I'll certainly take one initially, just to see how it works. I'll pay later, when we're closer to the end of the GB.
|
|
|
Pretty much - you can look at any P2Pool's stats page, there's a graph for bandwidth right there.
|
|
|
Mine was doing about 40kB/s, BTC and NMC. There's very little bandwidth required.
|
|
|
Can I just say, that the latest bfgminer (released today) has native support for blades so a proxy may not be needed. I've yet to try it myself, but it sounds promising.
The Windows binaries don't provide the http-port option, Wrong.
|
|
|
I was unsure if OP's mention of $3500 is the price s/he is paying or expected profit. So plugged that price into genesisblock
You'd have got more meaningful results if you plugged $3500 in to your ass.
|
|
|
You can mine any SHA256 coin.
|
|
|
The proxy running under Win32 is a godsend. Thanks, Luke. Looks like my little NUC mining machine will be turning in to a Windows box this evening.
|
|
|
Eligius and BTCGuild both do merged mining of NMC. I use both, and have had zero issues with either. Eligius is my primary pool.
|
|
|
Wow, OP you're a fricking idiot.
|
|
|
Who's 60GHS unit?
I'd rather buy the Blades, because they're available. Order today and you could have them tomorrow. 20BTC will get you 52GH if you get the old Blades and overclock. They'll be mining sooner rather than later.
|
|
|
I got my Blades running with BFGMiner this evening.
Total MHS: 12310 Received: 0000026720 Accepted: 0000025159 Per Minute: 168.64 Efficiency: 094.15% Up Time: 0d,02h,29m,11s
Total MHS: 12655 Received: 0000032551 Accepted: 0000031491 Per Minute: 173.24 Efficiency: 096.74% Up Time: 0d,03h,01m,46s
BFG is showing about 0.5% errors. There were a few more at startup, but they settled down. The same BFGMiner is also running 11 Erupters for an average of around 30GH/s.
BFG is running on Ubuntu 13.04 64-bit Desktop, running on a Celeron 847 Intel NUC (4GB RAM, 30GB Kingston SSD, connected to same 100Mb switch as the Blades).
The average BFGMiner is showing is pretty much what Eligius is reporting.
|
|
|
75 ºC was your GPU temperature, which isn't where the fire started.
This.
|
|
|
Virus checkers will try to delete the BFGminer.exe and possibly the Miner.bat files
Only if you're using shit antivirus.
|
|
|
Sounds like ecocoind died? No update posts for weeks?
2 years later... This is pretty awesome, does it still exist?
|
|
|
Scorchio! Those cards do run incredibly hot in that area - I stuck a load of RAM heatsinks to the metal bar, which kept mine a bit cooler. I also had a 120mm fan blowing on the back of the cards, and they still ran about 85C around the VRMs when mining LTC. Terrible design.
Thankfully mine all survived long enough for me to sell them for the same price I paid for them (bought used off eBay and sold again on eBay).
|
|
|
Pointless. Anything AGP won't be fast enough, even if it did have STREAM/OpenCL. A HD9550 is the newest AGP card you can get, and you're probably faster mining with your CPU.
|
|
|
Well I have proxy setup and BFG miner and one as primary server and one as secondary... Ans I can only do switch pools. And I see different hash rate without restart... So I guess there is something else... But will do some resets...
How long are you leaving the Blade after reboot? Mine will take a good 10 minutes to settle in at 13GH. Also they seem a bit bursty - in Eligius I'll see the rate go down to about 20GH, then it'll suddenly peak over 31GH. It all averages out in the end, of course. Mine are currently running though a single instance stratum_proxy. I'm hoping to get BFG set up on Linux in the next few days and see if it handles things a little better.
|
|
|
Just reboot the Blade - mine give shitty hash rates sometimes, a reboot brings them back to ~13GH. Sometimes after a reboot they'll only do 8GH. They're not the most reliable thing in the world...
|
|
|
Beware of implying something that is indeed incorrect ...
The unlock is of course either an interface in a system that you wrote that can of course be bypassed ... or a button that you click on when you believe a pool member has provided your required amount of proof.
It is indeed NOT true to say "can only be removed by signing a message" It would be true to say that you "eleuthria" will bypass the rule when someone signs such a message.
Fine: It can only be removed by somebody who has direct access to the database server because the permissions to remove that lock can only be executed when logged in from 127.0.0.1 (no remote DB connection can delete the lock record), on a server which can only be accessed via a specific VPN or local console access because it has no public IP to connect into. Don't forget, eleuthria:
|
|
|
|