Muito interessante, mas achei talvez um pouco perigoso. Imagina que eu uso o user @TryNinja para telegram para fazer negócios e ter conversas pessoais. Ai eu meto um setApprovalForAll malicioso e alguem rouba o meu nome. De repente ele se torna o TryNinja...?  o mesmo acontece com ENS né supondo que vc compreo TryNinja.eth e sofra um hack alguém poderá usá-lo no seu lugar aí entra no velho debate de vantagens e desvantagens de fazer sua própria segurança, auto-custódia, etc... |
|
|
|
Mas, não é bem NFT. São caixas com os doces, onde as caixas são numeradas e são uma edição limitada.
Bom, cada pacote tem um número de série, né? Então (tecnicamente) não é fungível... só não é virtual.  Mas é bastante interessante como eles estão usando a marca dos apes para vender uns produtos mais caros de "colecionador". se a moda pega daqui a pouco vamos ter sonho de valsa, twix e kopenhagen com cara de NFTs sendo vendidos pelo dobro do preço o mesmo sabor mas... com status! será? |
|
|
|
Freedom of speech is not absolute. Google it. So, to keep order in our society, we have to give up our freedom to say some things. Same here with KYC on gambling sites. In order to stop money laundering, financing of terrorism and some other bad stuff we agree to give up some of our privacy. Just a little bit of it, actually. Because no one is gonna see your KYC data unless there is a police warrant.
I tend to agree since more and more we're already losing privacy due to governments, anyone even posted his address and where's his live in social media lol. I mean, they're self exposing their privacy and I think it's already become a normal habit due to flex life style. I don't think there's so much difference between centralized exchanges and casinos, after all it's had relation with crypto. If anyone really had 100% privacy concern, why they're playing on centralized casino? I mean just the images that we post to instagram would be cool enough for any governmental agency. Just manage to do something like government tracking of people and appointing which instagram is owned by which citizen and you got yourself such a big data that you would be going crazy. I am not saying that it will be like that forever but it is definitely not something that I would be unwilling to wager they are not already doing. At the end of the day, just focus on the fact that KYC is a big deal of course but only if you are hiding something, if you have nothing to hide then there is no reason why not share everything you could be sharing about yourself with the proper places (not with scammers of course). but still this is a dangerous way to think (I'll give up privacy because I have nothing to hide) because of many things: everyone has something to hide (even if just their private keys) you may have nothing to hide now but have something to hide in the future it's hard to conquer privacy again if we give up on it completely |
|
|
|
Já que estamos em tempos de eleições no Brasil (daqui a menos de dois meses) achei que valia compartilhar essa por aqui Bitcoin, criptomoedas e CBDCs são abandonados pelos candidatos à Presidência nos planos de governoAlém disso, apenas dois candidatos citam o termo blockchain em seus planos: o atual presidente Jair Bolsonaro (PL) e o coach Pablo Marçal (PROS). Ambos falam sobre como pretendem usar a tecnologia para gerar mais negócios no país. o plano do Borsalino não parece detalhar muito (...) serão criadas condições para atrair investimentos internacionais que auxiliem no desenvolvimento econômico, na geração de empregos e no bemestar social
Já Pablo Marçal é mais ambicioso e fala em cidades inteligentes por meio de novas tecnologicas. O candidato do PROS ficou famoso famoso por, durante sua atuação como coach, colocar em risco a vida de 32 clientes quando tentava liderar a subida em uma montanha na cidade de Piquete (SP). hehehe também não foi bem assim que o cara ficou famoso Portal do Bitcoin... ele já fazia uns lançamentos de 7 dígitos antes disso.
enquanto isso Ciro descarta a possibilidade do Brasil virar El Salvador O candidato Ciro Gomes (PDT) , atual terceiro colocado nas pesquisa de opinião também não aborda o tema em seu plano de governo. Recentemente, ele descartou a possibilidade do Bitcoin ser utilizado como uma moeda de curso legal no Brasil caso ele venha a ser eleito nas próximas eleições. e aí mandou essa pérola mostrando que não entende nada de crypto, tadinho “Falando de bitcoins: é uma moeda que não tem uma autoridade que dê a ela curso forçado ou que dê a ela lastro como reserva de valor. Um belo dia pode virar uma pirâmide”
enfim, só jogando lenha na fogueira talvez seja até bom que eles estejam completamente perdidos. |
|
|
|
Yes, just as employers should also carefully screen applicants for other possible mental disorders. There is a reason why potential employees have to go through different levels of neurological and psychological exams before being accepted for a certain job. There is a reason why series of interviews and background checks will have to be conducted on a job candidate. This isn't only for the employer to successfully pick the best person. This is also to keep the company safe and secured.
