Challenge accepted, I'll look and see if there's reference... I suspect the Jews would have removed and/or fudged any books with those details when they translated them from Greek though. Also I've seen images of some of the remaining books, they're three feet wide and written by giants; the Jews have clearly plagiarize older works/stories from these giants.

Just FYI, all celestial objects are projected off the dome not just the Sun and Stars.

It's really difficult to think that something as detailed, complex, and drawn-out-in-time as evolution, might exist when you can't even find one factual example of it. If the evidences that are suggested to be for evolution, didn't fit adaptation or something else better, we might have a reason to suggest that we should go looking for something like evolution.

There isn't any evolution theory evolution. We have nothing that says that there is evolution except a bunch of scientific people who suggest something that is essentially impossible, while ignoring the things that are highly probable.  That's it!

Evolution is a hoax!

The madness of defending the globe hoax is getting to you, you can't even compose a coherent paragraph that doesn't contradict itself.

Why do you think that someone who is born without an arm would want to be or would not want to be born without an arm? You are mixing it up with his later greed for something that he sees that other people have. After all, is he alive without his arm? So, praise God for life if nothing else.

People ignorantly dumped themselves into pain and problems. And they do it daily, all around the world, by not acting according to the laws of the Bible. Pain and death are the results.

God is working His best to maintain the freedom of the people to continue to make such choices, or to choose to change their choices into things that will produce joy.

You would agree, wouldn't you, that when a person dies, he loses whatever pain that he has in this life? Death is a blessing from God. He's using it to take away the pain.

Why doesn't God simply fix things so that there aren't any pains or problems? Because people would simple use their freedom to make more pains and problems for themselves.

Why doesn't God simply take freedom away? Because then people wouldn't be people. And besides, if they could understand the idea of what freedom was, and knew that they didn't have any of it, they wouldn't like God for that either.

Wake up and understand that people are doing pain and problems to themselves and each other, and that is what they will always do in this life and universe, with the kind of physics that make up this universe.

God is making a new heavens and a new earth. This present heavens and earth will be destroyed, so that the problems that people make for themselves will be destroyed along with their abilities to make problems for themselves.

The new heavens and earth will have different physics in them, so we can't begin to understand how they will work. But, people will have freedom there, without the ability to make problems. God can do it because He is God.

Why didn't God do it in this universe, right now? Because He wanted people to be so strong great that He gave them God-greatness. They threw it away, freely and willingly. He figured a way around that. The answer is the new heavens and the new earth.

What are you really asking? I mean, how does an electron fly around a proton in an atom of hydrogen?

My faith changes according to my choice, which God holds ever open for me to change. Because of my choice to be against God in some ways, He has strengthened that portion of my faith, according to my own choice, so that it is difficult for me to change it to be in favor of God rather than against Him. But because of my choosing to be in favor of God in some dramatic ways, He has strengthened me in faith so that I will never lose that dramatic, in-favor-of-God portion of my faith.

If God were not holding my choice open for me, and if He were not strengthening me to remain if favor of Him to my benefit, I would fall into choosing to be against Him. He does this for me because He desires my choice to be in favor of Him, and I am too weak in faith to resist Him.

Your faith is quite strong that you are able to choose to be against God in the face of all the inviting He does for you, and the evidence He shows you that He exists. The more you fight Him by strengthening your own faith against Him, the more He will give you what you ask by strengthening your faith against Him, just as you are doing. Have you passed the point where you can turn to be in favor of Him? Perhaps. But if you have, you will die soon, at God's directing, so that you won't build up more reasons to be punished in Hell than you have already built into your life.

And thank you for allowing me to improve your English through my posting that answers your questions.

^^^ Engineered by God just like the Earth and Man.

1. A few hundred years of liars and their fools. What about the last 10,000 years?

2. The Bible claims there's a dome and the science of optics proves it with rainbows. Who says there's an edge?

3. Planes that fly east or west travel in a circle like the Sun does. A circle is round, you know that right?

4. Traveling in a straight line always leads to Antarctica. Can you prove this wrong?

5. Wide angle lenses cause what's known as barrel distortion and it causes the horizon to look curved. Have you climbed Mt. Everest and seen the horizon yourself?

The Earth is a flat and motionless plane covered by a dome, this is both scientific and biblical fact. Do some research and learn the truth for yourself.

Scientists might not have talked about proving the existence of God, but they have proven Him in the things that they do:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Yeah, wow you were right about these people. There are some very interesting situations in which the same people are commenting after them on lesser known or bumped bounty threads, but nothing conclusive enough because the vast majority or the are either copy and paste spamming (I reported them, that's against the rules) or not talking any significant amount to get any information. Some were just bounty hunting like crazy or low quality, which isn't really against the rules. There were a couple that seemed much higher quality as well.

Final verdict: Foreigners from a telegram channel based about bounties/translations.

Since you are ignorant about recognition and praise, and the great position it holds in the univrse, I understand why you would think as you do.

God offered freedom. Then He chose, in love, to relieve as much of the pain and problem as free people would let Him, but you are the living proof that you freely don't want your problem relieved. You would rather get old and die, and then die forever in the dissolution of your actual self.

Same with many others. But not all. There is a remnant who will give and get praise with God.

Actually, it strikes at the root of the question.

For example. If everybody knew for a fact that everything was designed by God, there would be no question. So the question has to do with the things that people know, not the fact of design or no design. However...

The general consensus among scientists (which is changing, btw) has been that there is only a material make-up in people. Science believes that their is no such thing as the soul and spirit, and that emotion is essentially an imaginary abstraction in the material/biological operation.

