|
1. PHI
2. Over
3. Tails
4. PHI
5. Yes
6. Yes
7. Under
8. No
9. Under
10. No
11. Over
12. 2
13. No
14. Sack
15. Field Goal
16. Under
17. Under
18. Under
19. Under
20. Under
21. PHI
22. KC
23. KC
24. PHI
25. Blue
Tiebreaker: 44
|
|
|
|
Indeed you are right GazetaBitcoin! My idea was to channel whatever amount the collectible gathered in the auction to directly support icopress efforts in supporting his country.
Of course, I'm 100% in favor of it and I'll be very happy to send your win of 1 m BTC to icopress as well.  I might do the same for my prize money but let's see if I can achieve place number 2 first.  It's for a good cause and I'm sure it'll help icopress a lot.
Now I know about our giveaway rule and I have a solution for not breaking the rule and also support RickDeckard in his noble gesture.
Since RickDeckard has won the card, he decided to donate it, which is 100% aligned with our rules and I totally support his idea. How could we expect that buying your BonBon L couch is directly helping Ukrainians and icopress? You really made a good decision by buying your BonBon L couch. It's generating so much positivity. |
|
|
|
Das stimmt, das wird sehr schnell sehr kompliziert und letzten Endes ist dann die Frage, wie repräsentativ die Auswahl noch ist. Gerade da die meisten Altcoins dazu tendieren, trotz frühem Hype langfristig gesehen zu scheitern (man denke nur as EOS, IOTA oder BCash, die einst in den Top 10 waren, denn diese sind nun praktisch irrelevant). Würde man z.B. die Top 100 wählen, würde man viele neue Altcoins, die früh in ihrer "Lebenszeit" hohen Gewinne abwerfen, nicht in der Auswahl haben. Jedoch die Altcoins, wie EOS, IOTA oder BCash, die in den letzten Jahren sukzessive verloren haben.
Soo... ich hab heute mal mit der coinmarketcap app nen bissl rum gespielt und nen ALT30 portfolio gebaut. Als Startpunkt habe ich den 6 Januar 2019 gewählt, was zum heutigen Zeitpunkt etwa 1 kompletten Zyklus her ist, sprich sowohl Bullen- als auch Bärenmarkt enthält. https://coinmarketcap.com/historical/20190106/Top5 Alts damals: ETH, XRP, BCH, EOS, LTC ... Referenz ist BTC, der in besagtem Zeitraum satte 475% zugelegt hat. Interessante Auswertungen! Damit diese akkurater sind, wäre es vielleicht noch von Belang, von Bullenmarkt zu Bullenmarkt (Allzeithoch zu Allzeithoch) oder Bärentief zu Bärentief auszuwerten, um die typischen Schwankungen zwischen Bärenmarkt und Bullenmarkt auszugeleichen, wo Altcoins respektive Bitcoin besser abschneiden. Ich habe mal für die Top 5 von letzem Allzeithoch bis heute die Daten herausgenommen. Als Datum habe ich den 24.12.2017 genommen, da Bitcoin am 17.12.2017 sein Allzeithoch hatte und viele Altcoins so um den 04.01.2018 herum. Jeder der 4 Altcoins hat damals 100 USD an Investment bekommen (4 x 100 USD) und zum Vergleich 400 USD in Bitcoin. Das Ergebnis: aus den 400$ bei Bitcoin wurden 651$, aus den 400$ bei Altcoins wurden 331$. Die Altcoins waren also nur halb so erfolgreich wie Bitcoin, jedoch war Ethereum mehr als doppelt so erfolgreich als Bitcoin. Und Bitcoin Cash war ganz miserabel mit einem Verlust von 94 Prozent... 
Ins Portfolio gekommen sind die Top30 Altcoins (ohne stable coins). Gewichtet habe ich wie oben beschrieben, d.h. jeder coin hat am 06.01.2019 eine Einmalzahlung in Höhe von 1000$/n bekommen. Am stärksten gewichtet war somit ETH mit 500$, der letzte coin der mit rein gekommen ist war BAT mit 32,26$.
