|
sadpandatech
|
 |
October 13, 2011, 12:38:41 PM |
|
sadpandatech: attack is still here, we're both fighting with that. Actually attack got a little more intensive before few minutes, but mining still works (though with connection errors sometimes).
thanks for the response, m8. I see you mentioned whitelisting, did you end up having to go the 'Deny All' route? Have you had any chance to analyze the attack packets? There has got to be some sort of identifiable trace in them that can be filtered out. Assuming your Host or upstream provider is using any kind of packet marking capabilities, its hard to suggest to them what methods to deploy without knowing how the attacks are coming in. Are they spoofed syn attacks, reflector type or what? Anything other than UDP based flooding can be stamped out with a 'Stack Pi' type mechanism. UDP can be strictly filtered from the upstream side. Sorry to be so buggy, I owned an ISP many moons ago and had to deal with a lot of this kind of crap. Cheers, m8 |
If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA
It is being worked on by smart people. -DamienBlack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list. |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
jh1523
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 13, 2011, 01:43:59 PM |
|
My miners' connections are very spotty. I manage to get 1 share in here and there, but then fails for minutes in a row. Website is unreachable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jezzz
|
|
October 13, 2011, 01:48:44 PM |
|
My miners' connections are very spotty. I manage to get 1 share in here and there, but then fails for minutes in a row. Website is unreachable.
I know some smaller pools that would be happy to have you temporarily until slush comes back up |
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 13, 2011, 01:51:25 PM |
|
I know some smaller pools that would be happy
Then they become noticeable and will defend to the same shits :-). |
|
|
|
jh1523
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 13, 2011, 01:56:04 PM |
|
My miners' connections are very spotty. I manage to get 1 share in here and there, but then fails for minutes in a row. Website is unreachable.
I know some smaller pools that would be happy to have you temporarily until slush comes back up I know a few of those too. I have my miners setup so that they mine on those smaller pools if my main pools are unavailable, but still keep retrying every so often. Those are the results I'm posting here. |
|
|
|
|
|
DutchBrat
|
|
October 13, 2011, 02:03:42 PM |
|
Connection seems to be stable again  Brat |
|
|
|
|
jh1523
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 13, 2011, 02:07:04 PM |
|
Nope. Still only manage 1-2 shares in here and there. Which due to the score-based payout method is not useful at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pekv2
|
|
October 13, 2011, 02:09:51 PM
Last edit: October 13, 2011, 02:32:13 PM by pekv2 |
|
Thank you Slush! You the Dood!!!!  . I am mining away, no rejects or errors. Website works fine on my side, no ssl as you stated, I'm fine with that. Cool that you are using the mitigation services. Great work, getting it backup! |
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 13, 2011, 02:17:44 PM |
|
Nope. Still only manage 1-2 shares in here and there. Which due to the score-based payout method is not useful at all.
I added some new DDoS balancers and DNS changes are in progress. So if you're still connected to original one (overloaded), you still might see some issues. I recommend you to restart miners and let them connect to fresh IPs. |
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 13, 2011, 02:19:19 PM |
|
Which due to the score-based payout method is not useful at all.
I forgot to state that I'll recalculate those rounds from DDoS attack with share based (proportional) mechanism later. Score method of course need stable connection on pool side, so using score while being under ddos is nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
digital
|
|
October 13, 2011, 02:49:34 PM |
|
Dont wanna jinx it, but things are starting to look a little more stable now...
|
If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20 50051.100 53668.0 53788.0 53571.0 53571.0 52212.0 50729.0 114804.0 115468 78106 69061 58572 54747
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 13, 2011, 02:54:04 PM |
|
that first DDoS IP ending with .109 is still a little overloaded. If you see many connection issues, you may try few miner restarts to connect miners to another IP from DNS balancing.
But yes, things are going to stabilize a little, at least for now.
|
|
|
|
|
sadpandatech
|
|
October 13, 2011, 03:11:25 PM |
|
Great work, getting it backup!
yes, def great work. Butttttt, it is far from being 'Back up'..... Only ~530GH on slush pool atm and I still cannot get in, along with many others..... |
If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA
It is being worked on by smart people. -DamienBlack
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 13, 2011, 03:19:38 PM |
|
Only ~530GH on slush pool atm and I still cannot get in, along with many others.....
Lot of miners disconnected and also hashrate on website is inaccurate for 30 minutes since last problems. But things are going better. |
|
|
|
|
sadpandatech
|
|
October 13, 2011, 03:25:04 PM |
|
Only ~530GH on slush pool atm and I still cannot get in, along with many others.....
Lot of miners disconnected and also hashrate on website is inaccurate for 30 minutes since last problems. But things are going better. Aye, I certainly applaud your work on this, m8. Have you slept yet? |
If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA
It is being worked on by smart people. -DamienBlack
|
|
|
dishwara
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
|
|
October 13, 2011, 03:34:07 PM |
|
Slush already said many posts & pages before after his tour & attack.
That he will never mention when he is going tour or sleep.
|
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 13, 2011, 03:45:43 PM |
|
Aye, I certainly applaud your work on this, m8. Have you slept yet?
I had only 30min nap while waiting on system upgrade. |
|
|
|
|
AngelusWebDesign
|
|
October 13, 2011, 03:46:36 PM |
|
That's a smart move -- imagine if everyone knew Slush's routine -- when he's gone for a while, what day he likes to run household errands, when he's unconscious (asleep) for 8 hours, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 13, 2011, 03:52:15 PM |
|
That's a smart move -- imagine if everyone knew Slush's routine -- when he's gone for a while, what day he likes to run household errands, when he's unconscious (asleep) for 8 hours, etc.
Actually it's very hard to find time when I'm completely off the Internet. And thanks to one of the first attack to the pool, which was during my holiday, I'm not telling my plans to anybody anymore. |
|
|
|
|
michaelmclees
|
|
October 13, 2011, 04:26:14 PM |
|
Slush. Username michaelmclees. I'm using a different IP to mine now than what you probably have on record. Anyway it whitelist the new one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
