Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 12:30:05 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 ... 171 »
2041  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 14, 2011, 11:33:23 PM
If anyone is still having connection problems, I noticed that peer block is blocking the new ip address the pool is using.

I'm not sure if it is the p2p blacklist or the spyware one  though.

Can you be more specific please? Which provider is blocking this new ip (178.79.183.97)? I tried to find it on some blacklists and everything looks clear for me, but maybe I'm missing something...
2042  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 14, 2011, 04:40:01 PM
Last days were very hard for me and I was doing my best to recover pool to normal operation as fast as possible. During those very long nights I had many thoughs if this is the end of the pool; people will leave it because it isn't working realiably soo long. Now I see hashrate is slowly rising back to normal, which is the best satisfaction for all my work. Thank you a lot for your support!
2043  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 14, 2011, 02:28:23 PM
Philj: I'm working on it right now. If I don't asleep with my head on keyboard, it will be later today (UTC).
2044  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 14, 2011, 12:40:21 PM
Seems like I always have a reject every time a new block is announced

If you have shares rejected _after_ block broadcast, then try restarting your miner. Some miners have bug that they don't reconnect to new LP URL given from server once they're already connected somewhere else. So maybe you're accepting jobs from different backend than you're submitting to...
2045  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 14, 2011, 09:24:12 AM
Boyd: I'm working on it. Most probably today, but you never know; I didn't expect that DDoS issues as well...
2046  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 14, 2011, 09:16:32 AM
All connection issues should be fixed. If your miner still don't work, please restart it to let it use actual DNS records.
2047  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 14, 2011, 07:30:41 AM
Remember: There's checkbox on profile page, it displays namecoin settings.
2048  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 14, 2011, 07:13:10 AM
Worst? Definitely not :-D There were already rounds with CDF over 99%
2049  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 14, 2011, 06:56:04 AM
I'm sorry for that error message, it was huge miscommunication from side of ddos prevention company.
2050  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 11:16:16 PM
Tried shutting down and then restarting guiminer...
tried rebooting the computer...
still getting  "Problems communicating with bitcoin RPC"

Although attack seems to be gone, there are still some minor issues making connection less stable, which will be here for few hours.

However this should not affect mining hashrate so much, at least with miner which support long polling and NTime rolling (poclbm, GUIMiner with poclbm core, cgminer). Thanks to this, mining isn't stopped on share submitting latency.
2051  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 11:12:55 PM
Good job on getting the pool stable again Slush.
I do have one small request though.Could you please make a userbar code available for the pool?
No rush  Wink

User bars aren't a problem; problem is that pool is calculating hashrate using current round only, which is insanely inaccurate on round start. So I need to rework hashrate calculations to make userbars useful...
2052  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 08:59:02 PM
Pool rounds #8393-#8396 has been recalculated using proportional (share based) mechanism to don't beat those miners who failed to connect on the end of rounds.
2053  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 08:32:44 PM
Seems to have solved it.

It isn't first time today why it seems solved Wink.
2054  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 08:20:42 PM
Please restart your miners; DNS changed again and some miners don't resolve them once again during operation.
2055  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 04:31:39 PM
My 'Have you slept yet?' comment was much more a sympathetic gesture

Lol, I personally understand it wasn't a real question. However I'm considering this in real life, because attackers are using those information.
2056  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 04:29:44 PM
actually whitelisting isn't necessary, normal traffic is passing thu also, but whitelisted IP don't need to pass filter.

Now is adding new IPs to whitelist not possible as I exported that whitelist to ddos mitigation company, sorry.
2057  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 03:52:15 PM
That's a smart move -- imagine if everyone knew Slush's routine -- when he's gone for a while, what day he likes to run household errands, when he's unconscious (asleep) for 8 hours, etc.

Actually it's very hard to find time when I'm completely off the Internet. And thanks to one of the first attack to the pool, which was during my holiday, I'm not telling my plans to anybody anymore.
2058  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 03:45:43 PM
Aye, I certainly applaud your work on this, m8. Have you slept yet?

I had only 30min nap while waiting on system upgrade.
2059  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 03:19:38 PM
Only ~530GH on slush pool atm and I still cannot get in, along with many others.....

Lot of miners disconnected and also hashrate on website is inaccurate for 30 minutes since last problems. But things are going better.
2060  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1400 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Now LP&Ntime, NMC merged mining on: October 13, 2011, 02:54:04 PM
that first DDoS IP ending with .109 is still a little overloaded. If you see many connection issues, you may try few miner restarts to connect miners to another IP from DNS balancing.

But yes, things are going to stabilize a little, at least for now.
Pages: « 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 ... 171 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!