Will we ever see this over 100k again
Check out the Newsletter in a few hours and decide for yourself. I will post it here shortly after it is in Slack.
|
|
|
What's this about EXP and Tindermint tech.?
The newsletter will be out by 9am CST. Lots of exciting improvements coming, news about that in a couple hours. I am not supposed to suggest people buy, but if anyone ever FUDs the devs, rest assured we are in for the long run and will be implementing huge improvements soon. (Testnet will be up by the end of the week) Chris knows the Tendermint dev and we plan on implementing a unique system of Tendermint with Masternodes and a Bond system, while still having the Ethereum smart contracts and implementing all the other cool and fun aspects of Expanse. If anyone doubts this technology, Tendermint, it is good enough for SWIFT that connects most of the banks in the world, we just plan on implementing it much earlier.
|
|
|
Bought this coin at like 66k sats. Fuck I would not worry too much. We should have some price increases in the coming weeks.
|
|
|
"Expanse Tendermint dPoS Bond System with (Masternode) Validators." I have the draft paper completed now, once Franko checks it out and approves I can share.
|
|
|
Any update on the bot, or, how can I get in on the beta test?
|
|
|
Update: Quite some time ago I left the Horizon project as I was unable to work with the current project manager at the time for a variety of reasons, we were just totally ideologically incompatible, to say the least. Regardless, I would not leave anyone stranded for anything I was involved directly in, so I set up buys on the order books for people to dump or sell into if they like. (Basically, I am breaking even overall with this project, and not even close considering I spent over a year dealing with advertisements and personal interactions for it) It was my first asset, and while it did what was promised and had some nice gains for some, there were too many problems and way too much time spent dealing with scammers that would try to use it to advertise with. The HZxchange was also not successful, so this essentially being only on that and the HZwallet made for a poor trading environment. The long-term solution will be a swap to a new project I will build on Expanse that is totally unrelated. I have come up with the idea, but I must keep it secret so nobody else uses it. It is however, better than this one. This is still a long long ways off, maybe a year or so as I am very busy at this time, but as a matter of principle, I want anyone that holds any Chronos to be happy in the end. So the choices are to sell into the orders I left and move on, (Inside the HZ wallet) and I put them way higher than the current orders when I did it, or wait until sometime in the future the new project is announced. Once announced I will not put any deadlines on the swap. It will be announced here and in the HZchronos Facebook page, and in the Expanse Newsletter.
|
|
|
so, after vcash... amp is done too? it's a legit question, all i've seen is a bunch of empty promises without nothing to hold the investors... so much money wasted, such a great idea...
I am with you on that. Dont get it, so much money invested for what? To get rekt? Still I dont believe the project is lost but it needs a lot of time to recover this BS. I am quite annoyed that I lost a great deal on what was basically a sure thing. There are a couple key problems I noticed. After the sale, they cut back on marketing right away, huge mistake! After that, I am mostly seeing some ego problems and people that think they understand more about crypto markets and what traders want than they really do. It is also pretty much unprecedented for one of the founders to attack the other in public, how does that help anything? I would have advised against that, and I would have sold much earlier if I thought that level of foolishness was even possible by intelligent people! It also might not be the smartest idea to ask for more money for funding when the price has crashed and investors are pissed. Synereo lasted years on 120k, and they can't last with 4.7 million USD? Nonsense, that is bullshit and everyone that has been working in crypto knows it, we are not fools. Plenty are willing to be paid in AMPs and even hold for the future. I can't see how this team can stay together as they were, and I would not invest a satoshi with a founder that is foolish enough to FUD his own project in public in order to preserve his reputation, which actually harms it. Not to mention the absurd delusion of thinking the investments were all about him, and not the entire team, the amplifiers, and idea itself.
|
|
|
Smooth has done an awesome job with this coin. I think it is a real contender if the community supports it going forward.