If this were the case, pure cause and effect would have to rule in everything. This would mean that opinions and/or scientific proof about the design question would have had to have been programmed in by Whoever/Whatever did the C&E programming. Why? Because we know of no complexity as great as opposed thinking like this that comes about by anything that seems random. Rather, randomness (standard random as opposed to pure random) leads to mediocrity. Prove it to yourself by flipping a coin a thousand times. The result will be nearly an equal number of heads flips as tails.

The whole idea of complexity as it exists, contradicts the mediocrity of standard random. And C&E in everything, without even a shred of evidence of pure random, has as its only result, a Programmer... in the face of the kind of complexity that exists. And a programmer shows that somewhere back in the beginning of the programming, there was the existence of Pure random, and such things as soul and spirit.

That's a nice attempt at evading the point that there aren't any intermediate fossils. If there were intermediated fossils, they could be pointed at, and evolutionists wouldn't have to make all kinds of excuses for their not being there. As it is, evolution people who try to suggest that intermediate fossils are unimportant, fill the books with gibberish so that people are distracted from the point that there aren't any intermediate fossils. No intermediate fossils means no evolution in the sense of evolution theory... or have you found the string of those intermediate fossils that show evolution changes as they go?

If there were evolution beneficial mutations in some animal species, according to evolution theory, it would happen only once, here and there, with big time gaps of no evolution mutation between happenings. This means that all the interbreeding between a mutated animal and the normal animals would have bred the mutation out of existence. It's the way that it works. Immune systems do that in mutations.

Punctuated evolution was an attempt at pushing mutations closer together in time, so that there would be less chance of a mutation being destroyed by the immune system before the next mutation could come along.

Evolutionists are simply grasping at straws. And the straws are falling to pieces before they can really take hold of them. The reason why evolution has gained such strength, is exactly the same reason why religions spring up with great strength throughout history. Like the other religions, the evolution religion will gradually die out as more and more people wake up to the fact that there is essentially nothing factual to support it, and that evolution scientists are simply talkers who have talked people into believing something that has no substance.

Evolution is a hoax.

Yeah, wow you were right about these people. There are some very interesting situations in which the same people are commenting after them on lesser known or bumped bounty threads, but nothing conclusive enough because the vast majority or the are either copy and paste spamming (I reported them, that's against the rules) or not talking any significant amount to get any information. Some were just bounty hunting like crazy or low quality, which isn't really against the rules. There were a couple that seemed much higher quality as well.

Final verdict: Foreigners from a telegram channel based about bounties/translations.

Any hypothesis needs to be clearly stated so that people can attempt to make a theory out of it. The same would be needed for a God-hypothesis. Besides, does anybody take something that is scientifically shown to be a fact, and make a hypothesis to determine if it is fact? That doesn't even make sense. If science already shows that God exists - as you stated - there is no sense in making a hypothesis to determine if He exists. Why? Because it has already been shown.

As for doing scientific tests to show God's existence, you might as well do scientific tests to show that cause and effect exist. C&E are self evident. Essentially 100% of scientific tests are C&E tests. When you go back to the basics like this, talking about doing scientific tests is talking about doing something that is exceedingly redundant, and essentially universal, already. See the "Scientific proof that God exists?" thread for all the information that proves that God exists.

You almost sound religiously hurt, feelings-wise, in the way you express that you think that God is a hoax. Why not examine the scientific proof that God exists, and the limited evidence that is against Him, and change your religion to a God religion. At least you would be doing something more logical that way.

On top of the above, you don't even express what all that has to do with evolution being a hoax or not.

A Magnitude of 1 in japan is felt that the water inside your glass will really move the waves inside it. Have you notice this?

And yet we can't feel the earth is spinning, ain't that a dumb claim? Believe me, I can feel the mosquito coming near me while they fly, if the earth is sniping they would have to struggle to land on my arm.

What are those numbers in the last column detailing?

In any case, I would actually be able to tell if they are the same users based on their language in the posts they make. You say they don't appear related, but by what classifications? I'm highly versed in the Language Arts, all my highschool and college professors were amazed at my understanding of literary arts. Maybe you'd want to compile that data into usernames for me to look through the posts of to see if they are truly the same person?

It could be it was just some Indian or other non-english speaking country telegram that posted about your bounty lots of foreign bounty hunters spamming around here these days.

Your choice! It just peaked my interest, and I really dislike bounty campaign spammers they support tons of scam ICO's, have really low quality posts...the amount of problems from these power users farming bounty campaigns is impactful. Anomalous data like that shouldn't go to waste if the investigation into the user's posts can provide meaningful information. I'm best contacted by PM (although I've been a little less active than usual because my current signature campaign has struck a really bad tone lately).

Good... both of us agreeing that things don't pop into existence. But big bang theory says that they did. However, the two claims in the video are easily shown to be false.

1. The fact that life has to do with carbon cycle DNA isn't proof for evolution. After all, God made these things this way so that they can operate together on earth. To prove evolution, we would need many other cycle forms - silicon, gold or silver, helium, etc. - which don't exist even a little that we have found. To say that these other forms of evolution can't exist because of this or that, is simply making excuses. The best reason for these other cycles not existing is that the Maker didn't make them.

2. Evolution theory says that the changes that changed one life form to another were very small. But we don't have even one example of one of these small changes that we can prove is a conversion from one creature type to another. For example. A wood carver carves a chair out of a log. As he chips tiny chips from the log, at which point does the log become the chair? We don't have any of those intermediate "log-to-chair" fossils in the fossil record. So why would anyone think that they might exist?

Evolution is a complete hoax.