I am not a Coinbase user, but the 16 character code should be along the QR code that was provided on Coinbase, that is the backup. You can also backup the QR code.

Real Madrid has scored 2 goals. No doubt Real Madrid has a big intention to get 3 points in this match. They released almost all their key players, I am sure they won't think to be defeated in their home. However, 2 goals aren't quite safe for them, Real Madrid needs to score 1 more goal. In this 2nd half, I think they need to replace Rodrygo with Ascensio. It will make their attacking line to be more effective and aggressive.

I doubt Barcelona has the ability to pay the transfer fees and salaries of both players. Signing these players won't be the same as signing Aubameyang, there will be no cheap salary for these players and Barcelona must pay quite big transfer fees. Why does Raiola force Barcelona to sign 2 players? Does he not understand the current financial problem in Barcelona? He chooses the wrong club, he should offer it to Real Madrid, not Barcelona.

Has anyone seen members offering to post for other members recently?

In fact, the oldest NFTs were on the bitcoin blockchain.  The origin assets of the digital antiquities market (NFTs)

https://rarepepewallet.com/

The truth is that Ronaldo is getting old and we shouldn't be expecting the best from him always. At this age he shouldn't be playing all 90mins. Ole knew how to use Ronaldo but Rangnick doesn't. Ronaldo should be used when the teams needs a man to break down the opponent defense especially when their defense are tired which means he should be playing mostly second half.

The young boys should be used to start games and not dead wood that can't tackle or run. United problem is far more than the coaches they hire instead they should look into the board. They have hired multiple coaches yet having same issue. The current players thinking they're bigger than the club should be discharged and they get their board in order before the next season starts.

I believe this is not done by a moderator but by V3rtigo,

I will provide a maximum of 5 unique posts per day and posts will be sent in .txt through your telegram account or direct message and you can paste it using your account just remember to wait 3-5 minutes before posting again.

Hello
BitForex is scam
I deposit coin MHC 3346 for sell with btc but no same mhc sell
 I go mhc for withraw but no received in other wallet. I go in help bitforex for give me guide but now more 15 days no give me solution and same msg send in email your confirm opération but no received any coin for me
I know now this site cheating

Another proof that the average newbie has no help from a trust system that he does not understand at all, despite the warnings that existed in the scammer profile. In my opinion, the forum has a bad policy towards such things - such members should not have the opportunity to be present at the forum, but the only thing we can do is try to warn others about such members.

Ronaldo should not be a top priority at Man United because he is old and no longer strong against young players who are still agile, but strangely Ronaldo remains the lone striker that Rangnick uses does he still believe in him for the next few seasons?
This is a little different, I saw when I was at Real Madrid and Juventus, Ronaldo's game was still good, so in Man United a little according to his performance, whether this was due to the age factor or indeed the squad was still not supplying the ball to Ronaldo, so it was a little decreased in performance.

I'm just surprised that these scammers can easily advertise their services here. Hoping new users don't do the same mistake as I did

Today one of my client contacted with me and told that he got scammed by Luter01 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=955479

Unfortunately he falled for a small price offer and got scammed.
I asked if he has any evidence like chat logs, but it was on telegram and obviously Luter01 deleted everything.

I thought that I might do a little digging about this user and see if I can find anything which is worth flagging him so other newbies might not get scammed by him.

His thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5335715.msg56951783#msg56951783
archived - https://archive.vn/iULQ7

Feedback quoted from his thread





KoRanAe and laminfofana are connected already as alt accounts and tagged as using alt accounts to give vouch for himself.
Most likely it is happening here aswell. He is giving vouch to himself with his alt accounts.

Is it worth to give Luter01 a flag? Every DT member can decide if they want to support it or not.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2776

Flag it, I'll support it.

Huh, now that's interesting--I didn't even know sites like bitcoinabuse.com existed.  However, with respect to that donation address and the complaints I see on the site, there's no proof of any wrongdoing and the site looks very much like the one that had that huge smear against Vod a long time ago (I can't remember what it's called, but basically anybody can post anything about anyone with zero evidence).

I'd hope that an address like that, which has received over $4m and has a current balance of over $600k, doesn't belong to a scammer.  If it does, I'd like to know what kind of scams they're pulling off.  I doubt they'd be charity scams, but I suppose it's possible.

Good afternoon, dear crypto community.

I propose to unite in this difficult time and launch a flash mob to support democracy, freedom and peace in Ukraine.

Your small donation and participation can greatly help those in need.

All proceeds from the sale will go to help the people of Ukraine. I will be happy to answer all questions and listen to any suggestions.

Please find collection here:

https://opensea.io/collection/support-ukraine-2022

The accusation of the OP is already solved. I think many exchanger which has scam accusation but all of those are not scammer. For example I used yobit for a long time but they never scammed me directly. Also, I have created post against binance for dogecoin issue but I am still using binance. So, creating a post against a site doesn't mean they are scammer. Almost all the site has such a small issue though all of them are not being posted on this forum.

The independence from the government and monetary delegates implied that anyone could gain access to monetary administrations. Regardless, this angle turns out to be one of DeFi's most significant setbacks. Concerns about information security and consistency with the capability of new guidelines for presenting new threats put a lot on the table for DeFi. There is no need to focus on the question of 'Is KYC required for DeFi?' Instead, consider 'How can KYC help DeFi?' The extent to which a DeFi arrangement supplier must address consistency has a significant impact on their options for carrying out (Know Your Customer) KYC on a DeFi arrangement.

Any business person or newly formed firm in the DeFi scene will undoubtedly need to stay on the right side of the law. It will help them gain institutional as well as corporate clients by referencing compliance with new guidelines. Regardless, will the DeFi and KYC mix separate the DeFi establishment?

Indeed, there are a variety of reasons why this is unlikely to be an issue. The new KYC and (Anti-money Laundering) AML guidelines do not imply that DeFi will lose its intrinsic value. Here are some of the reasons why KYC can function in DeFi while still serving as a decentralised method for completing monetary administrations.
....

Fortunately, there are a number of reasons why this isn't necessarily a problem or something that should detract from DeFi's inherent value as a decentralised approach to conducting and receiving financial services.

The freedom from government and financial intermediaries implied open access for anyone to financial services. However, this aspect turns into one of the most crucial setbacks for DeFi. The concerns of data security and compliance with the potential of new regulations for introducing new risks mean a lot on the table for DeFi. It is not about a question of ‘Is KYC needed for DeFi’ and more about ‘what can KYC do for DeFi.’ The extent to which a DeFi solution provider wants to address compliance has a profound impact on their decisions for implementing KYC on a DeFi solution.

Any entrepreneur or newly initiated firm in the DeFi landscape will obviously want to be on the good side of the law. It will help them bring in institutional as well as corporate customers by citing compliance with new regulations. However, will the DeFi and KYC combination break down the foundation of DeFi?

As a matter of fact, there are many reasons for which this might not be a problem. The new KYC and AML regulations do not necessarily imply that DeFi would lose its inherent value. Here are the reasons which can show how KYC can work in DeFi while retaining its capabilities in the form of a decentralized approach for carrying out financial services.

Should always cite your sources. Im sure you didnt composed this one alone. Even though you paraphrase it or add some content to it still you need to put some reference and also dont use too much paragpraph like this, cause some wouldnt bother to read it. Better be direct to the point, or at least make your post more presentable like bold others or title, and make a habit to shorten your idea.

I sometimes wonder to what extent a football player has a certain amount of guilt if he knows that he will almost certainly move to the other team in the new season.