Indirectly, yes. Inflation would be felt across countries which would affect how an individual will mke use of his or her funds. If an average employee would suffer from the increase with the daily expenses to live, then how come would he still be able to engage with investments? Therefore demand would be low perhaps in this industry as an example of investment. Why would it be that bad? Most of the people across the globe especially on third world countries are minimum wage earners which makes them the first ones to be affected by any economic problem. This is how I view the situation as having an indirect effect in this industry. Lower demand simply means lower market value.

And just like what everyone is saying, he managed to differ his fighting style after his fight with Nonito. Definitely a good characteristic for a boxer to have but this won't men an edge to others with a consistent fighting form such as with Ryan Garcia who instill that classic style of him to all of his fights, but that is a different story. In this fight, it is quite obvious that Inoue is having his edge over Fulton. But as we all know, things may still happen inside the square and for sure both boxers are aware of it which pushes them to be more ready before the bell rings.
Would be an obvious adjustment to make; weight class is a core category in boxing and other fighting sports. We've seen it with many boxers who either moved up or down on weight class but most of them struggled at first simply because of weight management and heavier punches to be taken perhaps on higher weight class.

Would it really matter? On a daily gambling routine, a player would choose what's more convenient. Perhaps a gambling site requires HTML5 but the player prefers to play with ease through smart phone. Basically he'd just move to platforms which would be suitable for his gambling habits. This should be likewise with fiat based gambling platforms the only difference is the mode of payment in this industry. We are all different as gamblers; some do prefer just clicking and go;eitherway is just okay. What should matter more is managing the risks in gambling than to put that much of attention to the device. I'm aware that the relationship between device and platform would yield to security of funds as well. But that's how preference just works.

For me yes, especially if this is a comparison between sportsbetting and traditional gambling games. Well, in both categories, luck would serve its role but atleast, in sports betting a bettor could analyze the teams to bet on; their stats, players, previous matches and the likes which could help to lessen the risk of having losing bet. Unlike with traditional gambling games wherein players could only rely on luck such as with slots, dice games and the likes. Card games on the other hand relies on luck obviously and strategies such as bluffing and the likes. Still, I think sportsbetting is a lot easier and also more entertaining to do so especially if you are a bettor who's really into sports.

It is one's mindset which eith put him/herself to danger, likewise in gambling. If you are gambling to get rich then for sure you are prone to addiction and that also means, losses. Winning is never certain in this industry. The problem id; many of us were fascinated by the idea that there are really people who managed to win the jackpot but unfortunately, it happens by chance. Much better to play it safely and with restrictions to atleast enjoy playing.Also it would be much better to do so to prevent things on getting worse. Gambling is truely addictive simply because it involves money. This is an enough and obvious reason to atleast be cautious of your gambling habits. If you'd win then that's good, but if you won't, try to ease down and never push through.

Definitely the pros of factors affecting the demand. There are many factors which could positively influence a demand but unfortunately, factors as well to pull it down. Simple events, as long as it could affect investor's interest towards this industry, would surely trigger market changes either long run or short price movements. Right now, news regarding adoption and such are the ones we can rely for sudden market price increase aside from the anticipated halving next year. Investing right now, given that there are events that could yield to a positive market behavior, could be an advantage. But since the market itself is full of uncertainties, managing the risks of doing so would be always better.

As long as you can manage the risks involved from doing so, it would be fine. Problem with investment is having limited resources and funds which is why their plans are being altered at some times wherein they are being pushed to sell early which sometimes results to loss. It is also a good thing to invest only half of your savings and not majority of it, in such way you'd still be able to sustain your daily expenses without worrying of suddenly pulling your investment out.Also, that is the downside of saving wherein you are setting aside the potential of making it bigger on a faster manner than to just pile it up until satisfaction. Pros of saving on the other hand is avoiding to deal with risks.

There could be an increase with the market price. It will create a wave in the demand given that Hongkong is one of the placed wherein many people are rich which could be huge investors of this blockchain unless this technology has already a bad image on that area.Why won't it have? Any positive news will have a positive impact with the marjet prices especially if it is regarding adoption of this technology. Try making the past as a basis when countries announced their acceptance of cryptocurrencies as a mode of payment. That is how factors affects a demand.

If you're confident of your looks, being a suitor to the casino owner's daughter would be s better option, like shooting your shot to every rich woman you know; not to limit to individuals related to a casino owner, 'coz for sure there are many rich people outside gambling industry. For me, best way with satirical options mentioned is robbing a casino, just be sure not to get caught 'coz it may take your life with it. Actually I like this thread even if it is not focused in gambling like usual. But atleast it shows the 'crazy' side of a player being frustrated to be rich in gambling industry and without actually playing. Question is, would you really be down to do such things?

Stake. Not to be biased but they really are offering good service to their players. Well, you'd sometimes see complaints towarda it but most of the time there are no proofs for their acusations. Also, problems are being discussed on their thread especially if it is proven legitimate and as far as I know, they are quickly reaponding to it with a solution. Also, it won't be reputable if there are issues often. So I think it would be okay sharing it to other gamblers out there. I am still playing at other gambling sites for other sort of gambling games. Also, I am not saying that I'd stay on their platform forever. Ofcourse if there's something better you are free to do so.

