I don't know if we should ban copypasta meme or not but it doesn't feel right tbh. I'd say: when in doubt: don't ban. |
|
|
|
I haven't added color coding to the BBCode yet. Update: I've just added this. To do
Mark banned accounts. Done! See http://loyce.club/trust/flags/15.htmlNote that my List of banned users doesn't update unbanned users yet. This is still on my list to fix. Also note that I only show the banned-status on flagged accounts, not for accusing or supporting/opposing users. Sample: 2019-06-18 Tue 21.01hsource: loyce.club~snip~ 205 Active. marlboroza flagged catchaBTC.com (type 1, see why). Supported by marlboroza, Last of the V8s, Hhampuz, micgoossens. Opposed by nobody. 206 Insufficient support. Coinfan flagged eliale (type 3, see why). Supported by Coinfan. Opposed by nobody. 207 Insufficient support. Coinfan flagged paci (type 3, see why). Supported by Coinfan. Opposed by nobody. 208 Active. Timelord2067 flagged buyercodesaws Banned! (type 1, see why). Supported by micgoossens, DireWolfM14, Timelord2067. Opposed by nobody. 209 Active. Lafu flagged nikkybtc Banned! (type 1, see why). Supported by Lafu, micgoossens. Opposed by nobody. 210 Active. Lafu flagged sinivate Banned! (type 1, see why). Supported by bones261, Lafu, Last of the V8s, micgoossens, 1miau, Quickseller. Opposed by nobody. 211 Active. bitmover flagged liamwup Banned! (type 3, see why). Supported by suchmoon, franckuestein, bones261, marlboroza, bL4nkcode, Lafu, Last of the V8s, micgoossens, witcher_sense, bitmover, DireWolfM14, Timelord2067, sabotag3x, stompix, akamit, Royse777. Opposed by nobody. 212 Active. Timelord2067 flagged master-P (type 1, see why). Supported by micgoossens, Timelord2067. Opposed by nobody. 213 Active. kruglikov flagged majestyz5 (type 1, see why). Supported by micgoossens, Steamtyme, Timelord2067, bill gator, mr.relax, mosprognoz, Thecryptofan911, kruglikov. Opposed by nobody. 214 Active. unibitcoinist flagged Vingolle Banned! (type 1, see why). Supported by bones261, micgoossens, Steamtyme, unibitcoinist. Opposed by nobody. 215 Active. Steamtyme flagged Rico80 (type 1, see why). Supported by micgoossens, Steamtyme. Opposed by nobody. 216 Active. morvillz7z flagged Rudibert (type 1, see why). Supported by suchmoon, franckuestein, LFC_Bitcoin, bones261, Slow death, marlboroza, micgoossens, witcher_sense, morvillz7z, ICOEthics, ePesoInitiative, GreatArkansas. Opposed by nobody. 217 Active. bones261 flagged Lokomotiff (type 1, see why). Supported by LFC_Bitcoin, bones261, Last of the V8s, Theb, micgoossens, witcher_sense, morvillz7z, TalkStar. Opposed by nobody. 218 Active. Lafu flagged CyFau Banned! (type 1, see why). Supported by Lafu, 1miau. Opposed by nobody. 219 Insufficient support. Dont_u_dare flagged BitcoinCZ (type 1, see why). Supported by Dont_u_dare. Opposed by nobody. 220 Active. Lafu flagged yanoaziz (type 1, see why). Supported by bones261, marlboroza, Lafu, micgoossens. Opposed by nobody. 221 Active. Timelord2067 flagged Aleister Crowley (type 1, see why). Supported by micgoossens, Timelord2067. Opposed by nobody. 222 Active. Timelord2067 flagged pumpmydump (type 1, see why). Supported by micgoossens, Timelord2067. Opposed by nobody. 223 Active. Timelord2067 flagged delaria Banned! (type 1, see why). Supported by micgoossens, Timelord2067. Opposed by nobody. 224 Active. xandry flagged Belogvardeec (type 3, see why). Supported by xandry, kzv, MaoChao, Alex_Sr, taikuri13, madnessteat, johhnyUA, SooEz4Me, DabLjat. Opposed by nobody. 225 Insufficient support. iwantapony flagged iwannafind1block (type 1, see why). Supported by iwantapony. Opposed by nobody. I think it would also be useful to list the name of the accused first, rather than the name of the accuser. When looking through the (upcoming) categories of type 2 and type 3 flags, I'd be most interested in who has recently had a new red type flag on them, as opposed to who was leaving them. Unless there is a very strong demand for this, I won't change it. I don't think it matters much. |
|
|
|
Bad actors are using newbie account to spread FUD, lies, and disinformation in certain forums. As much as I dislike that, it's not against the rules. It's very unlikely theymos wants to further restrict Newbies: The things on the forum which encourage spam are allowed mainly because it's part of the forum's mission to be as free as possible.