Hatte es jetzt einmal nicht gewichtet gemacht, da das zwar interessant ist, das Bild aber doch etwas verzerrt. Bei den Top 5 jetzt aber auch nicht so relevant. Ich schaue mal, dass ich die Tabelle etwas ausbaue, z.B. für die Top 10 und dann schauen wir später mal, wie die Daten aussehen, wenn wir ein neues Allzeithoch haben. Wobei man bei "Allzeithoch" auch immer eine Differenz von Bitcoin zu den verschiedenen Altcoins hat... Danke für die Auswertungen auf jeden Fall! |
|
|
|
Such a solution would make it more fair to reward more members. I'm not entirely sure about that. More members, sure - more fair, I don't know. ... I'm all about encouraging instead of discouraging, so therefore I lean against such a solution. I'm also all about encouraging instead of discouraging but I don't see how my suggestion would be discouraging members to report rule-breaking content and low-value post. The winner would still win quite a nice amount of valuable BTC for his reporting, something that didn't exist in previous years (before Bitcointalk had such yearly rewards) and even back then, we had quite some good reporters. I could even argue, that implementing my suggestion would encourage more members to report spam because it's more likely for more members to get a part of the BTC-rewards cake. |
|
|
|
I totally agree here. The amount scammed by SiNeReiNZzz is crazy low and he would receive this amount via his signature campaign in just a few weeks to pay the loan off. But instead, he decided to scam shasan and ruin his own account. There's still a little possibility that he'll come back once he realizes how stupid his move was but as said, it's very unlikely.  Some members found that he was active on Twitter and Telegram. That means he is active everywhere except the forum. In our local board, reports came up that SiNeReiNZzz had been active on Stake (a Casino site) last year as well and talked to at least one member. Maybe he doesn't want to think about how stupid this decision is.
He should, for sure. He could have saved himself from so much trouble. 0.01 BTC is barely nothing to ruin his account. 4 weeks of signature campaigns would have re-paid that amount for sure. On the other hand if we think that he is in a serious problem and having trouble repaying this loan, then he could have been active and asked @shasan for some more time to repay the loan, instead of being inactive like this.
Exactly! And shasan would have waited for sure... shasan has been very generous already as his payback date was postponed multiple times... It's really hard to understand why SiNeReiNZzz made that stupid decision... |
|
|
|
Wie macht ihr es denn mit dem Empfang der Wallet im Gewinnfall ?
Außerdem kann man in Deutschland noch "Postlagernd" nutzen. Zur Not würde ich das nutzen, wenn der Preis nicht hochwertig ist. Mehr Informationen dazu findest du hier. Wäre auch meine Wahl aber bisher habe ich noch nichts gewonnen... Wenn man sich die neuerlichen Fälle von SiNeReiNZzz und Yogg anschaut, ist es mir ohne Frage dann doch lieber, nicht meine private Adresse im Forum zu verteilen. Man weiß nie, wo die eigenen Adressdaten irgendwann einmal landen. Die Preise sind zwar ganz nett aber die Problematik der persönlichen Adressen sollte man nicht unterschätzen. |
|
|
|
I see we have some winners again from the same category as the previous year, maybe we should have an award for two-time bitcointalk award winners That's an interesting idea. Maybe we can make a nomination for those which succeeded that, like there is a position inside some companies named Honorary Chairman... Like a sign of recognition. I would do it quite the other way round. If there's a previously winning member in the Top 3 in the respective category, I would give an award to place number 4 as well + spilt the BTC prize money between the previous winner and the runner up. For example, votes have been counted as following: - CryptoLion (45) - CryptoShark (41) - CryptoDolphin (21) - CryptoFish (18) - CryptoLOL (11) - CryptoROFL (7) But CryptoLion has been a winner previously in the same category. Now, CryptoFish would also win an award (as runner up) and prizes are split between CryptoLion and CryptoFish evenly. If CryptoShark has been a winner previously in the same category as well, same procedure applies and CryptoLOL will also win an award + prize money is split between CryptoShark and CryptoLOL evenly. Such a solution would make it more fair to reward more members. |
|
|
|
And we are a bit sad to realize that our giveaway for celebrating GazetaBitcoin's new couch, Bonbon L, is already over.  This is the worst part You are 100% right here...
