Point number 7 there is factually incorrect.

What I'm asking is centrally relevant to this thread.

Since the thread is an attack on XC I will continue to address it.

It's not a matter of whether rdnkjdi listens or not, it's a matter of contending with FUD.


I'm sorry that this is frustrating. I think you'd be best off not reading this thread.



P.S. It's Synechist, not Synchillis. ;-)

It's very arrogant of you to call those statements "facts". You are not omniscient and so cannot make that claim.

It's also arrogant of you to simply ignore my posts, which are directly relevant to the topic of this thread and are written in a respectful and non-emotional tone.

Please alter your statements to reflect the actual wording on XC's statement.

Please also remove any mention of XC from the OP and title because it's not relevant to your case against Jasinlee.

I'm not aware of that actually. We'll let you know closer to Monday.

Alternatively you can just let your Xnode run and see what revenue it brings in.

Heh. Let 'em come. XC is rock solid and gets stronger by the week.

None of these facts are relevant to your case against Jasinlee, so why include them?

What are your intentions here?


Your intention cannot be to strengthen your case against Jasinlee, because it doesn't.

Might it be to spread FUD about XC?


What do you say your intentions are in leaving XC-related content in this thread?

This is factually incorrect.

The official statement says "Jasinlee is not an official member of the XC Team, as has been reflected on our website for some time."

We do not say "months ago".

By your saying "months ago" you attempt to make your case feel stronger than it is.

This is deceitful.


Please change it.

Dan's had this tech in mind since 7/7/14 or before.

No-one else has done it before.

For the time being though, you can read up on "coinshuffle" if you're interested.

I am giving you facts about the inaccuracy of your statements.

I am also substantiating my view that XC has no relevance to your case against Fibonacci, and that mentioning XC makes you come across as a fudder.

If this was spam, it would have to be irrelevant to the thread's topic.

Yet it is highly relevant, since it pertains to the central claims made in the OP.

Therefore it is not spam.



Please remove mention of XC from the thread's title and from the OP.

How are any of those statements relevant to your case against his ASIC project?

They're not relevant at all.

Therefore please remove mention of XC from the OP and the thread's title.

- I'm requesting, not "telling". I'm not in authority over you.


My guess is that on the 5th Teka was not aware that Jasin had stepped down, because he did so in conversation with Dan, and there is a whole lot going on in XC. It's impossible to be in every conversation, especially with the time-zone differences between Europe and the US.


You've been misquoting the official statement.

The statement does not say "months ago". It says "for some time".

By giving a more specific time-designation, you make your case appear stronger than it actually is.

Please do not bend the facts to suit your purposes.

Your case is against Jasinlee's ASIC project.

XC is not involved in Jasinlee's operations. Therefore any information about XC is irrelevant to your claims against Jasinlee's ASIC project.

Therefore you are attacking XC without warrant.

Attacking XC weakens your case: as it's not relevant to the ASIC project it makes you come across as a fudder.


So please either delete this thread or remove mention of XC from the OP and the title.

More or less big mainstream-ish sorts of plans.

Some factually incorrect statements:


- Not three people. 10 official ones, and several developers working for Dan.


- We explained precisely the respect in which Jasin was never an XC developer in our official statement: he never developed XC's code.
- We also explained why Jasin was listed as a developer when he was in the team: because he is a developer in his own right, and he was on the team. (He just didn't develop for XC.)
- I also stated this to you at least two other times.
- Do you still refuse to comprehend?


- No, it's as plain as day, but you refuse to see it.
- The above paragraph is based on personal opinion and speculation.
- What possible reason do you have to favour your own personal speculation over a clear case to the contrary?
- Without being able to observe your intentions, you come across like a desperate fudder with little to go on.


- I have painstakingly explained to you repeatedly and precisely the way in which our statements are consistent.
- Lots of other people have repeatedly said to you that you're not seeing things clearly because you don't want to.
- So you're blinded here. You can't see the truth because you're too pissed off.


- You have zero reason to lash out at XC when you think Jasinlee has done you wrong.
- If Jasinlee has moved onto a new project, it isn't XC, because he's not on the team, isn't getting paid, hasn't had access to the code, and hasn't written any of XC's code.


So please remove XC from the title of this thread.


Or please delete the entire thread.

***The XC Daily Update***

    6   days to go before Rev 2 is finalised!


- Dan continues work on the final Rev 2.


- VC Fundamentals are adding XC to their platform!

- About VC Fundamentals:
"VCFundamentals.com is powered by Sembro Development LLC and designed to provide research tools to the crypto currency investor much like traditional equity research.  Many current virtual currency traders rely solely on rumors and breaking news to make trading decisions; however, we hope to change the game by providing a research platform for day traders to become investors based on the intrinsic value of popular coins.  Our real-time analysis compares other currencies to the movement of bitcoin and will help indivuals create a diversified portfolio to reduce risk and maximize reward."


- XC is participating in the "Sponsor a Keepod Kid" Campaign, and it has raised over $478 in its first week! Keep donating folks: https://twitter.com/XCurrency/status/509222016432750592


- When XC reaches 500 followers on Facebook and 3000 followers on Twitter, we'll give one lucky person 100 XC. Spread the word!

Nice one sir!

BTW, coinjoin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.0

Jasinlee is not an XC developer.

Please change the title of this thread to reflect this.


Thank you.

Actually no (though that was a good guess).

Stealth addresses, as XC will implement them, is part of the implementation of the XChat publicised address feature, so it's a Rev 2.5 thing.

That said, it'll also improve privacy for payments in one respect: it'll make it easier to conceal the receiver's identity.

Not that you can't conceal a receiver identity already by using addresses as they were designed: as single-use entities.

Yes there are two features, but the first has been mentioned before, so it's not big news: Xnodes will earn transaction fees.

On the other hand, the majority of the public and the altcoin world don't know about this yet, so it's news all the same.

There's a test release available for anyone who wants to try this out.