> ./spminer
./spminer: error while loading shared libraries: libcudart.so.11.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
try: $ ln -s libcudart.so.11.2.72 lubcudart.so.11.0 Hmmm no: you should link to so.11 not so.11.0 otherwise as soon as there's a minor cuda update it will stop working. |
|
|
|
|
> ./spminer
./spminer: error while loading shared libraries: libcudart.so.11.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> nvidia-smi
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 460.73.01 Driver Version: 460.73.01 CUDA Version: 11.2 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
standard ubuntu 20.04, with distribution cuda and drivers, so on default paths.
|
|
|
|
|
if you make a linux build I will test it
|
|
|
|
...and it is statistically "impossible".
More's law say that computer power double every 2 years. statistically "impossible" today might not be impossible in 50 or 100 years. I also believe that it is possible to make bitcrack more than 10 times faster or more on existing hardware with a change of algorithm. 2017: A gpu can search 2^30 bitcoinadresses pr second 2117: A gpu can search 2^80 bitcoinadresses pr second (mores law, increase with 1 bit every second year) Yes but: - now it is statistically impossible - your miner won't work in 10 years or less from now - bitcoin will change its pow algorithm well before it's statistically feasible So it's totally a waste of time. |
|
|
|
I have released a faster binary of bitcrack. (A tool to bruteforce bitcoin private keys) https://github.com/sp-hash/Bitcrack/releases/tag/sp-mod1Should be around +50% faster than the fastest opensource The build require Compute 61 or newer (pascal). Please test. What hashrates are you getting?  Does it really work? Ask again after this: there are keys with 10000 BTC in them. Wouldn't be this same as stealing? :/ yes, unless the account is your own (and you lost the privkey for any reason). ...and it is statistically "impossible". |
|
|
|
I have released a faster binary of bitcrack. (A tool to bruteforce bitcoin private keys) https://github.com/sp-hash/Bitcrack/releases/tag/sp-mod1Should be around +50% faster than the fastest opensource The build require Compute 61 or newer (pascal). Please test. What hashrates are you getting? Does it really work? Ask again after this: there are keys with 10000 BTC in them. |
|
|
|
I have released a faster binary of bitcrack. (A tool to bruteforce bitcoin private keys) https://github.com/sp-hash/Bitcrack/releases/tag/sp-mod1Should be around +50% faster than the fastest opensource The build require Compute 61 or newer (pascal). Please test. What hashrates are you getting? Are you serious? Waisting time on such useless stuff?? What's next, lotto predictions? |
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a paper wallet with XCN from 2017. How can I import it into the XCN wallet downloaded from the website, please? Thank you.
Hello! You can use the importprivkey command. Thank you. I am assuming this can be done from the debug window, right? yes. importprivkey <your key> true |
|
|
|
Maybe you guys could try to get XCN listed on qTrade.io, at least you could give it a shot.
The problem ... A LOT of Exchanges have closed, gone bust, been hacked or just plain dried up. So which one and where has never been more difficult. #crysx Simple solution, for low volume, just trade here, 1 to 1...coins pretty much worthless at the moment, whats to lose.... Agreed ... Trade is Trade is Trade - no matter which form it takes. #crysx If the blockchain is fully working AND if we can create a blockchain explorer, we can get listed on Binance's Innovation Zone the chain works and the explorer is there, even though (about the latter) there are a couple features which are unfinished or lacking. |
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a paper wallet with XCN from 2017. How can I import it into the XCN wallet downloaded from the website, please? Thank you.
Hello! You can use the importprivkey command. |
|
|
|
I am working on a fast ethereum fee miner.
This is what I meant Ether hashrate is memory bound, so unless you can break the algo there's no way to speed it up further. Also, many have tried for years, imagine how much money there's into play. Now, I don't mean sp_ is not a good miner coder because he is, but on eth I think there's very little chance he can do anything. |
|
|
|
I managed to reach 570khash stable on the rx 570 now with hynix memory. With latest spminer and bios patch(polarisbioseditor 1 click patch, and AMD/ATI Pixel Clock Patcher 1.4.9). The card is applied with rx 580 straps and the ATI Pixel Clock Patcher 1 removes the signature checking so the drivers don't fail.
Windows 8.1
core/mem 1370/2150
pl -15%
Stock clocks without biospatch is only 320KHASH
When a super fast version of ETH? Never, unless you can break the algo. |
|
|
|
@sp_ Please release linux versions. Nobody mine under Windows in 2021.
He can do Amiga but not Linux. Quite weird. |
|
|
|
The thought was to decouple the CPU thread from the GPU so the GPU's 1000's of cores don't sit idle
while the CPU is doing it's thing. A "tiny fraction of an instant" times 5000 might not be so insignificant.
There should also be gains by running the hash loop locally on the GPU in instead of controlling it from the CPU.
Since the gpu hash loop is only run once every some tenths of a second, its running time is irrelevant. I can say that running the loop on gpu doesn't make any improvement because I tried it many times, and there's no measurable gain (unless the compiler can do some optimisations you forgot to put into the code). Also keep in mind you need to get updates from the pool or wallet, in order not to compute stale work, so going back to the cpu at least every second is highly advised. |
|
|
|
If you try to set the intesity to 30 in the opensource miner it will crash, and it will not optimize the profit 30%. A miner will not care how the optimization is implemented as long as the profit is increased. You didn't read my code good enough. I have reduced the registry usage, and removed instructions (precalculated some of them with the cpu.). If you try to run with 28 intensity it's still much faster and stable than the opensource.
Doing precalc on the CPU is good, but can it be done in parallel with the GPU? Doesn't make much sense, as it takes a tiny fraction of an instant. |
|
|
|
|
Don't waste your time on keccak, any coin.
A bcu can easily do 30 Gh/s, and there are thousands around.
|
|
|
|
thanks for reporting this, we will look into it. |
|
|
|
is this a possible new exchange to list xcn 2? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121953.0;all[EXCHANGE] ShorelineCrypto - ZERO Withdraw fee, Listing Fee 0.005-0.01 BTC We also offer 50% discount for new coin listing under ShorelineCrypto Coin listing Service Discount Program if the payment is made on Nengcoin (NENG) Thanks for reporting it. Honestly, I'm not sure we can trust it, plus we risk being denied listing: "We only accept bitcoin forked altcoins (coins with RPC 1.0 compatibility)". We are forked from bitcoin but with many modifications. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
