A lot of people have known this. But the percentage of all the people that they made up was very small. But because of Carlson and Sund, the percentage is growing rapidly. It Was Pelosi: Former Capitol Police Chief Reveals 'Set Up' Behind January 6 https://www.zerohedge.com/political/it-was-pelosi-former-capitol-police-chief-reveals-set-behind-january-6Carlson and Sund had notably recorded an entire interview on Fox News, which never aired. Perhaps most damning is Sund's claim that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) refused to authorize the deployment of the National Guard at the Capitol despite Sund's pleas, and that federal agencies withheld information and warning signs of potential dangers prior to the riot. "It doesn't seem like people really want to get to the bottom of it," said Sund, adding "It really doesn't. And it just gets worse. It gets worse from there." Sund got approval to bring in the National Guard at 2:09 p.m. Before his approval, he alleged that he begged several generals, including General Michael Flynn, to bring the National Guard. The officials told Sund they did "not like the optics of the National Guard" as he allegedly begged for their assistance to intervene in the violence. -Daily Caller "This sounds like a set up to me," Carlson said, adding "I'm sorry, it does." ...
|
|
|
Everyday Trump gets stronger with the people. And its the Deep State that is making him strong by stupid and useless accusations. The only question left is, if the Deep State causes an election steal in 2024 like they did in 2020, will the people do something about it this time? Trump Coming Back Is Already Spooking Western Elites https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-coming-back-already-spooking-western-elitesShould western elites and even NATO itself be afraid of Donald Trump returning to the White House in 2024? It's an entirely valid question given that the elites' own 'news' website in Brussels – Politico – penned a piece recently which argued not only should they be bothered, but they should also prepare themselves for it right now. Trump's return as U.S. president is looking more and more inevitable by the day, driven by the nefarious meddling of the Biden administration and its determination to put him into jail, where they, erroneously, think his bid for the White House ends. Even the most obscure French MP which Politico wheeled out to endorse its article accepts this, so what would 2024 look like with Trump back in the Oval Office for Europeans? ...
Yes. Any country or alliance that values democracy should be concerned about Trump winning the 2024 election. This is just common sense. Countries like Russia, North Korea and China, on the other hand, should be concerned about Biden winning the 2024 election. The thing that Biden shows best is that Democracy is only a more complex form of Group Dictatorship. But this is kinda good, especially if Trump gets back in. Why? Because the American people were getting too lax in life. Biden stirred things up for Americans. He made them start to think again, even though such wasn't part of his agenda. People are realizing that governments are simply ploys to farm them. And, because of the many average people who have studied the Constitution and what it is all about, the people are beginning to see exactly how much they are benefited by having small government. Part of the point is, no matter who gets into US government, Federal government will downsize. The States will become the greater authority. So, even a Trump win in 2024, isn't going to do the same as it would have, had he won in 2020. The people will start to bring government home to themselves.
|
|
|
As a bonus, watch The Tiny Dot - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6b70TUbdfs.Video in the article. 545 vs 300 Million https://banned.video/watch?id=64d6adda3a4bee58428bfd69It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted – by present facts – of incompetence and irresponsibility. In 1984 Charley Reese of the Orlando Sentinel wrote the following. Still true today. One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings, out of 300 million, who are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country. I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank. I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes. Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party. It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted – by present facts – of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist. If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red. If the Army and Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan. If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way. There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do. Those 545 people and they alone, are responsible. They and they alone, have the power. They and they alone should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees. ...
|
|
|
If they beat you (or the kids) when you take it in hand and do it, there are government agencies, private agencies, divorce courts (although I hate the idea of divorce), and several large churches that will help you out... even for free. If he doesn't like what you did with the bathroom color, he can call in the painters and paint it back. When you paint it back yet again, it might finally get into his thick skull that this is an important thing for you in your life. "Honey, let's talk"
|
|
|
Everyday Trump gets stronger with the people. And its the Deep State that is making him strong by stupid and useless accusations. The only question left is, if the Deep State causes an election steal in 2024 like they did in 2020, will the people do something about it this time? Trump Coming Back Is Already Spooking Western Elites https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-coming-back-already-spooking-western-elitesShould western elites and even NATO itself be afraid of Donald Trump returning to the White House in 2024? It's an entirely valid question given that the elites' own 'news' website in Brussels – Politico – penned a piece recently which argued not only should they be bothered, but they should also prepare themselves for it right now. Trump's return as U.S. president is looking more and more inevitable by the day, driven by the nefarious meddling of the Biden administration and its determination to put him into jail, where they, erroneously, think his bid for the White House ends. Even the most obscure French MP which Politico wheeled out to endorse its article accepts this, so what would 2024 look like with Trump back in the Oval Office for Europeans? ...
