It is interesting to recall some of the campaigns in which we were participants, and some of them are truly legendary, not only in terms of duration, but also in terms of how much they paid their participants. It is true that in its last period CM paid $6/post, but for most of the duration of the campaign it paid 0.0375 BTC max for 50 posts per week. Roughly calculated, it's just a little less than 2 BTC per year - I don't think anyone has managed to surpass that.

Who still trusts politicians? He is not pro-BTC, but sells some of his NTFs and tells what people want to hear - a classic populist. I'm not saying that the US will be worse for Bitcoin if Trump is re-elected as president, but it certainly won't be any better than it is now.

For those who want to know what was happening in the background -> The Mnuchin Files: New Documents Shed Light on Trump-Era Crypto Policy

If more than one moderator handles those reports, I assume that it is possible that not all mods are aware of how many posts have already been deleted. Therefore, instead of reporting each post individually, report one post and put post history in the report description, where it will be visible what exactly that user is doing.

BPIP shows 45 deleted posts, and I don't think that user will do such things on the forum for a long time.

The question arises, how does someone know that he has lost coins, and on top of that they are calling him on his phone number? It seems to me that he is being called by the same people who stole his coins and are now trying to pull off a double scam.


I believe that the address is only the beginning and in itself is probably irrelevant. Based on that address, the scammers will "conclude" that it is possible to return the coins, but in return they will demand that your brother pay in advance. Unfortunately, that's why I call it a double scam, and many fall for this cheap trick.

We can guess as much as we want, but in the end it may just be a wallet that contains nothing. The man was curious and downloaded the BTC wallet, after some time he apparently deleted it and the wallet file remained. It was a very different time than today with a lot of doubt in BTC, and about seventy times less price than today.

This is nothing strange, considering that the wallet is from 2013, it is possible that your friend invested some money in BTC then and completely forgot about it. Besides, it is not advisable to talk about such things, and maybe he was aware of that.

That saying "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me" is obviously not valid in the world of cryptocurrencies, and there is a high probability that we will see the next ordinal stupidity as soon as investors forget how "smart" they were with their investments the first two times. I hope that the developers will do something before that - let the children play in the playground, not in the place for adults.

It is logical that people who have invested in BTC will celebrate when this happens, but I think we have already had many similar celebrations - I remember when BTC reached $1000 (albeit not the first time), or when it reached $10 000, but also $50 000. In the end, these are just numbers that will quickly go down in history, because there should be no doubt that a new goal will be set right after that.


I wouldn't wait for 1 BTC to reach some kind of value to help someone who needs help today, of course assuming I have the money to do it today. For those who cannot set aside some money to help others, saving is a good choice - although I would warn everyone not to make their good deeds directly related to investing in cryptocurrencies. Sometimes good deeds can attract bad people who will come and try to take everything you have.

Today, people use virtual cards that they add to mobile wallets and pay via NFC on POS devices - and I don't see why the CBDC would change anything much when it comes to digital payments. In addition, when it comes to the EU, it was said that the maximum amount that a person will be able to have in such a digital wallet will only be EUR 300.

Regardless of what happens, I don't think that big companies will just give up - and neither will central banks just take over their business. There is probably some kind of compromise that will be made to satisfy both parties.

The matter is quite clear, you got access to the computer, and now you just need to get permission to load that file and see what's in it - of course, do it in the presence of his parents.


Maybe you found an empty wallet, and maybe the wallet doesn't have any protection - even if it does, maybe you'll find the password somewhere in his personal belongings or on the computer. In any case, whatever you do, be careful not to download a fake wallet - and if you want to try Electrum, I advise you to read -> [GUIDE] How to Safely Download and Verify Electrum [Guide]

@SAHASAN, challenge for you - read the forum rules and tell me what you are doing wrong in this topic? You might even get a prize

---

A question for you - would you have the same opinion about Bitcoin if its price was $1? Maybe the question is a bit pointless, but what attracts most people to BTC is something else...

I obviously missed something, but what exactly is that 90-day trading delay which prevented them from buying BTC before? Anyway, if it took them 15 years to figure out what Bitcoin is, they're not as intelligent as they think they are, are they?

Why did anyone think the OP really had $1 million? It's just a dirty tactic that leads to someone contacting him on PM and asking about that event - and then of course he'll try to sell it. As we can see, everything ends up with simple insults, no money, no bets

That would really be a great achievement, and perhaps such a vehicle could also have a special sticker that would indicate that it was sponsored by donations from some members of the BTT forum

---

There is no need to single out anyone in particular, because every donation is equally valuable.

I don't know if this is something that is common in online casinos, but it reminds me of a classic scam with fake CEXs where you first get a certain amount completely free, but for withdrawal you first need to make a deposit. However, considering that this is a NO-KYC casino that also offers a bonus for every registration, I don't see how players would not abuse it if there is no protection.

Expression of opinion and communication is a completely logical thing on the forums - what you do with your alt accounts is shilling a certain service - and advertising in posts is not allowed according to the rules of the forum. There are completely legal and common ways of advertising on this forum.

@justdimin, one of the forum members posted this link where you can see interesting information about spot ETFs (US). There are probably some other sources, but I think you can see all the important information on this link.

This is something that is definitely being talked about a lot, and I hope that interest rates in the US will go down as soon as possible, because here in the EU, most such decisions are made only after the US, and considering that I live in a country that depends a lot on tourism, the prices of products and services usually go wild in the summer months because the demand generated by tourists is an excellent opportunity for extra earnings.

As I can see, it is already the fifth day in a row that we have recorded positive inlows in spot ETFs, so even though it is not even close to what happened in February and March, it still has an evident effect on the price.


I sincerely doubted that such a thing existed, maybe some people have such information, but do not share it publicly. It seems to me that we could see the real action only in 3-4 months, but it is possible that the old patterns will not repeat themselves as most expect.

I think you will have to be patient, because such things are very sensitive, and only a few people work on them - who also have their own real life. In addition, you are certainly not the only one who has a similar problem, so you will obviously have to wait for your turn.

If you had read at least a few posts in this topic, then you wouldn't have guessed what happened - too many people only read the titles and the first post in the topic, and that's why their posts look like yours.

---

Based on what you wrote, do you think that repetitive content is completely acceptable and that regardless of what someone wrote before you, you have some sort of "right" to express yourself and repeat it in your own way? No offense, but I didn't expect such an answer from someone like you.

In addition, the topic has 12 pages.