Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 09:25:26 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 [108] 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 »
2141  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 20, 2012, 12:06:34 PM
Waiting for BTCmon update Cry

That's the reason for the change. Smiley It should be ready soon.
2142  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 20, 2012, 11:39:11 AM
Quick website update.

Now you can use /api/users in addition to /api/users/USERNAME to retrieve your stats.

I think including the username in the URL is more RESTful, but this simplified URL makes it easier for 3rd party apps to add BitMinter support.
2143  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 19, 2012, 02:32:09 PM
My point was to say that the only affect it will have on each person is: It will decrease variance.

Yep. Some miners like seeing more blocks come in, while others don't like seeing their "pay per block" go down. But the way it really affects each miner is to reduce variance.
2144  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 19, 2012, 02:21:16 PM
kano is more right.

Not really. Because he said "no" to higher hashrate increasing the odds of finding blocks. That's clearly incorrect. Higher hashrate does increase your chance of finding blocks. Otherwise I'd be CPU mining right now. Cheesy

But the end result of the increased hashrate is lower variance, that is true.

Anyway, I hope we can find something more useful to discuss today.
2145  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 18, 2012, 05:16:27 AM
@DrHaribo I have  an idea for the status window on site. Is their a chance to implement current round how many blocks required to build etc and shares etc mined and how many are remaining to be done for that round and maybe some more real time status to show your percentages within the pool at what input you are giving towards to total pool like efforts and added to pool in current round etc

and some status like next round starting in and then counts down going of the rate of work been done currently by all members in pool ?

It already shows how many shares are mined. That's the "accepted" and "rejected" numbers. If you are logged in there will also be accepted and rejected numbers showing how much you did in the current round. Your efforts and total pool efforts would be the hashrate?

We can't show how much remains of the current round in work or time. Every proof of work is like a lottery ticket. We don't know how many more tickets we need before we find a winning one. It could take 1 second or 100 years to finish the round. So the CDF value will never reach 100%. In the livestats it will stop at 99.99% but in reality of course it will get more and more nines.
2146  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 17, 2012, 12:39:44 PM
Are higher difficulty shares being considered on this pool?

Yes, that's the next upgrade I'm working on right now.
2147  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 17, 2012, 06:46:56 AM
There was a problem with shift updates last night. A rather large shift is now making its way down the list. All work is registered and will be paid when we find blocks. This will have the effect that the N in PPLNS is much higher until this huge shift is out of the last 10 list. So if you have work in this shift it will take longer than usual before it is fully paid.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
2148  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BitMinter.com * Optional Custom Miner, PPLNS, Merged mining, Newbie-Friendly! * on: October 16, 2012, 05:05:00 AM
WOW!!!! 20 blocks so far today.  Grin

Is this a new record?

Yeah, the old record was 18. Very lucky day.  Grin
2149  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Which is the best pool to join with your ASIC? on: October 15, 2012, 05:27:40 PM
such polmine.pl which supports   GBT

Maybe not the best example for a pool to use. Remember when they stole from their miners? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=50779.0

For some reason some people keep mining there.
2150  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BitMinter.com * Optional Custom Miner, PPLNS, Merged mining, Newbie-Friendly! * on: October 15, 2012, 04:37:45 PM
17 blocks already today. We could break the record! Grin
2151  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 15, 2012, 08:29:13 AM
I guess my main point is that IMHO it is a higher priority to have variable difficulty working with either GBT or stratum than to have multiple pool servers. You might never need an extra pool server with these other pieces in place.

You're right. The reason I wanted to do multi-server first is because it better allows testing all these new features separate from the main server. It was a bit of a hack the last time I did this (running a test port).

I'll do it in two phases though. Just some quick changes first so I can more easily run a test port. Then I'll get in the var diff, GBT, Stratum. After that I'll add full multi-server support and actually set up more servers. Finally comes the multi-server and multi-pool support in BitMinter client, which is probably the most complex piece.
2152  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 14, 2012, 07:59:36 PM
Great to hear the new server changes are working out Smiley

Yes, variable difficulty will be coming soon. I'm currently working on some changes to support multiple mining servers. I thought that might be a good idea to do first as it will make it easier to test var diff.