|
|
|
It's about time. House Oversight Committee Announces Entire Biden Crime Family Will Be Subpoenaed https://banned.video/watch?id=64d5784f3a4bee5842419589Major breaking news when it comes to the investigation into the Biden Crime Family as James Comer tells America that the whole family will be subpoenaed. Biden continues to find new ways to get money to Ukraine, this time throwing it into a disaster relief package going to Hawaii. Donald Trump seems to be having the most fun of his life campaigning during the political witch hunt he's being subjected to. Dan Lyman joins the show in studio to talk about the latest border news and now the Democrats complaining about illegal immigration. ...
|
|
|
Trump got himself into trouble when he agreed to let the attorneys and the judge make the decisions of the court. Because of this, it just might be exactly as this judge says. As Hearing Begins, Evidence Of Bias Mounts Against DC Judge https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trumps-dc-judge-evidence-biasUpdate (1030ET): With regard to bias we thought the following comments from the hearing this morning may also elucidate some of Judge Chutkan's views... "Mr Trump, like every American, has a First Amendment right to free speech. But that right is not absolute."
"A defendant's free speech is subject to conditions," Chutkan adds, noting that such speech must "yield to the orderly administration of justice."
We don't think that's how it works judge... ...
|
|
|
Loads of people know this. Loads of experts know this. The only way you can attack the perpetrators is: 1. In the US, a man to man claim in the courts; 2. In Canada, the UK, Australia, India, and a few other places of common law, is through "King's Bench" court - which is essentially man to man; 3. In all civil law countries, you must do a class action of the kind that the country in question allows. If you want to go man to man in these countries, you literally have to show the whole history of the law to show how a man is above the government. Difficult to do. The governments/courts are almost too entrenched to do it any other way.
|
|
|
I would agree that 'they' don't know as much as they profess, and that they know a whole lot more than they profess. Gravity is not at the center of the earth... like full gravity. At the center of the earth is no gravity. Why? Because mass is wherein gravity actually lies. Objects at the center of the earth, have the mass of the whole earth pulling at them evenly from every direction. This cause them to have no weight at all. Think about it. You would be weightless in a room at the center of the earth, floating in the air. Try this idea. There isn't any gravity at all. There is only inertia. In addition, everything is accelerating away from everything else with a reasonably slow acceleration. The whole earth is becoming farther and farther apart. Every subatomic particle in your whole body is becoming farther and farther apart. All the stars and galaxies are moving away from each other... expanding universe. Things only feel like gravitation, because the inertia in them makes gravitational feeling, as everything accelerates away from everything else. You could make a whole working science out of this idea if you wanted to. And, it would probably make more sense than an E=MC 2 universe. The only reason why this isn't a science already is, the people who run the universities through their massive donations, would rather have an E=MC 2 universe rather than an expanding universe.
|
|
|
Maybe my Bitcoins will be worth something after all. Anybody have any ideas of how to use the coin with an ETF to make big bucks? Should I buy the ETF when it comes out? Or will I be just as good simply hanging onto the Bitcoins? Thanks in advance. SEC Likely to Approve Several Spot ETFs, Sparking Next Bitcoin Rally: Matrixport https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sec-likely-approve-several-spot-124055427.htmlThe ETF providers would spend "considerable marketing expenses to draw in retail and institutional capital," Markus Thielen, head of research, wrote. Matrixport noted that at its peak, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) managed $43.5 billion in assets and generated annual management fees of $870 million. The SEC will respond to Grayscale's GBTC lawsuit filing and ARK 21Shares bitcoin ETF refiling, next week. The regulator is expected to respond to seven other bitcoin ETF filings during the first week of September. "A physical bitcoin ETF will likely carry a management fee of 0.7-1% which could still bring in $200m per annum for those ETF providers with marketing expenses front-loaded," the report said. The note said that any SEC spot ETF approval could have a "material positive impact" on bitcoin's price, and investors should have enough "upside exposure" on any day that the regulator is scheduled to respond to the ETF applications. If the SEC needs more time to assess the practicality of the surveillance-sharing agreements, then the bitcoin price may correct initially in mid-September, and this is the "dip to buy," the report added. CoinDesk's parent company, Digital Currency Group, owns Grayscale. ...
