Regarding the Supreme court... These Justices have a difficult job. They act for a whole major nation regarding some of the foundational stuff in the nation... the basis for national law. US law is built in 3 basic parts that all affect each other: 1. Statute Law; 2. Judicial law, sometimes called common law; 3. Real common Law, which supports and is supported by Natural Law. The justices need to balance all these 3 (4) parts/kinds of law together. They can't use natural or real common law when the cases are brought to them through attorneys and representations. They can only use natural or real common law when people bring a case to them.. unrepresented, and without use of statute law.  |
|
|
|
Let's keep this thread on topic: Here's a fun BADecker post from 2.5 years ago that's especially ironic because since then Biden became president, Biden is still president, Sidney Powell is spending her time being sanctioned for frivolous law suits and sued by Dominion for defamation, and one of the four criminal cases against Trump (Georgia election fraud) likely involves Rico/Racketeering charges. Are you never going to see past your nose, that Biden isn't President, that he is only usurping the job and position? |
|
|
|
You might be right with your first decisions,but to me it's not 100% right, I know you came up with this decisions based on the happenings in the country through the government, but sincerely it's not every government (politicians) that is against it citizens, though we know the good ones are few, believe it or not we still have government (politicians) that mean well for their citizens, I don't think we have to judge all of them by declaring that they are all the same and they are against their citizens of the country..
Your second decision is still not 100% accepted to me, but though you are correct, I'm saying this because I know there are some government that can favour the people and can't be controlled because
1.They know the wants of the people and are willing to attend to it
2. They are the government at the top and their decisions are final and can't be tempered with..
That's my say though
The thing that shows that I am right is the banking system. - The banking system loans money to the people. This looks good, because this helps people to grow. - But, according to literally written law in the Uniform Commercial Code and elsewhere, the loans were prepaid before they were even given... paid by the loan paperwork, the promissory note. So, when people are forced to pay the loans again over the years, there is great criminal activity done against the people by the banks... stealing their money through deception. - What does government have to do with this? They won't change the banking system so that this doesn't happen to the people, even though they know that it is true. And if they don't know it is true, they intentionally ignore it, even though money is the foundation of almost every activity in a nation, and the world. - Why don't the 'good' people in government get the banking laws changed? Because government would lose too much power over the people. - Meanwhile, government continues to borrow more money into existence to use in wars (Ukraine, etc.). And it adversely affects the people through inflation... which is stealing. So, the people get hit twice: A) Paying the loans back two times (or more when you consider interest); B) Inflation. - And most of the people haven't even heard of this, and don't believe it when they are made to understand. So, I am WAY right, and the video in the OP is a BIG example of how it happens... even around the world with many governments. |
|
|
|
Slightly before age 7, when I understood the 'I Am' that I am. |
|
|
|
^^^ Regarding Ukraine, nobody really knows for sure how large or small the population really is right now. Ukraine as a nation of people has been destroyed. Millions have left. Many more have died. The lands of Ukraine have become a military football field... not a nation of people. |
|
|
|
Some newborn babies seem to understand the language of their parents within only a week or two. Many babies have learned so much language that they can actually follow conversations by the time that they are one year old. How long does it take to learn Chinese? How many characters are in the Chinese language? The number of unique Chinese characters used through the ages, though the exact figure is unknown, is safely in excess of 100,000. The largest number ever recorded in a Chinese dictionary—the Taiwan Ministry of Education's 2004 Dictionary of Chinese Character Variants (異體字字典, Yìtǐzì zìdiǎn)—was 106,230. Only a subset of these characters are still in regular use today. How many Chinese characters do Chinese people know and use in their language? No one knows all the Chinese words though. Think about it, do you know all the words in an English dictionary? Probably not. A Chinese person of average education should know about 3,500 characters. A literate Chinese person may know 6,000 to 7,000 characters. The point is, education is everything. No wonder that, even though there are more and greater 'spikes' of high intelligence in Westerners, average Chinese people are way more intelligent than average Westerners. The Chinese have to learn way more difficult operations of language just to live than do Westerners. It's exercise. And practiced education exercise is the way to strengthen the brain. |
|
|
|
