For some reason, I have some IDEA tokens on the Kucoin exchange. I almost forgot about it (been staking for a long time). Sincerely, I thought this story was dead, looking at the market. This caught my attention


Is it just a cosmetic change and rebranding of the website or is it a complete change of the management team of the entire project?


Can you clarify a little about what exactly you offer for these 8% fees?
Perhaps you could explain the mechanisms of how you will ensure that every deal concluded on your site is satisfactory for both parties. (I know about some such disadvantages of similar platforms).

The term "newbie" should be clarified first. Someone can be a newbie here on the forum, but that doesn't mean that he is a complete beginner when we talk about Bitcoin things. It is not a rare case that someone, although he registered later on the forum, has more knowledge in a certain area than some natives.
Also, there is no universal rule here about which part of the forum can be more attractive for you (or anyone else). The advantage is that we have a fairly large volume of different topics, so everyone can find a part that suits their interests.

Even if there are no strict rules, the saddest part is that someone is ready to do dishonourable actions to deceive such a friendly and generous contest. At the same time, we are talking about almost symbolic awards, should we have a special committee that will investigate potential abuses here?
Does every good initiative have to be ruined by greed for $50?

It is certain that there is an opposition movement that would recognize your ideas. I suggest you try to get in touch with them, maybe they will give you some guidelines on what to do next. Leading politics is not as simple as it looks, most often honourable people have no place in it.
If you have the feeling that your life is in danger, it would probably be wise to contact an embassy of a country that has a strong influence in Kyrgyzstan. Maybe you can request political asylum. You can be present from a remote position as well, but still with your head on your shoulders.

Not to go into the details of your blockchain implementation proposal, but even if you overthrow the current dictator, expect that quite corrupt politicians will come after him, so they will not be very interested in blockchain either, where it is difficult to hide some facts. Maybe it will be more democratic and open, but most doors will certainly be closed to new ideas.

Do you understand how narcissistic and stupid this sounds? (I'll break my fingers if they don't write enough praise about me)
You're confusing me a bit. I looked at the "conflict" history between you and DireWolfM14, and I see that you were a little aggressive towards him even though he only asked legitimate questions about your lending business.
I would never expect such words and behaviour from a "nice" guy, with something like "We all are humans and think & like different, please respect your forum friends even if them don't share your thoughts. BE KIND." in signature.



I'm not going to get into the counting of members, whether they're just unnecessary bullies or rightfully punching the table. But I agree that this drama is becoming unnecessary to "kick a man when he's down".
As everything that was needed has already been stated here, and some decisions have been made, I suggest @HedgeFx to close this topic. For now, it seems obvious that we will not move forward with further discussion here.

Bitcointalk Username: examplens
Utopia Public Key: 322E17B212803491BF92453B498DC08A21989A4A12DC2704431FFC68E733BE68
BTC Address: bc1qkte05aepm8eey0uvcfpju5y7lmvmkh0hf5jvpj
Message Deep Link (Chat link): https://utopia.im/d53b4431fd604e2f0261792444797aa4?tid=4126388286014605335
Slot No: 45

Did the OP show his win/loss history here? only deposit/withdraw.
Is there a possibility that he wanted to mix tokens here using the casino? I see that he had a withdrawal on the same day so he would have deposited almost the same amount. I'm not sure what the wagering policy is at Duelbits, but it's understandable to me here if there is a concern for AML.

Helena, The first thing you need to accept is that you don't take things like this too personally.


Although the trust lists are public and everyone can see them, it is still some kind of personal opinion of each member. For some reason, rby felt that your opinion did not match his understanding, so he decided to put you on his distrust list. What is a solid reason for you, does not have to be the same for me or rby, or any member here.


I have 200+ members on my ~list, I mostly added them for a good reason (at least for me) and I would really hate to get 200+ PMs and have to explain why that is.


It's your choice, you don't need to ask others to explain what your opinion is.


In most cases, no. Unless you think that no one should put you on their distrust list.

Of course. It is a changenow.io widget, only integrated on the site. I believe he's just taking some referral profit here.
This is good to know if we look at trust from the side, changenow is still a better-known service. However, he is only an intermediary here and it can be very complicated and unsafe in some situations.

I'm not sure how much this is part of the SEC's "witch ^{Binance &crypto} hunt". Rather, I would say that the Nigerian government is very intent on controlling all money flows as much as possible. Binance is emphasized here only because of the current crisis with the SEC in the US.
I would consider this as an additional package of measures that the Nigerian government is implementing, and just a few months earlier they had another financial ban Nigerian banks suspend Int’l transactions on Naira visa debit card
It is obviously easier for them to suspend something than to adapt.

As far as I know, when finding the best solution for a business, a book in your case, it is ideal to look for a combination of a name and a free domain at the same time. Like your Vadermoon token, you certainly don't want to find that after you've set everything up, for example, Vadermoon is a well-known bike parts company.
Maybe you can try to ask ChatGPT for some title ideas.

Wrong for several reasons, I'm surprised that you have doubts about it at all.

For example, If your primary account was in the DT selection, it would automatically add your alt account minimum to DT2. In that case, you could influence the judgment of a member by giving him two DT feedback.


Why would you stop at one alt account? You can create a whole network, 10 or 20 accounts, with which you could have a more significant influence in some scenarios.


Will adding all your accounts to the distrust list be considered a punishment? Seems like the most realistic response to that.

