On my single Vega56, I get 1360-1400 H/s at 1522 core clock, 1945 memory and -7% power limit. How can I increaee it ? (Hynix memory, msi air boost)

Guys, do you know of ravencoin miner that tells temperature too ?

How much shares do you consider good ? I am getting 95% accepted with 3%"incalid result computation failed" and 2% "outdated due to job change" on sumocoin (Cryptonight Heavy)

Forking is not the only option to FPGA resistance. Another guy told me that with FPGAs your limited with the number of programable gates the silicon has. The more complicated the algorithm the less "cores" you can fit on the die. If someone wanted to create a GPU algorithm that was not as economical on an FPGA, you would make it so each round requires a ridiculous amount of instructions, or have the coin use a large amount of different algorithms which take up precious FPGA space. You then take the advantage away from FPGAs because 1) it would require alot more effort and time to program the FPGA, and 2) you can't fit as many cores on it, so the instead of it being 10x as fast as a GPU, you can only get away with 2-3x with maybe a slight increase in efficiency.

The price will rise if the devs modify their algo. FPGAs and/or ASICs are mining and dumping this coin for long time. Once the algo changes, miners will return and it's price will return to old high again.

Is there any miner that tells temperature while mining ? As I am on HiveOS, most of the time temperature is not reported (on their website dashboard), so I will attach the monitor and see the temperature reported by miner.

It's the opposite. They are the past not future. Making an algo resistant to FPGAs (economically) is possible.

I tried --maxmem but it says I need to disable HBCC from AMD settings to get upto 3% increase hashrate but if I disable HBCC I get half hashrate.

Biased man call others as biased while thinking that they are the awakened one. English is not my first language as you can see so I have some trouble explaining my ideas. Anyway, I am on this forum to understand the psychology of miners due to which I am also mining with few gpu rigs. I am involved with a cryptocurrency project that I think will be revolutionary.

Why are you taking this personally and boasting about your mining ideals, does that makes you feel good ? This is not about you and me. Neither you know my motivation for mining.
First you were talking about community & miners and now you are talking about the project & devs, those are two different things. Are you saying that it is the job of the devs or founders to be responsible for what to do best for humanity ? because it does not matter "Whether or not a miner mines for profit" You assume and blame me for mining for profit but then say that it does not matter  "Whether or not a miner mines for profit". Contradiction.


You were saying that ASICs were not necessary but how is something unnecessary when it was destined to arrive. You can not go back to past and remove ASICS from existing. Everything happens for good in the universe. It was destined to happen. Our present actions are not decided by us but by our destiny. Only because of Cold war man pushed themselves to their extremes and we reached the moon, it had to happen this way only because it was destined to happen this way. ASICs are just a phase of cryptocurrencies that will be gone but it will only help them. There can't be any other way round.

Again you talk like communists who talks about an ideal world with ideal human beings while completely rejecting the ground realities. It does not matter if I mine for profit or humanity, it's not about you or me, I am talking about community as a whole and my statement holds true even IF I mined for profit only, my mining objective doesn't matter, my statement is true. Peoples lie, maths don't. Now you tell me straight forward do you think that majority of miners mine for good of humanity and not for profit. I am talking about ground realities. You are feeling hostile and now making personal attacks but that's doesn't make you right.

I am not saying that we can't do anything and just surrender to Bitmain. But then there is not much we can do right now. You can and you should spread awareness in the community but that won't make much difference to the big picture. These are time of perseverance. Only technological advancements can bring the changes we want and they will happen soon. Too many GPUs floating around so the devs have a niche where they can capitalise. Soon there will be a trend of ASIC resistant coins and I am sure that solution to ASIC theats are already under progress.

Hash rate decreases if I do that.

How can I optimize my miner ? Single MSI Vega 56 Air Boost (Hynix). Latest drivers.

Afterburner settings : PL : -7%
                              Core Clock : 1522 MHz
                          Memory Clock : 945 Mhz
                            Fan             : 74 %
               
                            temp           : 57-59 C
   
For SumoCoin (Cryptonight Heavy) I am getting 1350-1358 H/s but I am getting only 94% accepted with 3% "invalid result computation failed" and 2% "outdated because of job change"   after 24 hours. Is this normal ? If not please tell me how can I optimize more.

