|
Why don't the monero shills (and anti-shills) just start their own forum and spam that shit ffs?
Not many people give a shit about Monero.
|
|
|
|
Gigabyte's cooler seems to be exactly the same as the one from the 970s, with the same crappy fans.
What's wrong with the Windforce fans? They are my favourite by far and I never ever had any major issues with any of them on dozens of cards (780 Ti, 750 Ti, 970). The only issue I had was some fans on 780 Ti's slowing down because of dust but after cleaning they were perfect again. They burn out. The coolers are pretty good, but the fans wear out after about a year of mining. They're small and use sleeve bearings. Pretty much all manuf. use sleeve bearings, sadly. It's weird you buy a $450 graphics card and they can't even spend the extra bit of money on a more exotic bearing type that lasts longer. I think eVGA this time around has a double ball bearing, but I don't have one yet. You can usually tell if it has a ball bearing based on spinning the fan. If it sort of 'wobbles' back and forth into place after you spin it, it's probably a ball bearing. Sometimes this is labeled on the sticker on the back of the fan as well, but not always (especially not with GPU fans). In my experience it seems to be there is a correlation between the thickness of the fan (shaft length), diameter, and reliability. Thinner and smaller fans burn out faster then larger ones. The ones on the Asus 970s were pretty good. Gigabyte fans burn out quite fast, I've also had lots of problems with XFX back when I used AMD (they used very similar fans to Gigabyte), and Asus is now using a similar looking fan so I expect it to go after about a year. Ball bearings you can almost always oil as you pop off the back sticker and there is a reservoir in back there. Sleeve bearings are usually sealed and it's next to impossible to open them, especially with GPU fans. If you need to oil your fans on a regular basis that probably means it's a junk fan to begin with. Cleaning fans helps. It seems as though Gigabyte fan blades gather dust faster then other types as well. and I don't see that they cool properly the memory and vrm's which gigabyte does fantastically well. this is all i care when it come to custom gpu, vrm, the damn vram need to be covered properly, gigabyte is the best there ^This. The reason why I abandoned Asus cards. The VRM's on the DirectCU II 780 Ti's were like ~30 °C higher than the core. |
|
|
|
Gigabyte's cooler seems to be exactly the same as the one from the 970s, with the same crappy fans.
What's wrong with the Windforce fans? They are my favourite by far and I never ever had any major issues with any of them on dozens of cards (780 Ti, 750 Ti, 970). The only issue I had was some fans on 780 Ti's slowing down because of dust but after cleaning they were perfect again. |
|
|
|
|
Bittrex or c-cex, maybe polo.
|
|
|
|
|
Can I please get a list of hashartes on one of the popular card like 280/290/480 just so I have a comparison, please? (I'm on team green, just being curious.)
Either way, I deeply respect Wolf0's work.
|
|
|
|
|
Read the other thread. It downloads another version and it sets up a scheduled task so that it runs every boot. It can download the virus at any time.
Besides, you should really not trust virustotal or any other scanners. The malicious payload can be encrypted so it won't show up.
Anyway, run everything in a restricted sandbox or virtual machine or on a rig with a throwaway OS. Otherwise you will get hacked eventually.
|
|
|
|
|
The block I found was an orphan because it didn't get credited.
And the difficulty jumped up again. 3924761 GH/block. Crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe your launch .bat didn't save or got corrupted? Happened to me once because the changes were only made in the cache and not made it into the disk.
I'm not sure, but yeah windows does get pissy if it gets shutdown abruptly.
If you can see the cards with different softwares you should be fine.
As useless as it sounds you might want to do a
chkdsk /f /r /x
in cmd and let it run next boot.
|
|
|
|
|
Will ccminer and sgminer be provided or you're going to solomine it for a few days with your private GPU miner?
|
|
|
|
I should have found ~3.5 blocks since upgrading to 1.0 but I haven't find anything. I'm not sure if solomining works anymore (or KlausT's miner) or I'm just that awfully unlucky with this coin.
Though ever since I started mining this coin, I'vee been really unlucky and found maybe half as many blocks as I should have on paper.
I've mined with 15G and didn't found block in eight days. I have double that and I only (hopefully) found my first block today since 1.0 came out - so yeah, 5 days. I should have find roughly 4 blocks by now. I've been mining this coin for 360 hours with some downtime and in the beginning the diff only increased every few days and not by that much but lately it increased a lot. It's basically twice of what it was. |
|
|
|
|
Congrats on the successful PoW/PoS transition and congrats on reaching page 100!
I had trouble staking for the last few days but now it finally works again and I got a nice, 52 EGC stake reward.
|
|
|
|
|
So apparently I just found a block but it's not showing up in the GUI wallet, however siac says so:
>siac [...] miner
Miner status:
CPU Mining: off
CPU Hashrate: 0 KH/s
Blocks Mined: 1 (0 stale)
>siac [...] wallet
Wallet status:
Encrypted, Unlocked
Confirmed Balance: 0 H
Unconfirmed Delta: +0 H
Exact: 0 H
Siafunds: 0 SF
Siafund Claims: 0 H
|
|
|
|
|
I should have found ~3.5 blocks since upgrading to 1.0 but I haven't find anything. I'm not sure if solomining works anymore (or KlausT's miner) or I'm just that awfully unlucky with this coin.
Though ever since I started mining this coin, I'vee been really unlucky and found maybe half as many blocks as I should have on paper.
|
|
|
|
Any idea how long it would take to mine a block with a 970? ~800 hours or 33 days with current difficulty. Did anyone find a block with the new wallet using KlausT's miner? I'm curious if I'm just that unlucky again. |
|
|
|
|
I hate ICOs just as much as the crypto-medieval, boring Litecoin which offers nothing extra at all.
|
|
|
|
Awesome! Does KlausT have a bitcointalk profile? |
|
|
|
Lyra2RE Cryptocoin is Crypto(CTO). We dont know only it...
Crypto has a marked value of 1000$ and a turnover of $1 per day. http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/crypto/#marketsThere has to be another coin. Anyone? Nicehash is paying around 0,512BTC a day for all the lyra2re miners. Wich coin is supporting the algo? Don't alway look for a hidden gems or even logic when it comes to nicehash. When sharkcoin was "big" (for some at least) solomining was paying way worse than mining sharkcoin via nicehash. Some people probably just can't do math or use bots properly. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