I remembered there was a huge company in my country that went bankrupt and closed after decades of operation because of an employee who's addicted to gambling.
Having said this, monitoring and screening should be done not just to potential employees but also to current employees.
I understand your concern that companies need to protect themselves as much as possible, but this should always be a trade off against the privacy rights of the employees. Should a company really know everything we do in our free time and that on a continuous basis? What if you go one week per year with your buddies on a man only trip to Las Vegas to have some fun? This could have series consequences if your employer knows it, even if it doesn't affect the work performance at all. In my opinion should all jobs that handle money have atleast one layer of supervision to protect itself from theft. But only targeting gamblers seems a bit excessive, I think there are many thieves who are not gamblers. I agree with Mauser here we shouldn't normalize giving up privacy rights, it's a slope that is hard to revert once we do if a person has a gambling problem, let's say, but that doesn't affect their performance at work, why it would be an issue? |
|
|
|
minha primeira pergunta é
Pra quê?
além de tornar os devs ricos o que essa criptomoeda fará que outras existentes no mercado já não fazem?
Tá me parecendo que todo mundo decidiu nadar no hype e quer alguma coisa, qualquer coisa, que enquadre na área de "inovação" que são as cryptomoedas. Por exemplo, não tinha motivo algum para o Mercado Livre criar uma moeda de cashback rodando na ETH, mas cá estamos.  Como eles estão conversando com a Paxos, há grandes chances de ser uma stablecoin whitelabel brasileira, mas já temos a BRZ e em breve também teremos a nova moeda da PicPay: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5405963então, a do mercado livre era super necessária? provavelmente não, mas dá pra entender até a razão deles lançarem, e se não vai rolar um mercado aberto na uniswap por exemplo, virará apenas um token de cashback... agora, se a da Nu for uma stable mesmo pode fazer algum sentido da mesma forma que temos USDC, DAI, USDT, etcetara... |
|
|
|
|
muito bom!
acho que o que deixa o faturamento da Nike bem diferente dos outros é que eles não decidiram fazer um lançamento original ou uma parceria, simplesmente compraram a RTFKT que já era uma empresa estabelecida no mundo dos NFTs e pivotaram ela para o lado da Nike, sem descaracterizar a marca
provavelmente o movimento mais gênio dentre as citadas
(não cheguei a ver todas a da lista da dune, mas acompanhei algumas... Nickelodeon não sabia que tinha lançado nfts por exemplo)
|
|
|
|
When all forms are carried out that require emotions there will clearly have an impact on people's psychology, especially in this case gambling, the impact is clear because here it definitely gives emotion in the game.
Regardless of whether it is bad or not in society, actually things like this are a choice because indeed things like gambling like this are a choice and when we enter there we must also be prepared to accept the consequences.
Maybe gambling looks bad in society, but maybe not for everyone, especially those who often gamble. Those who say that gambling is not bad may still be able to control themselves so that they do not get too big of a consequence or risk from gambling. Meanwhile, we have also seen many people who have fallen from gambling and lost many things in their lives, especially their loved ones. But most people will not see or accept the consequences of gambling, especially if they suffer a loss from gambling. They will instead continue to play in the hope of recovering their losses. it's tricky a bit like alcohol it can be a good source of escapism and entertainment but it can also destroy families and make people dependent, agressive and disconnected from themselves. some say the difference between the vaccine and the poison is the dose. |
|
|
|
|
interesting results, pretty much balance with a bit more people voting for
Direct cash deposit
in the end I think it comes to this idea:
why are you gambling? to make money or just to play?
those who want just to play will be fine with the free rolls.
|
|
|
|
~ I personally am all for KYC implementation on every crypto gambling site.
