Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 04:15:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 [112] 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 ... 184 »
2221  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: One of XC's Developers is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 06, 2014, 12:43:40 AM
Quote
I disagree that you have any kind of proof that Jasin is a scammer.

You are not welcome to respond to this.  Even though clowns of your caliber can't keep from it.

A - Person says "Cachecoin is worth .01 bitcoin if you order my ASIC"
Well, did you agree? If you thought Cachecoin was worth more, why pay? If you thought it was worth less, then that's a great deal.

Quote
B - Person sells their cachecoin they mined months before to you to buy their ASIC using their wife's account.
Jasin directly sold YOU cachecoin? Or did you buy it on an exchange?

Quote
C - Person has no evidence they ever had an ASIC because the foundry would "cancel the order if they knew it was going to be used for cryptocurrency"
Jasin is not obligated to supply such evidence, and not supplying it does not constitute fraud. So you should delete this line.

Quote
D - Person disabled their website and used it promoted XC
So? How does this pertain to a scam in any way? I think you should delete this line too.

Quote
E - Person offers you discount (in cachecoin) that is now worth 0.2% of what it was.
Then why the hell did you pay using a volatile currency? It would be completely unreasonable to expect anyone to refund you some other amount than the one you paid. He even offered you a discount.

Quote
F - Person "runs out of refund money" for people who paid in bitcoin and litecoin.
Because a coder of his stole the wallets... yes I know the facts. It's pretty rough all round.

Quote
This is the calliber "red flag" we are talking about for those thinking about investing in XC.  The currency now promoted on the site that took all of our orders.

All this stuff simply evaporates into thin air when you take off your scam-accusing lenses, as I've hoped to show here.

The truth is that Jasin's ASIC project got into trouble, and he's doing all he can to straighten out the mess. You scam-accusers are making things harder for everybody.



2222  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 06, 2014, 12:29:01 AM
Why people like you always call everything "FUD"??

Here's why:

"FUD" stands for "fear, uncertainty, and doubt".

What's been propagated in this thread is wilfully unsubstantiated claims of a very serious nature about Jasin.

Their effect is to produce fear, uncertainty, and doubt about Jasin, XC, Cache, etc.

Since they're unsubstantiated and therefore cannot be properly called facts, they're simply "FUD."




(Now what does this tell you about the kind of person I am?)


2223  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 06, 2014, 12:26:24 AM

This is much more than just a project blowing up. This is someone taking money for a project and failing to even produce any tangible proof that the money received was indeed going towards work of the project.

No, this is exactly what happens when a project blows up. Something goes wrong, and then sentiment turns against the project and accusations start flying.

I do PR. I'm very well aware of how quickly people perceive things to be "tangible proof" when in fact they're just misperceived half-truths and emotion.

Case in point: XC's FUDstorm at the hands of a competitor. The FUD was solidly and resoundingly repudiated (before I was part of XC), but not before most people had dumped. And they dumped because they believed they had "tangible proof" that XC was a scam. They were all wrong. The "tangible proof" (like, say items in github, etc.) turned out not to be any kind of proof, and the truth came out.


Oh please stop with the mis-direction.

First:
When a project blows up, sentiments and accusations start flying in addition to valid complaints.

You're just sweeping everything said here as false accusations when in fact:

1. Money was taken for a product.
2. Said product was not delivered.
3. Requests for explanations are met with nebulous / non-verifiable excuses.
3. An entire website filled with data on customer orders was taken down and has not been put back up well after the promised date.
4. No explanations are offered for the delay.
5. Jasin has not answered any further questions and has been MIA for the past week and a half.

Second
You're trying to confound the meaning of tangible proof and the use case. Your example is the use of fabricated proof to attempt to back an accusation. In this case tangible proof constitutes verifiable proof to prove a point; that work was done. Again, the refusal to allow someone to contact a foundry to verify dealings with Fibonaci is a red flag.

I would agree that you have red flags.

I disagree that you have any kind of proof that Jasin is a scammer.


Since allegations of scamming are very serious and highly damaging, they should not be made lightly or without proof.

Therefore, do not accuse Jasin of being a scammer. It's profoundly unethical.


2224  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 06, 2014, 12:21:10 AM
Organiser persists in systematically hounding Jasin and spreading any negative sentiment he finds about him.

