Bitcoin Forum
June 08, 2024, 06:27:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 [109] 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 ... 484 »
2161  Economy / Reputation / Re: Royse777 is Casino Critique on: September 23, 2022, 09:39:54 PM
~yawn~
You are wrong. I am not using alt-accounts to either discredit you or to keep highlighting the Bitlucy/Royse777 scam.
Yawn LOL
How could you deny some data.

Just look at your post history. Last one week how many posts you made and how many of them are related to me. Go and count the numbers.

Look at the number of posts you made in this topic, look at the number of posts you made on the bitlucy withdrawal topic, look at other topics created related to me. Who has the most number of responses?

You are obsessed with me. How could anyone will not suspect that all those alt are not you just to create new conversion when another conversation is dead. You are even talking to yourself just to create conversation. See.

All these you are doing to discredit my reputation, you are doing good though. Wherever you are having chance you are not missing it to insult me. Meta, reputation, scam accusation, gambling which board you left untouched? Why wouldn't you? After all I am your new subject after 1xbit.

You are obsessed about me, obsessed to discredit everything I have done and do or will do. Do yourself a favor, before lying check your data to back that come out from pressing your keyboard. Something tells me, in real life you are a frustrated loser living a lonely life.
2162  Other / Meta / Re: How username turned into "Anonymous" in 2022? on: September 23, 2022, 09:17:46 PM
Want to share your motivations?  I don't really care, but my curiosity will return if I see this thread again.   Cheesy
Older members who seen me around or seeing me around for long time they obviously know what I am, that does not concern me.

A new member who is unknown about the forum, and does not know me (even it could be an unregistered visitor) they will obviously become a little off when they will see the recent bad name I earned. I did not want to let that happened so decided to remove myself from it.

Theymos left me two options. Removing it keeping the creator of the topic anonymous, replace anyone else as topic creator. I did not bother to contact anyone to request to be the OP not even any of the escrow, I was just not in my usual mental state. So I picked the first option.

Besides, I wanted to reduce my involvement which I do voluntarily for the forum. This place is an emotion for me. It does not effect me when a criticism against me is valid and does not cross the border line but when it cross the border then it effects my real life and people around me. I can not let it happen.

I hope OP and other who are genuinely interested to know the reason then you have it.
It was little off to see the topic created for it too. I did not want it to publicize at all.
OP could PM me instead since he knew it was me.
2163  Economy / Reputation / Re: Royse777 is Casino Critique on: September 23, 2022, 05:51:27 PM
all the money CC collects isn't being held by just one person
Don't be surprised if the next new reputation topic from JollyGood and his alts is something like this:
"All escrow team members are alt of Royse777"

It's possible from the stupidity level of JollyGood.
Months before he was seeing 1xbit to everything, now he is seeing Royse777 in everywhere.
2164  Other / Meta / Re: How username turned into "Anonymous" in 2022? on: September 23, 2022, 05:32:16 PM
does anybody even care?
Nobody but you do care.

having said we do not know the motives for Royse777 wanting to disassociate herself from that thread..
What malicious intend were you able to find from it?
2165  Economy / Reputation / Re: Royse777 is Casino Critique on: September 23, 2022, 05:05:02 PM
I just fail to understand the concern here  Huh
You will need to realize who is obsessed with Royse to understand the concern.

Who are these following users?
Royse777isCasinoCritique, notwhatyouthink, Zalima Zohair.

Who is the known account behind these unknown usernames? How can anyone describe why all these accounts has a common interest?


Let's add some clue.
JollyGood is the only known account who is bitching against Royse all the time. He needed it, after all his campaign against 1xbit was losing traction. Question here: who is going to be his next hunt?
2166  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Cryptocurrency Directory Site Launching Need some suggestion on: September 17, 2022, 09:30:56 AM

Is there a way for the users to use the stats on their listing. This way it will help to check data of rankmath.

Some typo things on Pinterest by the way.