I will PM him today, in case he does not see the post. If he refuses it I propose to make a short raffle with the participants of the "couch raffle".
Looking forward to your reply. But as our rules are stating, if the winner refuses it, it'll be allocated for the next giveaway. So, if it should be refused we have to allocate it to our next givwaway. And that's also leading to our next giveaway: I'm already planning to hold an educational giveaway as I've done some years before. For this giveaway, I would allocate some valuable BTC of course and we could add your card, too. The funny part: RickDeckard has been the one who reminded me in late 2021 to do such a giveaway once again.
| Name | Number | Gap | | _______________________ | ________________________ | ________________________ | | LoyceV | 774396 | 109 |
Can I argue I thought January has only 30 days?  Best I can do is April, Sir! Now, we need a solution to determine a winner for the second place. My suggestion would be: predict the last Bitcoin Block mined in February 2023.
But icopress and a majority of our participants need to agree here. I like it! And if there's a draw again, make them predict the last block of the year +1 And yes, hopefully it'll be a draw once again! And we are a bit sad to realize that our giveaway for celebrating GazetaBitcoin's new couch, Bonbon L, is already over. But the couch is still there, right?  I hope so...
RickDeckard has won our giveaway, many congratulations to him, well done! Here is his winner prediction. In my opinion, his win is 100% deserved, because RickDeckard's prediction has been very detailed. To win an event made in honor of Bonbon L is something that I couldn't be more happier! Truly spoken like a deserving winner! Might that win bring you prosperity and a lucky HODL of your coins. Places 2 and 3 are a draw because icopress and 1miau both have a 5 point gap. Now, we need a solution to determine a winner for the second place. My suggestion would be: predict the last Bitcoin Block mined in February 2023. But icopress and a majority of our participants need to agree here. I tend to agree with this option albeit I think it may be a long period between the end of the 1st run and the guessing of the 2nd and 3rd place winner... What do you think of meeting half way - EOD 14 February - as the final date for guessing the last mined BTC block? But it would shorten our remaining celebration time. And I need your Bitcoin address for sending your valuable BTC.
Alternative solution for 2nd/3rd place: Combine the prizes and split evenly, so both get 0.375 mBTC.
It's a solution but it's also a solution where we would lose almost 4 weeks of additional celebration time! I'll PM 1miau with an address.
+1 Great move and I'll send it to that destination at least Saturday afternoon. |
|
|
|
Wenn wir wie im Vorjahr einen Coin wie Axie Infinity dabei gehabt hätten, wäre ja sogar jeder mit Gewinn raus gegangen Ich hatte den nichtmal gekauft, das ist das Ärgerliche daran. Hast du ein Archiv davon? Weil aktuell (2:00), führt Ted_Zz mit 2 Prozentpunkten (3 USD) vor mole0815, wenn es um den zweiten Platz geht.