OP, you can't say 100% of Government are against the people, then why did you celebrate some leaders in government as heroes? Let's not generalise bad leader to the good ones. Have seems leaders that are people oriented and are passionate over the people's affairs and welfare. Just that in Africa and some other part of the world. People use people instead of using things. We must speak against bad leaders instead of generalising it. It will discourage people about Government. We have good and respected leaders Everything that is good in truth builds people up in freedom and sufficiency for life. Everything that is evil tries to break the good down. Pure evil is 'destruction'... intendedly, the destruction of everything. Good is at the base of everything because there wouldn't be anything without 'good'. What does evil use to destroy things? It uses things that are good, things that were made to be used for goodness... and in so using, evil destroys not only the good, but the evil, as well. In other words, it will take the destruction of everything to destroy all the evil, even though the good will be destroyed at the same time. Some leaders are good by intent; some are evil by intent. That's why we need wise, good leaders... so that they know how to improve the good, and weaken the evil, especially in themselves. Trump and Biden are examples. Trump had/has evil in himself. If he didn't, there wouldn't be all those people who found some evil in him. But his intent seems to be to build up good. We can see it in the many ways he made America better and stronger. Biden has evil within himself. We can see it in how he is using American money to provoke WW3 by supplying Ukraine. We can see his destructive effects on America - inflation - and in the way he is supporting general morality breakdown in individual Americans. It would be nice if these evil things were not intentionally done. But it's difficult to see how Biden's intent is not evil. Same said every ruler, and, in fact, every man or woman. |
|
|
|
~ Historically the southern Zakarpattia oblast (Berehove) was part of the Kingdom of Hungary since its foundation in the year 1000. Later it was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire until World War I. It was also part of the "West Ukrainian National Republic". The "Transcarpathian Hungarians" want to be part of Europe, but are held "hostage" in Ukraine with the created artificial border. There is a massive natural border the "Trans-carpathian mountain" range with only a handful or roads connecting with Ukraine. Thats why i am a self-sovereign and govern myself. If someone wants to be part of Jonestown cult, Covid cult or any other group he things he belongs to, so be it.  Thanks for the historical note, very interesting. I guess there is always a case to create a state or a new country and, in my experience of the world, there is always people willing to promote it - usually to take advantage of it. But still, I think that being in a state, empire or organisation should be just a matter or deciding what is best for people, by people. The Anarchism and self-sovereignty is very appealing, but usually not realistic. We are social animals and would find it hard to survive alone. Nobody can make a correct evaluation without having all the info. That's why we need each other... to supply info we don't have. Thanks to both of you^^ for supplying info that we might not have otherwise. |
|
|
|
Russia is paying the price to China right now. Russia is strong enough that they are significantly weakening the US and Nato. The REAL question is, will China repay Russia in like manner, for Russia's good deed to China, when China takes over the world because the US has been weakened so badly by Russia. Check out all the links and the video. Xi Jinping delivers a chilling message for the West as he tells 'dear friend' Vladimir Putin
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11887931/Xi-Jinping-Vladimir-Putin-say-change-coming-ominous-message-West.htmlChina's President Xi Jinping told a grinning Vladimir Putin 'change is coming' in an ominous parting message as he departed Moscow last night following talks with his Russian counterpart. 'Change is coming that hasn't happened in 100 years. And we are driving this change together,' Xi told Putin via his interpreter – words sure to set alarm bells ringing in the West. 'Please, take care, dear friend,' he added, gripping the Kremlin leader's hand warmly before being waved off by the Russian despot, who bid Xi a 'safe journey'. After the two leaders hailed a 'new era', Xi's plane left Moscow's Vnukovo airport on Wednesday. He was seen off by a guard of honour who played the Russian and Chinese national anthems, Russia's RIA Novosti news agency said. In February 2022, the pair announced they had forged a 'no limits' friendship and Putin invited Xi to visit the Russian capital. They have since publicly talked of strengthening their 'special relationship', with Moscow and Beijing both rejecting what they say are US attempts to create a 'unipolar world' controlled by Washington. ...
|
|
|
|
And we thought running your car on hydrogen was going to be difficult. Now we can run electric cars on hydrogen, without an internal combustion engine. Who cares about the Petrodollar? The dollar is collapsing, and the oil companies will collapse right along with it. Newly Discovered Enzyme Turns Air Into Electricity, Promising a New Clean Source of Energy
https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/newly-discovered-enzyme-turns-air-into-electricity-promising-a-new-clean-source-of-energy/Not so, since researchers have been able to use a bacterial enzyme that conducts hydrogen to create electricity, literally out of thin air. The discovery promises to open up a new field of clean energy that would take on all kinds of sci-fi forms. Recent work by the team at Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute at Monash University, Australia, has shown that many bacteria use hydrogen from the atmosphere as an energy source in nutrient-poor environments. "We've known for some time that bacteria can use the trace hydrogen in the air as a source of energy to help them grow and survive, including in Antarctic soils, volcanic craters, and the deep ocean," said Monash Univ. Professor Chris Greening. "But we didn't know how they did this, until now." In their discovery paper published in Nature, the researchers extracted the enzyme responsible for using atmospheric hydrogen from a bacterium called Mycobacterium smegmatis. They showed that this enzyme, called Huc, turns hydrogen gas into an electrical current. "Huc is extraordinarily efficient," notes co-author Dr. Rhys Grinter. "Unlike all other known enzymes and chemical catalysts, it even consumes hydrogen below atmospheric levels—as little as 0.00005% of the air we breathe." ...
