Ps: I think theymos should get a theme coded for mobiles as he doesn't wants to install tapatalk. There is a mobile stylesheet. Shrink your browser window to see it. Suggested improvements are welcome. That doesn't actually show up on smartphones, because in absence of a viewport tag it will assume ~700px or so. If you want it to show up on mobile devices (instead of just when someone shrinks their browser window): <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width"> |
|
|
|
|
If you think sane heads in the community will allow a change from SHA256 unless it is broken, you're delusional. Bitcoin is SHA256.
|
|
|
|
the hot pocket will dump all coins in secure storage if it detects an intrusion.
Interesting. I wonder how you do it. We're really limited on the amount of info we can share on this aspect. Maybe when we revamp it  |
|
|
|
any way to sign into multiple accounts at the same time?
Multiple browsers. I just deposited into CoinLenders. Is there anything special I have to do to earn interest, or just wait? Do you need to buy a CD to earn interest? (I'd rather not and have the option to pull out at any time.) You don't need to, but you get a higher rate if you do. |
|
|
|
Hi TF,
I have just seen in your faq: "Tor detection - accounts that registered using Tor can use Tor, other accounts may not for security reasons".
1) I setup non-tor. So am guessing there is indeed no way to allow tor for this account?
2) If so, can we close and reopen a new acct with same email?
Thanks.
There is - please contact support@inputs.io and we can manually enable tor for your account. We'll be adding extensive proxy lists too but also expose this option to the user after they've signed in of course. For now, just contact us |
|
|
|
|
They already did a redesign, they probably can't afford another.
|
|
|
|
When I send money to a service it seems to see my change address as a sender address instead of the actual sender address.
And if they want to send only to the address they got the money from, they send to the change address.
Is that behavior normal?
Only with VERY poorly designed services. As such, I make a significant effort to avoid any services designed this way. Hey, of course they'd do that if they charge you 0.5% for additional privacy. |
|
|
|
Updated the OP with a video of what it's like.
This video has been removed because it is too long. |
|
|
|
Thanks for answering. I would like to clear a few things. There's a few reasons 'why not do something like blockchain.info':
Blockchain.info does have access to your wallet. You get all of your information from Blockchain.info's central servers. They could do a lot of things, like make you sign outputs to their addresses, make up transactions that were never transmitted, and if you use their API they have your private key already. Not to mention they can include malicious JS.
Are you talking about, when we create a wallet .. they are the one generating all this for us? How about if we rather create an account offline, and then add it to BlockChain.info? Features like mixing require control of private keys as well as off chain transaction. It's possible to use Inputs.io in a way that limits your counterparty risk to just that we won't double spend.
What if we don't want to use mixer? Do you provide an option to opt-out, and get full control over your account. We have redundancy plans (aka 'dead man's switch'), both automated and manual. This isn't just for seizes / etc, the hot pocket will dump all coins in secure storage if it detects an intrusion.
My question is can we move to other services if we want to? and can we add externally generated wallets? Something like an import/export feature. Happy to! 1) No, with blockchain.info you get pretty much everything from Blockchain.info's servers. Your transaction list, your balance, your outputs that you sign, etc. 2) There isn't a way to opt out at this time - turning on mixing also helps other users as you'll be contributing to our mixer volume 3) Yes. We also have watch only addresses and accounts (say, you manage a bunch of Inputs.io websites) on the planned features list. |
|
|
|
|
No, you get paid for all your posts but you must reply to this thread each month to start another cycle.
|
|
|
|
Bloody hell, finding this on someone's server would be a goldmine!
So sending coins away is as simple as one GET request? The wrong people will be drooling over this.
Unless I'm misunderstanding something, I strongly recommend you forget about advising people to automatically return funds to non-existent users, and strip all that stuff out. Read-access to a server shouldn't result in this kind of compromise.
Just like how sending coins away is just as simple as a JSON-RPC request.. Read-access to a server does give you wallet.dat |
|
|
|
I really like you website, but have a few question before I create a wallet account.. - I din't find any privacy policy. Can you please share a link?
- Somewhere in this thread I read, you have our private key.. is that true? Why not do something like blockchain.info, where they don't have access to your wallet at all.
- How do you store our personal information like email and IP? What if a gov agency ask you for any particular account? What information can you provide?
- If your website gets taken down tomorrow by XYZ agency, do we still have our wallet or it's gone with you? Can we export or move to other service or a desktop client?
- Do you support closing accounts? If yes, do you erase information from your systems?
Great questions, please see https://inputs.io/faq#q1-4There's a few reasons 'why not do something like blockchain.info': Blockchain.info does have access to your wallet. You get all of your information from Blockchain.info's central servers. They could do a lot of things, like make you sign outputs to their addresses, make up transactions that were never transmitted, and if you use their API they have your private key already. Not to mention they can include malicious JS. Features like mixing require control of private keys as well as off chain transaction. It's possible to use Inputs.io in a way that limits your counterparty risk to just that we won't double spend. We have redundancy plans (aka 'dead man's switch'), both automated and manual. This isn't just for seizes / etc, the hot pocket will dump all coins in secure storage if it detects an intrusion. Send an email to support@inputs.io if you'd like to clear our account, and we'll delete all info we have on you. It'll take longer for the data to be gone in backups. |
|
|
|
|
You can minimize this risk by simply automatically sweeping your coins to your own address.
|
|
|
|
|
Source code may be in GPL (so you are allowed to use existing open source libraries / code).
Given a JS variable 'toaddress' on the page, HTML and JS code should ask for a private key, and upon a sweep key being pressed sweep all funds to the toaddress on client side. Should be styled with Twitter Bootstrap.
0.5 BTC Bounty.
|
|
|
|
|
ASICMINER could develop hardware to mine alt coins (eg Litecoin) in the future, which would cost more resources but it is theoretically possible for ASICMINER to exceed the valuation of Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
how good is the free mixer? what volume of BTC is mixed daily?
I am also interested to know how it works. Is it instant, or do you have to wait for few confirmations before transaction shows up (like blockchain.info mixer) ? 3-4 digits of BTC volume per day. There's pretty high variance however. It's instant, there is no privacy issue with this as you're not sending to one address to have it sent to another - your balance is deducted 'off the chain' and an unrelated transaction is sent to the destination address. You can generate signed payment receipts to prove that you did send a transaction however if you want, for example for a group by. |
|
|
|
|
Is there a specific trust rating you are referring to?
|
|
|
|
|
If you haven't signed in for 14 days, we'll prompt you if you still have your recovery key with a fairly stern notice. This should reduce the "I never wrote my recovery key down!" incidents.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