Ich habe mir einen Wecker gestellt und um 23:59 und 00:00 nachgeschaut, was mich zur Bekanntgabe der Rangliste bringt: Dann bedanke ich mich ebenfalls für die Mühe der Organisation und die finale Auswertung. An dieser Stelle möchte ich mich aber auch nochmal bei euch allen für dei Teilnahme bedanken und hoffe, dass wir so etwas mal wieder in einem Bullenmarkt veranstalten können Da ein potentieller Bullenmarkt aktuell vor der Tür steht, wäre jetzt ein passender Zeitpunkt dafür, sofern du natürlich Lust und Zeit hast sowie sich dafür genug Teilnehmer finden, die ihre wertvollen Satoshis für riskante Profite mit Shitcoins verzocken möchten. Ich wäre zumindest dabei. |
|
|
|
Wow, great list and I guess it took some effort and time to count all votes. Congratulations to all winners! I've presented the result already in our German topic here as citb0in from our local board has won a small prize in "Discovery of the year". Maybe you could correct his name, looks like a small typo in his name: Many thanks @icopress and @GazetaBitcoin for managing our 2022 Bitcointalk Community Awards and Betnomi + Cryptios for a very generous sponsorship! I'm already looking forward to our next round. |
|
|
|
Die abgegebenen Stimmen wurden nun von icopress und GazetaBitcoin ausgezählt und die Ergebnisse in einem neuen Faden in Meta veröffentlicht. Hier die Ergebnisse der großen Bitcointalk-Auszeichnungen 2022: | | |
|
|
| |
Hero of Good |
theymos (87), LoyceV (32), The Sceptical Chymist (14), Hhampuz (14), DdmrDdmr (9), Cyrus (8 ), fillippone (7), CryptopreneurBrainboss (6), 1miau (4), JayJuanGee (4), DarkStar_ (3), El duderino_ (3)
|
|
|
| |
Golden Feather |
fillippone (53), LoyceV (26), Hhampuz (22), JayJuanGee (21), o_e_l_e_o (18), yahoo2278 (14), The Sceptical Chymist (12), DdmrDdmr (11), CryptopreneurBrainboss (9), Plutosky (9), El duderino_ (6), minerjones (5), suchmoon (5), theymos (5), 1miau (4), hugeblack (4), Ratimov (4), gbianchi (3), gmaxwell (3), icopress (3)
|
|
|
| |
Bitcointalk Ninja |
TryNinja (61), LoyceV (43), DdmrDdmr (35), suchmoon (13), fillippone (7), ibminer (6), gbianchi (5), The Sceptical Chymist (5), bitbollo (4), o_e_l_e_o (3), hugeblack (3), JayJuanGee (3), Paolo.Demidov (3), PowerGlove (3), yahoo2278 (3)
|
|
|
| |
Bitcoin Geek |
o_e_l_e_o (56), achow101 (15), JayJuanGee (14), gmaxwell (12), pooya87 (11), LoyceV (10), NotATether (9), n0nce (8 ), babo (7), dkbit98 (7), ETFbitcoin (7), LFC_Bitcoin (6), yogg (5), BitcoinGirl.Club (4), BlackHatCoiner (4), DdmrDdmr (4), gbianchi (4), hugeblack (4), igor72 (4), DaveF (3), nc50lc (3)
|
|
|
| |
Discovery
of the Year |
PowerGlove (77), n0nce (15), citb0oin (7), NotATether (4), icopress (3), mendace (3), PrivacyG (3), CoinEraser (3), hymperion (3), Ratimov (3)
|
|
|
| |
SpamBuster |
GazetaBitcoin (50), Ratimov (43), lovesmayfamilis (31), The Sceptical Chymist (9), Welsh (9), Lafu (8 ), mprep (8 ), actmyname (7), BitcoinGirl.Club (3), Jolly Good (3), SFR10 (3)
|
|
|
| |
ScamBuster |
lovesmayfamilis (52), examplens (21), SFR10 (15), Ratimov (13), bitbollo (7), nutildah (7), Lafu (6), GazetaBitcoin (5), suchmoon (5), LoyceV (4), Poker Player (4), Rikafip (4), The Sceptical Chymist (4), ChiBitCTy (3), dkbit98 (3), icopress (3), JollyGood (3), YOSHIE (3)