saying privacy is only for criminals or that you're fine with giving up your privacy because you have nothing to hide is the same as saying free speech is not needed because you have nothing to say Freedom of speech is not absolute. Google it. So, to keep order in our society, we have to give up our freedom to say some things. Same here with KYC on gambling sites. In order to stop money laundering, financing of terrorism and some other bad stuff we agree to give up some of our privacy. Just a little bit of it, actually. Because no one is gonna see your KYC data unless there is a police warrant. Well, there is an absolute reality that is as you say, it is known that as time goes by they will try to take away people's privacy, I don't know, I have seen this since 2017 with many projects that came out that were about privacy where always who reigned was and still is Monero, that is why the casino that implements Monero will give them many clients, because there is something that was talked about and it was about the adoption and the adoption of Bitcoin and even cryptocurrencies is not the problem, and that it will be given without effort, now what will be most sought is to be more anonymous, and only those who provide this service are the ones who will have the leadership without a doubt. I agree freedom of speech is not absolute, there's the paradox of tolerance too which is quite interesting though I think it's different with freedom to transact and privacy normalizing the idea that we should give away our data can develop to a dystopian society where all your financial movement is under surveillance not the nicest future and definitely not the one I wish for my children. @Betwrong says no one is gonna have access to your data but the many breaches that happen every week shows us that this is not true KYC also ends up incentivizing a parallel market where people will buy docs or pay someone to do KYC for them... |
|
|
|
Notícia interessante do Portal do bitcoin Telegram quer leiloar nomes de usuário e links no formato de NFTsa ideia seria que os usernames e links t.me/username poderiam se tornar NFTs e ser leiloados estilo um ENS mas para nomes de usuário achei um caso bem interessante para uso de NFTs dentro de uma empresa de forma diferente do que vimos até agora teve os y.ats né, mas essa foi uma empresa nova, diferente do telegram que já tem base de usuários gigante e tal o que acham? |
|
|
|
|
bom proveito Thiagofelipe!
por aqui quase acabando o Moonwalking with einstein e to adorando
recomendo!
avançando mais em um sobre mitologia grega e romana também
que é um assunto que faz tempo queria aprofundar mais mas não encontrava nenhum livro legal sobre
Lendo o do Gustav Schwab
|
|
|
|
I honestly think casinos and exchanges are hitting two targets with one arrow.
By setting a mandatory KYC on their platform they are following the regulations from the government as well as selling this data to other companies for money.
Governments are keeping these regulations for AML but may be exchanges and casinos are using this KYC data for their benefit as well.
We can never know the hidden truth behind this.
As long as there's no blackmail or many strangers asking you for money, I don't think your KYC is being used by other people. Because that's where your data being used and it's a sign if many people already know how to reach you. You may correct we don't know behind truth about this, but at the same time they're getting forced to ask KYC. That's why if you're want to give your KYC, make sure you're already 100% trust with the project. the hard part about digital data is that in the end it's impossible to verify if something was truly deleted so you have no way to know if the documents you submit on a website will end up being sold on the deep web for pennies or not... And it is because of this that people are so concerned about giving their personal data to online companies, we must assume that once something is uploaded to the Internet it will stay there forever. And even if we assume that the service that we are using is to be trusted and they will never sell that information willingly we know that hacks can happen, where I live recently there was a hack and the information of many customers of the business that got hacked is not being sold on the dark web, so regardless of how tight the security of any casino could be there is no guarantee something like this could not happen to them and you will find your information being sold on those dark marketplaces. exactly and we see all kinds of absurd things nowadays including sensitive information being kept in a non-cryptographic way it's a deep rabbit whole to dig do you have any hope these issues in security of information will be solved one day? |
|
|
|
Yes.. I believe in this round had several unforeseen events, the results of some games surprised many people...