Yet Organiser was never a customer of Jasin's.

Now if it were the case that Organiser has proof that Jasin is a scammer, Organiser's actions would be justified.

But if it were not the case that Organiser has proof that Jasin is a scammer, Organiser's actions would be manifestly awful and brutal.


Since the facts presented here and in the other threads are inconclusive at best, and since Organiser has not had opportunity to engage in a refund process with Jasin, he lacks the crucial evidence needed to assert that Jasin is a scammer.

Therefore Organiser is brutally unethical.



THIS is what I implied earlier when I questioned Organiser's motives. I did NOT imply that I don't care about fighting scammers.


2225  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:58:30 PM
I object to this assertion that I'm using "wordplay".

What I am doing is asserting that:

- you're making serious allegations

- which would need proof if you want to avoid being very unethical

- and proof has not been even remotely provided here.


Since you're mounting a case, the burden of proof is on you.

I've been helpful enough to indicate earlier what would amount to sufficient proof for your case.

Now go get some proof.


2226  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:54:15 PM
Is the XC braintrust implying that Jasin did not take orders on fictional asics and make statements about these asics (such as delivery, project status & performance claims), did not collect LTC, BTC and CACHE for these orders?

It's a pretty simple question to answer without trying to redirect into another argument.



No, I am not implying, I am directly stating that "Jasin did not take orders on fictional asics and make statements about these asics (such as delivery, project status & performance claims), did not collect LTC, BTC and CACHE for these orders."

This is because the word "fictional" ought to be replaced with a more correct word, like "planned".

As such, I directly state that:

"Jasin did take orders on planned ASICs and made statements about these ASICs (such as delivery, project status & performance claims), and collected LTC, BTC and CACHE for these orders."


So, umm... I've stated it now. Have you thereby accomplished something?


2227  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:47:21 PM

This is much more than just a project blowing up. This is someone taking money for a project and failing to even produce any tangible proof that the money received was indeed going towards work of the project.

No, this is exactly what happens when a project blows up. Something goes wrong, and then sentiment turns against the project and accusations start flying.

I do PR. I'm very well aware of how quickly people perceive things to be "tangible proof" when in fact they're just misperceived half-truths and emotion.

Case in point: XC's FUDstorm at the hands of a competitor. The FUD was solidly and resoundingly repudiated (before I was part of XC), but not before most people had dumped. And they dumped because they believed they had "tangible proof" that XC was a scam. They were all wrong. The "tangible proof" (like, say items in github, etc.) turned out not to be any kind of proof, and the truth came out.


2228  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:41:11 PM
Dude.  The proof that he promised it?

No. Because not delivering is not proof that he's a scammer.

Quote
Each one of those points is backed up in the OP's thread.  If anyone with more than 20 posts besides synchillis asks for proof from those points I will do the work to dig up Jasin's posts and the counter posts and blah blah blah on here.

Who's synchillis?

Quote
doesn't give a shit about scammers

No, I explicitly stated that I would not work with scammers.

Quote
I posted plenty of proof in the threads of the OP.


You did absolutely nothing of the sort.

You just posted a pile of crap. MAKE A CASE.

Quote
 It will turn into a massive, and I mean MASSIVE thread that will mostly be duplicated.

This will only happen if your case is not tightly executed.

Quote
You... have stated yourself that people are spreading unreasonable FUD if they don't have a personal stake in a scam.

Huh? I doubt very much that you'll find even the remotest support in my post history for this claim. ;-)

Quote
Shut up.  Go away.  Send someone else and I'll do the painstaking legwork of spoonfeeding direct quotes from those threads.

No. I don't think I will go away (unless you apologise and delete this thread, of course).


2229  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:31:04 PM
Jasin has taken many people's money and has failed to deliver any sort of product.

Jasin has made excuse after excuse on why a product has not been delivered. These excuses were always obscure and meaningless. There were even a few that was just plain unbelievable.

Example of such an excuse: not providing the name of the foundry for people to verify because the company does not like crypto-currency mining and he would be taken out of the queue if the foundry found out. This does not make sense on so many levels. Why would a foundry care about the use of an ASIC as long as they're not violating export regulations? Even if the foundry did, why would one take such an unnecessary risk? There are contract terms that can protect you from a foundry deciding to pull you out of queue on the fly; are there not these sort of terms in the initial contract agreement? If not, then why?

