For example if you have a Note with a balance of 1BTC you will receive 0.00033333BTC every day added to your balance, so 0.01BTC a month in total. After a day your Note balance would be 1.00033333BTC and so on until you withdraw. You could deposit today, wait for a day, withdraw and you would still get to keep the rewards for that day.
Is it a fixed amount every day, that 0.03333... BTC or it will depend on the amount of bitcoins that passed through your service on a certain day? Also, is this 1% or 0.0003333 for 1BTC the guaranteed amount or it can also vary depending on the use of the service and total bitcoins in your stake "pool"? |
|
|
|
I just left him a negative feedback, which someone could understand as aggressive, but if someone shows me arguments to think that the feeback is wrong, I will not hesitate to change it. I prefer to use the feedback in prevention of a scam than to use it when the user has already been scammed.
I think I'm still in DT, although I haven't even bothered to check lately, so I guess it will show.
It is not clear to me why he was not red tagged at the time for borrowing without collateral, when it is standard practice on the lending board.
Well, this case is definitely somewhere on the border. I would say it deserves a negative tag, but also not enough evidence for it. Personally, I prefer that there is some obvious evidence before a negative tag. Both cases that the OP mentioned are also just the words of other members. TheChin0s already has some negative accusations on his profile, but they are all on the untrusted feedback list. The problem is that none of them gave a valid reference, so we would have to rely only on their word. Asking for a loan without collateral is still not solid proof that spam has happened, nor that it will happen because I am not sure that any newbie will ever get a loan under such conditions.  |
|
|
|
I will post it in meta soon. Maybe in some other board as well. Maybe reputation?
I don't think anyone will mind if you add a link to the thread or site, something like "generated by bitcoindata.science". This would make your service more recognizable. |
|
|
|
Hold my spot until I join back  |
|
|
|
|
You should write what exactly you did, that is, where you sent the Bitcoin. Did you pay somewhere or did you just send it to a friend? You will probably have to contact the recipient and explain, possibly paying only the difference.
You send 0.0004734BTC or 13.10USD and cost you Transaction fee 0.00046642BTC or 12.91USD
To the address you wanted to send it to, only 13.10 USD arrived instead of the planned $40. At least that's how I understood it.
|
|
|
|
Let's see if you can get this transaction to confirm.
92110a375867e72c063733940799878c2a33890c26250b06ca927518e585326f#0
Been over 2 days now, network probably going to drop it soon. Accelerated I call BS on this. Can you share how you "accelerated" this? I believe you have no power over confirmations. I wouldn't be surprised if the OP is trolling. The fee is in a slight decline today, currently, 57 sat/vB it is possible that in the near future, it will really come to 25.1 sat/vB how much is in yahoo's transaction. This means that the transaction will be accepted by the network, regardless of any acceleration. OP will probably present that confirmation (after 5 days) here as well, in order to receive gratitude, or maybe a nice word on the trust page. |
|
|
|
Not exactly. There are remote locations that may have low mobile network coverage, making internet access impractical.
Despite this, it may be possible to send an SMS, since the moments when the equipment connects to the network, for a few seconds, allows the sending of the SMS.
Certainly, there are exceptions, but we are talking about a real need. I am not sure what percentage of people would decide to send money via SMS "when the equipment connects to the network, for a few seconds". At the same time, you probably don't know if the transaction went well. Low level of SMS security, I don't even want to comment. I'm not here to defend this concept, but I understand its usefulness. Because being in a place where you can send an SMS does not necessarily imply that you can also access the internet.
As I remember, there were similar projects that provided similar possibilities, Obyte for example. But it is obvious that it is not sustainable. |
|
|
|
I always wanted this tool to use in my threads:  Yes, for example, this is an excellent tool for the escrow service, where it is easy to see the current balance at the escrow address. I guess there are a lot of users from Brazil here but given that bitcoindata.science is a global service, I would expect USD to be the default currency, with all due respect to BRL. just my $0.02 |
|
|
|
Honestly am new here and with my little time that i have spent in this forum i have observed,and i wanna ask the forum mate if that is posible because i saw it happening amonge the forum mate and the person that invade this platform for me,people in this forum who are connected in one way or the other are trading on their sendable merit not only the their sndable merit but orher way of trading on merit is going on in this forum,so my question is,is it good and permitted to do such on the forum,
You expressed your doubts a little confused, but we will try to understand what you want to ask. No, it is not allowed to buy/sell merit, although there are no significant sanctions for that except a negative tag account. This is about certain rewards for contributing to this forum, not for making money or showing that you have money to pay for merit. The purpose of the metric is to highlight useful members from those who are only here to make money. |
|
|
|
|
Prediction 1: $28,111.09
bech32 address: bc1qkte05aepm8eey0uvcfpju5y7lmvmkh0hf5jvpj
|
|
|
|
This is a bitcoin problem and bitcoin is the king, solving bitcoin problem with altcoins is a total let down to the king.
The irony is that the whole problem was caused by some kind of altcoin, NFT exactly. It's still hard for me to accept that in addition to thousands of altcoins and tokens, there is still a need to bother the Bitcoin chain unnecessarily. |
|
|
|
Slažem se, ni meni se ne sviđa ta ideja isplate preko platforme ali mislim da manageri vjerojatno neće pristati na ideju o isplatama svaka dva tjedna ili jednom mjesečno.