I'm curious, why do you need to leave the feedback from an alt account?[/list]

I am unsure why you are raising this topic after a long time with useless views. The OP left his last comment on February 27, 2023; after that, we have no update on the status of this dispute. I am close to the assumption that the case is resolved because we would certainly have further insistence from the OP.
However, I will not bid here whether the case is resolved or not.
It is up to the CEX.io company to do something about the question of their support, and it has already been brought to their attention earlier that it is becoming symptomatic, where there are many complaints mainly related to disabling withdrawal and very slow problem resolving.

I hope your new HW wallet is not Ledger again.


I'm not sure what exactly you mean here.
You need new addresses, from the new HW. After that, you definitely need to access your old Ledger wallet to send BTC to the new addresses. There is NO difference compared to sending anywhere else, here only you know that it is your new HW wallet.


It also depends on the quantity you have and your later needs, but I guess it's better to send everything to one address. He could use the transaction as a consolidation of funds if they were collected from several smaller transactions. It has nothing to do with safety if they are in the same wallet


If your coins are already "KYC" as you say, you've already lost your privacy there. If such a status suits you, then it is enough just to move the coins and there will be no significant changes in that matter. Anyone who knows that your address is A and all the funds on it is yours will certainly know that you sent them to address B and it will be easy to determine the connection of those addresses with your KYC information.
In case you want to increase the privacy of your BTC, then when moving from old to new HW, use one of the mixer & tumbler services.

Be sure to ask here before taking any more serious steps if you are not sure, it's better that way than to feel bad for you later.

Uh, first I would change the title of your book. When I first read "After Bitcoin" I thought it was some text predicting the crash of bitcoin. The next thing that goes in the title is some kind of exodus, so when I combine it with the first impression, I conclude that the book is about the mass abandonment of Bitcoin and the transition to virtual money. Pretty confusing isn't it?
According to the cover you posted, and without reading your further explanation, I would say that it is another book about conspiracy theories through Bitcoin.


I honestly wouldn't mix any church (religion) and Bitcoin much. Bitcoin is an open space and all similar markings are unnecessary.


I support this proposal. No matter whether the book is free to use, a blog or website is a much better solution. From both sides, both as a reader and as an editor.

OP, as a support to you, I offer you a domain and hosting as a donation for this idea, if you seriously want to commit to the whole thing.

He deleted one inappropriate negative feedback, only to leave another also inappropriate. 

Looking further accuracy of feedback, I would say that GazetaBitcoin also got the wrong label (even only neutral). Following the given reference, I'm not sure where there is a racial insult here.
btw. what race are baboons?

---

To be clear, I'm not condoning any kind of insult.

Not all pornography is exclusively perversion, people have different reasons for watching it.


I would like to see any segment of society where abusers are completely excluded.
The porn industry is one of the most powerful in the world, huge money is in circulation, that is a fact. It is probably a matter of time before the door to cryptocurrencies will be completely opened there, and considering the size of the porn market, it will be a significant step for everyone.

Maybe something similar exists, but I'm not in it enough to know. What I feared, for example, was that the porn industry would start spamming the Bitcoin blockchain with something like BRC20-Onlyfans NFT, it would indeed bring new troubles for Bitcoin enthusiasts.


I am not surprised that the highest percentage is from Germany, as far as I know, it is one of the most liberal countries when it comes to sexual freedom.
btw. Any chance to share more about the ongoing scandal which you mention?


Again, enjoying pornography does not automatically mean that someone is a pervert.

OP offers to send advertising messages that can be seen by a maximum of 12 million people. Most of them are people who can and are willing to pay something online. Isn't that a much better potential than what bounty campaigns offer, where Twitter accounts of users from "third" world countries are engaged, where, for example, the use of Paypal is not allowed?


I guess you don't expect the invasion of these perverts on the forum, where all of a sudden they will exclusively present some sick and perverted suggestions here?
How can we even be sure that some of them are already among us on this forum?


I can say with certainty that there have already been users on the forum who run that "perverse" business (I've worked with some of them).

As far as I have noticed, they have done much less damage to Bitcoin than various investment platforms, which put the shady "pyramid scheme" sticker on the crypto world.

---

In conclusion, we definitely cannot limit who will use Bitcoin, certainly not if we consider it the future global currency. Limiting Bitcoin only to "nice" people seems to me to be completely opposite to the story of financial freedom.

Also, the copper member membership is there for those who do not want to open new topics with "Newbie how to..." guides in order to earn some merit and upgrade their rank. 


In fact, the biggest problem here is that everything is quite transparent, so everyone can see how much someone earned this week in the signature campaign. Imagine in the offline world, a company that pays salaries in front of everyone (employees, associates, casual passers-by...) and clearly emphasizes how much someone earned. Crazy, right?

Final repayment of $41 (messed up with a $1 withdrawal fee in last payment) to TFDsiykiaAB8GeoZxVFz8MM2P4Ed9cYrfN
Once more internal transfer, note 138319135386

Thanks shasan for this deal.

Try to find something about Chipmixer and try to draw some conclusions. Was in a much stronger position than you expect it to be, and yet funds were frozen/seized, the domain and website seized as well as the TOR page.
You understand these things too easily for someone who pretends to gain trust for keeping other people's money.


If you re-read what I say, you will see that I am pointing out some of the illogicalities you present, and it is related to your years of operational work and experience. Through such little things, I can see that you are not honest and for me, it is a big red flag when it comes to your service.


Seriously?


But you have an incredible plan to avoid all that knocking on the door, something that no one has thought of yet? At least that's what you say in your reply FatFork.