|
|
|
| |
Craft Master |
Jayce (45), Hhampuz (37), icopress (26), CryptoBrainboss (14), Maus0728 (11), giammangiato (9), willi9974 (8 ), fillippone (7), 1miau (6), yahoo2278 (6), Royse777 (4), BlackHatCoiner (3), Liquidoptions (3), MoparMiningLLC (3), Rikafip (3), taufik123 (3)
|
|
|
| |
Antihero |
Royse777 (48), franky1 👿 (13), JollyGood (8 ), naim027 (7), Hhampuz (3)
|
|
|
| |
Miss Bitcointalk |
Foxpup 🦊 (47), lovesmayfamilis (22), suchmoon (13), BitcoinGirl.Club (12), sheenshane (6), SatoPrincess (5), 5Ksana_HandMade (4), LoyceV (4), yahoo2278 (3)
|
|
|
| |
Event of the Year |
🎃 BitcoinTalk Pumpkin Carving Contest 🎃 (63), BitcoinTalk Community Awards 🏆 (15), FTX collapse (13), Bitcoin Pizza Day (12), Bitcoincleanup.com (12), Hodlonaut's win (7), Ukraine (6), Elon and Twitter (5)
|
|
|
| |
Fail of the Year |
FTX collapse (90), Luna collapse (28), Adoption of CEXs (9), CSW (5), TheBitcoinTalkShow (5), Hodlonaut's win (4), Sam Bankman-Fried (4), BTC Price (3), Putin (3), Russia/Ukraine War (3)
|
|
|
| _________________ | _________________ | |
- List of unaccounted nominees and votes
BTC_Mouse, burugcrypto, PaperWallet, ShafixNero, Popkon6, halim50_, Rbolisna, Atikah92, satoshi, Lauda, asu Liste der Nominierungen mit weniger als 3 Stimmen: hilariousandco, creep_o, HostFat, kano, phantastich, tranthidung, Mitchell, d5000, HagssFIN, stompix, HCP, arulbero, DireWolfM14, EFS, FP91G,
garlonicon, Husna QA, mocacinno, NeuroticFish, NotFuzzyWarm, philipma1957, Pmalek, ranochigo, sabotag3x, Zlatan, albert0bsd, Agbe, Ale88, BitGoba, darxiaomi,
Hispo, m.lov, Porfirii, Queentoshi, RickDeckard, serhack, Skot, turtlecute, Igebotz, Csmiami, alexrossi, conilmionome, Lillominato89, mendace, MindlessElectron,
mole0815, TheBeardedBaby, The Cryptovator, holydarkness, Rizzrack, Timelord2067, $crypto$, Amph, Dave1, duesoldi, FatFork, lucius, ScamViruS, Shasan, Stalker22,
cygan, jack0m, jeremypwr, LegendaryK, xhomer10, CR02, cryptofrka, irfan_pak10, MrCryptHodl, Shahzadafzal, so98nn, Trofo, Yatsan, BADecker, FortuneJack,
larry_vw_1955, MikeJ_NpC, QuestionAuthority, Quickseller, nullius, Lesbian Cow, BitcoinBunny, Disruptivas, Fattcatt, Helena Yu, Majestic_milf, mk4, Sandra_hakeem, womanderful Aus unserem Bereich hat damit citb0in den dritten Platz in der Kategorie "Entdeckung des Jahres" belegt (7 Stimmen) und er erhält damit 3 m BTC. Das wertvolle Bitcoin des Gewinns wird von icopress versendet, wenn citb0in seine Adresse dort im Faden nennt. |
|
|
|
Ich kann mir beim besten Willen nicht vorstellen, dass jemand aus dem deutschen Bereich mit einem Legendary Account wegen 0.01 BTC jemanden betrügen würde beziehungsweise seinen Account wegen so einem niedrigen Betrag zerstören würde.
Das ist in der Tat eine sehr geringe Summe aber nach aktuellem Stand der Dinge ist das so passiert. Man sollte ebenfalls bedenken, dass um die Zeit der Rückzahlung der Preis des Bitcoins bei 50k stand. Ist aber trotzdem nicht viel. Da steckt bestimmt mehr dahinter, evntl. wurde der Account gehacked oder verkauft?