Iskreno, isplata preko platforme ima smisla. To je neka kompanija sa kojom saradjujes i trebalo bi postojati obostrano poverenje. Isto tako, ako vec promovises nekog, zasto suzdrzavanje od koriscenja njihovog servisa? Licno, ako bih upravljao kampanjom za kazino, mozda bih bez obzira na trenutno ludilo sa fee, ipak isplacivao preko platforme. Tako bi promoteri ipak bar na neki nacin upoznali sta to promovisu. Nije retko da sam video kako clanovi signature kampanje ni ne znaju sta oni to reklamiraju, niti se nesto interesuju. Trebalo bi svima biti u interesu uspesna kampanja i da vlasnik ima nekakav benefit od svega. Jedini problem je da su ljudi ušli u kampanju s obećanjem tjedne isplate a ne mjesečne ali s obzirom na okolnosti ionako mislim 95% neće lovu odmah poslati dalje i prepoloviti si zaradu.
Ovo mozda iziskuje i neke druge promene, najverovatnije ukljucivanje escrow servisa, jer nije isto drzati sredstva za jednu ili cetiri nedelje. Posebno kampanje sa vecim budzetom ili "mladjim" menadzerima. Da ne bude zabune, ovde ne mislim npr. na cro2 tim, licno imam poverenje, ali ima raznih postera ovde kao i menadzera. Ne vidim problem ni da se isplata konvertuje u neku "jetiniju" valutu. |
|
|
|
Okay, so it's only on their US branch/based exchange. I thought it is the Bittrex exchangeas a whole. Well, good enough if the file won't be denied. Also, it's probably bad timing for its US users knowing there are only several exchanges can legally operate there and the BTC price keep hanging the 30k barrier.
If that is true, I wonder if it's the same company, how can they go bankrupt only partially, i.e. only in the U.S. Rather, I would say that this is an attempt to avoid responsibility, especially if we consider that their problem with the SEC is that they have been working illegally for years, without the necessary permits and licenses. Very disappointing, I don't know what to expect from them in the future. It's probably better to close them completely. |
|
|
|
The SMS works on the principle of sending data packets over cellular networks. A packet is sent from the sender's device to the nearby cellular tower. The cellular tower then bumps the packet to SMSC which is Short Message System Center. This center then locates the nearest tower of the "receiver" and thus it transmits the packet to their device and they receive the readable message.
This does not require any sort of internet connection. Pros: If somehow the receiver is not within the reach of the cellular network then SMSC stores the packet and keeps trying to send the SMS until they get it. This means, there is a high probability of reaching the receiver's device.
SMS does not require an internet connection, but a network is required. The phone itself, without mobile operators and their infrastructure, will not send SMS. In this case, the mobile network represents what the Internet represents for the blockchain. btw. wherever you have phone network coverage, you also have the possibility of accessing the Internet. I'm not sure why we would go back to a much more limited (plus much less secure) technology. Here is a similar example, but even more illogical. To drive a car, to go from point A to point B (and this can be considered a form of transfer), you don't need the Internet. But you can't do without roads. |
|
|
|
..
In any case, we would need sinbad's intervention.
Hiperlink stopped working after about 36 hours after the beginning of the mix, it returns 404 now. But just after the transaction was sent the page showed me my transaction though with 0 confirmations. After the tx was confirmed I wasn't able to check the status. I've added the link and the guarantee letter in the letter that I sent to your email (from the site): support@sinbad.io. Why can't you just check the inbox? All the relevant information is there. I've already contacted your support by telegram either and still nothing. It seems that you're not really interested in solving this issue? My funds're gone User @Potato Chips is not an official representative of Sinbad Mixer, so he can't answer some of your questions. It's just a matter of support to explore all possibilities before we get any response from Sinbad.io. It is obvious that they are currently having some problems with the clearnet page, it is possible that this also affects the delay in answering. |
|
|
|
Hello! I have an issue with my mix: funds sent but not received. I've contacted your support by e-mail and in telegram already but no actions have been taken still. Can you help me please?
can you confirm two things? - Are you sure you used their only official site https://sinbad.io or TOR http://[directing people to darknet sites is not allowed].onion/ ? - Considering the currently very high fees, have you checked whether your transaction has been confirmed by the network?
There is a problem with the sinbad.io page here, it seems that it is currently unavailable. TOR works without problems  |
|
|
|
You are right that the person has no account to sell. It is just to scam people by the name of account sells. It is known to everybody that the price of the seller can be earned within a month by the signature campaign. If that person had any account to sell then s/he could offer a higher amount or work on a signature campaign or take a loan and default the loan. Legendary accounts can get a higher amount than the offered price.
Anyway, I have tagged and supported the flag.
This is the most common scenario with account sellers. I contacted one (I think you exposed him here) he sent me a screenshot of the account with a blurred username, I still managed to find that account after the registration time. Through further conversation, it turned out that he doesn't know anything about that account, not even in any campaign. Unfortunately, that is not enough for any tag or any action against that account. Resellers who offer several Hero or Legendary accounts are certainly not the original owners. These are either hacked accounts or fake offers without real access to these accounts. |
|
|
|
|
Sending any Bitcoin is pretty frustrating right now. Two days ago I sent it, but in the end, I had to pay a significant bump fee, in order to finish everything after 30 hours of waiting
This Ordinal garbage somehow makes the idea of Bitcoin practically meaningless. cheap and fast transactions are no longer part of Bitcoin. I really hope this madness will stop.
btw. Is there at least a direct solution to this problem in sight, or will we remain hostages to this plague?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
