I see that SUQA growths and develops.
But there are couple issues with SUQA wallet that should be corrected I think:
1. I use SUQA latest win wallet (my OS Win7 x64) and CPU usage is very high (up to 100%). It makes the using of the wallet too inconvenient
2. There is a bug of transaction sum imaging: I sent 256 SUQA and after the confirmation I saw that I sent 269.3 SUQA. I was confused how it could be happened? I checked blockchain and see the sum of 256 SUQA. What??? Did I lost my mind?
Then I sent another test transaction and it's sum was correct. After I restarted the wallet and saw that my first transaction was 256 SUQA. I tried to send the third transaction and it also was with wrong sum imaging. It's not critical bug however it's still a bug
There's a visual bug where the change is counted as fee before the tx is confirmed. Will be fixed in the next release. |
|
|
|
We have updated our core wallet with some fixes. Please only download from our official github. https://github.com/SUQAORG/SUQA-CORE/releases - added more seednodes - CPU load reduced - fixed "too few connections" on outbound-only nodes - many visual and cleanup fixes - added non-dns seednodes - some other minor fixes It's update are mandatory? Not mandatory but recommended. |
|
|
|
New blockchain snapshot: https://mega.nz/#!wdwVACyT!zkrtVbivXg-TVFq9tb4N_b-evsG8PEniYMnVN7kbtKM |
|
|
|
awesome, that is great to hear.
May I ask where you found this information? any information regarding this matter would be great to pass on to other gpu miners.
It is in the whitepaper |
|
|
|
I notice that the blockexplorer is having multiple block number, what might be the cause?
"latest transactions" |
|
|
|
To the Dev's,
I was wondering about the 25% apr for the first three months and wanted to know if you make a deposit, one day before the three month period is about to end and make the deposit for three months, will you still get the 25% apr as you locked in prior to the change to 5% apr.
Would appreciate any feed back.
I am mining this coin, with two 6 GPU rigs and two gaming computers with two GPU's in each. I read the posts on this site almost everyday and enjoy the wealth of information from the supports.
So far I have been very impressed with the Team and the direction of this coin.
The 25% apr is calculated over the first 3 months, only for those days locked inside that interval. What is out, gets less. |
|
|
|
Here is our 60% faster opensource miner from our old opensource miner with solo-mining option. This will make the100K SUQA NVIDIA(CUDA) Bounty much harder to reach for the opensource developers and will also open new doors for improvement from the community. https://github.com/SUQAORG/ccminer-x22i/releasest-rex have x2.5 hashepower like a ccminer1.2.0  No longer. T-rex is still faster, but not that much. And it's not opensource, and has Dev fee. Let's see if the bounties help the opensource reach the same speed or even higher ;-) No longer - we'll see) But about not than much.. My tests: Zjazz = x22iccminer1.2.0 = ~8mh per 1080ti and ~12.5mh on t-rex... devfee 1% ok ~12.375 mh  +55% hashpower at t-rex right now  you said 2.5x - no longer that's what I was saying ;-) |
|
|
|
Here is our 60% faster opensource miner from our old opensource miner with solo-mining option. This will make the100K SUQA NVIDIA(CUDA) Bounty much harder to reach for the opensource developers and will also open new doors for improvement from the community. https://github.com/SUQAORG/ccminer-x22i/releasest-rex have x2.5 hashepower like a ccminer1.2.0 No longer. T-rex is still faster, but not that much. And it's not opensource, and has Dev fee. Let's see if the bounties help the opensource reach the same speed or even higher ;-) |
|
|
|
Can anyone explain why the coin has to change the algorithm several times a year? (this is written in white paper).
Because FPGA (and consequently ASIC) developers don't have enough time and incentive to make a miner for it. |
|
|
|
|
Where is the best place to discuss randomhash?
|
|
|
|
devs,are you planing to add suqa to cryptobridge and/or other exchanges?
cryptobridge will be ready very soon ;-) |
|
|
|
Monero V8 became live on the 11th of October. Lethean was attacked 10 days later. Then Lethean was updated to V8.
If this trend continues (someone wealthy to attempt attacks on smaller networks), and it will, updating on time will be cruical.
The attack had nothing to do with pow version. It could have been done before, one month ago, whenever. Hashrate for cnv1 and cnv2 available on nicehash, rental services and farms in general, is always enough to carry such an attack. The story will change only when our network hashrate becomes comparable to that of monero. |
|
|
|
1. The team is trustworthy and cares about the coin.
2. They are quick when things are critical, but not that quick after that.
3. If Lethean is a target for someone, than it must be worth it.
4. The network needs more peers. When a simple node instalation guide is available,
many new nodes will help avoiding such attacks.
5. Regular code updates will be needed from now on.
1. Thanks. 2. What do you mean by "after that"? 3. Indeed. 4. The network needs more HASHRATE, that is more miners. More nodes is good, but doesn't protect against those kind of attacks. 5. Not sure what you mean. Look at GitHub to see how often we commit. |
|
|
|
I thought this coin has a new algo, but when I saw the info in all of the pool this coin is using miner that mostly and widely use in some scrypt base, x11, x13, x14 algo, so it is not advisable to mine with gpu cards.. Those algo will rape the gpu.. The total hash is looming to 25GH
no it is a new algo, not compatible with any other algo made before. the miner needs to support it, otherwise it won't work. |
|
|
|
https://wallet.escodex.com/market/ESCODEX.SUQA_ESCODEX.BTC listed, but because of the credibility of this useless exchange - trade volumes, as well as a good price there will not be. Be careful when using your account from a cryptobridge - it is suitable as a login (since you cannot create a new one on this goblin market), but you will most likely be cleaned up on a cryptobridge))))) creating account now works Test right now - failed to create account - unknown error it's cheap fake of cryptobridge and scamgarbage. Deposits there is dangerious for your money) if anything - I warned) I created an account without issues. I also deposited and withdrawn and it worked. When tests are finished, it will be announced. Meanwhile, use at your own risk. |
|
|
|
https://wallet.escodex.com/market/ESCODEX.SUQA_ESCODEX.BTC listed, but because of the credibility of this useless exchange - trade volumes, as well as a good price there will not be. Be careful when using your account from a cryptobridge - it is suitable as a login (since you cannot create a new one on this goblin market), but you will most likely be cleaned up on a cryptobridge))))) creating account now works |
|
|
|
I don't see any evidence in this. And the images do not work. |
|
|
|
Hello, liunx wallet installation and compilation can not be used.
"./configure --disable-tests --with-incompatible-bdb --disable-shared --with-pic --with-bignum=no --with-gui=qt5 --disable-hardening CPPFLAGS=-fPIC"
Why can't this configuration be used?
Prompt "-bash: ./configure: No such file or directory"
How to install it on yiimp, thank you.
run ./autogen.sh first |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