Dass der Account gehackt wurde, kann praktisch ausgeschlossen werden, denn dann hätte sich SiNeReiNZzz mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit einen Alt Account angelegt, eine Bitcoin-Adresse signiert und damit gezeigt, dass sein Hauptaccount gehackt worden ist. Damit hätte er den Account zurück bekommen. Das war aber nicht der Fall, daher kann ein Hack ausgeschlossen werden. Zudem wurde SiNeReiNZzz auch auf Telegram von shasan angeschrieben und SiNeReiNZzz hat dort erst die Nachricht von shasan gelesen, jedoch nie geantwortet. Anrufe blockt SiNeReiNZzz ebenfalls ab, siehe hier. Dass der Account verkauft wurde, ist ziemlich unwahrscheinlich, denn zum Zeitpunkt der Beantragung des Darlehens hatte SiNeReiNZzz noch ganz normal wie immer Beiträge geschrieben, auch in unserem lokalen Forenbereich. Ich denke, dass es tatsächlich damit zusammen hängt, dass er möglicherweise auf einer Glücksspielseite sehr viel Geld verzockt hat. Oben hat seek3r das ja sehr gut beschrieben. |
|
|
|
Maybe o_e_l_e_o will win our special BonBon L giveaway rewarding his bullish prediction. 0O
I've just took a look and I think that the last block number was 774505 and if I'm right then o_e_l_e_o may have won place #4. However, let's wait for the official announcement. You are right, last mined Bitcoin Block in January 2023 is No. 774.505:  After evaluating our predictions, we have a winner: RickDeckard has won our giveaway, many congratulations to him, well done! Here is his winner prediction. In my opinion, his win is 100% deserved, because RickDeckard's prediction has been very detailed.  Places 2 and 3 are a draw because icopress and 1miau both have a 5 point gap. Now, we need a solution to determine a winner for the second place. My suggestion would be: predict the last Bitcoin Block mined in February 2023. But icopress and a majority of our participants need to agree here. Place 4 goes to o_e_l_e_o. So, I would need 1 BTC Address from RickDeckard and o_e_l_e_o to send out your won BTC. RickDeckard can PM GazetaBitcoin for the Bitcoin Romania card. Many thanks to all participants once again! And we are a bit sad to realize that our giveaway for celebrating GazetaBitcoin's new couch, Bonbon L, is already over. |
|
|
|
Bezüglich Gewinnern und Verlierern: Die Plätze 4-8 erhalten doch ebenfalls 8% vom Portfolio. Du gehst mit weniger raus, als du eingezahlt hast aber da alle beteiligt sind, darf auch jeder mitentscheiden Der 8. Platz mit 8% Beteiligung ist doch immerhin besser als der 4. Platz, wo man so knapp an einem höheren Gewinn vorbeischrammt. Danke für die Erinnerung, das hatte ich ganz vergessen, wie hier die Aufteilung ist und dass die Plätze 4 bis 8 noch einen Trostpreis bekommen, der, wenn die Shitcoins signifikant gestiegen wären, sogar höher hätte sein können als die Teilnahmegebühr. Dann hoffen wir mal, dass unsere Shitcoins entsprechend steigen.
Also in bisschen mehr als 4 Stunden ist das Gewinnspiel vorbei und aktuell sieht es so aus, als würden sich @mole0815 und @Ted_Zz nochmal um den 2. Platz streiten. Jetzt gerade liegt Ted_Zz mit 2$ vor mole0815 Hast du ein Archiv davon? Weil aktuell (2:00), führt Ted_Zz mit 2 Prozentpunkten (3 USD) vor mole0815, wenn es um den zweiten Platz geht. |
|
|
|
Wirklich schade, das SiNeReiNzzz so agiert. Das hätte ich nicht von ihm erwartet. Seinen guten Namen für so einen Betrag hier kaputtzumachen steht eigentlich in keinem Verhältnis.