|
|
|
Why didn't they do this a long time ago? And what about hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), the safest of all drugs that work to cure covid? And what about fenbendazlole (dog anti-parasitic) for cancer? FDA Drops Ivermectin Bombshell https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/fda-drops-ivermectin-bombshellDoctors are free to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID-19, a lawyer representing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said this week. "FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID," Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. The government is defending the FDA's repeated exhortations to people to not take ivermectin for COVID-19, including a post that said "Stop it." The case was brought by three doctors who allege the FDA unlawfully interfered with their practice of medicine with the statements. A federal judge dismissed the case in 2022, prompting an appeal. "The fundamental issue in this case is straightforward. After the FDA approves the human drug for sale, does it then have the authority to interfere with how that drug is used within the doctor-patient relationship? The answer is no," Jared Kelson, representing the doctors, told the appeals court. ...
|
|
|
The simple reason for the aggressiveness of the Russian world is, nobody else will do it for them. Bravo! I'm amazed! It's like a killer saying I killed a man because no one else would. It's like a fireman saving a kitten in the tree because nobody else would do it. That kitten just ran away from the boa, who pretended to be a fireman. And then you forgot that a kitten is much better at climbing trees than any fireman. That's why the kitten is stuck in the tree. Kittens don't know how to climb down. Soon the fireman will get up to the branch the kitten is stuck on, and help the kitten down. Dear, the topic is not about kittens on a tree, but about the reason for Russia's aggressiveness. I'm amazed that you hadn't forgotten that... after all this time.
|
|
|
-cut- Have you notice how this section in the forum is losing a lot of interest? -cut-
Mainly because we don't have to care or worry anymore and democrats can move to building the country. Right wing republicans might be lunatics, but adults are in charge, and now we have just to wait. Things take time to go trough proper channels. Trump is most likely going to jail and your disinformation links can't do anything about that. I know that you must be fired up about that as you need to make new conspiracy theories how Trump is still in charge of his prison block. Another like I was talking about. Trying to predict the future. And if it goes your way, you'll be all up and in my face like, "See? I'm good. I knew it." I know, I know. You are angry. Was your mommy mean to you when you were a kid? You probably don't really know what you are angry about. But Trump was there, so might as well be angry at him. Not for any reason, of course. Just gotta be angry at somebody big. Meanwhile Biden is screwing many people over many times worse than Trump could even think to be. Just think. All those deaths in the Ukraine war. Biden extended them way beyond what they would have been without his support. If Trump had been there, there wouldn't even have been any war. You ignorant jokers are dishonest as the day is long, and that's why you are joining the Biden crooks who are in office. You think Biden is going to make you all rich. You're like the Russians who cheered Stalin, until they woke up dead from one of his death squads.
|
|
|
blah blah.... Typical reply, Bud. You did not address my point about the judge being a Trump toadie, but just went off on a retarded tangent with your normal deluded diatribe drivel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WddHQHbLtx4Damn it! Why am I feeding the resident p+s troll again? ...Must of be been that tasty nip I just quaffed to start off my lovely summer weekend. Thanks for the advertising. Have you notice how this section in the forum is losing a lot of interest? Now that people are finding out that Trump is good, and that Biden is bad, and that Russia is beating the crap out of Ukraine, and that the US is embarrassed about it, what else is there to talk about? Your advertising helps the section stay alive.
|
|
|
The good side is, if a meteorite like this one takes out New York City, people will stop complaining that 9/11 was an inside job... which it was, of course.