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Twitchy. The tentacles of the Deep State aren't going to be as big as the tentacles of the Kraken, this time. But thanks for reminding us about how hard the DS is trying. What if Trump loses in court, and is sentenced to prison? It will be soooo fun watching him disregard the judgment of the court - to do what Obama and the Dems say - and Make America Great Again, no matter how many years they add onto his sentence for disregarding the terms of his sentencing. Lol. What I mean is, Trump is becoming more and more popular all the time, and this is helping. It's kinda fun watching the DS squirm. Alan Dershowitz: Trump Can Serve As President "From Prison"
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/alan-dershowitz-trump-can-serve-president-prisonTrump announced on social media this past weekend saying he believes he'll be arrested soon in connection to District Attorney Alvin Bragg's probe into whether he was involved in allegedly making hush money payments to during the 2016 campaign. Unnamed sources have also told news outlets that the former president may be indicted, but Trump has denied any wrongdoing. Dershowitz, an attorney who has represented controversial clients including O.J. Simpson and Jim Bakker, told Newsmax that he believes Trump will be indicted in New York City because of what he described as an unfair legal system in the Democrat-dominated city. But if Trump is convicted and sentenced to a prison term, the U.S. Constitution will allow him to serve in that capacity. "He will be indicted," Dershowitz, who also provided legal counsel to Trump during his first impeachment trial, told Newsmax. "In New York, you can indict a ham sandwich. In New York City, you can convict a ham sandwich because the jury pool is so unfair. Even if he's convicted, he can run for president. He can run for president from prison; he can even serve as president from prison." The U.S. Constitution doesn't bar felons from holding elected office, including the presidency. The Constitution's text only lists three criteria to run for president: a candidate has to be age 35 or older, be a natural born citizen, and they must have lived in the United States for at least 14 years. In a separate interview with Chris Cuomo, Dershowitz asserted that "Trump can run from prison, the way [Boston] Mayor [James] Curley did, and he could win, and he can govern from prison." Curley, a Democrat who served as mayor of Boston four times in the early part of the 20th century, was convicted twice and notably served time in prison during his fourth term in office. ...
|
|
|
|
Xi doesn't want the war to stop. The more damage Putin can do to the US and Nato, the easier it will be for China to take over... no matter who wins the war. |
|
|
|
We need to make a contract with all our elected people, that if they don't fulfill their contract, execution. Their contract would be the platform they run on, including any details that we don't want them to do. |
|
|
|
Everybody's picking on Putin. Give Zelensky a chance. He's only been in office since 2019. Lol. |
|
|
|
Is like Puttin is trying to have new allies which he can do business with,so that his country economy can survive without the western countries. This countries are China,Africa,India. He is trying to create a good international relationship with these countries.
Putin and Xi call each other none other than "dear friend", they drank vodka together ten years ago. If you do not understand what this means, I will explain - Russians usually drink vodka only with good friends. But what does "now" have to do with ten years ago? Some things take time to mature. Male friendship from among them, without the test of time here one cannot be firmly convinced of something. I guess you are right. But ten years is long enough to go the other way as well. It took the US banking cartel over 100 years to... Build Biden up so that he could destroy America and bring chaos to the world in two years... After it took Trump 4 years to bring peace to America and the world. It would probably be wise of Putin and Xi to remain friends to better stand up against US Imperialism. |
|
|
|
^^^ Everybody, especially every government leader, does wrong at times. The US, the Ukraine government, and Zelensky are doing far greater war crimes than Putin could ever think of doing. Seems like Zelensky wants to bring back the days of Stalin, with himself in the driver's seat. Thank Goodness that Putin has been able to thwart this new Stalin somewhat. |
|
|
|
Of course, this is what a government controlled news agency would say. Mainstream media is controlled by the bosses of the media. Their reporters must report and print the things that the bosses say, or lose their jobs. That's why it's so hard to get to the real story these days. The beauty of this defamation lawsuit is we get to see what the executives, producers and on air personalities at the biggest American media company were saying when they weren't on air and didn't think any of it would ever be public. Here are some of the internal communications of the biggest American media company that were provided to the private American business they defamed for the benefit of the President of the United States: “Sidney Powell is lying.” Tucker Carlson to his producer Alex Pfeiffer,
November 16, 2020 (Ex.150)“
“Sidney Powell is a bit nuts. Sorry but she is.” Laura Ingraham to Tucker
Carlson and Sean Hannity, November 15, 2020 (Ex.155 at FNN035_03890539)
“Really crazy stuff.” Rupert Murdoch, November 19, 2020 (Ex.156)
“Q: Do you believe as of November 6 that going on television to say that the
election is being stolen would be a conspiracy theory?