2167  Other / Meta / Re: Reee: How would bitcointalk community react to bitcointalk nfts on: September 17, 2022, 08:42:27 AM
I'd hate to see that community devolve into something like OpenSea's gallery which is full of 99% pickpocketers (which are almost completely unmoderated BTW) and %1 actual collectors. It draws some strange parallels with social media.
A friend of mine made good money from NFT, still he is making. According to him they list on secondary market, they buy it then again they buy it. It's actually moving it from one address to another address. This way they create a demand for the specific NFT before someone else buy it from them. I don't know how exactly it works but that's what I was able to understand from the conversation. My head is too full to understand NFT. But the concept of collection is a good idea however I never looked deep at it to understand them correctly.

Regarding bitcointalk nfts, since I have zero knowledge, I will follow others instead of giving any input.
2168  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hodlonaut Trial on: September 17, 2022, 08:09:22 AM
I really don't understand how uneducated a court could be. If they do not understand the technology then they need a team who understand it. People paying tax to waste money on those uneducated court people, why?

It just need a bitcoin address to sign the proof of authentication but no one seems to be going to that path. What does these witlessness has to do here. When a technically detailed case handled by a group of politics, history educated people then nothing good can be expected from it.

All waste of time.
2169  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Looking for Angel Investors on: September 08, 2022, 02:04:39 PM
Quote from: @ETFbitcoin
On a side note, please trim/delete non-relevant part of his thread since that quote could notify 42 people.
That is what brought me here indeed.
It was a trick and it seems successful to bring traffic to the topic :-P
OP now got attention from all of you and going to regret the million dollar offering from Pmalek :-)

Come on @Lafu. At least offer some 5 figures LOL
2170  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What is your plan with Bitcoin? on: September 08, 2022, 01:58:12 PM
In the future, countries where you can travel with Bitcoin without a visa will grow, that's my dream Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
It's going to require few centuries. Not something that is going to happen in the next few decades.

PS: Don't spam. Looking at your history I see you are making too many posts and most of them could be seen as spamming. If you are really looking to graduate in bitcoin then at least do not get banned from this forum. You will learn a lot if you can stick to this community.
2171  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Cryptocurrency Directory Site Launching Need some suggestion on: September 08, 2022, 09:33:51 AM
Just added a site, please don't make it public in here as I want it unpublished on this forum.

It took me as guest
I can not update the listing
Uploaded images but was not able to see any preview, don't see any image on the listing too.

Assuming all because you are still working on the site?

By the way, would you mind contacting me on Telegram? May be we both can find something to work together.

Cheers,

Edit:
Created an account but no verification email received yet.
2172  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: 1.im - Project Ideation (non-commital) on: September 08, 2022, 09:10:14 AM
I own the domain name 1.im along with one.im and 1im.com.
Checking the redirection of the 1.im domain, there are no doubt you own the domain. Good job in owning them.

FWIW. I own a portfolio of U.S. News Brands (mainstream news) that I intend to integrate with the platform as well to drive downstream engagement with the platform from everyday internet users who may or may not even be familiar with crypto markets and how they function.
This part got my attention. Would you mind having a discussion on my Telegram @Royse777
I may have something to talk to you. Not related to 1.im (please don't get wrong impression) but something else which I would like to discuss in private.

Cheers,
2173  Other / Meta / Re: joker_josue Merit Source Application - to encourage the Portuguese community on: September 08, 2022, 08:48:25 AM
I've been curious for a while now: what do you mean with "I'm BTC" in your personal text? Is that a typo?
It might be In BTC since 2013 :-)

Jokes aside, I remember you from the [banned mixer] campaign and once seen your application and by your performance in the forum, I support it.
Most of the time we do not notice but in local boards so many things too to notice. We only notice them once they are in English boards. It amaze me when I see some users from local boards with good contribution and earned a lot of merit in a signature campaign.

@joker_josue, consider you have my support for it. Good luck buddy.


