What I hope is the final version PCB has been ordered.
I've also got chip sources secured that'll keep me rolling for at least the rest of the year. That's good news because these pods eat 8 chips each.
If the final version works as expected, that'll solidify the Terminus form-factor. Any future pod will be built to the same physical specs, so any cases or custom whatever-the-heck will work for them too.
Optmizer is finalizing the buck design that'll be used on Bitfury gear, which is cool. Hopefully I can get something laid out and tested soon.
Good news, been waiting for this puppy to drop. Will they be going to the usual distributors? Will Bitshopper have his own version like he did with the compacs? |
|
|
|
- No info on team? There needs to be, especially if claiming the team is from Apple and Wall St. Random names are being thrown around; John, Pierre, etc. No info on these people anywhere. Can't argue with this. In case the dense one before still didn't get it (and assuming you're not him), this is what I meant by had names but still anonymous. So you argue with me when I say there is no team, but you agree there's no info on team? Anonymous names isn't reliable enough to say they have a team, can easily be one guy. |
|
|
|
When I did my ICO due diligence I found out the 'lead dev' worked at a Pizzeria.
That is all.
So everyone who ever worked at a pizzeria then decided to learn coding is a ... ? Good thing Vitalik came out of his mother with a usb stick containing eth source code  No but a lead dev should have prior experience, otherwise you're a junior dev. |
|
|
|
Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal. Why would I post a rebuttal to the following.. "they're just anonymous... with names". "So?". "That's funny". Then I take it that you accept your "evidence" - "No team", "hiding contact information on domain" and having a beta bypassed - is nonsense. Got it. Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that? I know it because I've spent more time on this thread than the (claimed) 1 hour you needed to post your drive-through scam accusation. You really didn't think about that, huh? Please provide evidence. Apart from the fact that it is you who needs to provide evidence for your list of supposed evidence, I'm not going to spoon-feed you since you clearly don't deserve it. The pagination facility provided by BCT is open to everyone and very easy to use so help yourself out. Start around page 50 and you might just stumble on the post with an email screenshot that had a name and another post that had another name when they decided to lock the thread. Also, use your eyes to view the Trello board you found so interesting and you'll see yet another name. So you're saying I need evidence for saying there is no team, no tos, hidden domain info etc? If so I'll stick with my ad hominem and call you a retard. And seeing as that is not a valid argument, you fail yet again at helping your case. But seeing as you had none to begin with I guess WCX should be thankful you're bumping their thread for free. Funny how you will take the time to reply, but not show any proof of a team because you don't want to spoon-feed me? Not a fan of Vitalik but his signalling theory quote works well here.
I've seen better attempts at reverse psychology. This is pathetic at best. Again you're providing no proof, just arguing. At least your sig post count is going up though! |
|
|
|
Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal. Why would I post a rebuttal to the following.. "they're just anonymous... with names". "So?". "That's funny". Then I take it that you accept your "evidence" - "No team", "hiding contact information on domain" and having a beta bypassed - is nonsense. Got it. Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that? I know it because I've spent more time on this thread than the (claimed) 1 hour you needed to post your drive-through scam accusation. You really didn't think about that, huh? Please provide evidence. Apart from the fact that it is you who needs to provide evidence for your list of supposed evidence, I'm not going to spoon-feed you since you clearly don't deserve it. The pagination facility provided by BCT is open to everyone and very easy to use so help yourself out. Start around page 50 and you might just stumble on the post with an email screenshot that had a name and another post that had another name when they decided to lock the thread. Also, use your eyes to view the Trello board you found so interesting and you'll see yet another name. So you're saying I need evidence for saying there is no team, no tos, hidden domain info etc? If so I'll stick with my ad hominem and call you a retard. Funny how you will take the time to reply, but not show any proof of a team because you don't want to spoon-feed me? Not a fan of Vitalik but his signalling theory quote works well here. |
|
|
|
Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal. Why would I post a rebuttal to the following.. "they're just anonymous... with names". "So?". "That's funny". Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that? Please provide evidence. |
|
|
|
|
Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.
Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!
If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
|
|
|
|
Guys, all indicators say this is a scam.
What is your indicators? Explain in detail No team. No terms of service. Only name on the entire project (the escrow) pulled out because WCX wouldn't give any contact information. Hiding contact information on domain. Forum member bypasses beta login with ease, indicating poor coding practises. Lots of newbie accounts standing up for them (look below). Their Trello which has bugs to fix is public (why?!), yet only goes back to 1st Sep. Also appear to be preventing archive.org/wayback machine from saving website. This is what I've discovered in less than an hour. @Morguk lol you're a little late FUD muffin. WCX already delivered their exchange it is live
Little newbie account muffin, go and get a job instead of shilling crap. |
|
|
|
|
When I did my ICO due diligence I found out the 'lead dev' worked at a Pizzeria.
That is all.
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, all indicators say this is a scam.
|
|
|
|
|
Is yobit the only exchange?
|
|
|
|
|
Want to get my coins of finex.
Whats the easiest and safest way of storing them? I don't have a wallet yet.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree wholeheartedly, IOTA is the only other crypto that has made my heart miss a beat since discovering Bitcoin back in 2013.
NO FEES AND IT SCALES.
I don't know how to argue with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Dev how much have you solo mined already?
|
|
|
|
|
I want one.
Hopefully Bitshopper can keep the costs down a bit as usually they are a lot more expensive than just importing it from the US.
|
|
|
|
I've just joined the club with 4.650 tokens. Good luck to you all.  Welcome  Not long to wait now. |
|
|
|
If you were lucky enough to get a card, this will be distributed on the weekend. BTW our entire card platform will be introduced in the near future!
 |
|
|
|
|
Amanda Nunes (c) vs. Valentina Shevchenko Shevchenko
Yoel Romero vs. Robert Whittaker Romero
Daniel Omielańczuk vs. Curtis Blaydes Blaydes
Fabrício Werdum vs. Alistair Overeem Werdum
Anthony Pettis vs. Jim Miller Pettis
Travis Browne vs. Oleksiy Oliynyk Browne
Chad Laprise vs. Brian Camozzi Laprise
Thiago Santos vs. Gerald Meerschaert Santos
Jordan Mein vs. Belal Muhammad Muhammad
Rob Font vs. Douglas Silva de Andrade Font
Cody Stamann vs. Terrion Ware Stamann
Trevin Giles vs. James Bochnovic Giles
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