A: I agree that that would
not be based in fact at that point.” Meade Cooper, Fox News Executive Vice
President for Primetime Programming (Ex.108, Cooper 194:1-6)
“Q: [Y]ou believe, since at least the time that Fox News called the election
on November 7th, that Joe Biden was legitimately elected the President of the
United States, correct?....
A: Yes, I believe that.” Suzanne Scott, Fox News CEO
(Ex.143, Scott 365:10-19)
“It’s dangerously insane these conspiracy theories.” Fox reporter Lucas
Tomlinson to Bret Baier, Fox’s Chief Political Correspondent, December 1, 2020
(Ex.367)
“[T]he whole theory is absolutely ludicrous to anyone who bothers
researching elections for more than five minutes or speaking with any elections
professional.” Stephen Richer, Republican, County Recorder in Maricopa County,
Arizona (Ex.139, Richer 22:6-23:11)
“Incorrect” and “not evidence of widespread fraud.” Fox’s internal “fact
checks” regarding the Dominion allegations, November 13 and November 20,
2020 (Ex.318; Ex.159)
“[T]hat whole narrative that Sidney was pushing. I did not believe it for one
second.” Sean Hannity (Ex.122, Hannity 322:19-21)
“[N]o reasonable person would have thought that.” Fox Politics Editor
Chris Stirewalt, on whether the allegation that Dominion rigged the election was
true. (Ex.146, Stirewalt 154:18-19, 153:24-157:11) Go have a read: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23684956-2023-02-16-redacted-dominion-opening-sj-brief-18 The point is not the lies. Everybody lies a bit now and again. Good people tell untruths by accident, or because they are weak with fear at times. The point is the truth. That's why the Jan6 Committee and their associated Senators and Congressmen who are against Tucker, are criminal liars. They aren't lying by accident or because they are living in fear. They are lying about Tucker because the truth he is showing is eating into their profits. See what I mean by watching the video listed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5445825.msg61953557#msg61953557. Then, get yourself into the truth of things, even if good people lie once in a while by accident or out of fear. |
|
|
|
Every human has an intrinsic longing deep within us to be or become something, theres this inner longing to fill a certain void in our heart and sometimes if that thing isnt achieved no matter the amount of money you may make you wont find that satisfaction hence many commit suicide; herein lies who we truly are figuring that thing out and dedicating our lifes wholly to it will bring lasting satisfaction. we live in a fast world and thus sometimes were too busy to pay attention to our inward yearnings and voices thus a lot of us are missing out of creating lasting impact in our world; a wise man once said that the richest place in the whole world is the grave because buried in there, are potentials that left untapped....
Men like Albert Einstein[relativity], Isaac Newton[gravity], Thomas Edison[bulb], Mohamed Ghandi, Nelson Mandela[freedom] etc were able to identify their purpose. The truth is that any life that is lived for oneself is a worthless life, ive come to see life as a seed that must be sown and the fruits be for the good of humankind in the absence of this there will never be a genuine satisfaction. we must of necessity search within ourselves to find this inward driven purpose.
There are a few things that deprives us from finding ourselves viz;
a. When we compare ourselves with others we miss the mark, as this saps our internal energy.
b. When we begin to place huge importance on materialistic[especially financial] gains.
c. When we begin to make excuses about our background and position thus avoiding to take a leap of faith towards actualizing our goals.
d. When we take a conservative approach to life and not launch out because we are scared instead of being courageous.....
We must understand that in pursuing our purpose is where we get to find our true self.
Even if we die like all those men you named? St. Paul says, "But we have this treasure in jars of clay, to show that this all-surpassing power is from God, and not from us." If we don't recognize that it is all from God, then we die in vain. |
|
|
|
Is like Puttin is trying to have new allies which he can do business with,so that his country economy can survive without the western countries. This countries are China,Africa,India. He is trying to create a good international relationship with these countries.
Putin and Xi call each other none other than "dear friend", they drank vodka together ten years ago. If you do not understand what this means, I will explain - Russians usually drink vodka only with good friends. But what does "now" have to do with ten years ago? |
|
|
|
^^^ Almost Right. We need Jesus to return, because as well as being a man, He is God. As God, He can control it all in righteousness. However, listen to the OP video in detail. And maybe 5 times. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