2174  Economy / Reputation / Re: The most influential people of the forum. Who are they? on: September 06, 2022, 05:11:10 PM
It'd be interesting to think about what sort of role they'd take if they did every come back too. I imagine we'd have the demographic that worships them like a god, but ultimately the question is has Bitcoin veered off too much from their original vision? And would people be more willing to follow Satoshi simply because they were the creator or would they listen to reason to the other developers which have been working their socks off for the last decade.
It will be great to get satoshi back in live hoping he is around but most likely he is not around anymore. We still don't know the pseudonym satoshi was a single entity or a group of people. It will remain always mystery and it is interesting that way. Personally I like the fact that it is a mystery.

Satoshi's influence is not limited to the forum only but it's all around in the crypto space. Anyone who heard crypto, heard the name satoshi.
2175  Other / Meta / Re: Is the forum now attracting people trying to impress for reward? on: August 31, 2022, 01:14:35 PM
It quite easy to spot threads from those who don't seem passionate about things they post. You kind of feel they are trying to impress others for rewards or attract attention to themselves. I wonder if they will continue to post if viewers, merits, or paid campaigns disappear completely?
We will see a dramatically reduction of traffic in the forum if paid campaigns disappear. Merit was introduced in January 2018 so forum was running without merit for most of it's life so far. If you do not have visitors to appreciate your idea/post - eventually you will lose interest to write. No one visits dead place.
2176  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Fortunejack scam me 400$ - !!! on: August 30, 2022, 11:37:28 AM
I don't understand why the red tag in OPs feedback page.

OK
It was a rainy day and my documents were in the car. I had to pass an identity check, but there were no documents. Then I remembered that a long time ago I found a wallet with other people's documents and I decided to load them and I didn't have to leave the apartment anywhere. (YES I AM SUCH IDIOT, I DIDN'T KNOW THAT EVERYTHING IS SO COMPLICATED WITH YOU HERE THAT I CAN LOSE ALL MY MONEY DUE TO A BANAL CHECK)
BUT the check was not passed on non-my documents! Your service rejected them.
Then I had to go to the car and go through a check already on my documents! By the way, when checking my face, I had to look into the camera - IS IT NOT A PROTECTION HERE FROM SUCH IDIOTS LIKE ME? I WOULD NOT WANT TO PASS THE VERIFICATION TO THE END FOR OTHERS' DOCUMENTS!!

As a result, I passed the verification of my documents!
It turns out that there are no violations here!
My account profile is filled out correctly.

This could be a made up story or truth too. We don't know and if the red tag was to justify this story then this is a wrong justification. There are no solid evidence that he is not telling the truth same as no solid evidence that he is telling the truth. Red tag should not be warrant here. I hope yahoo62278 will revise it.

I would really like to hear a comment from the  Royse777, I know for sure that on this forum he does not sell his vote and he can be trusted.
Now there is enough information to draw a conclusion.
In fact, my actions can carry such a serious punishment?
The bookmaker does not want to give me my winnings, can they at least return my deposit to me?
Sorry bud you are putting too much trust on me. I am just a regular user who even have his own problems and thrown away at a corner but fighting for it. Recently I was in depression but thankfully something else is keeping me busy. Keeping myself away from things that harms me mentally so I don't really spend time on forum affairs these days.

Anyway, it was a mistake when you tried to upload someone else's ID. In life we make mistakes knowingly or unknowingly but we need to accept the consequence whatever it is that comes from the mistake.

Casinos are tied up by their terms and conditions but unfortunately regular users really do not pay much attention unless they face any issue. I will suggest you to try getting the deposit back and leave out the rest. Consider it the punishment for the mistake you made knowingly or unknowingly and move on. Life is beautiful.
2177  Economy / Reputation / Re: The most influential people of the forum. Who are they? on: August 30, 2022, 11:19:01 AM
For this community?
theymos without any doubt.
If satoshi is back (unlikely) then they will suppress theymos :-)

There are many others but let's not take their names. I will surely miss many if I mention the names and they will think they were left behind intentionally.
2178  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Fortunejack scam me 400$ - !!! on: August 25, 2022, 02:47:26 PM
i ask fortunejack team:

and answer:

I am assuming you PMed me to check this case. Sorry these days I am not active. But anyway, all seems words to me. Would you mind adding something that will help us to look into deep.