I didn't bet on the Fortaleza x Corinthians game... because I would bet on Corinthians lol
But I did  I lost a good bet on Corinthians yesterday haha, I was so sure about the victory, I lost 25 BRL Corinthians is lacking constancy, it's curious, the team won a game 4 x 0 against Athletico and got the classification for semi finals of Copa do Brasil, after that lost a match to a team almost at the demoting zone, and lost the 3 place, now it's 4th. Even with so many new players, the situation is not good. Now it's 10 points distant from the first place of Palmeiras. I almost put 50 BRL, but I glad I didn't good that you didn't lose too much sometimes we can learn a lot by small losses I'm almost never betting on soccer results because it's so unpredictable not sure think about this victories from Ceara a couple of weeks back not sure if many expected that. |
|
|
|
|
minha primeira pergunta é
Pra quê?
além de tornar os devs ricos o que essa criptomoeda fará que outras existentes no mercado já não fazem?
se for uma stable são outros quinhentos, aí veremos...
curioso pros próximos capítulos.
|
|
|
|
If I remember correctly, there are only a few types of poker left where the AI is still weaker than a human. And if you look at the trend, this situation is clear how it will end. I'm not sure exactly what Carlsen's motivation is, since in poker no one player (in modern conditions) has ever dominated. At the highest level, this is a game of luck, where the outcome is determined almost entirely by chance. For Carlsen, it's most likely just entertainment plus making money. I think advertising from an influencer like him is very expensive.
indeed it's probably expensive to hire Carlsen for an ad and he's probably picky on which companies to advertise for regarding Poker and AI, can AI bluff? curious about it for sure it can calculate the mathematical possibilities better than humans, but poker is not only luck, it's a game of skill What is the game of skill? In all games where only skill is taken into account, AI is already undeniably better than a person - chess, GO, checkers, any other board games. As for bluffing, I can’t answer this question because I don’t know the details, but it seems to me that it can because from the AI point of view, bluffing is a common action in the game that leads to certain consequences with certain probabilities. Since the AI calculates all these probabilities, why not use this technique. this is the point AI will take the mathematical and logical approach and some things are beyond this domain bluffing is one of them even though AI can calculate the odds of determined combination of cards being the winner, top poker players can also do it winning on poker is not about it, it's way more totally different game than chess makes sense? |
|
|
|
existem algumas pesquisas de como adicionar privacidade na rede da ethereum Aztec é um dos projetos nessa busca. Falando no Aztec, hoje um usuário teve a sua conta da FTX bloqueada simplesmente porquê depositou ETH que passou por lá, algo como depositar moedas que acabaram de passar por um mixer. https://coincodecap.com/ftx-restricted-a-user-from-interacting-with-zk-money“ According to FTX, Aztec Connect - Aztec network / zk money has been identified as a mixing service, which is a high-risk activity prohibited by FTX.” Devemos começar a ver mais histórias como essa depois de toda essa treta com a Tornado Cash. sim, é bizarro nesse caso o cara consegue ao menos retirar o dinheiro da exchange ou fica congelado? li no instagram da paradigma que fizeram uma análise pelo dune e mais de 40% da contas tem envolvimento de até 4 hops de distância de alguém que passou pelo tornado... se aumentar pra 8 hops provável que beire os 90-99%. |
|
|
|
Has anyone noticed on YouTube that Carlsen is advertising some kind of casino? I don't remember the name, but I do remember the slogan "Zero Risk Gambling" hahaha. Judging by his participation in poker competitions and this advertisement, it can be assumed that he is increasingly immersed in the world of gambling. Is this just making money interesting or is he seriously interested in this area? I hope this is a passing fad, I would like to see him in the next cycles of the Candidates Tournament.
I have not seen this but there could be some very deep reasons for this new interest in gambling, I have seen chess go from humans being better than computers, then being evenly matched to a complete dominance of computers over humans, poker due to its nature is still a game in which humans are better than computers and most likely this will remain the case until very smart AI is developed, maybe Carlsen is frustrated with the fact that even if he is the best human chess player he cannot beat his digital opponents, and he would like to try poker as it is a game in which he could reach the true top, but this is speculation on my part. If I remember correctly, there are only a few types of poker left where the AI is still weaker than a human. And if you look at the trend, this situation is clear how it will end. I'm not sure exactly what Carlsen's motivation is, since in poker no one player (in modern conditions) has ever dominated. At the highest level, this is a game of luck, where the outcome is determined almost entirely by chance. For Carlsen, it's most likely just entertainment plus making money. I think advertising from an influencer like him is very expensive. indeed it's probably expensive to hire Carlsen for an ad and he's probably picky on which companies to advertise for regarding Poker and AI, can AI bluff? curious about it for sure it can calculate the mathematical possibilities better than humans, but poker is not only luck, it's a game of skill |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