WTH, you just combined two of the above posted comments.

Coincidece....I think not.

An ass does not hit himself twice against the same stone.

You are talking like a idealist not realist. It does not matter if ASICs are necessary or not, the thing is that they exist they are here to stay and we have to deal with them.
And yes, hurdles like ASICs are necessary for the development of cryptocurrencies. This is how it works everywhere in nature. ASIC resistant algos exists because ASICs exists. More smart ASICs will only lead to more robust asic resistant algos.

You are saying that we need both miner and devs to keep check on each other but what we "need" doesn't = what we get.Yes awarness is necessary in the community but the fact is majority of miners (95%+) ONLY mine for capital gains without caring about decentralisation or humanity, just have a look at ASICs sale.

Yes i contradicted myself by saying that it is job of devs to be responsible (only possible in ideal world) but even if the community abandons use of ASICs that won't stop Bitmain from manufacturing them. There is already enough money in mining from their own miners. ASICs are a reality we have to accept. Only solution is to completely abandon the coin which doesn't use latest asic resistant algo (again only possible in ideal world).
The best we can do is launch an aggressive assault against pro asic coins on forums. It is the duty of High merit members (like you) who have taken red pill to speak against these coins on that coin's forum.

I do believe that ASICs are on the losing team in long run.

I think ASICs could work if there is more competition in the market and no monopoly of single company. Another problem is there retail availabilty and pre mining which could be solved if competition increases. Intel only bought good processors for cheap when AMD bought them in the market first. Competition solves many problem and it is necessary for healthy working of capitalism.

But crony capitalist CCP and Bitmain won't allow that to happen. You can't even open a ASIC company in china. Bitmain has all the cards, they control the whole game. SIA founder tried to open a ASIC company in China and lost million dollars due Bitmain's tactics not allowing him to open the company.

We shouldn't let such (or any) company and govt. control the entire ecosystem. Instead of thinking about small personal profit one should think about the big picture but that is the job of the devs as we can't trust the community to act responsibly. The average miner doesn't care about decentralisation or cryptocurrencies, all he cares about is how to get maximum capital gains in least amount of time. One should not hope that one day the community will take the red pill. Only support coins that are against ASICs.

ASICs are still necessary because they lead to more advancement in stronger asic-resistant coin. The problem with majority is that they think if an ASIC has been made for asic-resistant algo then gpu mining is dead. They only look at one side. When powerful missiles came, tank's armour became more thicker and stronger. None of that has stopped to this day. More powerful missiles come with more powerful tank armour. One will come before another. Similarly if there are more powerful ASICs now there will be more powerful ASIC resistant algo in future. No antivirus is virus-proof forever, they keep updating to protect the computer. Same with asic-resistant algos.

How to use --forcecompute and --maxmem for a single Vega56 ? I tried maxmem but it says that of I disable HBCC, i'd get upto 3% increase but if do disable HBCC, i get half the hashrate.

Also sometimes the miner just keeps showing hashrates and doesn't accept any share or new job.

"Specifications wise, the new GeForce GTX 1050 model boasts the GP107 GPU which looks to be the same SKU as the GTX 1050 Ti. This core features 768 CUDA cores, 1392 MHz base clock and 1518 MHz boost clock. The core specifications alone make it faster than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. But in terms of memory, we are looking at 3 GB VRAM, a 1 GB improvement over the previous GTX 1050 but still 1 GB less than the GTX 1050 Ti.

The memory is clocked at 7 Gbps just like all the other 1050 (Ti) models but is featured along with a 96-bit bus interface with a memory bandwidth of 84 GB/s. The card is still suggested to feature the 75W TDP so we can expect connector less and single 6 pin connector custom models in the market soon"

https://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-3gb-official-launch/amp/


www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/products/10series/geforce-gtx-1050/

Lol. Reminds me of those Russian scientists who mined Bitcoins with Super Computers. I wonder how much Bitcoins those computers could mine.