And as BitMaxz said, I would request FortuneJack to add some information too.

Right not the case does not have enough information to discuss in deep.
2179  Economy / Reputation / Re: Bitlucy withdrawal problem, does this acceptable? on: August 12, 2022, 03:54:50 PM
Has notting to do with Royse777
Thanks for your input, at least someone is speaking. Although it does not matter much now, we never talked to each others too. I am just wondering what job you did for him?
2180  Economy / Reputation / JollyGood Crossed his line. on: August 05, 2022, 07:02:37 PM
JollyGood    2022-08-04    Reference    Feedback updated: This user has serious anger management issues and avoids answering questions about their full involvement in the Royse777/Bitlucy scam.

Has refused to return funds to all victims citing fake KYC requirements and was campaign manager and self declared "Co-Partner and Marketing Director" in the Royse777/Bitlucy scam

JollyGood    2022-06-23    Reference    Read previous feedback or click link for details about the Bitlucy scam. Unacceptable conduct from a campaign manager. In this situation negligent management cannot be excused by mitigating circumstances or previous forum post history.

I will review/revise my feedback and support of flag if compelling evidence or statements come to light.

While he had one older one, now he added another one. What is he trying to prove?
I would rather ask the questions to the users who is trusting JollyGood.
JollyGood's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Vod (Trust: +26 / =2 / -2) (1929 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. DiamondCardz (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (98 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. peloso (Trust: +1 / =3 / -5) (186 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Coinfan (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (109 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Lauda (Trust: +33 / =17 / -5) (1924 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. digit (Trust: neutral) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Timelord2067 (Trust: +13 / =10 / -0) (DT1 (-8) 918 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. jeremypwr (Trust: +19 / =2 / -0) (1991 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. allyouracid (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (270 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. stompix (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 3436 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. Avirunes (Trust: +12 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (Cool 419 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. dopey (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (14 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. SiNeReiNZzz (Trust: +4 / =2 / -0) (792 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. NeuroticFish (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3729 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. DaveF (Trust: +31 / =1 / -0) (3393 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. owlcatz (Trust: +48 / =0 / -1) (629 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. examplens (Trust: +4 / =4 / -0) (DT1! (11) 824 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. nutildah (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 4344 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. thandie (Trust: neutral) (359 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (5957 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. s0nix (Trust: neutral) (11 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. TwitchySeal (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1182 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. vlom (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (113 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. JaredKaragen (Trust: neutral) (165 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. Slow death (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (532 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. IconFirm (Trust: +1 / =1 / -1) (74 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. johnsmithx (Trust: +0 / =2 / -1) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. blurryeyed (Trust: +1 / =5 / -2) (20 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. kurian (Trust: neutral) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (2898 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. mosprognoz (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. KTChampions (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 1318 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. icopress (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (Cool 3109 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. Removed naim027 Banned! (Trust: neutral) (517 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. invincible49 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (243 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. logfiles (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1205 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. tvplus006 (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (1517 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. witcher_sense (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3086 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. darcon_pr (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. The Cryptovator (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (20) 2008 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3025 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. cryptobenn (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. TalkStar (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (733 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. Trade Runner (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (63 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. bitbottrader (Trust: neutral) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. zasad@ (Trust: +3 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (3) 3276 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. Rikafip (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (3663 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. protrader786 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (61 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. FatFork (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 1297 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. decodx (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (480 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. CryptoYar (Trust: neutral) (532 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. villain_Mr.Burns (Trust: +0 / =2 / -2) (25 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Are you trusting him because he is busting scam?
If so, do you see he is using your trust against me because he thinks I need to share the same information that I have shared with the people I trust.
I have full right to choose who should I show my data. No one can force me for it. But JollyGood is forcing me for it.
Pages: « 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 [109] 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 ... 484 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!