I just tried that. I was able to verify the message using other tools like electrum successfully.
So, a message signed by coinomi from a legacy address can be verified by other tools, but it can't be verified by itself.

Edit:
I tried this with a segwit address too and I was again successful in verifying the message using electrum.
It's weird. Because the message signed by palle11 yesterday isn't verifiable even using electrum.

I just tested that with signing a message from a legacy address and got the same error.

It's really funny how Coinomi works.
If you sign a message from Coinomi and then verify the same message without closing "Sign/verify message" window, it's verified successfully. It's verified even with a wrong signature.
If you sign a message from Coinomi, close the "Sign/verify message" window and then open it again and verify the message, it can't be verified.

They are lying about that. Trustwallet used to be open-source, but it became close-source after being bought by binance.
According to github, their code hasn't been updated for four years. The code we see on their github is for an outdated version of trustwallet.

Even if you are sure that your mobile phone is 100% secure and you never connect it to the internet, you can't say that your wallet is completely secure.
Trustwallet is close-source and there is no way to know how the keys have been generated.

It may be worth mentioning that you should never trust your memory. It's always possible that you forget your seed phrase.

I tried to verify the message on Coinomi. It says "Message verification failed".

Edit:
I just signed a message on Coinomi and verified it with itself to see how it works.
Seems that there's a bug on Coinomi. It can't even verify the message signed by itself.
As suggested by BlackHatCoiner, don't use Coinomi.

As mentioned by BlackHatCoiner above, the message can't be verified. There's a probability that you made a mistake when copy pasting the signature or the address.

Take note that there is no standard algorithm for signing message from segwit addresses. So, a message signed from a certain wallet may not be verifiable through another wallet.  
What wallet did you use for signing the message?

OP posted this topic initially in "gambling" board, not "Scam accusations".


Source: https://ninjastic.space/post/60918503

I'm not sure, but the topic may have been moved to "Scam accusations" board by moderators. Of course, it's possible that OP has moved the topic by himself/herself.

According to the the post made by dhru9, he/she has already withdrawn all the balance and there is no way for Stake to freeze the fund.
Also, I doubt OP has won 883 dollars. He/she has surely deposited some bitcoin which should be deducted from that 883 dollar.

They don't always force users to pass KYC. They ask users to pass KYC only if they think there may be something suspicious going on.
Most probably, OP wasn't asked to pass KYC for the second account at all.

dhru9, you are (unintentionally) help these scammers with backlinks.
Please edit your topic and make the links unclickable. To do so, you can put them in code tags.

You are again wrong. A bitcoin address can have more than 37 characters.

Native segwit single-signature addresses include 42 characters.
Native segwit multi-signature addresses and taproot addresses include 62 characters.

What do you mean by "combination of alphanumeric words"? Can you please elaborate more on this?
Do you mean seed phrase? If so, a seed phrase usually includes 12 or 24 words.

You are probably referring to the topic created by 1miau. Click the following link to visit the thread.
List of useful Bitcoin block explorers

Edit:
There's another topic created by bullrun2020bro.
[List] Blockchain Explorer (BTC, ETH, XRP etc.), 02/20

The chance would be only around 9.7%

As already calculated, the chance to not win any lottery ticket in a week is 0.338%. This means that the chance to win at least 1 lottery ticket in a week is 99.662%
So, the chance to have at least 1 week without any lottery ticket in a 30 week period is around 9.7%.

1 - 0.99662³⁰ = 0.0966

From my understanding, it doesn't say anything about banning proof of work cryptocurrencies in the United States. It says that the congress may ban cryptocurrencies mining.

Are you sure that they have great ratings?
Their rating on trustpilot is only 2.2 from 5 and their review page is full of negative reviews.
Even if they had a good rating on review websites like trustpilot, it didn't mean they are trustworthy. It's not difficult to buy fake reviews.

China owned a big percentage of the total hashrate when they decided to ban bitcoin and its mining. What happened after that? The total hashrate increased and reached a new all time after a while.
The same thing will probably happen if United States ban bitcoin mining.

Yes. You are not the only one who has made a scam accusation against them. Visit the following threads.

MBit SCAMMERS
I can't withdraw my winnings from the MBit Casino for 2 months. Please help!!!
MBIT CASINO SCAMMED ME
[SCAM] mBit Casino ***DO NOT PLAY***

Can you please elaborate more on what exactly you mean by "transactions started on specified input/output addresses"?

As suggested above, blockchair allows you filter transactions based on some different fields. For example, it allows you filter transactions based on number of inputs and outputs or their value. But I don't understand what you mean by "specified input/output addresses".

Yes, the dumpprivkey command is used for exporting the private key of a single address.
Use that command, if you know the address(es) containing bitcoin.

If you want to dump all your private keys, use the following command. It will create a text file including all your private keys.

Replace X with your desired directory. For example if you want the private keys to be saved in a text file in drive C with the name of "walletdump', replace X with C:/walletdump.txt


You should add your address to the command.
For example, dumpprivkey X gives you the private key associated with address X.


Yes and Yes.