It could also be useful to have a couple more servers when ASICs turn up. Wink
2153  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BitMinter.com * Optional Custom Miner, PPLNS, Merged mining, Newbie-Friendly! * on: October 13, 2012, 06:11:28 PM
Thanks for the donations, guys. They are much appreciated. And yes, namecoin donations help, they're worth much less than bitcoins but they're not worthless.

If all else fails, you could always bump the donation percentage required for the unconfirmed payout perk again. Hopefully, though, even at 2% you'll get enough in the coffers to cover for those.

I can't really turn off people's perks or raise their donations without giving advance notice. I don't think that would be good form.

If orphans go up to 5% or whatever for a short time the pool can survive that. Might need a backup plan if the orphans get completely out of hand, though. Maybe announce ahead of ASICS that prepay may get disabled if orphans get too high? I think most likely the orphans will be manageable, though.
2154  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 13, 2012, 02:24:52 PM
Small server update today:
  • Increase shift size (PPLNS with N=4x difficulty). This should reduce variance for part-time mining and if you have some downtime on your rigs.
  • Implemented getwork "midstate" extension. Most miners support this now. It reduces bandwidth a little and also CPU usage on the server.
  • Small speedup for long poll
  • Small speedup in checking proofs of work

Only shaved a few percent off the server CPU usage this time, but every bit helps. Smiley

EDIT: most browsers  Cheesy of course I meant most miners support this now. Also, if your livestats don't show shift progression correctly (100% when only half done), try clearing your browser cache and reloading the page.
2155  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Phoenix 2 Miner v2.0.0 on: October 12, 2012, 07:28:53 PM
Phoenix 2 is spamming the wrong password 10 times per second, just like Phoenix 1. Maybe you can fix that?
2156  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 12, 2012, 11:40:04 AM
Looking at the stats my home machines using cgminer seem to be fine. I only noticed because my work PC went quiet all of a sudden, it is using the BitMinter Java client with the port 80 switch... so I guess that doesn't use long polling as it keeps running out of work?

Sure it uses long polling, or it would cause a lot of rejects. But it goes through the web server. Not recommended unless you really need to use port 80 because that's all your firewall allows.
2157  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1600 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 12, 2012, 11:03:12 AM
A bit of russian DDoS attack on the web server currently taking place. Sorry for the instability. Mining looks fine so far, though.
2158  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BitMinter.com * Optional Custom Miner, PPLNS, Merged mining, Newbie-Friendly! * on: October 11, 2012, 12:20:24 PM
i was wondering if the operator or anyone else has given this outcome any thought and whether the current policy on payout for orphaned blocks will changed

link: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4953/how-will-a-massive-increase-in-hashpower-affect-orphan-rates

Actually it's me asking that question on the bitcoin stackexchange. So yes I am thinking about it.  Wink

I'm guessing orphan rate will go over 2% and the pool will lose some coins. But it shouldn't be that bad, and I will be doing what I can to keep the orphans at bay.
2159  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 11, 2012, 07:38:23 AM
Some server changes are in. CPU usage reduced by 20-25%. The server is now also using Luke-jr's trick of sending pre-computed "empty" blocks (only transaction is the generation transaction) through long poll. So now the load spikes from abusive miners are greatly reduced and long poll is faster. This results in much fewer rejects than we've seen in the last few days and the delay you would sometimes see with getting work after long poll seems essentially gone.

At the moment for the current round I have 0.04% rejects. Pool wide rejects are 0.43% though. I would have hoped to get this lower. Let me know if you still have a high reject ratio and I'll see what I can do.

Namecoin rejects are sometimes very high. I suspect some miners are configured to ignore namecoin long polls. Not a big deal I guess, with namecoin value being what it is.

Note: every round starts with rejected work. If you see 10% rejected in the first second of a round, that's normal. Round data is more useful to look at after it has gone over, say, 30 minutes.
2160  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] BitMinter.com [Zero Fee, Hopper Safe,Merged Mining,Tx Fees Paid Out] on: October 10, 2012, 08:05:55 PM
Quote
20:46 <+MintBot> Outdoor mining FTW! Isokivi mints a BTC block (height 202410,
                 income 50.01420000 BTC, 1 hour and 28 minutes, CDF 46.63%)

Now you can see what MintBot is talking about, Isokivi's outdoor rig: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhqCcQlIEMI
Pages: « 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 [108] 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!