Well, it is just a matter of choosing the right one; reputaion and credibility of a gambling platform for sure are top things to consider when finding a platform. Not all casinos without KYC would have a tendency to steal your funds. Actually I do take those who does, as more concerned with their olayers. KYC would limit the chances of easily withdrawing funds from your account so atleast that would give a harder time for those who are hacking accounts. Another thing is limiting underaged gamblers because they are more prone to addiction not to mention their sustainability of funds. So I am not totally against it, unless the activity itself is prohibited in your country.

In a business? I guess this would only be sustainable to businesses which are offering services and not products and such. If the service business would only require skill, then it would be sustainable in a sense that the owner of that particular business won't be needing money to maintain the business which will keep him safe from the burden unlike with those who offers products which will need to circulate the funds earned from payments in order to keep it alive. This has something to do with market price volatility wherein there will be time prices would decline and those are also times converting won't be a good option. Not unless your needs in that business would be payable as crypto as well.

It encountered many issues in the past but is still in this industry at the present. One of the stable coins I guess, for some reasons. Litecoin is a good choice if you are into a more stable asset. During pumps it has a decent rate of increase and low decline during bearish market. In terms of payment method, well LTC is also a good choice and is running on a large chain across different projects. But to compare it with Bitcoin I guess is different. Bitcoin would be a better investment or asset over it if you are into more obvious growth in terms of market price. Would be between investor's preferences whether stability is more chosen.

Had no problems with it. Happens to other exchanges as well if I'm not mistaken. Would only be a problem if you'd engage into those tokens without checking how secure it is. We are all free to invest on which token we are interested with but let us be responsible on our choices. Choosing tokens without checking for the risks involved is one's negligence. This is why prior knowledge on what you are engaging yourself into, is necessary.Indeed a lot easier than with other exchangers. Most of the time centralised exchangers are the ones having a more difficult method of listing which provides more security with tokens but also has bigger transaction fees.

Depends on what kind of an investor you are. If you are into long term investment then go with top 10names in this industry because those cryptocurrencies are the ones having sustainable market prices through ups and sumps which would make less of risk compared to others as an asset. If you are into short term, altcoins would be an option as well as new project tokens because if you would make the right choice, bigger profit will be earned since smaller tokens has higher rate of increase during bullish trend. Problem is choosing the right one which won't be that easy. Luck would be a factor aside from technical analysis and token potential.

Go find a job then. This is the problem; many people in this industry are way too dependent with the profit they are getting from this industry. To make a living, one needs a stable income which is why a decent job is still necessary. There are issues present still in this industry which should be an enough caution to investors. But it would be worse if the only thing you would do is to focus in this industry; there'd still life outside. If ever this blockchain will be banned and prohibited in your country, and if this industry would fall, you have to make your own move to still be able to provide something in the table than to push through against limitations.

Possible to hit both. Correction could always take place especially if the reason behind an increase, is not that strong, enough to push a long pump in the marjet prices. Right now the market price is more likely to be back at $20k. $30k on the other hand is possible to be crossed mid year but I cannot cite exact reason for this thing. The marjet is just unpredictable and full of uncertinty. The recent increase was not even anticipated by many investors. It just did, and eventually influenced the demand towards other cryptocurrencies. Right now wherein the market is a bit retesting, the next price movement is hard to predict or even assume.

Technically, there's none. But it has a responsibility on it. Engaging with investments at the early age for sure has its own limits. You'd be more often at edge of losing unlike with having a job at the right age wherein you'd atleast be able to endure losses on your investment. In any field of investment, there would always be risk present. Which is why it is always being reminded to us that we should only invest an amount we can afford losing simply because there's no certainty of profit especially to this industry wherein market prices of most crypto are too volatile. Ofcourse, knowledge into what you are engaging youself with, will always be needed to give you a start.

That is how addiction works; you became unaware that you are being to hooked up on a particular thing and the moment you'd realize is when you cannot independently stop it and is needing professional help. Everyone's aware of the down side of things but why do they still continue? because they have their own purpose which is to gain profit from this industry. This drive simply pushes them to cross that caution. They are simply taking the risk straight forward. It might be cliché to some but you'd only understand it once you are in such situation. Likewise with vices; for sure you know someone who smoke which believed that it is a bad thing when he was a child but ended up being one. So in this matter, try to be more considerate; we are all going through different circumstances which pushes us to embrace risk.

The question is for what purpose are you sharing this technology? It would be better to break expectations than to have high hopes to an extent they would assume that much from this industry. As we all know there are still issues such as volatile market price and prohibitions of its usage to some countries. Regarding profit potential, indeed this technology could really be beneficial IF they would have the knowledge to make use of it. With that being given, they should as well invest on more knowledge before their actual engagement. For sure we all know someone who thinks this industry is a scam simply because their expectations were not met.