Ist mir ebenfalls komplett unverständlich, sich damit seinen Account kaputt zu machen. Schließlich hatte der Account den Rang Legendary, wofür viele Nutzer mehrere Jahre benötigen. Den geliehenen Betrag hätte er ganz einfach zurückzahlen können, indem er ein paar Wochen (vermutlich nicht mehr als 3 Wochen) die wöchentlichen Beträge einfach an shasan sendet... Und danach hätte er weiter Geld aus der Signaturkampagne bekommen. Er hatte auf jeden Fall nie Probleme, in Signaturkampagnen zu kommen. Das ist schon echt dämlich und hoffentlich realisiert SiNeReiNzzz noch, wie sinnlos diese Aktion war. Wenn er den Betrag zurückzahlt, kommt er vielleicht nochmal aus der Nummer raus. Aber nach dem, was abgelaufen ist, geht die Wahrscheinlichkeit wohl gegen null, dass er das einsieht. Bleibt zu hoffen, dass er seinen Account nicht noch irgendwann an einen Betrüger verkauft, um noch den letzten Rest an Geld herauszuquetschen, daher wäre es sinnvoll, wenn DT1 und DT2-Mitglieder den Account SiNeReiNzzz distrusten, um hier Missbrauch zu vermeiden.
Ich möchte hier keine alten Geschichten aufwärmen, die mich eh nicht selbst betroffen haben, aber gab es nicht auch schon mal ein kleines Problem, wegen der Gewinne (?) bei einem Bundesliga Tippspiel vor einiger Zeit? Soweit ich es damals mitbekommen habe, wurde das zu aller Zufriedenheit geregelt.
Das war Scheede.
Wer weiß was passiert ist hoffentlich nichts schlimmes und wie du schon geschrieben hast eventuell klärt sich alles auf zu nem Zeitpunkt !
Passiert ist wohl nix, SiNeReiNzzz war ja in seinem Telegram-Account aktiv bis shasan ihn da kontaktiert hat, SiNeReiNzzz da die Nachricht gelesen hat aber den Kontakt seitdem auch da abblockt. Er will wohl einfach nicht den Betrag an shasan zurückzahlen. Daher blockt er jede Kommunikation ab.  |
|
|
|
I don't know what happened to him, a legendary rank account of good reputation ran away with this small amount (not a big amount according to his rank and reputation). If he had been active in this forum and participated in a signature campaign, it would not have taken much time to pay off this loan. But he became inactive and ruined his reputation.
I totally agree here. The amount scammed by SiNeReiNZzz is crazy low and he would receive this amount via his signature campaign in just a few weeks to pay the loan off. But instead, he decided to scam shasan and ruin his own account. There's still a little possibility that he'll come back once he realizes how stupid his move was but as said, it's very unlikely. Flag supported and left a feedback.
Done, too. I'm hoping as well that DT members will distrust him as he might also try to sell his account (which is unlikely, too, but we are better off to avoid risk here). |
|
|
|
...
When Ulbricht launched Silk Road, he probably didn't have any bad intentions, so we should consider that when judging him. But yes, Ulbrichts actions resulted in a lot of damage. The early days of when Bitcoin was launched, many criminals abused it and unfortunately a lot of them gathered on Silk Road for criminal business. The dust settled now, the criminal use of Bitcoin is decreasing and maybe one day, Ulbricht will be released from jail. I would not rule it out.
Since the option of "none of them" has been added in the poll, I think one more option should have been added - "both of them".
Good point, I would also like to see such an option, since it would change the outcome probably. And you can't vote for both in OP's poll.
For this gentleman I fell into FTX Token Scam in November 2022 worth $1500.
Sad to hear, mate! I hope it isn't all of your money and you had most of your money in a private wallet. Always make sure, that you don't store your valuable coins on exchanges. It's even more risky than trading! 
They cannot be compared, but its illogical one is in prison and one is free... If Ross payed for killing, then he should be in prison... for the rest I can see something which started with a good idea, with a lot of freedom etc ....
