Maybe it is just more additional work. The question is how helpful the links to the ANN thread would be. I assume that everyone who starts a giveaway or contest definitely places links to ANN, the site or wherever they want to direct visitors.
The link to the giveaway threads is still the most important, it is obvious that the OP is the initiator or at least the manager and can give all the necessary explanations.

86 - examplens

thanks 

Maybe the manager prioritized the quality of the posts, which is emphasized for the bonus rewards. If only the quantity were rewarded, it would be an invitation for spammers, and I believe that is not the main goal of the campaign.

I am of the opinion that every cloud mining should be labelled as a scam. No exceptions. So far, I have not seen cloud mining profitable for users, only for owners.
About 10 years ago, I saw it for the first time on the cex.io exchange, I even bought that Ghash of theirs, which really brought some kind of income. But everything ended up like what you wrote in the table. With no real profit, they are hanging on the edge of breaking even. It's a good thing that they stopped doing it themselves without an exit scam.

I really don't know why Binance starts something like this, big red flag for them because of that.

Both flags set by lesliegray and cicadasTR refer to cases where they received their funds.
So, cicadasTR case Betnomi 0.16090?? BTC no pay, bet history missing, geoblocked post withdrawal is positively solved for him and there is no basis for a supporting flag.
lesliegray created a flag on this Betnomi closed my account and took my funds (3600$) after I completed KYC also decided in his favour, the flag is defective in this case.


I would say that you don't understand very well how things work with creating flags. At some point, you both ^{you and cicadasTR} created a flag for the same thing and asked for support. When we add to that his ^cicadasTR attempted manipulation in that case, you both got a question mark from me for bias.
I think I even got a PM from you, where you said that you made a mistake and that you didn't know how the flag system works.

I will not go further into this discussion. If you want to argue with someone and ask for support to slander anyone, I am not a good interlocutor for that.

If we talk about my bias, it can only be towards a fair and honest business. I have no relationship with Betnomi. I don't know anyone from there, I've never had an account there, nor have I ever received money from them.
If there is a real case, with unequivocal evidence against them, I will not hesitate to support the flag in that case or to leave them negative feedback.

I played a bit but completely forgot to take a screenshot during the game. I can only set bet history. Is that acceptable or must there be both screenshots* (during the game and history)?
Recording the screen and creating a screenshot from there is complicated and a bit tiring.
It would be good if each bet had its own ID, which you could check. This game also lacks an all-bet history, at least the latest 10 games.

It seems that the whole forum has lost a little enthusiasm in the last few days. I also attribute it to the summer period and vacation time, plus nothing significant is happening globally.

Crypto is not illegal in my country. Hardware wallets are available on regular sale.
By the way, I got Ledger in a prize contest, just before the last scandal with recovery keys. I only use it for some testing and fun, Trezor is still my main wallet.

I see that no one has mentioned OmegaStarScream Telegram bot, it seems that it went unnoticed when he published it. It's fine, pull news from several sources
https://t.me/BitnewsNotifier

I occasionally read things on Reddit, other members often add comments if the news is incomplete or biased. It can be useful.

I have to admit that I was surprised what I read it here. Bangladesh has banned crypto, and just having a crypto wallet is enough to get jailed. What madness. Well, every mobile device can be a wallet for cryptocurrency, is owning one also punishable? How stupid is the one who designed such a law and still enforces it?

Ledger arrived for me, where the parcel is characterized as a USB flash memory, I believe that such a way can work in this case as well.

The OP should think about other things, for example, what is an honourable way of doing business. Developing any serious platform requires effort and work, and I have doubts about his work ethic. I looked at his post history, and he was previously interested in virtual mining, he is obviously more interested in such a thing. This is a scammer in the announcement, the only question is when will he find a seller for everything he needs, cloud mining script and fake offshore company.
I will not be surprised if soon I see his victims opening scam accusation topics.

Many shit tokens offer to stake to stimulate holders and reduce sales and thus avoid a drop in value. This gives them time to cash in their profits and often easy preparation for an exit scam.

I registered on Graviex a long time ago, probably because of some coins listed only there. I went to check the status, and I am surprised that my account is still active.
It looks like an abandoned ship. In open orders, there are just a few hundred bucks in total.
$28701 highest sell bid 

This should be a good sign, it means that there are new people interested. There was a period when no one wanted invitations.

There are several reasons why I didn't have the motivation to share invites, nor to try to make meaningful flips, so maybe I missed some things. For example, why it became important how many coins the inviter has in the stake? I see that it is often emphasized, but I have not been able to recognize why it is important to someone new, who is being validated for the first time.

Plus, a ban on their platforms for sellers is a bigger penalty than simply returning money through escrow.

Probably the most complicated part of the escrow is to confirm that there really was an exchange of goods. This is not a problem with transactions on a public blockchain like Bitcoin, already when the mediator has to determine whether a certain service has been performed in all the frameworks of the contract.

For a while, the platform https://zen.land/ was quite active here, I tested them and they seemed promising.

---

OP, @SelfCustody, is there a possibility to write all the answers in one post, and not to write a new post for each reply? It's just tiring to read, and otherwise, it's against the forum rules

I am in the process of writing. Here we had strong storms that caused serious damage to the internet and electrical network infrastructure, so I have been in very difficult conditions for the last few days. If there are additional outages today, I will post this so far written, around 70%.

I definitely wanted to ask, is adding screenshots mandatory or necessary? repeating the screenshot from the application probably only serves as proof that we really went through the process.
tx

I looked at your feedback on Trustpilot, I must admit that they look very suspicious to me. It looks more like a paid campaign to create a positive reputation.
Someone who pays to get fake feedback cannot be considered reliable.
You have only been on BestChange monitoring for a month, there is still no feedback.

Can you explain the nature of the partnership between you and Coinbase, Binance, Okex... what you stated on the site. Do these companies know about the partnership with Changee.com?

p.s. You need to move this topic to the Exchanges section, certainly, it belongs there. In the bottom left corner is the "move" option.

Currently, the mixing and gambling industries have the largest turnover of money. New projects either do not have enough initial (real) capital for promotion here on the forum or they even think that it is not important to present them here. Compared to some earlier days when Bitcointalk was the starting point for all crypto businesses, now there are a lot of other platforms and in combination with social networks, they have reduced the influence of the forum.
Nevertheless, the most precise information can still be obtained here, especially if we are talking about the technical side. Finally, does anyone expect a direct discussion in the advertising space?

I am of the opinion that the only obstacle standing between you and merit source status can be if the Nigerian local board already has enough merit source members. If I remember correctly, at some point there was a discussion where the wish was expressed to activate local boards. Bigger circulation of merit in local boards is part of that idea.

Is there any information, on how many merit sources are active in Nigerian local?

It's funny when you say this.
For someone who is tired of this forum and someone who has no desire to participate in it, you spend too much time on this forum.


It doesn't matter who you stand behind, it's the way you behave.
btw. If I may ask, what exactly is the reason why you took such a position in that case in whirlwind? Only if you can explain briefly.

That's what I'm talking about. It is necessary to present real evidence, not as you did, which looks more like an attempt at manipulation. I will not support a flag just because I don't like someone, regardless of the lack of justification.