Now in the past couple weeks, another promised deadline was missed and not one single word from Jasin. He, at this point, has all but disappeared with people's money.

These are much more than allegations. The poster of this thread has linked a forum post that spans 600+ pages, of which at least the past 100+ pages are filled with people who have had their money taken from them. There are even a number of lawsuits being filed.

Please:
- make one allegation at a time.

- link to a specific post (or limited number of posts) that plainly establish the truth of the allegation.

- Avoid including random facts that are neither here nor there, and can be used to either defend or attack Jasin, depending on how you use them.



2230  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:27:39 PM


1 - Jasin promised ASICs that there is STILL no evidence exist.

2 - HE promised them 2 months ago.

3 - He refuses to post in the litecoin thread

4 - It's proven that his wife was selling Cache while he was pumping it

5 - It's proven dozens of people are waiting for hundreds of thousands in refunds.



Is that supposed to be proof?

Come on.


2231  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:27:08 PM
Quote
Well what's the truth then?

That Jasin owes me $5,000+.  That he owes others up to $30,000+.

Please quit replying to my thread.  You are reading nothing.  That (regardless of what you say) I would have posted this if he owed me nothing.

Prove that he owes you $5000.

Do it here.

Otherwise your allegations are unfounded.




It will require me to pull old crypsty orders, the cachecoin order I sent to him, his wife's sockpuppet account buying cache.  Which I can and will absolutely do as soon as I have access to my 2FA computer.  

You have seriously read none of those threads have you?  

I've re-read those threads this evening, and read them (and several more) multiple times when this ASIC thing blew up.

What you've linked to by no means constitutes proof. Do you seriously think it does??


And yes, pull every single order and account for it all. Otherwise this is just more unethical FUD.



Let me spell out how I'd imagine proof to work:

Make allegations one by one.

Substantiate each allegation with specific quotations from specific posts (not entire threads), carefully reconstructing conversations where necessary and in such a way as to eliminate doubt that the allegation is untrue.

For an allegation to be free of doubt, there must be no speculation, no hearsay, no facts not stated, linked, and verified wherever necessary. The case must be plain.


What you have here could not be farther from this standard.


2232  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:23:51 PM
Quote
Well what's the truth then?

That Jasin owes me $5,000+.  That he owes others up to $30,000+.

Please quit replying to my thread.  You are reading nothing.  That (regardless of what you say) I would have posted this if he owed me nothing.

Prove that he owes you $5000.

Do it here.

Otherwise your allegations are unfounded.




It will require me to pull old crypsty orders, the cachecoin order I sent to him, his wife's sockpuppet account buying cache.  Which I can and will absolutely do as soon as I have access to my 2FA computer.  

You have seriously read none of those threads have you?  

I've re-read those threads this evening, and read them (and several more) multiple times when this ASIC thing blew up.

What you've linked to by no means constitutes proof. Do you seriously think it does??


And yes, pull every single order and account for it all. Otherwise this is just more unethical FUD.

2233  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos on: September 05, 2014, 11:18:45 PM



XCurrency has been added to VCFundamentals's voting page


Vote for it folks:

https://twitter.com/VCFundamentals/status/508014182693093377




Voted! 

I also noticed that there are two listings for XCurrency... strange!

Well let's hope that means XC can get twice the votes. :-)
2234  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:18:14 PM
Quote
Well what's the truth then?

That Jasin owes me $5,000+.  That he owes others up to $30,000+.

Please quit replying to my thread.  You are reading nothing.  That (regardless of what you say) I would have posted this if he owed me nothing.

Prove that he owes you $5000.

Do it here.

Otherwise your allegations are unfounded.


2235  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:16:27 PM

Keep a written note of how many times I have to repeat myself, and then ask yourself: why is it that you're not noticing the facts that are in front of your eyes? Are your intentions/emotions getting in the way?


2236  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:15:17 PM
Unlike you apparently I have no use for scammers in crypto space.  I don't want them working with me, around me, on the coin I'm invested in or anything else.