No brainer in the long run, dev here is solid and the marketcap is a tiny fraction of Monero (also a must have), and that appears to be winning the anon race.
|
|
|
Monero keeps impressing me, buying more.
|
|
|
Bought AMP at a median value of roughly 15500, and with a current value of around 30-40% lower than that it is time for me to allocate more funds into AMP. This is certainly not the average pump&dump shitcoin and might very well be a sleeping giant.
Agreed, down 20% based on just FUD. Easy enough to watch their hangouts and you can see they are still working on it. Steem rushed the release and went to hundreds of millions marketcap for a time. In the long run I think AMP will be fine.
|
|
|
Are exp have same issues like Eth or not? I mean spam-attacks, synchronization issues, unitnended forks etc?
same core code We have variations like block timing, we intentionally never included the difficulty bomb and other things. The block timing is the most helpful for some of those issues, but there is a permanent solution that would really put Expanse at the cutting edge and make it impervious to those issues, we have not talked about it in public as we would rather be first with it. (Franko and I talked about it for some time, and I think Dan is coming around too) It would also likely increase price and make for a nice uptrend, but as always, take your own risks and make your own calls. I can assure you all that the team is very positive about the future however and we have no fears, as we have enough combined experience to handle any issues.
|
|
|
This coin reminds me a lot of how bitcoindark got started...still mining here, good luck friends
Nailed it, that is exactly what I was thinking. I had a huge amount of Bitcoindark early on, it started to drop, I doubted myself, then sold. Of course I would have had a fortune with more patience.
|
|
|
Bought a nice stake at 34 and at 36. Go go go ZCL it is time for moon!!!
lol Placebo, very sneaky. (Certain people fud for accumulation, usually it is a good sign... but so annoying)
|
|
|
Why are you accusing our service of being a scam? We offer competitive rates and we are actually serving more than 115 miners from ZEC community. Prices are fair and realistic. You can just compare with Genesis hash or others to see that this is the market price for such Hashing powers. https://www.zerocashcloud.comNever and never buy cloud contracts , you never get the profits or you will be scammed +1. All cloud contracts (100%) SCAM and HYIPs, buy only PC for yorself and make your profit!!! Agreed, don't support those cloud mining scams, they are all ponzis. Just buy a GPU, or a few of them, and mine.
|
|
|
The problem with ZCL is the premine blocks: But all looks like they were mined before the ANN.... People should maybe double check the block explorer themselves and compare it against the time when the thread was created Op Addressed in the initial post After failing at those two approaches, on Halloween, I announced, "I'm forking Zcash with no 20% Founders Reward. Ping me to help. There won't be any reward for helping." https://twitter.com/HeyRhett/status/793201219393105921I offer my sincere apology to the community for people who feel they may have missed the announcement because there wasn't enough advance notice. I was reaching out to people, but I did not have the large exposure of a foundation with investors. Now that the coin is live, most of what you see above is work done by the community. This coin is almost 4 days old, and I'm amazed at what we've done so far. So at best he ninja launched 83 blocks before the 1st person started to mine besides him 83 blocks x 2.5 minutes = 208 minutes = around 3 hours, its what we are discussing here measly 3 hours and there was no ill intend as explained on the initial post 1037 coins out of the 21 000 0000 = That's 0,000049405 % This is a community Project now, much bigger than any individual. I gotta to say Thanks to Rhett for kickstarting this project, and he really deserves those 0,000049405 % coins in my opinion. You can do all the trolling you want, you fail to understand there's a really community rallying behind this coin. Something that you and your scam coins ever failed to do. Every project needs some advantage or incentive for the dev. Ninja launch is one strategy. This is not something new. (lol) While this may seem obvious for the smart people, just do some research on the dev and who tweeted about this project.
|
|
|
Hey, in case this helps, here are my .bat for windows mining of EXP and Decred, I know it works, mining it now, and I know it pays out fine. Good luck. Just replace the part with "myusername.1" with yours. GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 ethdcrminer64 -epool exp.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal myusername.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -dpool dcr.suprnova.cc:2252 -dwal myusername.1 -dpsw x -allpools 1 -allcoins 1
|
|
|
|