No previous leader has come anywhere close to the line Trump has crossed with the possible exception being Spiro Agnew (Nixons VP).

You call it persecution, but it has nothing to do with his political beliefs and everything to do with deterring future Presidents from abusing their power. 

Tash has you covered: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5307332.msg56041284#msg56041284

BADecker will fill us in on the details later today I'm sure.

With Ted Cruz making a fool of himself (in his defense, hilariously unlucky timing having to go from his speech to hiding under his desk) and so many Republicans finally conceding Trump is a psycho I expect a whole bunch of people working for Trump to resign very soon if they have any reputation left to salvage. 

No, they didn't.  The Democrats don't make those decisions, and there were tons of recounts and litigation before the votes were certified.

The only way this could have been avoided would have been if the Republicans successfully committed fraud and gave Trump the presidency. 



Or maybe he's full of shit just like he was during every election related lawsuit that got thrown in the trash.

He might be leaving without a twitter account.

embedded live stream for you.

On paper right now it's really close, but it seems like the most likely outcome is Dems sweeping when considering which ballots have yet to be counted.
Decision desk already called Warnock:

---

Check out Loefflers scandals and the police report about Warnock's ex wifes foot.

I think most people would assume that both seats would go to the same party almost certainly.  At least that's been my assumption.  If they're very tight races, it very well could be the anti black/female voters that make it a split decision. Although they're more likely to stay home I suppose.

He's done that a bunch of times recently. 

---

Biden is Uniting the country before he even steps into the White House:



Pretty crazy how much bipartisan support he's had both during and after the election.

The sad thing is millions of people will read that tweet and convince themselves it's true.  Poor Pence - just when he thought he was getting out of there without an angry mob of crazys coming after him.

A lot of people seem to be assuming Biden will weaponize the DOJ the way Trump has, I think that's very unlikely.

It may sound extreme compared to how Trump does things now, but there was a system in place to keep any decisions involving domestic law enforcement away from the president, and the president would go out of his way to only encourage broad strategies to his LE and intelligence agencies on anything domestic. Suggesting charges or an investigation of  specific group, or business, or person or, worst of them all, a political person would be unheard of and a massive scandal.  Not just Obama, every president for decades.

It's possible Biden tells the AG not to charge Trump, but I think the most likely situation will be Biden being as far away as possible from the decision.  And I doubt his choice for AG will be based on anticipating how the nominee would deal with Trumps crimes specifically.

What were the accusations.  That's what I'm asking.  You're the one that brought it up.

What's up with the "accusations of loaning that is outside of their jurisdiction"?  Obviously it wasn't just the act of loaning and there's more to it.

You're obviously not just being accused of 'loaning'.

Sounds like you scammed someone and they banned you, why not just spill the beans now before someone else explains what really happened first.

1BTC is reasonable for a hot wallet, there's always a chance an exploit is found which costs the site the balance.  It's happened before and it will probably happen again.  'constantly and methodically' implies the wallet will never run empty and the majority of cash out requests will be instant.

Making funds a player has requested to withdraw easily available to gamble with is not a good look though, I'll give you that.

Listened to a 538 podcast recently and they addressed this - it's more likely than you would think, mostly because of the "I don't vote for women or black guys" crowd. 

Side note: There's been a huge lack of polling due to the holidays and many pollsters not seeing any upside to going to Georgia in the current climate (pussys), but Warnock (d) is a pretty big favorite and the other race is basically a toss up - kind of a surprise for me, but again, very little data is available and there's nothing normal about tomorrow.

The cases were already litigated.  Judge after judge threw them in the trash where they belong.

What you heard was Trump both begging and trying to intimidate the SOS into making Trump the winner of Georgia.  Pathetic on so many levels, but not the least bit surprising.

Adding 1 ballot for Trump is essentially the same as taking away 1 for Biden.  What he meant was "make it so that I won", to the SOS that explicitly said he did not win.

Either way, imagine the headlines you'd be posting if a similar recording of a Democrat were released.  Would you be saying 'it shouldn't have been released', or 'that incriminating statement was phrased poorly?'.  lol.  Seriously, close your eyes and imagine what your reaction would be.   

I notice you didn't mention the part where Trump asked him to 'find 11,780 votes'.  

You're defending what Trump said on the phone call because you agree with Trump politically, not because you actually think what was said was an acceptable thing for a President to say to a SOS in this situation.  In other words, you're arguing in bad faith.

So I spent like 2 hours reading some of his Blogs and most of Deep Capture last night.  Byrne knows how to tell a story. And I think he's probably just insane and got realllly lucky but maybe not.