Perhaps you missed this post earlier:

The problem with all this is that you're on the outside with suspicions, hearsay, and scant evidence, and we're on the inside and can chat to Jasin regularly and also get a clear notion of his character and personality.


Therefore:

I DO mind working with scammers, and I have no reason whatsoever to suppose that Jasin is one.

2237  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:13:51 PM
why on earth would they defend him and keep him around.


Why on earth would you attack him so persistently? You're not even a customer of his.



What the hell?  This is essentially XC's PR guy saying "Who gives a shit if he's a scammer - he didn't take YOUR money.  What's your problem"

"You have no reason to inform people that a developer is a massive fraudster if he didn't take YOUR MONEY"

Does nobody give a flying f%%% when people are ripped off thousands and just continue on their way?  The XC "team" obviously doesn't.  Not in practice - not in speech.  And this statement parades it around on massive display.

You do NOT want to be associated with these guys.

"If he didn't steal from you - you shouldn't give a sh** that other people are gonna get ripped off"

What a tool.

If I'm not mistaken, Jasin refunded you and then you claimed to have bought more shares - but didn't prove it.

You stopped replying to Jasin's PMs.

Why don't you simply reply with proof of the money you're owed and then get refunded?



Once again - not true.  You read nothing.  You say what you want to be true to try and discredit me.  I wish I'd made this thread moderatable.  

What a joke.

Is jasin on the payroll - I didn't see that question answered.

Well what's the truth then?

NO, for the third/fourth time.
2238  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:11:06 PM
why on earth would they defend him and keep him around.


Why on earth would you attack him so persistently? You're not even a customer of his.



What the hell?  This is essentially XC's PR guy saying "Who gives a shit if he's a scammer - he didn't take YOUR money.  What's your problem"

"You have no reason to inform people that a developer is a massive fraudster if he didn't take YOUR MONEY"

Does nobody give a flying f%%% when people are ripped off thousands and just continue on their way?  The XC "team" obviously doesn't.  Not in practice - not in speech.  And this statement parades it around on massive display.

You do NOT want to be associated with these guys.

"If he didn't steal from you - you shouldn't give a sh** that other people are gonna get ripped off"

What a tool.

If I'm not mistaken, Jasin refunded you and then you claimed to have bought more shares - but didn't prove it.

You stopped replying to Jasin's PMs.

Why don't you simply reply with proof of the money you're owed and then get refunded?



Given this, why do you continue to spread FUD instead of just doing the responsible thing?

What are your intentions here?


2239  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:10:18 PM
why on earth would they defend him and keep him around.


Why on earth would you attack him so persistently? You're not even a customer of his.



What the hell?  This is essentially XC's PR guy saying "Who gives a shit if he's a scammer - he didn't take YOUR money.  What's your problem"

"You have no reason to inform people that a developer is a massive fraudster if he didn't take YOUR MONEY"

Does nobody give a flying f%%% when people are ripped off thousands and just continue on their way?  The XC "team" obviously doesn't.  Not in practice - not in speech.  And this statement parades it around on massive display.

You do NOT want to be associated with these guys.

"If he didn't steal from you - you shouldn't give a sh** that other people are gonna get ripped off"

What a tool.

If I'm not mistaken, Jasin refunded you and then you claimed to have bought more shares - but didn't prove it.

You stopped replying to Jasin's PMs.

Why don't you simply reply with proof of the money you're owed and then get refunded?

2240  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XC/Cache Developer is a master scammer - don't walk. RUN. on: September 05, 2014, 11:09:07 PM
There's more than reasonable evidence that Jasin is at least involved in Fraud (whether you want to say intentional or unintentional, is up to you).

Nope, there isn't. There's just people like you who excel in interpreting information in ways that suit certain purposes.

Jasin has refunded a large number of people, and will resolve the ASIC issue one way or another. The decentralised exchange is going live soon too so people will have opportunity to sell shares.


The problem with all this is that you're on the outside with suspicions, hearsay, and scant evidence, and we're on the inside and can chat to Jasin regularly and also get a clear notion of his character and personality.

This is why we defend him even though he has no definite role in XC and even though we have no need to in order to defend XC's legitimacy. We know him better.


Pages: « 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 [112] 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 ... 184 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!