|
|
|
This thread should be entitled... "The US and Nato sacrificing Ukraine for the salvation of the world." The Illusory Truth Effect And The "Unprovoked" Invasion Of Ukraine https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/the-illusory-truth-effect-and-the“Right now if you’re a respectable writer and you want to write in the main journals, you talk about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, you have to call it ‘the unprovoked Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Chomsky said. “It’s a very interesting phrase; it was never used before. You look back, you look at Iraq, which was totally unprovoked, nobody ever called it ‘the unprovoked invasion of Iraq.’ In fact I don’t know if the term was ever used — if it was it was very marginal. Now you look it up on Google, and hundreds of thousands of hits. Every article that comes out has to talk about the unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.” “Why? Because they know perfectly well it was provoked,” Chomsky said. “That doesn’t justify it, but it was massively provoked.” Indeed, you can disagree with Russia’s invasion or believe that Putin overreacted to the situation, but what you can’t do is legitimately claim that the invasion was unprovoked. It’s just a well-documented fact that the US and its allies provoked this war in a whole host of ways, from NATO expansion to backing regime change in Kyiv to playing along with aggressions against Donbass separatists to pouring weapons into Ukraine. There’s also an abundance of evidence that the US and its allies sabotaged a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine in the early weeks of the war in order to keep this conflict going as long as possible to hurt Russian interests. ...
|
|
|
I concede, you got me, you're absolutely correct! I said that Ukraine did it, but Ukraine is a country and as such technically unable to perform terrorism, which only humans are capable of doing.
You seem to be enormously agitated by this pipeline that was made useless by your glorious leader long before it was damaged. What happened to the whole "let Europe freeze" strategy? Anyways, even if "Ukraine" had done it, how the fuck would it be terrorism if they're at war with Putinstan... are we still pretending that it's just a "special operation" and it's super unfair for the special operators to suffer any consequences? That is funny.The terrorists are yelling,look out,terrorist attacks against our country.As Zelensky said,the war will come to Russia,especially to those parts supporting the unprovoked illegal war at the maximum and it has started yesterday with a boom in that optical factory,of course the Russians said it was the boiler room taking fire but Ukraine presidential advisor said from the images and videos shown it does not look like it was the pyrotechnics who got fire claiming may be some other reason.It is good for the Russians to feel the same pain Ukrainians have so maybe they react and call to the reason to act upon and stop Putler. Well, what can anybody expect? When you poke your sharp, little stick at Big Bear Russia, you're going to get swatted. Now, think about this one thing. As Ukraine killed maybe more than 1400 Russians and Ukrainians since 2014 before Russia retaliated... And then Ukraine lost a whole bunch of land to the Russians for it... What does anybody think is going to happen to the tiny Ukraine that is left if they continue trying to turn this thing into a all out war? Russia might not take all of Ukraine, but there won't be any Ukraine left at all.
|
|
|
I don’t know about this one… I’m definitely of the belief that not having any ice to stand on is bad for polar bear populations. Even if they can survive, certainly they’re over exposed to predators like orcas and falling victim to exhaustion and drowning. Maybe I’m misinformed, but I think polar bears are likely to become extinct in the next 100 years.
No-ice would be bad, especially for our drinks. But there is still land for polar bears and Eskimos to stand on. And a no-ice situation isn't something that will happen in the near future, anyway. Besides, the polar bears survived when the polar regions didn't have any ice thousands of years ago, but were warm. Of course, just because the bears are thriving doesn't mean that they always will be. However, less ice gives them more ice table edges to stand on as they scoop fish out of the water. Even if polar bears survive in low ice climates, the argument the activists would use are that sea levels would rise and affect human populations or other wild life. I don't think it's a tenable argument for obvious reasons, though. There's still debate at how much humans can control the climate and if we can't have a measurable impact on global temperatures, it makes the conversation entirely pointless. If the elites were so concerned about the climate, I'd encourage them to lead by example and trade in their private jets for bicycles. I agree. I mean, if the leaders of the global warming cult really wanted, they could simply nuke a couple of giant volcanoes into activity, and darken our skies with so much dust that almost no sunlight would get through to warm the earth. They won't do this however... because they are a bunch of BSers and don't want the climate to change much if any. All they want is to put fear into our hearts so that we place our lives under their control to be saved. But then they will have us.
|
|
|
|