~snip~
Limiting newbie participation is very harmful for a community. Newbie jail will never return: I consider the newbie-jail period to have been extremely damaging to the forum. When barriers to participation are too high, then the best people often just won't go to the trouble of joining, and the people who are willing to jump through the hoops are often people who aren't good for the community: people with nothing better to do, scammers, get-rick-quickers, etc. Having a permanent newbie jail policy would improve things a lot in the short-term, but would end up being a fatal poison to the community. |
|
|
|
taken completely out of context Here's a new one: fiat currency and the mental state it has left me in has caused severe damages to me, I don’t sleep at night |
|
|
|
However we see other members have RED type 1 warning flag and a THIS PERSON IS A SCAMMER warning at the top of their threads. Can you show a link? Type 1 is yellow, Type 2-3 is red. When clicking on their trust page we can see NO mention or details of the flag so how to oppose or support it or EVEN KNOW why they were given this warning flag? Again: can you show a link? I haven't found any flag yet that I can't view: http://loyce.club/trust/flags/14.html |
|
|
|
Unless you're in a rush, it doesn't matter if it's "the best time" or not. My Bitcoin Core estimates that 1.18 satoshi/byte is enough to confirm within 24 hours. If fees go up and it doesn't confirm, it'll probably confirm on Sunday. So as long as you're not in a hurry, just set a low fee, broadcast the transaction, and you'll see it confirmed eventually. |
|
|
|
What node are you connected to? I'm currently connected to one of ACINQ's nodes, which is the easiest to connect to from Eclair. lightning:lnbc100u1pws3w8tpp5eyzwh4hwtqkj83yeueqkgaycjxtnzqyza8fwkdvd6wakv6unx4dqdp2f3hhjcm92csxcmmpdcsxvmmjyppxjazrwfuhqar90qcqzpgxqyz5vq02ly82jzuhayx6pcd78p4xygmvnf44xwtq657llpnfu2k7qf2fwhlepgzqqzdd89kzsdkrjwpslrh0qkw70mfq5q0wvvmjd45fjveygpu307qq Funded! Welcome my third customer  I paid a whopping 5.52 satoshi on fees.
I also installed BlueWallet, which allows receiving Lighting payments without funding a channel first. Using a custodial wallet certainly has benefits. BlueWallet recommends to only use it for small amounts. From what I've seen, it charges (up to) 1% in fees for making a payment. For small payments, that's totally acceptable, and much less than the on-chain fee I paid to close a channel that failed to open (due to my low funding fee). |
|
|
|
|
I read this suggestion before (but didn't bookmark the link), so I'll reproduce it: Could it be you wrote the words in a different order:
Say:
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
And now you're going 1 3 5 7 ...... 2 4 6 8 ......?
|
|
|
|
Could you sort out all flags into categories, such as casinos? No, sorry. I only add things that I can automate to the list. |
|
|
|
I've updated my Trust Flag viewer, see http://loyce.club/trust/flags/13.htmlI've seen requests for some statistics, and with the color coding it's easy to count: Active flagsThe large majority of flags are either type 1 (yellow) or inactive. There are only 15 Active red flags. 2 of those involve ky94PjDw. I'm not entirely sure what the story is, but it seems to be a Flag testing account. That leaves just 13 red flags: type 2 (1x) and type 3 (12x). Out of 12 type 3 flags, 4 were flagged by me, and they're alt-accounts. Insufficient support9 type 3 flags have insufficient support. I didn't count type 1, and type 2 has no unsupported flags. I expect the number of type 2 or 3 flags to rise once new scams are reported, and the victim can be pointed in the right direction to create a flag. |
|
|
|
The earning is from a forum linked to a gambling site and the funds are sent to my balance there and if I don't withdraw, I kind of bust the small amount in temptation  So thinking to withdraw daily the moment I get , but I'll check the exchange websites you mentioned.... Maybe I need to control my gambling urges xD  Why don't you install a Dogecoin wallet and withdraw to there? Allow me to put some numbers to this: $3 per day in Doge (see CMC) is 954.5 Doge per day. It recently dropped in value to the current 34 satoshi per Doge. That would mean you'll probably get 33 at an exchange: 0.315 m BTC per day. So: install a Dogecoin wallet, wait (11 days) until you have 10,000 Doge, exchange it to Bitcoin at an exchange with low withdrawal fees (the one I mentioned earlier for instance) pay the 0.25 m BTC deposit fee, and you still have about the same left as when you'd give 10% away. You don't just get $2.75 per day, you now get $30 every 11 days. If you can spread the deposit fee over a longer period, you lose less. |
|
|
|
Well. Right now I have bunch of inputs on legacy addresses. Can they be consolidated on one or two "bc1" addresses? Or I have to use the "1"-type- addresses as the destination to consolidate them? As long as your wallet supports it, you can send funds to bc1 addresses. |
|
|
|
So you're saying you want a big advertising company to decide what you get to read? Facebook has a terrible UI, designed to get people addicted to their "Likes", meanwhile maximizing the amount of advertising and tricking people to "Like" advertisers. So no, we don't need that here! Let me quote Cøbra: A hundred years from now, nobody will give a shit about Twitter, Facebook or Reddit. But there's a good chance they will give a shit about Bitcoin (and one can hope they will be using it). You can be sure this forum will be in the history books. Little kids will look over archives of our threads as they dream of one day owning 1 BTC. Threads like "we are the new wealthy elite" will be discussed in classrooms. Homework assignments will ask kids to go and research how the HODL meme originated. If Bitcoin does take over the world, you can tell your grandkids you were in the place where it all began. We have something that can't be replicated elsewhere: history. |
|
|
|
I recently declined to give bibop555 merit because his post history is nearly entirely made up of one liners when I checked yesterday. Most of his posts deserve deletion. But if he really improved after realizing that's what he needs to rank up, that kinda deserves a reward. On the other hand, abruptly going from shitposter to decent posts sets off my "plagiarism alarm". I can't find it, it might be a very good text spinner, but I find it hard to believe it's his own work. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