SBF is a scam from the start and we will never know what exactly happened with politicians etc but for sure a lot happened which hurt lots of people
Like I said, there is nothing logical in this clown world, especially if you are watching mainstream brainwashing all the time. That's a slogan often used mostly by fascists who don't have any arguments left, so these fascists claim it's all "brainwashing by msm". In reality the world is much more complex that in the heads of these extremists. In general, the concept of "msM bAd" is antithetical to what an educated person would do: hear all the arguments, evaluate the arguments and look at the education of the people voicing the arguments. For example, a gardener is probably a bad source for planetary science and so on. The funny thing: the conspiracy nut crowd has started producing a massive amount of lies over the last 5 years (probably more than over the last 25 years combined), and that will become a big problem for the conspiracy theorists as more and more of it is proven as a lie. Nobody willtake them serios anymore at some point. 
Regardless, the claim that Ross Ulbricht is innocent is not something I believe. He was aware that millions of dangerous illegal trades were taking place on the Silk Road, but he did nothing about it.
As far as I know, Ulbricht admitted that SilkRoad has been a mistake. I also expect he was not fully aware, that Silk Road would get abused like that. And personally, I would always re-evaluate an imprisonment if that person had admitted their mistake and if the person still is a danger for society. I don't know if that's a valid argument since I’m not a lawyer but when releasing someone from prison, we should also consider: how likely is it, that the person who's currently in jail will do crimes again, when he's released? Is it more beneficial for society to keep him in prison or is it more beneficial to release him? And for Ulbricht, I believe, it wouldn’t hurt to release him. |
|
|
|
someone out there maybe forgets if they have an old paper wallet and keep it somewhere in a safe box. like the example picture below:
Yes, it's always important to be able to import a paper wallet, it's a basic step. And it's also working for every private key, no matter where it's from, easy to import. Knowing the difference between importing and sweeping is also important, see Importing Vs Sweeping Private Keys; What you need to know.Importing means, you'll get access to your original wallet (which you are importing) = you'll make your original wallet accessible in Electrum. Sweeping means, you'll create a transaction sending your coins from your (paper) wallet to your preferred Electrum wallet = coins are transferred. |
|
|
|
Hello saxydev, after reviewing your case, it's very clear that DT is right to bring up a scammer flag on your account. I'm always giving members a benefit of doubt but your case is really unfortunate because all evidence is right here. The flag brought up by dkbit98 applies because you accepted the deal. It's archived. You might have a different point of view but DT is a decentralized system and as long as dkbit98's accusation is valid, the flag is appropriate. You can only get rid of the flag by making dkbit98 roughly whole and even then, there's still your fraudulent service (but your fraudulent service is not related to your flag). So, yes, make dkbit98 roughly whole and he might forgive you. In addition it's a bit weird that such a flag really gets opposition. It's not a good showing to side with a scammer... Let's wait for Belkin1986's evidence if there's even more fraud.
And may I ask, why you also defended a dangerous fraud Shitcoin?
Saxydevs shill of Pi token: A shit coin ? 100%. Turned out to be a scam ? Nope, simply a shitcoin that people have been "mining" with their phones for years, remember the ads about it for years now, looked recently into it as I've "mined" about 300 of those, which apparently are trading OTC at this point.
You are missing the point that a Shitcoin is mostly harmless and "just" resulting in a loss (by simply holding it). PI is a fraudulent shitcoin where harm is actively done in multiple ways: PI is only available for people doing KYC. This results in possible identity theft, which is even more harmful that just a financial loss. PI is a private company and should be sued and punished for requiring KYC. PI is advertising to be mined via phone, which is potentially damaging for the phone but at least it's unprofitable by making false promises. PI is a glorified ponzi. And the only winners of PI Shitcoin are the founders! Supporting a fraudulent Shitcoin like PI should be highly discouraged. |
|
|
|
...
Multumesc pentru cuvintele frumoase si, bineinteles, pentru tombole! Mă bucur să aud. Este o plăcere faptul că avem câștigători care apreciază tombolele noastre interesante cu tematică Bitcoin. Desigur, când voi mai lansa o tombolă, mebrii eligibili ai secțiunii românești sunt bineveniți. Dupa cum am promis, am tradus în topicul tombolei din secțiunea germană postarea ta în care dadusei informații despre participarea la tombolă și despre pariurile la Betnomi. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
