I wonder, can people vote multiple times by moving their coins?

Vote, move your coins to a new address, vote with that address as well, rinse, repeat.

Anyway, they propose to disable the difficulty bomb but have the same coin emission rate by reducing block rewards. In theory, the emission would be (roughly) the same but we wouldn't have slower block times due to the difficulty bomb.

As much as dislike ASICs, they're not killing Litecoin.

With current prices 55.15 BTC or $56,448 worth of Litecoins get mined every day. Even if that was mined by GPUs, most of it would get dumped just the same. Especially if there's no development or some incentive to hold instead of dumping.

Dual algo mining would make LTC interesting for a while but then again, ASIC miners would have to agree to share the cake with GPUs which they'll likely won't do.

What I mean is that you can only ever change the algo of Litecoin if the majority of miners accept the fork. Short of that you could have a fork with a different algo but that would just mean you have a Litecoin fork with a tiny network while the original ASIC network would keep going.

Good luck getting ASIC miners to support a fork which cuts them off completely.

I asked sp_ to do that because hardcoded realtime priority hard freezes all of my rigs quite often when the miner starts.

But for people who doesn't have that issue and higher priority is required (ccminer is fighting for CPU time with other softwares so much that it's detrimental to the hashrate) you can use
start /HIGH ccminer.exe...
to launch it with high (or whatever) priority, because now that's not overwritten by the hardcoded priority.

Thanks sp_!

Wow, an ICO timer for the next ICO without any info.

Not that any info would matter, right? Epitome of bullshit scams.

^This. It's misleading but only at the end of the day you'll know how much Mrai each claim will worth (400.000 divided by all claims).


Maybe more people work for the same wallet (unlikely) or maybe someone hires bots (people) to solve captchas remotely.

Nice find.

Yeah, no.

You have to link the images directly:

It's not perfect but www.cryptocompare.com/portfolio might just do the trick.

For you maybe, Bittrex is, and always was pretty fast for me. Otherwise I wouldn't use it.

Considering Polo added way shittier coins, I'd be surprised if they wouldn't add it.

But others are doing it is never a good argument. But it always depends on the amount and how much security you want.

Personally, I don't even feel comfortable holding more than a few bitcoins worth on any exchanges.

My vote would be a strong 1.

I don't see how you, and only you could have the private key for an address. And if anyone else than you knows the private key, it's not safe.

Simple, if I see that it's an ICO, I just close the tab and never think of it again.

It's an old list but might help:

PIVX is different from DASH just as much as DASH is different from Bitcoin.

Just because once it started with Dash code it doesn't make it its competition.

10.000, that's currently ~1,61 BTC.

In addition/correction to the above, PIVX had a 6 month PoW period but it's ended last summer.

And it has a unique (afaik at least) system in which any masternode owner can create and vote on proposals the dev team so far always followed.

It also has a unique seesaw mechanic which balances masternode and staking rewards and zerocoin protocol is on the way.

And its emission rate is getting cut rapidly:


We're at block 561594 at the time of writing.

The coin had a lot of issues, especially with forks in the past but that's long gone and the coin is pretty stable.