates is not great. In fact, that was the one thing that I complained about right here, sometime back. This is not a new thing though, I don't think they ever were much active in Bitcointalk. But remember that they do have many other communication channels (conferences, reddit, twitter, facebook, press releases), all moving about, though again, slowly.

I very much doubt that interest is lost, just considering the weight of GoCoin in the overall business of merchant adoption of crypto currencies. In any case, it would be great to get some update from the Ziftrcoin/GoCoin team, where things are, what's been accomplished recently, what are the challenges ahead...

Personally, I don't give a rats ass about the current exchange rate, as it is entirely driven on speculation for the time being. Once a real use case materializes (which has been the stated plan from day 1), then I'll hope to see some meaningful demand, backed by folks actually using Ziftrcoin for purchase discounts, exclusive promotions, etc.

I'm somewhat frustrated at how long things are taking, but given the merger with GoCoin, it does seem reasonable, and ultimately, I firmly believe that the upside potential is worth the wait. What I did not count on, was that I'd amass way too much ZRC for my prospective spending (assuming using ZRC for 10% of the total purchase value). Oh well, 1st world problems...

One that you keep safe. If you're ok running a full node, the standard command line wallet is certainly a good pick.

-> MyMonero <-

@crysx, it's a PoS/PoW Hybrid, will have long term mining going on.

I did, not so long ago. Works out pretty well as far as I can tell, but would likely get very messy if said miner was being sold to a large number of people. I don't know of any other examples, but I'd imagine other people have done the same.

Side note 1: Being public about the terms of the deal, and changing them after-the-fact, is utter bullshit. I'd say that's much worse than not being public about the terms but sticking to them no matter what.

Side note 2: I understand people are around here with a miner's mindset, and ROI is king. But, if you folks care for the potential of cryptocurrencies at all, maybe someday, try to pick some altcoin that you like, mine it even at a loss, grow a bag, help that community, participate, develop some service, some utility. Much more fun, and oddly enough, big profits on occasion...

Both of you having issues, please confirm that you are indeed running the latest client? (Version 1.2.2.0 currently).
If you use a recent bootstrap, and sync fresh with the latest client, you should not be forking at all, if I understand correctly.

51 votes.
HELL YES
_{Refund address provided to DavidLatapie via PM}

Sweet logo. I don't have a position towards the timing or necessity of changing logo at this point, but I have to confess I really like this one. Nice job bud!

3rd dan, 51 votes.

I vote that the MEW is dissolved, and remainder funds are donated towards CK (as per below) and Monerodice, equally split among the two. If there is another live initiative of particular relevance, I'd suggest adding that as well.

Smooth's point just above is quite important as well in my mind, though if one quickly finds the majority voting in a certain direction, however informal the process, I'd be happy with reaching closure and hopefully not be wasting everyone's time.